Jung, Jihye
(Physical Therapy Team, Hangeoleum Rehabilitation Hospital)
,
Choi, Wonjae
(Department of Physical Therapy, Health and Welfare Graduate School)
,
Lee, Yonghyuk
(Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Science and Social Welfare, Sahmyook University)
,
Kim, Jiwoo
(Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Science and Social Welfare, Sahmyook University)
,
Kim, Hyunju
(Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Science and Social Welfare, Sahmyook University)
,
Lee, Kyoungho
(Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Science and Social Welfare, Sahmyook University)
,
Lee, Jaewoo
(Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Science and Social Welfare, Sahmyook University)
,
Lee, Seungwon
(Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Science and Social Welfare, Sahmyook University)
Objective: This study aimed to identify the area with greatest effect using self-myofascial release technique (self-MFR) in the hamstring, suboccipital, and plantar regions. Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Twenty-two adult subjects were evaluated for flexibility and hamstring pain threshold ...
Objective: This study aimed to identify the area with greatest effect using self-myofascial release technique (self-MFR) in the hamstring, suboccipital, and plantar regions. Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Twenty-two adult subjects were evaluated for flexibility and hamstring pain threshold after self-MFR. Based on the superficial back line, the self-MFR application areas were the suboccipital region, hamstring, and plantar regions. Self-MFR was applied to each area using a wooden pole for a total of 4 minutes. Self-MFR was applied for 3 days at the same time of day, which was randomly assigned for each subject. Treatment was applied to one area each day. The sit and reach test (SRT), active range of motion (AROM), and passive ROM (PROM) were used to determine changes in flexibility, and an algometer was used to determine pain threshold. Pre/post-self-MFR effectiveness was tested using a paired t-test. Repeated measurement was used to compare self-MFR effects in the suboccipital, hamstring, and plantar regions. Results: When the self-MFR technique was applied to the 3 areas, the SRT showed significant improvement over baseline (p<0.05). Bilateral AROM and PROM showed significant improvements (p<0.05). When the self-MFR technique was applied to the hamstring, the semimembranosus showed a significant change in pain threshold (p<0.05). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that indirect application based on the Anatomy Trains could be effective for those who need to improve muscle flexibility. Moreover, self-MFR easily alleviates myofascial pain while maintaining flexibility, and can be performed at any time and place.
Objective: This study aimed to identify the area with greatest effect using self-myofascial release technique (self-MFR) in the hamstring, suboccipital, and plantar regions. Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Twenty-two adult subjects were evaluated for flexibility and hamstring pain threshold after self-MFR. Based on the superficial back line, the self-MFR application areas were the suboccipital region, hamstring, and plantar regions. Self-MFR was applied to each area using a wooden pole for a total of 4 minutes. Self-MFR was applied for 3 days at the same time of day, which was randomly assigned for each subject. Treatment was applied to one area each day. The sit and reach test (SRT), active range of motion (AROM), and passive ROM (PROM) were used to determine changes in flexibility, and an algometer was used to determine pain threshold. Pre/post-self-MFR effectiveness was tested using a paired t-test. Repeated measurement was used to compare self-MFR effects in the suboccipital, hamstring, and plantar regions. Results: When the self-MFR technique was applied to the 3 areas, the SRT showed significant improvement over baseline (p<0.05). Bilateral AROM and PROM showed significant improvements (p<0.05). When the self-MFR technique was applied to the hamstring, the semimembranosus showed a significant change in pain threshold (p<0.05). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that indirect application based on the Anatomy Trains could be effective for those who need to improve muscle flexibility. Moreover, self-MFR easily alleviates myofascial pain while maintaining flexibility, and can be performed at any time and place.
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
제안 방법
This study had a cross-sectional design. To determine the effectiveness of self-MFR, data on 25 subjects meeting the selection criteria were collected.
All subjects wore stretchable and loose-fitting pants that did not affect ROM. Preliminary testing included the sit and reach test (SRT), hip joint passive and active ROM in supine position, and assessment of hamstring pain-pressure thresholds (PPTs). To decrease the carry-over effect of each area (suboccipital, hamstring, and plantar regions), self-MFR was applied for 3 days at the same time of day at 24-hour intervals.
Preliminary testing included the sit and reach test (SRT), hip joint passive and active ROM in supine position, and assessment of hamstring pain-pressure thresholds (PPTs). To decrease the carry-over effect of each area (suboccipital, hamstring, and plantar regions), self-MFR was applied for 3 days at the same time of day at 24-hour intervals. The application area was randomly chosen for each subject, and self-MFR was applied to one of the areas each day.
