$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

네트워크 중심성, 자율적 동기, 그리고 능력 간의 상호의존적 관계가 지식공유에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구
Analyzing the Interdependent Role of Network Centrality, Motivation and Ability in Knowledge Sharing 원문보기

한국전자거래학회지 = The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies, v.24 no.4, 2019년, pp.49 - 78  

정상윤 (Information Systems, Graduate School of Business, Seoul National University) ,  노상규 (Information Systems, Graduate School of Business, Seoul National University)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

지식기반사회의 21세기에서 경쟁하는 기업들에게 조직구성원간의 지식공유는 기업의 핵심역량과 밀접한 연관을 갖는 핵심화두다. 특히 조직 내 네트워크의 위치 요인이 지식공유에 미치는 영향에 관해서는 학문적으로 논란이 계속되어 왔다. 이는 네트워크 중심성이 높을수록 정보에 대한 접근성이 높아지고 지식공유의 기회는 확대되는 반면에 약한 유대감으로 인해 실제 지식공유가 이루어지지 않는다는 논란이다. 본 연구에서는 지식 공유에 있어 세 가지 요소 - 네트워크 중심성, 자율적 동기, 그리고 지식공유능력 - 간의 상호작용이 지식공유에 미치는 영향을 보고자 한다. 그리고 더 나아가, 지식공유능력을 다양하고 깊이 있는 사전지식, SNS 활용능력, 그리고 자기효능감의 세 가지 측면으로 심도 있게 연구하였다. 그 결과, 부분적으로 네트워크 중심성과 자율적동기, 지식공유능력 간의 상호작용이 통계적으로 유의함을 밝혔다. 즉, 네트워크 중심성이 낮고, 높은 자율적동기, 그리고 사전지식이 많을 때 가장 높은 수준의 지식공유를 볼 수 있었다. 이를 통해, 동기와 능력이 강하면 네트워크의 주변적 위치라는 불리한 환경에서도 지식공유가 일어난다는 것을 알 수 있었다. 따라서 본 연구는 지식공유를 둘러싼 기존의 학문적 논쟁에 새로운 대안을 제시했다는 의의를 가진다.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

In the context of knowledge sharing, network position has been a controversial subject. A central position in the network provides access to non-redundant knowledge, leading to more opportunities of knowledge sharing. On the other hand, as "bridging" relationships, its characteristics as a "weak tie...

주제어

표/그림 (10)

참고문헌 (66)

  1. Aiken, L. S. and West, S. G., "Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions," Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 534-650, 1991. 

  2. Anderson, M. H., "Social Networks and the cognitive motivation to realize network opportunities: A study of managers' information gathering behaviors", Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 51-78, 2008. 

  3. Ardichvili, A., Page, V., and Wentling, T., "Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice," Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 64-77, 2003. 

  4. Bae, S. and Baek, S., "Exploring Impact of Individual Network Position toward Knowledge Sharing Intention," The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 29-50, 2016. 

  5. Baek, I., "The future prospect and development direction of SNS based knowledge management system for the government," IT & Future Strategy, Vol. 6, pp. 1-24, 2011. 

  6. Bamberger, P., "Employee help-seeking: Antecedents, consequences and new insights for future research," in Research in personnel and human resources management, pp. 49-98, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2009. 

  7. Bandura, A., "Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change," Psychological Review, Vol. 84, No. 2, pp. 191-215, 1977. 

  8. Bandura, A., "Mechanism in human agency," American Psychologist, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 122-147, 1982. 

  9. Bandura, A., "Perceived Self-Efficacy in Cognitive Development and Functioning," Educational Psychologist, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 117-148, 1993. 

  10. Bennett, J., Owers, M., Pitt, M., and Tucker, M., "Workplace impact of social networking," Property Management, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 138-148, 2010. 

  11. Blumberg, M. and Pringle, C. D., "The Missing Opportunity in Organizational Research: Some Implications for a Theory of Work Performance," Academy of Management Review, Vol.7, No. 4, pp. 560-569, 1982. 

