$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

LID 시설 여재에 관한 기술지침 및 적용에 관한 고찰
Filter Media Specifications for Low Impact Development: A Review of Current Guidelines and Applications 원문보기

한국습지학회지 = Journal of wetlands research, v.21 no.4, 2019년, pp.321 - 333  

게라 하이디 (한서대학교 환경공학과) ,  김이형 (공주대학교 토목환경공학과) ,  김영철 (한서대학교 환경공학과)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

LID 시설의 성능, 유지관리 빈도 및 수명에 가장 큰 영향을 미치는 1차적인 인자는 여재의 형태 및 구성(깊이 및 profile)일 것이다. 여재 스펙에 관련된 규정 및 정보를 제공하는 지침이 있으며 여재의 효과를 입증하려는 수많은 연구가 진행되고 있다. 일부의 연구결과는 서로 유사하거나 일관성이 있으나 일부는 전혀 다른 결론에 도달하고 있으며 매우 적은 연구가 여재의 형태 및 조성이 성능에 미치는 영향에 초점을 맞추고 있는 실정이다. 이와 같은 상황은 오히려 여재의 선정이나 설계하는데 불확실성과 혼란을 유발하고 있다. 이와 같은 관점에서 본 논문에서는 다양한 문헌과 실험실 및 현장 경험을 토대로 여재 스펙 및 구성을 종합적으로 분석하여 제시하였다. 먼저 LID 시스템을 침투 및 비침투 구조, 그리고 식생형 및 비식생형으로 분류하였다. 분류에 따르면 일반적인 여재 Profile을 여재층의 구성, 재료 및 깊이에 따라 고찰하였다. 또한 여재특성이 수리 및 수문학적 기능뿐 만 아니라 오염물질의 저감에 미치는 영향을 비교 분석하여 제시하였다. 유기물질의 침출로 인한 막힘, 여제 세척, 시공 중의 취급 등 기타 고려사항에 대해 간략하게 서술하였다. 본 고찰의 목표는 LID 시설을 설계할 때 적절한 여재를 선정하는데 일조하기 위함이며 또는 장래에 필요한 여재연구방향을 제시하는데 있다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

A primary aspect of low impact development (LID) design that affects performance efficiency, maintenance frequency, and lifespan of the facility is the type of filter media as well as the arrangement or media profile. Several LID guidelines providing media specifications are currently available and ...

주제어

#LID 시설   #여재스펙   #여재층   #지침   #여재의 선정   #여재성능  

표/그림 (11)

참고문헌 (49)

  1. AECOM (2013). Model Standards & Specifications for Low Impact Development Practices, The City of Riverbank, Riverbank, California. 

  2. Auckland Regional Council (ARC) (2003). Stormwater management devices: Design guidelines manual 2nd edition, Auckland Regional Council, Auckland New Zealand. 

  3. Atchison, D, Potter, K and Severson, L (2006). Design Guidelines for Stormwater Bioretention Facilities, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin. 

  4. Brabec, E, Schulte, S, Richards, PL (2002). Impervious Surfaces and Water Quality: A Review of Current Literature and Its Implications for Watershed Planning, Journal of Planning Literature, 16(4), pp. 499-514. [DOI: 10.1177/088541202400903563] 

    상세보기 crossref

  5. Brown, RA and Hunt WF (2011). Impacts of Media Depth on Effluent Water Quality and Hydrologic Performance of Undersized Bioretention Cells, Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 137(3), pp. 132-143. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000167] 

    상세보기 crossref

  6. Chapman, C and Horner, RR (2010). Performance Assessment of a Street-Drainage Bioretention System, Water Environment Research, 82(2), pp. 109-119. [DOI: 0.2175/106143009x426112] 

    상세보기 crossref

  7. Chen, Y (2015). Development of a Vertical Flow Wetland for Treating First-flush from Impermeable Area, Ph.D. Dissertation, Hanseo University, Seosan, Republic of Korea. 

  8. City of Edmonton (2011). Low Impact Development Best Management Practices Design Guide, City of Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 

  9. City of Portland (2004). Stormwater Solutions Handbook, Environmental Services City of Portland, Portland, Oregon. 

  10. City of Tucson (2015), Low Impact Development and Green Infrastructure Guidance Manual, Pima County, Tucson, Arizona. 

  11. Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) (2010). Low Impact Development Stormwater Management Planning and Design Guide, Credit Valley Conservation and Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, Toronto, Canada. 

