$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

Reliability of the Korean Version of Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia for Temporomandibular Disorders 원문보기

Journal of Oral Medicine and Pain, v.43 no.2, 2018년, pp.34 - 40  

Park, In Hee (Department of Oral Medicine and Oral Diagnosis, School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University) ,  Jang, Ji Hee (Department of Oral Medicine and Oral Diagnosis, School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University) ,  Chung, Jin Woo (Department of Oral Medicine and Oral Diagnosis, School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Purpose: The aim of this study was to translate the original English version of tampa scale for kinesiophobia for temporomandibular disorders (TSK-TMDs) for cultural equivalency into Korean language and to evaluate the reliability of the Korean version of the TSK-TMD among symptom free subjects. Met...

주제어

AI 본문요약
AI-Helper 아이콘 AI-Helper

* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.

제안 방법

  • All the findings were re-evaluated and discussed by the expert panel and then, the final Korean version was completed. The Korean version of TSK-TMD questionnaire is attached in the Appendix 1 (available online only) of this manuscript.
  • An expert panel then compared and assessed the two versions of TSK-TMD. This was to ensure that the translated version reflected the same content as the original version.
  • There are weak but significant relations were found between symptom checklist and TSK-TMD score and each subscale. Based on these results, the questionnaire itself can be used not only to evaluate fear of movement, but also to understand overall symptoms of TMD. In the study of Visscher et al.
  • 12,13) But, there is currently no validated Korean version of TSK-TMD for the Korean population. Because of variations in social structures, culture, and language, an instrument must be cross-cultural adapted and validated to retain the psychometric properties of the original version.14) The aims of this study were to translate the original English version of TSK-TMD for cultural equivalency into Korean language and to evaluate the reliability of the Korean version of TSK-TMD.
  • On the first visit of the subjects, an examiner who was an oral medicine specialist instructed them brief information for the Korean version of TSK-TMD questionnaire and the patients completed the series of the questionnaire and the checklist on TMD symptoms. One or two weeks later, on the second visit of the subjects, the questionnaire was drawn up once again using the simple blind technique.
  • On the first visit of the subjects, an examiner who was an oral medicine specialist instructed them brief information for the Korean version of TSK-TMD questionnaire and the patients completed the series of the questionnaire and the checklist on TMD symptoms. One or two weeks later, on the second visit of the subjects, the questionnaire was drawn up once again using the simple blind technique. The one or two weeks interval was selected as a period short enough to eliminate the likelihood of significant changes in the subject’s TMD symptoms taking place, but long enough to ensure that subjects could not recall their responses to the first questionnaire.
  • 12) suggested that 12-item version of the TSK-TMD has generally good reliability and validity and more suitable for assess TMD patients, as a result of construct validity assessment. Therefore, in this study we analyzed both TSK-TMD with original 18 items, and modified 12 items.
  • To assess whether there is an association between the degree of FM and symptoms of TMD, all subjects also completed the checklist regarding their specific complaints. There are weak but significant relations were found between symptom checklist and TSK-TMD score and each subscale.

대상 데이터

  • A total 90 subjects were participated in this study. All the participants fully completed the Korean version of TSK-TMD questionnaires and declared that the items of TSK-TMD were easy to understand.
  • One hundred subjects without any symptoms and signs of TMD volunteered and participated in the study. One subject refused to participate in the study, 7 subjects did not answer the second questionnaire, and 2 subjects did not complete the questionnaire.
  • Participates were consisted of 50 women and 40 men, and mean age was 27.46±4.75 years (ranged from 21 to 41 years).
  • One subject refused to participate in the study, 7 subjects did not answer the second questionnaire, and 2 subjects did not complete the questionnaire. Therefore total 90 subjects were evaluated in this study. Participates were consisted of 50 women and 40 men, and mean age was 27.

데이터처리

  • 6 may be acceptable. Test-retest reliability was assessed using an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). To investigate whether the each subscale of TSK-TMD is associated with the symptoms of TMD, we analyzed correlation between symptom checklist and each subscale with Spearman’s rho coefficient.
  • To compare gender differences in each sum of original TSK-TMD and FM, AA, and SF subscales, independent t-tests were performed. Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach’s alpha.
  • To investigate whether the each subscale of TSK-TMD is associated with the symptoms of TMD, we analyzed correlation between symptom checklist and each subscale with Spearman’s rho coefficient.
  • p-values were obtained from independent t-test.
본문요약 정보가 도움이 되었나요?

참고문헌 (28)

  1. LeResche L. Epidemiology of temporomandibular disorders: implications for the investigation of etiologic factors. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1997;8:291-305. 

  2. Dworkin RH, Breitbart WS. Psychosocial aspects of pain: a handbook for health care providers. Seattle: IASP Press; 2004. pp. 405-425. 

  3. Gatchel RJ, Peng YB, Peters ML, Fuchs PN, Turk DC. The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: scientific advances and future directions. Psychol Bull 2007;133:581-624. 

  4. Keefe FJ, Rumble ME, Scipio CD, Giordano LA, Perri LM. Psychological aspects of persistent pain: current state of the science. J Pain 2004;5:195-211. 

