$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

여성장애인의 장애유형별 자녀양육역량, 양육스트레스, 회복탄력성, 사회적 지지에 대한 잠재평균분석
Latent Means Analysis of Parenting Competency, Parenting stress, Resilience, Social support according to the disability types among disabled women 원문보기

한국융합학회논문지 = Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, v.10 no.1, 2019년, pp.291 - 298  

이유리 (남부대학교 사회복지학과)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

본 연구의 목적은 잠재평균분석을 활용하여 여성장애인의 자녀양육역량, 양육스트레스, 회복탄력성, 사회적 지지 수준이 장애유형(정신장애, 신체장애)에 따라 차이가 있는지 탐색하는 것이다. 이를 위해 여성장애인의 장애유형에 따라 정신장애 167명, 신체장애 132명으로 구분하고 설문조사를 실시하였다. 연구 결과, 양육스트레스와 사회적 지지 수준은 정신장애 여성에서 더 높게, 자녀양육역량과 회복탄력성은 신체장애 여성에서 더 높게 나타났다. 이러한 결과를 바탕으로 장애유형에 따라 차별화된 실천적 정책적 개입전략을 제시하였다.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

This study aimed to examine disabled women to determine whether differences existed in parenting stress, resilience, social support, and parenting competency based on the disability type using an latent means analysis. The research data was sampled from 167 mentally disabled women and 132 physically...

주제어

표/그림 (3)

AI 본문요약
AI-Helper 아이콘 AI-Helper

* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.

문제 정의

  • On the above results, this study will propose a practical approach that differentiates parenting competency support systems based on disability type in disabled women.
  • The aim of this study is to be employed as a policy tool for classifying support systems based on disability types in disabled women. This study is academically meaningful in that it attempted a differentiated approach that accounts for characteristics of disability types, which were not examined in the existing studies, by comparing differences in parenting competency, parenting stress, resilience, and social support based on disability type.
  • Preceding research has revealed that there are various influencing factors on the parenting competency among disabled women; those include factors related to psychological factors such as parenting stress and resilience [10,11], familial relationship factors such as spouse support, relationship with children, and family communication, and social factors such as surrounding help, and professional support [10, 12-14]. This study focuses on parenting stress, resilience, and social support. Also, internal and external studies on parenting competency up until now have not taken into account differences based on disability types among disabled women, and therefore this study will analyze differences in the primary factors related to the parenting process based on characteristics for each disability type among disabled women, and will propose differentiated, practical interventions for each disability type.
본문요약 정보가 도움이 되었나요?

참고문헌 (34)

  1. Ackerson, B. J. (2003). Coping with the Dual Demands of Severe Mental Illness and Parenting: The Parents' Perspective, Families in Society, 84(1): 109-118. 

  2. J. J. Kim. (2000). A Study on the parenting related variables of women with mental disorder affect the social competence of their children, Ewha Womans Univ, Seoul. 

  3. S. A. Hong, et al. (2007). A Study on Supporting Parental Support for Women with Disabilities, Korean Women's Development Institute, Seoul. 

  4. S. A. Hong & Y. M. Lee. (2009). Parenting and Social Supports: Disabled mothers experiences of raising children, The Journal of Asian Women, 48(1): 119-157. 

  5. Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2017). Survey of the disabled, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Sejong. 

  6. Government of Canada (2006). Advancing the Inclusion of Persons with disabilities. 

  7. Nicholson, J., & Henry, A. D. (2003). Achieving the goal of evidence-based psychiatric rehabilitation practice for mothers with mental illness. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 27(2): 122-130. 

  8. N. A. Kim & S. K. Choi. (2011). A Study on Pregnancy, Childbirth, Child Rearing to Experience Physically Disabled Women, The Korean Civic Ethics Society. 22(2): 275-302. 

  9. S. J. Kim & J. B. Yang. (2012). A Study on the Child-Rearing Experiences of Physically Disabled Women. Korean Journal of Family Social Work, 17(4): 63-86. 