  12. Davis, AP (2007). Field Performance of Bioretention: Water Quality, Environmental Engineering Science, 24(8), pp. 1048-1064. [DOI: 10.1089/ees.2006.0190] 

    상세보기 crossref

  13. Davis, AP, Shokouhian, M, Sharma, H and Minami, C (2001). Laboratory Study of Biological Retention for Urban Stormwater Management, Water Environment Research, 73(1), pp. 5-14. [DOI: 0.2175/106143001x138624] 

    상세보기 crossref

  14. Davis, AP, Shokouhian, M, Sharma, H, Minami, C and Winogradoff, D (2003). Water Quality Improvement through Bioretention: Lead, Copper, and Zinc Removal, Water Environment Federation, 75(1), pp. 73-82. [DOI: 10.2175/106143003x140854] 

    상세보기 crossref

  15. Davis, AP, Hunt, WF, Traver, RG and Clar, M (2009). Bioretention Technology: Overview of Current Practice and Future Needs, Journal of Environmental Engineering, 135(3), pp. 109-117. [DOI: 10.1061/ASCE0733-93722009135:3109] 

    상세보기 crossref

  16. DeBusk, KM and Wynn, TM (2011). Storm-Water Bioretention for Runoff Quality and Quantity Mitigation, Journal of Environmental Engineering, 137(9), pp. 800-808. [DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000388] 

    상세보기 crossref

  17. Dietz, ME (2007). Low Impact Development Practices: A Review of Current Research and Recommendations for Future Directions, Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 186(1-4), pp. 351-363. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-007-9484-z] 

    상세보기 crossref

  18. Dietz, ME (2016). Modified Bioretention for Enhanced Nitrogen Removal from Agricultural Runoff, Journal of Environmental Engineering, 142(12), pp. 06016007. [DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001144] 

    상세보기 crossref

  19. Ergas, SJ, Sengupta, PE, Seigel R, Pandit, A, Yao, Y and Yuan, X (2010). Performance of Nitrogen-Removing Bioretention Systems for Control of Agricultural Runoff, Journal of Environmental Engineering, 136(10), pp. 1105-1112. [DOI: 10.1061/ASCEEE.1943-7870.0000243] 

    상세보기 crossref

  20. Fassman-Beck, E, Wang, S, Simcock, R and Liu R (2015). Assessing the Effects of Bioretention's Engineered Media Composition and Compaction on Hydraulic Conductivity and Water Holding Capacity, Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment, 1(4), pp. 04015003. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/JSWBAY.0000799] 

    상세보기 crossref

  21. Geosyntec Consultants (Geosyntec) (2014). Low Impact Development Practices Design & Implementation Guidelines Manual, Orange County Planning Division, Orange County, Florida. 

  22. Gulbaz, S, and Kazezyilmaz-Alhan, CM (2016). Experimental Investigation on Hydrologic Performance of LID with Rainfall-Watershed-Bioretention System, Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 22(1), pp. D4016003. [DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001450] 

    상세보기 crossref

  23. Hinman, C (2012). Low Impact Development Technical Guidance Manual for Puget Sound, Washington State University and Puget Sound Partnership, Puget Sound, Washington. 

  24. Hsieh, C and Davis, AP (2005). Evaluation and Optimization of Bioretention Media for Treatment of Urban Storm Water Runoff, Journal of Environmental Engineering, 131(11), pp. 1521-1531. [DOI: 10.1061/ASCE0733-93722005131:111521] 

    상세보기 crossref

  25. Hunt, WF and Lord, WG (2006). Urban Waterways: Bioretention Performance, Design, Construction, and Maintenance, AGW-588-05, North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, North Carolina. 

  26. Hunt, WF, Smith, JT, Jadlocki, SJ, Hathaway, JM and Eubanks, PR (2008). Pollutant Removal and Peak Flow Mitigation by a Bioretention Cell in Urban Charlotte, N.C., Journal of Environmental Engineering, 5(134), 403-408. [DOI: 10.1061/ASCE0733-93722008134:5403] 

  27. Hunter, G (2012). 'Media' wars in the trenches defending a robust biofiltration media specification, Proceedings of the Stormwater 2012 Conference, Australia, October 15-19, 2012. 

  28. Hurley, S, Shrestha, P and Cording, A (2017). Nutrient Leaching from Compost: Implications for Bioretention and Other Green Stormwater Infrastructure, Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment, 3(3), pp. 04017006. [DOI: 10.1061/JSWBAY.0000821] 

    상세보기 crossref

  29. Kim, H, Seagren, A and Davis, AP (2003). Engineered Bioretention for Removal of Nitrate from Stormwater, Water Environment Research, 75(4), pp. 355-367. [DOI: 10.2175/106143003x141169] 

    상세보기 crossref

  30. Los Angeles Department of Public works (LADPW) (2014). Low Impact Development Standards Manual, County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works, Los Angeles, California. 

