본 연구의 목적은 연구데이터 관리서비스 구현 시 성공적인 서비스를 위한 고려사항을 도출하는 것이다. 이를 위해 선행연구를 활용하여 연구데이터 관리서비스의 영역을 파악하였고, 미국, 독일, 호주에서 연구데이터 관리서비스를 시행중인 대학도서관 6곳과 1개의 기관에서 담당자 8명을 대상으로 연구데이터 서비스에 관한 질문의 답변을 이메일을 통해 수집하였다. 또 해외서비스를 대상으로 수집한 고려사항이 국내에 적용가능한지 국내 연구데이터 관리서비스 전문가와 검토하였다. 연구데이터 서비스 영역은 총 9개의 카테고리로 구분하여 분석하였는데, 연구서비스와 연구데이터 관리서비스 연계, 국가/대학/기관 차원의 협약, 메타데이터 입력주체 및 필수 요소, 직원의 전문화 방안, 이용자 요구분석을 통한 주요서비스 영역 선정, 연구데이터와 연구결과물의 효과적인 연결방안, 이용자와 유관기관과 긴밀한 공조 등의 연구데이터 관리서비스 구축 시 고려사항을 도출할 수 있었다.
본 연구의 목적은 연구데이터 관리서비스 구현 시 성공적인 서비스를 위한 고려사항을 도출하는 것이다. 이를 위해 선행연구를 활용하여 연구데이터 관리서비스의 영역을 파악하였고, 미국, 독일, 호주에서 연구데이터 관리서비스를 시행중인 대학도서관 6곳과 1개의 기관에서 담당자 8명을 대상으로 연구데이터 서비스에 관한 질문의 답변을 이메일을 통해 수집하였다. 또 해외서비스를 대상으로 수집한 고려사항이 국내에 적용가능한지 국내 연구데이터 관리서비스 전문가와 검토하였다. 연구데이터 서비스 영역은 총 9개의 카테고리로 구분하여 분석하였는데, 연구서비스와 연구데이터 관리서비스 연계, 국가/대학/기관 차원의 협약, 메타데이터 입력주체 및 필수 요소, 직원의 전문화 방안, 이용자 요구분석을 통한 주요서비스 영역 선정, 연구데이터와 연구결과물의 효과적인 연결방안, 이용자와 유관기관과 긴밀한 공조 등의 연구데이터 관리서비스 구축 시 고려사항을 도출할 수 있었다.
The purpose of this study is to determine crucial factors of consideration in ensuring the successful implementation of research data management services. The study begins by extracting a range of service areas from their equivalent in existing research on data management services. It then collects ...
The purpose of this study is to determine crucial factors of consideration in ensuring the successful implementation of research data management services. The study begins by extracting a range of service areas from their equivalent in existing research on data management services. It then collects relevant information via e-mail survey from eight individuals respectively overseeing research data management services at six university libraries and one institution located throughout the United States, Germany, and Australia. Having originated in overseas cases, the resulting factors of consideration were reviewed by domestic experts in research data management services. The finalized areas of research data management services consist of nine categories. The crucial factors of consideration in RDM services are connection between research services and research data management services; national/university-level/institutional agreements; metadata entry personnel and required elements; strategies for the provision of specialized staff; major service area selection through user demand analysis; effective linkage between research data and research results; and close cooperation with users and related organizations.
The purpose of this study is to determine crucial factors of consideration in ensuring the successful implementation of research data management services. The study begins by extracting a range of service areas from their equivalent in existing research on data management services. It then collects relevant information via e-mail survey from eight individuals respectively overseeing research data management services at six university libraries and one institution located throughout the United States, Germany, and Australia. Having originated in overseas cases, the resulting factors of consideration were reviewed by domestic experts in research data management services. The finalized areas of research data management services consist of nine categories. The crucial factors of consideration in RDM services are connection between research services and research data management services; national/university-level/institutional agreements; metadata entry personnel and required elements; strategies for the provision of specialized staff; major service area selection through user demand analysis; effective linkage between research data and research results; and close cooperation with users and related organizations.
Kang, HeeJong (2012). Key resources in 21st century, policy tasks on use of national scientific data. STEPI Insight, (91), 1-26.
Kim, SunTae, Hahn, SunHwa, Lee, Taeyoung, & Kim, Yong (2010). A study on a model for using and preserving scientific data. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 21(4), 81-93.
Kim, EunJeong, & Nam, TaeWoo (2012). Factor analysis of effects on research data collection. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 29(2), 27-44. http://dx.doi.Org/10.3743/K08IM.2012.29.2.027
Kim, JiHyun (2014). A study on research data management services of research university libraries in the U.S. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 25(3), 165-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2014.25.3.165
Seoul National University (2010). Seoul National University Research Ethics Guidelines
Shim, WonSik (2015). Developing a roadmap for national research data management governance: based on the analysis of united kingdom's case. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 49(4), 355-378. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2015.49.4.355
Shim, WonSik (2016). A case study of u.s. academic libraries' research data support services. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 50(4), 311-332. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2016.50.4.31
Lee, SangHwan, & Shim, WonSik (2009). Sharing and Utilizing for Scientific Data. KISTI Knowlege Report, 5.
Bouma, G. D., & Ling, R. (2004). The Research Process. South Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.
Carlson, J. (2018, January 28). email interview with the author.
Cox, A. M., & Pinfield, S. (2014). Research data management and libraries: Current activities and future priorities. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 46(4), 299-316.
Hedstrom, M., & Jinfang, N. (2008). Incentives for data producers to create "archive/ready" data: Implications for archives and records management. In Proceedings from the Society of American Archivists Research Forum.
Helbig, K. (2018, February 12). email interview with the author.
Jones, S., Pryor, G., & Whyte, A. (2013). 'How to Develop Research Data Management Services-a guide for HEIs'. DCC How-to Guides. Edinburgh: Digital Curation Centre. Available online: http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/how-guides
Kozlowski, W. A. (2018, January 30). email interview with the author.
Muilenburg, J. S. (2018, February 2). email interview with the author.
Perry, C. M. (2008). Archiving of publicly funded research data: A survey of Canadian researchers. Government Information Quarterly, 25(1), 133-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2007.04.008
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.