최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기환경생물 = Korean journal of environmental biology, v.37 no.4, 2019년, pp.483 - 492
이상연 (국립생태원 자연환경조사팀) , 유영한 (공주대학교 생명과학과) , 정길상 (국립생태원 장기생태연구팀) , 최유성 (국립생물자원관 국가철새연구센터) , 주성배 (국립생태원 진화생태연구팀)
During the breeding season, both adults and immature Eurasian Oystercatchers (Haematopus ostralegus osculans) were observed to feed on prey, such as gastropods (Umbonium thomasi) and bivalves, at the tide water line around Yubu island in Korea. To determine differences in the foraging efficiency bet...
핵심어 | 질문 | 논문에서 추출한 답변 |
---|---|---|
해양성 조류란 무엇인가? | 해양성 조류 (seabird)는 수명이 길고 (Holmes and Austad 1995), 집단 생활을 하며, 유소성 (site fidelity)이 있는 야생조류에 해당한다 (Wooller et al. 1992). | |
섭식이란 무엇인가? | 섭식은 야생동물에게 있어서 생존과 직결된 매우 중요한 활동으로 (Skórka and Wójcik 2008; Berón et al. 2011) 적합한 섭식지와 먹이원, 섭식 기술을 선택하는 일련의 과정으로 구성된다 (Wunderle 1991). 동종 내에서의 섭식 능력은 개체에 따라 차이가 있지만, 일반적으로 연령에 따라 확연하게 구분되는 것으로 알려져 있다. | |
검은머리물떼새의 성체와 미성체의 섭식 능력을 비교한 연구에서 먹이원 탐색 방법은 어떤 차이가 있었는가? | 서해비단고둥을 섭식할 때 단위 시간당 걸음수 및 먹이원 탐색시도횟수, 섭식성공횟수, 조작시간에서 성체와 미성체 간 유의한 차이를 확인할 수 없었다. 그러나 탐색방법을 살펴보면 단일탐침은 성체가, 중복탐침과 찔러넣기는 미성체가 더 높은 비율로 이용하였다. 해양성 조류의 일종인 섭금류 (shorebird) 는 복족류를 손쉽게 섭식할 수 있는 먹이원으로 인식하는 경향이 있다. |
Altmann J. 1974. Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227-266.
Arenz CL and DW Leger. 2000. Antipredator vigilance of juvenile and adult thirteen-lined ground squirrels and the role of nutritional need. Anim. Behav. 59:535-541.
Aviles JM and PA Bednekoff. 2007. How do vigilance and feeding by common cranes Grus grus depend on age, habitat, and flock size? J. Avian Biol. 38:690-697.
Beron MP, GO Garcia, T Luppi and M Favero. 2011. Age-related prey selectivity and foraging efficiency of Olrog's Gulls (Larus atlanticus) feeding on crabs in their non-breeding grounds. Emu 111:172-178.
Bertellotti M and P Yorio. 2000. Age-related feeding behavior and foraging efficiency in Kelp Gulls Larus dominicanus attending coastal trawlers in Argentina. Ardea 88:207-214.
BirdLife International. 2017. Haematopus ostralegus (amended version of 2016 assessment). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017:e.T22733462A117739875. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2017-3.RLTS.T22733462A117739875.en.? Downloaded on 30 July 2019.
Boates JS and JD Goss-Custard. 1989. Foraging behaviour of oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus during a diet switch from worms Nereis diversicolor to clams Scrobicularia plana. Can. J. Zool. 67:2225-2231.
Boates JS and JD Goss-Custard. 1992. Foraging behaviour of oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus specializing on different species of prey. Can. J. Zool. 70:2398-2404.
Boukhriss J, S Selmi, A Bechet and S Nouira. 2007. Vigilance in greater flamingos wintering in southern Tunisia: age-dependent flock size effect. Ethology 113:377-385.
Bryan JE and PA Larkin. 1972. Food specialization by individual trout. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 29:1615-1624.
Burger J. 1980. Age differences in foraging black-necked Stilts in Texas. Auk 97:633-636.
Burger J. 1981. Feeding competition between laughing gulls and herring gulls at a sanitary landfill. Condor 83:328-335.
Burger J and M Gochfeld. 1986. Age differences in foraging efficiency of American Avocets Recurvirostra Americana. Bird Behav. 6:66-71.
Catry T, JA Alves, JA Gill, TG Gunnarsson and JP Granadeiro. 2014. Individual specialization in a shorebird population with narrow foraging niche. Acta Oecol. 56:56-65.
Cayford JT. 1988. The foraging behaviour of oystercatchers, Haematopus ostralegus, feeding on mussels, Mytilus edulis. Ph.D. thesis, University of Exeter, UK.