  31. LeFevre, G, Paus, K, Natarajan, P, Gulliver, J, Novak, P and Hozalski, R (2014). Review of Dissolved Pollutants in Urban Storm Water and Their Removal and Fate in Bioretention Cells, Journal of Environmental Engineering, 141(1), pp. 04014050. [DOI: : 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000876] 

    상세보기 crossref

  32. Li, H and Davis, AP (2008). Heavy Metal Capture and Accumulation in Bioretention Media, Environmental Science & Technology, 42(14), pp. 5247-5253. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/es702681j] 

    상세보기 crossref

  33. North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) (2018). NCDEQ Stormwater Design Manual: Bioretention Cell, Department of f Environmental Quality, North Carolina. 

  34. Niu, S (2016). Vertical and Innovative LID-wetland Treating Stormwater from Paved Road, Ph.D. Dissertation, Hanseo University, Seosan, Republic of Korea. 

  35. Perrin, C, Milburn, L, Szpir, L, Hunt, W, Bruce, S. McCLendon, R, Job, S, Line, D, Lindbo, D, Smutko, S, Fisher, H, Tucker, R. Calabria, J, Debusk, K, Cone, KC, Smith-Gordon, M, Spooner, J, Blue, T, Deal, N, Lynn, J, Rashash, D. Rubin, R, Senior, M, White, N. Jones, D and Eaker, W, (2009). Low Impact Development: A Guidebook for North Carolina (AG-716), NC Cooperative Extension Service, NC State University, North Carolina. 

  36. Pitt, R and Clark, SE (2010). Evaluation of Biofiltration Media for Engineered Natural Treatment Systems, Geosyntec Consultants, Santa Barbara, California. 

  37. Pitt, R, Lantrip, J, Harrisson, R, Henry, CL and Xue D (1999). Infiltration through Disturbed Urban Soils and Compost-Amended Soil Effects on Runoff Quality and Quantity, Report EPA/600/R-00/016, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. 

  38. Prince George's County (2007). Bioretention Manual, Environmental Services Division, Department of Environmental Resources, The Prince George's County, Maryland. 

  39. Robertson WD (2010). Nitrate removal rates in woodchip media of varying age, Ecological Engineering, 36(11), pp. 1581-1587. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.01.008] 

    상세보기 crossref

  40. Saeed, T and Sun, G (2011). Enhanced denitrification and organics removal in hybrid wetland columns: Comparative experiments, Bioresource Technology, 102(2), pp. 967-974. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.056] 

    상세보기 crossref

  41. Sharma, S (2017). Effects of Urbanization on Water Resources-Facts and Figures, International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 8(4), pp. 433-459. [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317950856] 

  42. Shuster, WD, Bonta, J, Thurston, H, Warnemuende, E and Smith, DR (2005). Impacts of impervious surface on watershed hydrology: A review, Urban Water Journal, 2(4), pp. 263-275. [DOI:10.1080/15730620500386529] 

    상세보기 crossref

  43. Southeast Michigan Council of Governments (SEMCOG) (2008). Low Impact Development Manual for Michigan: A Design Guide for Implementors and Reviewers, Southeast Michigan Council of Governments, Detroit, Michigan. 

  44. Tetra Tech, Inc. (2011). San Diego Low Impact Development Design Manual, PITS070111-01, Tetra Tech, Inc. and Construction and Development Standards Section, San Diego Storm Water Division, California. 

  45. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (1999a). Storm Water Technology Fact Sheet: Infiltration Trench, EPA 832-F-99-019, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. 

  46. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (1999b). Storm Water Technology Fact Sheet: Bioretention, EPA 832-F-99-012, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. 

  47. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2001). Our Built and Natural Environments: A technical review of the interactions between land use, transportation, and environmental quality, EPA 231K13001, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. 

  48. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2017). https://www.epa.gov/nps/urban-runoff-low-impact-development 

  49. USKH, Inc. (2008). Low Impact Development Design Guidance Manual, Municipality of Anchorage, Anchorage, Alaska. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

BRONZE

출판사/학술단체 등이 한시적으로 특별한 프로모션 또는 일정기간 경과 후 접근을 허용하여, 출판사/학술단체 등의 사이트에서 이용 가능한 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로