$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

A Risk Assessment of Vibrio parahaemolyticus for Consumption of Shucked Raw Oyster in Korea 원문보기

한국식품위생안전성학회지 = Journal of food hygiene and safety, v.33 no.4, 2018년, pp.248 - 254  

Lee, Jong-Kyung (Department of Food & Nutrition, Hanyang Women's University) ,  Yoon, Ki-Sun (Department of Food and Nutrition, Kyunghee University) ,  Lee, Hyang (The Research Institute of Nursing Science, Seoul National University) ,  Kim, Hyun-Jung (Korea Food Research Institute)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

본 연구에서 소비-섭취 시나리오와 온도-시간의 장염비브리오 생육모델을 활용하여 국내 생굴의 병원성 장염 비브리오균의 위해평가를 실시하였다. 장염 비브리오균의 오염 수준 및 병원성 인자 데이터를 활용하였으며, 국민건강영양조사와 농촌진흥청의 표준레시피를 활용하여 섭취량을 조사하였고 용량반응관계는 Beta-Poisson모델을 활용하였다. 국내 소비자가 생굴을 섭취할 때 병원성 장염 비브리오균으로 발생하는 위해는 식중독이 주로 발생하는 4월, 10월, 11월에 $5.71{\times}10^{-5}$ (5퍼센타일 $2.71{\times}10^{-8}$, 95퍼센타일 $1.03{\times}10^{-4}$로 추정되었다. 본 연구에서 생굴의 장염비브리오 위해의 영향인자는 소비시점 생굴의 장염비브리오균의 오염수준, 생굴 섭취량, 병원성 인자(tdh or trh 유전자)의 존재 여부, 상온의 노출온도 및 시간으로 나타났으며 위해관리방안을 제시하였다.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

To assess the risk of V. parahaemolyticus infection caused by consumption of raw oysters in Korea, contamination levels during the retail-to-table route of oysters was modeled to predict V. parahaemolyticus growth based on temperature and time. The consumed amount data of the KNHANES and the standar...

주제어

AI 본문요약
AI-Helper 아이콘 AI-Helper

* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.

제안 방법

  • A predictive model for temperature variables were used to predict V. parahaemolyticus growth at different steps along the pathway (Fig. 1). A previous study comparing the growth patterns of trh-positive pathogenic V.
  • 3). Changes in log MPN/g of V. parahaemolyticus during retail, transportation, and consumption of oysters were modeled based on temperature and time variables (Fig. 1).
  • Collection of quantitative monitoring data were restricted to April, October, and November in this work, since these are the most common periods of V. parahaemolyticus outbreak, V. parahaemolyticus detection in raw oysters, and raw oyster consumption in Korea (Table 1).
  • Data gaps were found as the prevalence of oyster consumers, limited sample size, consumer behaviors during preparation in this study. In addition, some of the box package containing ice prohibits the growth of V.
  • This survey of 9,047 subjects over 12 years of age was carried out and it contains information regarding food items and amount of food consumed by respondents during 24 retrospective hours per serving per person. To account for variations in consumption caused by the cooking method, the amount of oyster (g) containing other food materials such as vegetables and meat that was consumed was calculated by multiplying the consumed amount of raw oyster-containing food (g) from the KNHANES data by the raw oyster ratio of the standard RDA recipe (Table 2). The ratio of oysters in the food was calculated from the standard RDA recipe for each person?i.

대상 데이터

  • . This survey of 9,047 subjects over 12 years of age was carried out and it contains information regarding food items and amount of food consumed by respondents during 24 retrospective hours per serving per person. To account for variations in consumption caused by the cooking method, the amount of oyster (g) containing other food materials such as vegetables and meat that was consumed was calculated by multiplying the consumed amount of raw oyster-containing food (g) from the KNHANES data by the raw oyster ratio of the standard RDA recipe (Table 2).

이론/모형

  • The amount of raw oysters consumed was calculated using Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) data conducted in April19) and Rural Development Administration (RDA) standard recipe information19). This survey of 9,047 subjects over 12 years of age was carried out and it contains information regarding food items and amount of food consumed by respondents during 24 retrospective hours per serving per person.
본문요약 정보가 도움이 되었나요?

참고문헌 (28)

  1. DePaola, A., Hopkins, L.H., Peeler, J.T., Wentz, B., McPhearson, R.: Incidence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in US coastal waters and oysters. Appl. Environmental Microbiol., 56, 2299-2302 (1990). 

  2. Zhang, X.H., Austin, B. Haemolysins in Vibrio species. J. Appl. Microbiol., 98, 1011-1019 (2005). 

  3. Sakazaki R. Vibrio. pp. 127-136. In: Food-borne disease, Cliver DO, Riemann HP (eds). Academic Press, London. (2002). 

  4. MFDS (Ministry of Food and Drug Safety) (2016) http://www.foodsafetykorea.go.kr/portal/healthyfoodlife/foodPoisoningStat.do?menu_no519&menu_grpMENU_GRP02. Accessed Oct. 25, 2016. 

  5. Codex Alimentarius Commission (1999) Principles and guidelines for the conduct of microbiological risk assessment, CAC/GL-30, Geneva. 

