본 연구에서는 사회적 재난으로 인한 간접외상 척도(ITSSD: Indirect Trauma Scale of Social Disaster)를 개발하고 그 타당도를 검증하였다. ITSSD의 문항구성을 위해 경험적 기술문을 수집하였고 탐색적 요인분석을 실시하여 21개 문항으로 최종 선정하였다. 연구 결과, 사회적 재난으로 인한 간접외상 척도의 문항 내적 일치도가 높았으며(Cronbach's α=.95) 확인적 요인분석 결과 개인의 대응 반응, 가해자에 대한 반응, 세상에 대한 불신 반응, 증상 반응 4요인으로 구성되어 있는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 외상 후 위기 체크리스트, 상태-특성 불안검사, 한국판 수용-행동 척도, 용서 특질 척도, 삶의 만족도 척도와의 상관을 살펴보면 결과, 준거타당도가 검증되었다. 마지막으로 본 척도가 사회적 재난으로 인한 간접외상에 취약한 집단과 취약하지 않은 집단을 변별하는 기능을 잘 할 수 있는지에 대해서 확인하기 위해 성차를 살펴본 결과, 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 나타내는 것으로 나타났다. 추가적으로 본 연구의 함의, 한계 및 추후연구에 관한 제안을 제시하였다.
본 연구에서는 사회적 재난으로 인한 간접외상 척도(ITSSD: Indirect Trauma Scale of Social Disaster)를 개발하고 그 타당도를 검증하였다. ITSSD의 문항구성을 위해 경험적 기술문을 수집하였고 탐색적 요인분석을 실시하여 21개 문항으로 최종 선정하였다. 연구 결과, 사회적 재난으로 인한 간접외상 척도의 문항 내적 일치도가 높았으며(Cronbach's α=.95) 확인적 요인분석 결과 개인의 대응 반응, 가해자에 대한 반응, 세상에 대한 불신 반응, 증상 반응 4요인으로 구성되어 있는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 외상 후 위기 체크리스트, 상태-특성 불안검사, 한국판 수용-행동 척도, 용서 특질 척도, 삶의 만족도 척도와의 상관을 살펴보면 결과, 준거타당도가 검증되었다. 마지막으로 본 척도가 사회적 재난으로 인한 간접외상에 취약한 집단과 취약하지 않은 집단을 변별하는 기능을 잘 할 수 있는지에 대해서 확인하기 위해 성차를 살펴본 결과, 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 나타내는 것으로 나타났다. 추가적으로 본 연구의 함의, 한계 및 추후연구에 관한 제안을 제시하였다.
The purpose of this study was to develop scale for the measurement of indirect traumatization occurred by social disaster and test their validity. To achieve this purpose, this study conduct a research through the following procedure. First, to develop the inventory, various responses of indirect tr...
The purpose of this study was to develop scale for the measurement of indirect traumatization occurred by social disaster and test their validity. To achieve this purpose, this study conduct a research through the following procedure. First, to develop the inventory, various responses of indirect traumatization occurred by social disaster were gathered from Korean adults participated in open questionnaire. 41 items were made. Second, exploratory factor analysis were performed and 21 items were selected in this step. The Indirect Trauma Scale of Social Disaster(ITSSD) consisted of 4 factors, each with 4-to-8 items, respectively. Four factors include ① private coping responses ② symptom responses ③ distrust responses of world ④ moral emotion cause of social perpetrators. Appropriate levels of reliability were established for the ITSSD. Third, Indirect Trauma Scale of Social Disaster was validated by confirmatory factor analysis, and 21 items were fixed. To 300 participants differed from development step, confirmatory factor analysis was performed. 4 factors structure derived from the exploratory analysis was appropriate. And 4 factors indicated reasonable fit index such as TLI(.913), CFI (.924) and RMSEA(.077). In addition, ITSSD identified a significant positive correlation with Posttrauma Risk Checklist, Korean Depression Scale, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-KYZ and negative with Acceptance-action Questionnaire-2. But that was unrelated to Forgiveness Trait Scale and Life Satisfaction Scale. Also the result showed that Women experienced high level of indirect trauma of social disaster than men.
The purpose of this study was to develop scale for the measurement of indirect traumatization occurred by social disaster and test their validity. To achieve this purpose, this study conduct a research through the following procedure. First, to develop the inventory, various responses of indirect traumatization occurred by social disaster were gathered from Korean adults participated in open questionnaire. 41 items were made. Second, exploratory factor analysis were performed and 21 items were selected in this step. The Indirect Trauma Scale of Social Disaster(ITSSD) consisted of 4 factors, each with 4-to-8 items, respectively. Four factors include ① private coping responses ② symptom responses ③ distrust responses of world ④ moral emotion cause of social perpetrators. Appropriate levels of reliability were established for the ITSSD. Third, Indirect Trauma Scale of Social Disaster was validated by confirmatory factor analysis, and 21 items were fixed. To 300 participants differed from development step, confirmatory factor analysis was performed. 4 factors structure derived from the exploratory analysis was appropriate. And 4 factors indicated reasonable fit index such as TLI(.913), CFI (.924) and RMSEA(.077). In addition, ITSSD identified a significant positive correlation with Posttrauma Risk Checklist, Korean Depression Scale, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-KYZ and negative with Acceptance-action Questionnaire-2. But that was unrelated to Forgiveness Trait Scale and Life Satisfaction Scale. Also the result showed that Women experienced high level of indirect trauma of social disaster than men.
AI-Helper
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.