  12. Bock, G. W. and Kim, Y., "Breaking the Myths of Rewards: An Exploratory Study of Attitudes about Knowledge Sharing," Information Resources Management Journal, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 14-21, 2002. 

  13. Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y., and Lee, J., "Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Forces, and Organizational Climate," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 87-111, 2005. 

  14. Borgatti, S. P., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J., and Labianca, G., "Network Analysis in the Social Sciences," Science, Vol. 323, No. 5916, pp. 892-895, 2009. 

  15. Burt, R. S., Toward a structural theory of action: Network models of Social structure, Perception, and Action, pp. 1-381, Academic Press, New York, NY, 1982. 

  16. Burt, R. S., Structural holes: the social structure of competition, pp. 1-313, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992. 

  17. Cabrera, A. and Cabrera, E. F., "Knowledge sharing dilemmas," Organization Studies, Vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 687-710, 2002. 

  18. Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A., "Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, No 1, pp. 128-152, 1990. 

  19. Coleman, J. S., "Social capital in the creation of human capital," American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 94, pp. S95-S120, 1988. 

  20. Compeau, D. R. and Higgins, C. A., "Computer self-efficacy development of a measure and initial test," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 189-211, 1995. 

  21. Correa, T., Hinsley, A. W., and de Zuniga, H. G., "Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users' personality and social media use," Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 247-253, 2010. 

  22. Cross, R. and Cummings, J. N., "Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 47, No. 6, pp. 928-937, 2004. 

  23. Dawson, J. F. and Richter, A. W., "Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression: Development and application of a slope difference test," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 91, No. 4, pp. 917-926, 2006. 

  24. Deci, E. L. and Ryan, R. M., Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior, pp. 1-371, Plenum Press, New York, NY, 1985. 

  25. Deci, E. L. and Ryan, R. M., "The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior," Psychological Inquiry, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 227-268, 2000. 

  26. Degenne, A. and Forse, M., Introducing social networks, pp. 1-248, Sage, Trowbridge, Wiltshire, UK, 1999. 

  27. Davenport, T. H., "Ten principles of knowledge management and four case studies," Knowledge and Process Management, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 187-208, 1997. 

  28. Davenport, T. H. and Prusak, L., Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know, pp. 1-199, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 1998. 

  29. Foss, N. J. and Pedersen, T., "Transferring knowledge in MNCs: The role of sources of subsidiary knowledge and organizational context," Journal of International Management, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 49-67, 2002. 

  30. Freeman, L. C., "Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification," Social Networks, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 215-239, 1978. 

  31. Gargiulo, M., Ertug, G., and Galunic, C., "The two faces of control: Network closure and individual performance among knowledge workers," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 54, No. 2, pp. 299-333, 2009. 

  32. Granovetter, M. S., "The strength of weak ties," American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 78, No. 6, pp. 1360-1380, 1973. 

  33. Granovetter, M. S., "The impact of social structure on economic outcomes," The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 33-50, 2005. 

  34. Haas, M. R. and Hansen, M. T., "Different knowledge, different benefits: toward a productivity perspective on knowledge sharing in organizations," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 28, No. 11, pp. 1133-1153, 2007. 

  35. Hansen, M. T., "The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 82-111, 1999. 

  36. Hansen, M. T., Mors, M. L., and Lovas, B., "Knowledge sharing in organizations: multiple networks, multiple phases," Academy of Management Journal, Vol.48, No. 5, pp. 776-793, 2005. 

  37. Hsu, M., Ju, T. L., Yen, C., and Chang, C., "Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations," International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 65, No. 2, pp. 153-169, 2007. 

  38. Ibarra, H., "Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement: Determinants of technical and administrative roles," Academy Of Management Journal, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 471-501, 1993. 

  39. Igbaria, M. and Iivari, J., "The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage," Omega, Vol. 23, No. 6, pp. 587-605, 1995. 

  40. Inkpen, A. C. and Tsang, E. W. K., "Social Capital, Networks and Knowledge Transfer," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 146-165, 2005. 