  6. FDA (2005) Quantitative risk assessment on the public health impact of pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus in raw oysters. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Food/ScienceResearch/ResearchAreas/RiskAssessmentSafetyAssessment/UCM196915.pdf 

  7. Lee, J.K., Jung, D.W., Eom, S.Y., Oh, S.W., Kim, Y.J., Kwak, H.S., Kim, Y.H.: Occurrence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in oysters from Korean retail outlets. Food Control, 19, 990-994 (2008). 

  8. Lee M.A., Lee J.K., Cha S.M. Analysis on the consumer's attitude and purchase behavior of oysters. Korean J. Cookery Sci. 24, 919-930 (2008). 

  9. Lamerding, A.M. Fazil, A. Hazard identification and exposure assessment for microbial food safety risk assessment. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 58,147-157 (2000). 

  10. Toyofuku, H. Harmonization of international risk assessment protocol. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 53, 579-590 (2006). 

  11. Lee H. Microbiological population of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in oysters of wholesale seafood markets. J. Food Hyg. Safety 21, 238-243 (2006). 

  12. Yu H,, Oh E.G., Shin S.B., Park Y.S., Lee H.J., Kim J.H., Song K.C. Distribution and antimicrobial resistance of Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolated from Korean shellfish. Korean J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 47, 508-515 (2014). 

  13. Kim S., An S., Park B., Oh E.G., Song K.C., Kim J.W., Yu H. Virulence factors and antimicrobial susceptibility of Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolated from the oyster Crassostrea gigas. Korean J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 49, 116-123 (2016). 

  14. Bacteriological Analytical Manual http://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodScienceResearch/LaboratoryMethods/ucm070830.htm. Accessed Dec. 1, 2016. 

  15. Chung Y.T., So B.T., Kim Y.K., O Y.H., Ham H.J., Cha Y.S. et al. Detection and pathogenicity of hemolysin gene in Vibrio parahaemolyticus. The Report of Seoul Metropolitan Government Research Institute of Public Health and Environment 38, 56-61 (2002). 

  16. Yoon K.S., Min K.J., Jung Y.J., Kwon K.Y., Lee J.K., Oh S.W. A model of the effect of temperature on the growth of pathogenic and nonpathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolated from oysters in Korea. Food Microbiol. 25, 635-641 (2008). 

  17. KMA (Korea Meteorological Administration) (2005) http://www.kma.go.kr/weather/observation/past_cal.jsp?stn108&yy 2005&mm4&obs1&x24&y6. Accessed Jul. 26, 2016. 

  18. Yoon K.S. Risk Assessment of pathogenic Escherichia coli and development of pathogen modelling program. Korea MFDS reports. (2012). 

  19. KCDC (Korea Center for Disease Control and Prevention) The Third Korea national health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES III) (2005). 

  20. RDA (Rural Development Administration) (2010) http://koreanfood.rda.go.kr/inctfd/total_srch_more1.aspx. Accessed Feb. 16, 2010. 

  21. FAO/WHO. Risk assessment of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood. Microbiological Risk Assessment Series 16, 1-200 (2011). 

  22. Park M.S., Cho J.I., Lee S.H., Bahk G.J. A study on doseresponse models for foodborne disease pathogens. J. Food Hyg. Safety 29, 299-304 (2014). 

  23. FAO/WHO. Hazard identification, exposure assessment and hazard characterization of Campylobacter spp. in broiler chickens and Vibrio spp. in seafood. Geneva, Switzerland, July 23-27, (2001). 

  24. Sobrinho, Pde S, Destro, M.T., Franco, B.D., Landgraf, M. A quantitative risk assessment model for Vibrio parahaemolyticus in raw oysters in Sao Paulo State, Brazil. Int. J Food Microbiol. 180, 69-77 (2014). 

  25. GonzalezEscalona, N., Blackstone, G.M., DePaola, A. Characterization of a Vibio alginolyticus strain, isolated from Alaskan oysters, carrying a hemolysin gene similar to the thermostable direct hemolysin-related hemolysin gene (trh) of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Appl. Environmental Microbiol. 72, 7925-7929 (2006). 

  26. Gooch, J.A., DePaola, A., Bowers, J., Marshall, D.I. Growth and survival of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in postharvest American oysters. J. Food Protect. 65, 970-974 (2002). 

  27. NZFSA. Risk profile: Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood. http://www.foodsafety.govt.nz/elibrary/industry/Risk_Profile_ Vibrio-Science_Research.pdf (2003). 

  28. Yamamoto, A., Iwahori, J., Vuddhakul, V., Charernjiratragul, W., Vose, D., Osaka, K., Shigematsu, M., Toyofuku, H., Yamamoto, S., Nishibuchi, M., Kasuga, F. Quantitative modeling for risk assessment of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in bloody clams in southern Thailand. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 124, 70-78 (2008). 

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

BRONZE

출판사/학술단체 등이 한시적으로 특별한 프로모션 또는 일정기간 경과 후 접근을 허용하여, 출판사/학술단체 등의 사이트에서 이용 가능한 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로