During the intervention, 3 subjects complained of musculoskeletal pain and were excluded from the experiment. The remaining 22 subjects completed this study, and were assessed for SRT performance, hip joint active ROM (AROM) and passive ROM (PROM), and hamstring flexibility in the same manner as in the posttest.
In this study, self-MFR was applied to 3 areas (suboccipital, hamstring, and plantar regions), and all induced significant improvement in hamstring flexibility (p<0.05) (Tables 2, 3).
Also, to choose the area with largest effectiveness under self-MFR on hamstring; these three areas will need to be directly compared for their effect of application. The main purpose of this study is to investigate instant effect on hamstring flexibility increase by applying self-MFR to three areas (suboccipital region, hamstring, and plantar region).
대상 데이터
Of these, 30 consented to the study after learning the purpose, significance, and methodology. Among the 30 participants, those scoring less than 4 points of 9 points on the Beighton score were selected [27] for this study. The Beighton score evaluates hypermobility of selected joints.
This study had 22 subjects (male, 14; female, 8) who met the selection criteria. The male subjects had an average age of 22.
This study had 22 subjects (male, 14; female, 8) who met the selection criteria. The male subjects had an average age of 22.93 years, height of 174.64 cm, and body weight of 70.57 kg. The female subjects had an average age of 21.
57 kg. The female subjects had an average age of 21.13 years, height of 162.63 cm, and body weight of 53.00 kg (Table 1).
For this study, 60 participants were recruited through a 2-week verbal promotion among adult women and men enrolled at Sahmyook Universy in Nowon-gu, Seoul, Korea. Of these, 30 consented to the study after learning the purpose, significance, and methodology.
이론/모형
Descriptive statistics were used to analyze subject general characteristics. Pre/post self-MFR effectiveness was tested using a pairedt-test. Repeated measurement was used to compare self-MFR effects in the suboccipital, hamstring, and plantar regions.
성능/효과
05). In this study, AROM and PROM measured by the SLR test were significantly improved after self-MFR was applied at the occipital region. Hip joint AROM increased by 3.
This study found that the same degree of effectiveness could be achieved by applying self-MFR to the back of the head and soles as an alternative, when self-MFR could not be used directly due to hamstring inflammation, skin damage, scarring, etc. This implies that indirect application based on the Anatomy Trains by Myers could be effective for those who need to improve muscle flexibility.
참고문헌 (37)
Wong KK, Chai HM, Chen YJ, Wang CL, Shau YW, Wang SF. Mechanical deformation of posterior thoracolumbar fascia after myofascial release in healthy men: a study of dynamic ultrasound imaging. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2017;27:124-30.
Kalichman L, Ben David C. Effect of self-myofascial release on myofascial pain, muscle flexibility, and strength: a narrative review. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2016.11.006.
MacDonald GZ, Penney MD, Mullaley ME, Cuconato AL, Drake CD, Behm DG, et al. An acute bout of self-myofascial release increases range of motion without a subsequent decrease in muscle activation or force. J Strength Cond Res 2013;27:812-21.
Skarabot J, Beardsley C, Stirn I. Comparing the effects of selfmyofascial release with static stretching on ankle range-of-motion in adolescent athletes. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2015;10:203-12.
Peacock CA, Krein DD, Antonio J, Sanders GJ, Silver TA, Colas M. Comparing acute bouts of sagittal plane progression foam rolling vs. frontal plane progression foam rolling. J Strength Cond Res 2015;29:2310-5.
Sullivan KM, Silvey DB, Button DC, Behm DG. Roller-massager application to the hamstrings increases sit-and-reach range of motion within five to ten seconds without performance impairments. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2013;8:228-36.
Bradbury-Squires DJ, Noftall JC, Sullivan KM, Behm DG, Power KE, Button DC. Roller-massager application to the quadriceps and knee-joint range of motion and neuromuscular efficiency during a lunge. J Athl Train 2015;50:133-40.
Halperin I, Aboodarda SJ, Button DC, Andersen LL, Behm DG. Roller massager improves range of motion of plantar flexor muscles without subsequent decreases in force parameters. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2014;9:92-102.
Grieve R, Goodwin F, Alfaki M, Bourton AJ, Jeffries C, Scott H. The immediate effect of bilateral self myofascial release on the plantar surface of the feet on hamstring and lumbar spine flexibility: a pilot randomised controlled trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2015;19:544-52.