  41. Kang, Y. S. and Lee, H., "Understanding the role of an IT artifact in online service continuance: An extended perspective of user satisfaction," Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 353-364, 2010. 

  42. Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B. C. Y., and Wei, K., "Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An Empirical Investigation," MIS Quarterly, Vol.29, No.1, pp. 113-143, 2005. 

  43. Levin, D. Z. and Cross, R., "The strength of weak ties you can trust: the mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer," Management Science, Vol. 50, No. 11, pp. 1477-1490, 2003. 

  44. McDowell, W. C. and Voelker, T. A., "Information, Resources and Transaction Cost Economics: The Effects of Informal Network Centrality on Teams and Team Performance," Journal Of Behavioral & Applied Management, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 134-147, 2008. 

  45. Mors, M. L., "Innovation in a global consulting firm: When the problem is too much diversity," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 31, No. 8, pp. 841-872, 2010. 

  46. Nardi, B. A., Whittaker, S., and Schwarz, H., "Networkers and their Activity in Intensional Networks," Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Vol. 11, No. 1-2, pp. 205-242, 2002. 

  47. Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., and Konno, N., "SECI, Ba and leadership: a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation," Long Range Planning, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 5-34, 2000. 

  48. Obstfeld, D., "Social Networks, the Tertius Iungens Orientation, and Involvement in Innovation," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 100-130, 2005. 

  49. Opsahl, T., Agneessens, F., and Skvoretz, J., "Node centrality in weighted networks: Generalizing degree and shortest paths," Social Networks, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 245-251, 2010. 

  50. O'reilly, T., "What Is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software," available at: http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html, 2005. 

  51. Pempek, T. A., Yermolayeva, Y. A., and Yermolayeva, S. L., "College students' social networking experiences on Facebook," Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 227-238, 2009. 

  52. Reagans, R. and Mcevily, B., "Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 240-267, 2003. 

  53. Ryan, R. M. and Connell, J. P., "Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 57, No. 5, pp. 749-761, 1989. 

  54. Reinholt, M., Pedersen, T., and Foss, N. J., "Why a Central Network Position Isn't Enough: The Role of Motivation and Ability for Knowledge Sharing in Employee Networks," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 54, No. 6, pp. 1277-1297, 2011. 

  55. Rha, J., "Consumers' Usage of online social networks: Application of Use-diffusion model," Journal of Consumer Studies, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 443-472, 2010. 

  56. Szulanski, G., "Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, No. S2, pp. 27-43, 1996. 

  57. Sparrowe, R. T., Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., and Kraimer, M. L., "Social Networks and the Performance of Individuals and Groups," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 316-325, 2001. 

  58. Tsai, W., "Knowledge transfer in interorganizational networks: effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44, No. 5, pp. 996-1004, 2001. 

  59. Tsai, W., "Social structure of 'coopetition' within a multiunit organization: coordination, competition, and interorganizational knowledge sharing," Organization Science, Vol. 13, No.2, pp. 179-190, 2002. 

  60. Teece, D., "Profiting from technical innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing, and public policy," Research Policy, Vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 285-305. 1986. 

  61. Wang, S. and Noe, R. A., "Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research," Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 115-131, 2010. 

  62. Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., and Hudy, M. J., "Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures?," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 82, No. 2, pp. 247-252, 1997. 

  63. Wasserman, S. and Faust, K., Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, Cambridge University Press, Newyork, Newyork, 1994. 

  64. Weinstein, N. and Ryan, R. M., "When helping helps: Autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 98, No. 2, pp. 222-244, 2010. 

  65. Williamson, B., "Managing at a distance," available at: http://www.zimbio.com/BusinessWeek/articles/vXJT1mLEdwz/MANAGING+AT+A+DISTANCE, 2009. 

  66. Vardaman, J. M., Amis, J. M., Dyson, B. P., Wright, P. M., and Van de Graaff Randolph, R., "Interpreting change as controllable: The role of network centrality and self-efficacy," Human Relations, Vol. 65 No. 7, pp. 835-859, 2012. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

GOLD

오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로