$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$
  • 검색어에 아래의 연산자를 사용하시면 더 정확한 검색결과를 얻을 수 있습니다.
  • 검색연산자
검색연산자 기능 검색시 예
() 우선순위가 가장 높은 연산자 예1) (나노 (기계 | machine))
공백 두 개의 검색어(식)을 모두 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (나노 기계)
예2) 나노 장영실
| 두 개의 검색어(식) 중 하나 이상 포함하고 있는 문서 검색 예1) (줄기세포 | 면역)
예2) 줄기세포 | 장영실
! NOT 이후에 있는 검색어가 포함된 문서는 제외 예1) (황금 !백금)
예2) !image
* 검색어의 *란에 0개 이상의 임의의 문자가 포함된 문서 검색 예) semi*
"" 따옴표 내의 구문과 완전히 일치하는 문서만 검색 예) "Transform and Quantization"

논문 상세정보

DEA를 활용한 나노기술의 투자분석

Analysis of Investment in Nanotechnology Using DEA

Abstract

This study aims to objectively measure the efficiency of nanotechnology R&D programs by systematically evaluating the inputs and outputs of nanotechnology R&D activities and to find implications for improving the efficiency of nanotechnology R&D programs. Data on input factors such as R&D investment, R&D manpower, R&D period, and output factors such as paper, patent, and commercialization for R&D projects which started from 2008 or afterwards and ended by 2011 are gathered through National Science and Technology Knowledge Information Service, which are used for efficiency evaluation. In this study, we analyzed R&D efficiency in detailed technology units in depth. The process taken in this study is as follows. First, the basic statistics of input and output factors to compare and analyze R&D investment, R&D manpower, R&D period, paper, patent, and commercialization status by technology unit are analyzed. Next, DEA models are utilized to derive the overall efficiency, pure technology efficiency, and scale efficiency by conducting the efficiency evaluation for each technology unit, from which implications for strategic budget allocation are derived. In addition, partial efficiency evaluation is conducted to identify advantages and disadvantages of each technology unit. In turn, cluster analysis is performed to identify similar technology units, from which implications for efficiency improvement are derived.

저자의 다른 논문

참고문헌 (14)

  1. 1. Banker, R.D., Charnes, A., and Cooper, W.W., Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis, Management Science, 1984, Vol. 30, No. 9, pp. 1078-1092. 
  2. 2. Boussofiane, A., Dyson, R.G., and Thanassoulis, E., Applied Data Envelopment Analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, 1991, Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 1-15. 
  3. 3. Eilat, H., Golany, B., and Shtub, A., Constructing and Evaluating Balanced Portfolios of R&D Projects with Interactions : A DEA Based Methodology, European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, Vol. 172, No. 3, pp. 1018-1039. 
  4. 4. Fitzsimmons, J.A. and Fitzsimmons, M.J., Service Management for Competitive Advantage, McGrow-Hill, Inc., 1994. 
  5. 5. Guan, J.C., Yam, R., Mok, C.K., and Ma, N., A Study of the Relati), hip between Competitiveness and Technological Innovation Capability based on DEA Models, European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, Vol. 170, pp. 971-976. 
  6. 6. Hong, S.K. and Ahn, D.H., A Study on the Analysis of the Inter-industry Flow and Increase of Direct and Indirect Productivity of R&D Investment, Science and Technology Policy Institute, 1991, pp. 6-47. 
  7. 7. Hsu, F.M. and Hsueh, C.C., Measuring relative efficiency of Gov.-sponsored R&D projects : A three-stage approach, Evaluation and Project Planning, 2009, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 178-186. 
  8. 8. Hwang, S.W., Ahn, D.H., Choi, S.H., Kwon, S.H., Cheon, D.P., Kim, A.R., and Park, J.H., Efficiency of National R&D Investment, Science and Technology Policy Institute, 2009, pp. 28-53. 
  9. 9. Kocher, M.G., Luptacik, M., and Sutter, M., Measuring Productivity of Research in Economics : A Cross-country Study Using DEA, Socio-Economic Planning-Sciences, 2006, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 314-332. 
  10. 10. Lee, H.Y., Park, Y.T., and Choi, H.G., Comparative evaluation of performance of national R&D projects with heterogeneous objectives : a DEA approach, European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, Vol. 196, No. 3, pp. 847-855. 
  11. 11. Lee, J.S. and Jeong, B.H., Analysis for The National R&D Investment and The Trend of Patent Application in 6T Areas, Joint Conference of the Korean Society of Industrial Engineers and Korean Society of Management Scientists, Chonbuk National University, 2004, Korea. 
  12. 12. Nam, I.S., Kim, W.S., Lee, J.S., and Jeong, B.H., A Study on Trend Analysis of Patents Application in 6T Area, Journal of Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2004, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 49-58. 
  13. 13. National Science & Technology Information Service, http://www.ntis.go.kr. 
  14. 14. Wang, E.C. and Huang, W., Relative Efficiency of R&D Activities : A Cross-Country Study Accounting for Environmental Factors in the DEA Approach, Research Policy, 2007, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 260-273. 

원문보기

원문 PDF 다운로드

  • ScienceON :
  • KCI :

원문 URL 링크

원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다. (원문복사서비스 안내 바로 가기)

DOI 인용 스타일

"" 핵심어 질의응답