Mikesky AE, Bahamonde RE, Stanton K, Alvey T, Fitton T. Acute effects of The Stick on strength, power, and flexibility. J Strength Cond Res 2002;16:446-50.
Jay K, Sundstrup E, Sondergaard SD, Behm D, Brandt M, Saervoll CA, et al. Specific and cross over effects of massage for muscle soreness: randomized controlled trial. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2014;9:82-91.
Okamoto T, Masuhara M, Ikuta K. Acute effects of self-myofascial release using a foam roller on arterial function. J Strength Cond Res 2014;28:69-73.
Chan YC, Wang TJ, Chang CC, Chen LC, Chu HY, Lin SP, et al. Short-term effects of self-massage combined with home exercise on pain, daily activity, and autonomic function in patients with myofascial pain dysfunction syndrome. J Phys Ther Sci 2015;27: 217-21.
Jandre Reis FJ, Macedo AR. Influence of hamstring tightness in pelvic, lumbar and trunk range of motion in low back pain and asymptomatic volunteers during forward bending. Asian Spine J 2015;9:535-40.
Law RY, Harvey LA, Nicholas MK, Tonkin L, De Sousa M, Finniss DG. Stretch exercises increase tolerance to stretch in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: a randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther 2009;89:1016-26.
Witvrouw E, Danneels L, Asselman P, D'Have T, Cambier D. Muscle flexibility as a risk factor for developing muscle injuries in male professional soccer players. A prospective study. Am J Sports Med 2003;31:41-6.
Bradley PS, Portas MD. The relationship between preseason range of motion and muscle strain injury in elite soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 2007;21:1155-9.
Gajdosik RL, Hatcher CK, Whitsell S. Influence of short hamstring muscles on the pelvis and lumbar spine in standing and during the toe-touch test. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 1992;7: 38-42.
Myers TW. Anatomy trains: myofascial meridians for manual and movement therapists. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2014.
Cho SH, Kim SH, Park DJ. The comparison of the immediate effects of application of the suboccipital muscle inhibition and self-myofascial release techniques in the suboccipital region on short hamstring. J Phys Ther Sci 2015;27:195-7.
Kim DH, Matkowskyj KA, Lubner MG, Hinshaw JL, Munoz Del Rio A, Pooler BD, et al. Serrated polyps at CT colonography: prevalence and characteristics of the serrated polyp spectrum. Radiology 2016;280:455-63.
Lemmink KA, Kemper HC, de Greef MH, Rispens P, Stevens M. The validity of the sit-and-reach test and the modified sit-andreach test in middle-aged to older men and women. Res Q Exerc Sport 2003;74:331-6.
Youdas JW, Krause DA, Hollman JH. Validity of hamstring muscle length assessment during the sit-and-reach test using an inclinometer to measure hip joint angle. J Strength Cond Res 2008; 22:303-9.
Cornbleet SL, Woolsey NB. Assessment of hamstring muscle length in school-aged children using the sit-and-reach test and the inclinometer measure of hip joint angle. Phys Ther 1996;76: 850-5.
Hemmatinezhad M, Afsharnezhad T, Nateghi N, Damirchi A. The relationship between limb length with classical and modified back saver sit-and-reach tests in student boys. Int J Fit 2009; 5:69.
Nussbaumer S, Leunig M, Glatthorn JF, Stauffacher S, Gerber H, Maffiuletti NA. Validity and test-retest reliability of manual goniometers for measuring passive hip range of motion in femoroacetabular impingement patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010;11:194.
Neto T, Jacobsohn L, Carita AI, Oliveira R. Reliability of the active-knee-extension and straight-leg-raise tests in subjects with flexibility deficits. J Sport Rehabil 2015;Technical Notes 17: 2014-0220.
Aparicio EQ, Quirante LB, Blanco CR, Sendin FA. Immediate effects of the suboccipital muscle inhibition technique in subjects with short hamstring syndrome. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2009;32:262-9.
Kim JH, Kim JG, Do KS, Yim JG. The effect of applying a head-weight device on cervical angle and pain of neck muscles. Phys Ther Rehabil Sci 2016;5:101-5.
Webb TR, Rajendran D. Myofascial techniques: what are their effects on joint range of motion and pain? -a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2016;20:682-99.
Hyong IH, Kang JH. The immediate effects of passive hamstring stretching exercises on the cervical spine range of motion and balance. J Phys Ther Sci 2013;25:113-6.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.