  5. Heuts PH, Vlaeyen JW, Roelofs J, et al. Pain-related fear and daily functioning in patients with osteoarthritis. Pain 2004;110:228- 235. 

  6. Vlaeyen JW, Kole-Snijders AM, Boeren RG, van Eek H. Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic low back pain and its relation to behavioral performance. Pain 1995;62:363-372. 

  7. Kori SH, Miller RP, Todd DD. Kinesophobia: a new view of chronic pain behavior. Pain Manag 1990;3:35-43. 

  8. Crombez G, Vlaeyen JW, Heuts PH, Lysens R. Pain-related fear is more disabling than pain itself: evidence on the role of pain-related fear in chronic back pain disability. Pain 1999;80:329- 339. 

  9. Roelofs J, Goubert L, Peters ML, Vlaeyen JW, Crombez G. The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia: further examination of psychometric properties in patients with chronic low back pain and fibromyalgia. Eur J Pain 2004;8:495-502. 

  10. Swinkels-Meewisse IE, Roelofs J, Verbeek AL, Oostendorp RA, Vlaeyen JW. Fear of movement/(re)injury, disability and participation in acute low back pain. Pain 2003;105:371-379. 

  11. Turner JA, Brister H, Huggins K, Mancl L, Aaron LA, Truelove EL. Catastrophizing is associated with clinical examination findings, activity interference, and health care use among patients with temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 2005;19:291-300. 

  12. Visscher CM, Ohrbach R, van Wijk AJ, Wilkosz M, Naeije M. The tampa scale for kinesiophobia for temporomandibular disorders (TSK-TMD). Pain 2010;150:492-500. 

  13. He S, Wang J, Ji P. Validation of the tampa scale for kinesiophobia for temporomandibular disorders (TSK-TMD) in patients with painful TMD. J Headache Pain 2016;17:109. 

  14. Aaronson N, Alonso J, Burnam A, et al. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res 2002;11:193-205. 

  15. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1993;46:1417-1432. 

  16. Iigaya M, Sakai F, Kolodner KB, Lipton RB, Stewart WF. Reliability and validity of the Japanese migraine disability assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire. Headache 2003;43:343-352. 

  17. Lethem J, Slade PD, Troup JD, Bentley G. Outline of a fear-avoidance model of exaggerated pain perception-I. Behav Res Ther 1983;21:401-408. 

  18. Westman AE, Boersma K, Leppert J, Linton SJ. Fear-avoidance beliefs, catastrophizing, and distress: a longitudinal subgroup analysis on patients with musculoskeletal pain. Clin J Pain 2011;27:567-577. 

  19. Geisser ME, Haig AJ, Wallbom AS, Wiggert EA. Pain-related fear, lumbar flexion, and dynamic EMG among persons with chronic musculoskeletal low back pain. Clin J Pain 2004;20:61-69. 

  20. Goubert L, Crombez G, Van Damme S, Vlaeyen JW, Bijttebier P, Roelofs J. Confirmatory factor analysis of the tampa scale for kinesiophobia: invariant two-factor model across low back pain patients and fibromyalgia patients. Clin J Pain 2004;20:103-110. 

  21. Swinkels-Meewisse EJ, Swinkels RA, Verbeek AL, Vlaeyen JW, Oostendorp RA. Psychometric properties of the tampa scale for kinesiophobia and the fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire in acute low back pain. Man Ther 2003;8:29-36. 

  22. Woby SR, Roach NK, Urmston M, Watson PJ. Psychometric properties of the TSK-11: a shortened version of the tampa scale for kinesiophobia. Pain 2005;117:137-144. 

  23. Uritani D, Kawakami T, Okazawa N, Kirita T. Development of the tampa scale for kinesiophobia for temporomandibular disorders- Japanese edition: a preliminary study. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2016;25:e87. 

  24. Aguiar AS, Bataglion C, Visscher CM, Bevilaqua Grossi D, Chaves TC. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and construct validity of the tampa scale for kinesiophobia for temporomandibular disorders (TSK/TMD-Br) into Brazilian Portuguese. J Oral Rehabil 2017;44:500-510. 

  25. Dworkin SF, LeResche L, DeRouen T, Von Korff M. Assessing clinical signs of temporomandibular disorders: reliability of clinical examiners. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:574-579. 

  26. Wahlund K, List T, Dworkin SF. Temporomandibular disorders in children and adolescents: reliability of a questionnaire, clinical examination, and diagnosis. J Orofac Pain 1998;12:42-51. 

  27. Buer N, Linton SJ. Fear-avoidance beliefs and catastrophizing: occurrence and risk factor in back pain and ADL in the general population. Pain 2002;99:485-491. 

  28. Houben RM, Leeuw M, Vlaeyen JW, Goubert L, Picavet HS. Fear of movement/injury in the general population: factor structure and psychometric properties of an adapted version of the tampa scale for kinesiophobia. J Behav Med 2005;28:415-424. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

GOLD

오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로