최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기지하수토양환경 = Journal of soil and groundwater environment, v.22 no.5, 2017년, pp.48 - 62
조명현 (전북대학교 환경공학과 및 토양환경연구센터) , 김도형 (한국환경산업기술원) , 백기태 (전북대학교 환경공학과 및 토양환경연구센터)
Korea and other countries have made various efforts to preserve soil. During the past several decades, Korea has implemented various policies on soil conservation practices; however, those policies have often lacked consideration of human and ecosystem risk management. while other countries have pra...
핵심어 | 질문 | 논문에서 추출한 답변 |
---|---|---|
위해성평가제도는 무엇인가? | 위해성평가제도는 오염토양의 일률적 정화를 지양하고, 오염부지의 특성 및 인체 위해도를 고려한 합리적인 정화추진을 위해 도입된 제도이다. Table 2에 국내 위해성평가 제도 관련 제도, 기술의 현황 및 문제점을 제시하였다. | |
토양오염 판단 및 관리를 위해 해외국가에서 오염물질 특성 등을 고려해 법적인 기준을 설정하는 이유는 무엇인가? | 미국, 독일 등 해외국가에서는 효율적인 토양오염 관리 및 토양오염을 판단하기 위해 오염물질 특성, 우선순위 등을 고려하여 법적인 기준을 설정하고 있다. 이는 오염기준을 활용하는 것이 오염유무에 대해 확인이 용이하고 수치에 의해 명확한 비교분석이 가능하기 때문이다(Park etal., 2005). | |
유럽연합은 LIFE and Soil Protection을 통해 어떤 이슈에 대한 투자를 계획하였는가? | 유럽연합(EU)은 토양과 관련하여 The Life Programme(The financial instrument for the Environment)의 LIFE and Soil Protection(2014-2020)을 통해 토양 관련 토양 피복(Soil Sealing), 토양생물다양성(Soil biodiversity), 토양탄소포집(Soil carbon capture), 토양모니터링(Soilmonitering), 물-토양연계(Water and Soil), 지속가능농업(Sustainable Agriculture), 토양오염(Land Contamination)의 8개 주요 이슈에 대한 투자 계획을 수립하고 토양오염과 더불어 토양 생태계 및 건강성과 관련한 정책을 추진하고 있다(EU LIFE Environment, 2014). |
Asensio, V., Rodriguez, A., Gamendia, L., Andre, J., Kille, P., Morgan, A.J., Soto, M., and Marigomez, I., 2013, Towards an intergrative soil health assessment strategy : A three tier (intergrative biomarker response) approach with Eisenia fetida applied to soils subjected to chronic metal pollution, Sci. Total. Environ., 442, 344-365.
Chae, Y.E., Kim, S.W., Kwak, J.I., Yoon, Y.D., Jeong, S.W., and An, Y.J., 2015, A comparative study of assessment techniques for soil ecosystem health: Focusing on assessment factors of soil health, J. Soil Groundw. Environ., 20(3), 15-24.
Chinese Ministry of Environmental Protection, http://www.zhb.gov.cn/ [accessed 17.08.20]
DEFRA, 2009, Soil strategy for England supporting evidence paper, UK.
EA, 2006, The development and use of soil quality indicators for assessing the role of soil in environmental interactions, Science Report SC030265, Environmental Agency, Bristol, UK.
Federal Ministry for the Environment, 2002, German Federal Government Soil Protection Report, Bonn, Germany.
Japanese Ministry of the Environment, http://www.env.go.jp/water/ [accessed 17.09.01]
Kerth, M., 2014, A Report of Management of Contaminated Land Registry and Suspicious Soil Contamination in Germany, KEI International Environmental Policy Forum for Soil and Groundwater, Sejong, Republic of Korea.
Korea Environmental Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI), 2015, Final Report: Study on the Surface Environment Management Technology Development Project.
Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning (KISTEP). 2015, 2015 Technology Evaluation.
Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE), http://www.me.go.kr/home/web/index.do?menuId286 [accessed 17.08.20]
Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE), 2003a, Study on Risk Assessment Plans for Soil Contamination.
Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE), 2003b, Study on the Development of Soil Contamination and Rehabilitation Criteria by Land Use.
Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE), 2007a, Guideline on Remediation Methods for Contaminated Soil.
Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE), 2007b, Study on Priority Selection of Soil Contaminants.
Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE), 2008, Study on the Improvement of the Risk Assessment System for Soil Contamination.
Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE), 2009, Soil Conservation Master Plan (2009-2019).
Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE), 2012, Environmental Technology Roadmap (Eco-TRM 2022).
Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE), 2013, Comprehensive Plan for Surface Soil Conservation (2013-2017).
Korea Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT), 2012, Groundwater Management Master Plan (2012-2021).
LIFE Environment, 2014, LIFE and Soil protection. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. European Union.
Marc van Liedekerke, M., Prokop, G., Rabl-Berger, S., Kibblewhite, M., and Louwagie, G., 2014, Progress in the management of Contaminated Sites in Europe. Joint Research Centre of the European Commission. European Union.
Ok, Y.S., Yang, J.E., and Park, Y.H., 2005, Framework on soil quality indicator selection and assessment for the sustainable soil management, J. Environ. Policy., 4(1), 69-87.
Ok, Y.S., Lim, S., and Kim, J.G., 2002, Electrochemical properties of soils: Principles and applications, Life Sci. and Nat. Resour. Res., 10, 69-84.
Panagos, P., Van Liedekerke, M., Yigini, Y., and Montanarella, L., 2013, Contaminated sites in Europe: Review of the current situation based on data collected through a European Network, J. Environ. Public Health., Article ID:158764.
Park, Y.H., 2017, Policy approaches for expanding the scope of risk assessment at contaminated soil sites in South Korea, J. Environ. Policy., 25(2), 183-198.
Park, Y.H., Yang, J.E., and Ok, Y.S., 2005, Policy Suggestions to Korea from a Comparison Study of the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, the Netherlands, and Denmarks's Policies on Risk Assessment of Contaminated Soils, J. Soil Groundw. Environ., 10(5), 1-10.
USDA, 2013, National Soil Survey Handbook Part 622, National Resources Conservation Service Soils, United States Department of Agriculture.
USEPA 1999, Risk assessment guidance for superfund, Washington D.C., USA.
USEPA, http:// www.epa.gov/land-research/ research-management-contaminated-sites [accessed 17.08.20]
USEPA, 2001, Road Map to Understanding Innovative Technology Options for Brownfields Investigation and Cleanup.
USEPA, 2003, Using the Triad Approach to Streamline Brownfields Site Assessment and Clean-up.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
출판사/학술단체 등이 한시적으로 특별한 프로모션 또는 일정기간 경과 후 접근을 허용하여, 출판사/학술단체 등의 사이트에서 이용 가능한 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.