  10. Grue. L. & K. T. Laerum. (2002). Doing Motherhood': some experiences of mothers with physical disabilities, Disability and society. 17(6): 671-683 

  11. Newman, T. & Wates, M. (2005). Disabled parents and their children: Building a better future, Disability & Society, 17(6): 613-625. 

  12. Mowbray, C. T., et al. (2005). Living Arrangement and Social Support: Effects on the Well-being of Mothers with Mental Illness. Social Research, 29(1): 41-55. 

  13. J. M. Seong. (2008). A study on the parenting competency model of the mothers with mental disorders, Sungsil Univ, Seoul. 

  14. C. S. Ko. (2016). The Influence of Perceived Family Strengths on Parenting Stress of Mothers with Disabled Children, The Journal of Digital Convergence, 14(11): 389-397. 

  15. D'Arcangelo, J. S. (2003). An investigation of parenting competency and sense of belonging in a sample of mothers with and without mental illness, Ph.D. dissertation, New York University. 

  16. H. K. Lee. (2008). A Study on the Motherhood Experience of Women with Mental Disorders - Phenomenological Research-, Mental Health & Social Work, 30(1): 162-198. 

  17. Bybee, D., et al. (2003). Variability in Community Functioning of Mothers with Serious Mental Illness, The Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research, 30(3): 269-289. 

  18. Aldridge, J. & Becker, S. (2003). Children Caring for Patents with Mental Illness : Perspectives of Young Carers, Parents and Professionals. Bristol: The Policy Press. 

  19. Walsh, F. (1998). Strengthening Family Resilience. New York: The Guilford Press. 

  20. Jack, G. (2000). Ecological influences on parenting and child development, The British Journal of Social Work, 30(1): 703-720. 

  21. Armstrong, M. I., et al. (2005). Pathways between Social Support, Family Wellbeing, Quality of Parenting and Child Resilience: What We Know, Journal of Child and Family Studies, 14(2): 269-281. 

  22. Kang et al. (2016). The Effects of Married Immigrant Women's Parenting Experiences on their Mental Health, The Journal of Digital Convergence, 14(7): 451-459. 

  23. Mckeever. P. J. et al. (2003). It's More of a Production': accomplishing mothering using a mobility device, Disability and society, 18(2): 179-197 

  24. Oyserman, D., et al.(2002). Positive parenting among african american mothers with a serious mental illness, Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(1): 65-77. 

  25. E. J. Im. (2011). A Study on the Parenting Related Variables of Women With Physical Disabilities Affected the Social Competence of Their Children, Daegu Univ, Daegu. 

  26. Johnston, C. & Mash, E. J. (1989). A Measure of Parenting Satisfaction and Efficacy, Journal of clinical child psychology, 18(2): 167-175. 

  27. Mahmut, M. K. & Menictas, C. (2011). Validating the factor structure of the self-report psychopathy scale in a community sample, Psychological Assessment, 23(3): 670-678. 

  28. Abidin, R. (1990). Parenting stress index short form-test manual. Pediatric Psychology Press, Charlottesville. 

  29. S. J. Sin. (1997). Effects of Stress, Social Support and Efficacy on Mothers' Parenting Behaviors, Yonsei Univ, Seoul. 

  30. Y. E. Jung. et al. (2012). The Korean version of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale: an extended validation. Stress Health, 28(1): 319-326. 

  31. S. H. Hong. (2000). The Criteria for Selecting Appropriate Fit Indices in Structural Equation Modeling and Their Rationales, The Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 19(1): 161-177. 

  32. Curran, P. J. et al. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to non-normality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis, Psychological Methods, 1(1): 16-29. 

  33. S. H. Hong, M. H. Hwang, E. S. Lee. (2005). Latent Means analysis of the Career-Barrier Scale for Korean female adolescents, The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 19(4): 1159-1177. 

  34. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Science, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

BRONZE

출판사/학술단체 등이 한시적으로 특별한 프로모션 또는 일정기간 경과 후 접근을 허용하여, 출판사/학술단체 등의 사이트에서 이용 가능한 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로