De Vlas SJ, EJ Bunskoeke, BJ Ens and JB Hulscher. 1996. Tidal changes between Nereis diversicolor and Macoma balthica as main prey species of the Oystercatcher Haematopus ostralegus. Ardea 84:105-116.
Dierschke V, J Kube, S Probst and U Brenning. 1999. Feeding ecology of dunlins Calidris alpina staging in the southern Baltic Sea, 1. Habitat use and food selection. J. Sea Res. 42:49-64.
Ens BJ and JT Cayford. 1996. Feeding with other oystercatchers. pp. 77-104. In The Oystercatcher: from Individuals to Populations (Goss-Custard JD ed.). Oxford University Press, New York, USA.
Espin PMJ, RM Mather and J Adams. 1983. Age and foraging success in Black-winged Stilts Himantopus himantopus. Ardea 71:225-228.
Gerasimov Y, Y Artukin, N Gerasimov and E Lobkov. 1999. Status of shorebirds in Kamchatck, Russia. Stilt 34:31-34.
Gill F and D Donsker. 2019. IOC World Bird List (v9.1). doi:10.14344/IOC.ML.9.1.
Gochfeld M and J Burger. 1994. Vigilance in African mammals: differences among mothers, other females, and males. Behaviour 131:153-169.
Gomez A Jr, J Jr Pereira and L Bugoni. 2009. Age-specific diving and foraging behavior of the Great Grebe (Podicephorus major). Waterbirds 32:149-156.
Goss-Custard JD and SLVD Durell. 1983. Individual and age differences in the feeding ecology of oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus wintering on the Exe Estuary, Devon. Ibis 125:155-171.
Goss-Custard JD and SLVD Durell. 1987. Age-related effects in oystercatchers, Haematopus ostralegus, feeding on mussels, Mytilus edulis. I. Foraging efficiency and interference. J. Anim. Ecol. 56:521-536.
Goss-Custard JD, JT Cayford and SEG Lea. 1998. The changing trade-off between food finding and food stealing in juvenile oystercatchers. Anim. Behav. 55:745-760.
Goss-Custard JD, SLVD Durell, CP Goater, JB Hulscher, RHD Lambeck, PL Meininger and J Urfi. 1996. How oystercatchers survive the winter. pp. 133-154. In the Oystercatcher: from Individuals to Populations (Goss-Custard JD ed.). Oxford University Press, New York, USA.
Greig-Smith PW. 1985. Winter survival, home ranges and feeding of first-year and adult Bullfinches. pp. 387-392. In Behavioral Ecology: the Ecological Consequences of Adaptive Behaviour (Sibley RM and RH Smith eds.). Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, UK.
Hesp LS and CJ Barnard. 1989. Gulls and Plover: Age-related differences in kleptoparasitism among Black-headed Gulls (Larus ridibundus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 24:297-304.
Holmes DJ and SN Austad. 1995. Birds as animal models for the comparative biology of aging: a prospectus. J. Gerontol. Ser. A-Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 50:B59-B66.
Hulscher JB. 1982. The oystercatcher Haematopus ostralegus as a predator of the bivalve Macoma balthica in the Dutch Wadden Sea. Ardea 70:89-152.
Hulscher JB. 1996. Food and feeding behavior. pp. 7-29. In The Oystercatcher: from Individuals to Populations (Goss-Custard JD ed.). Oxford University Press, New York, USA.
Joo S, SY Lee, IJ An, SS Kim, SY Park, JY Kang, HJ Ryu, SD Jin and G Jeong. 2018. Population ecology of vulnerable wildlife species in the ecosystem change. Final report NIE-BR-2018-03. National Institute of Ecology, Seocheon, Republic of Korea.
Kang TH, HJ Cho, IK Kim, YS Lee and SW Lee. 2010. Avifauna at Spring season in Yubudo island, Korea. J. Korean Nat. 3:213-218.
Kersten M and A Brenninkmeijer. 1995. Growth rate, fledging success and post-fledging survival of juvenile oystercatchers. Ibis 137:396-404.
Lee SY, YS Choi, S Joo, G Jeong and YH You. 2018. Foraging behavior and preys in relation to feeding site types of the Eurasian oystercatcher (Haematopus ostralegus osculans) during the breeding season in Yubu Island, Korea. Korean J. Ecol. Environ. 51:184-191.
Loughry WJ. 1992. Ontogeny of time allocation in black-tailed prairie dogs. Ethology 90:206-224.
Marchetti K and T Price. 1989. Differences in the foraging of juvenile and adult birds: the importance of developmental constraints. Biol. Rev. 64:51-70.
Martin P, PPG Bateson and P Bateson. 1993. Measuring Behaviour: an Introductory Guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Melville DS, YN Gerasimov, N Moores, Y Yat-Tung and Q Bai. 2014. Conservation assessment of far eastern oystercatcher Haematopus [ostralegus] osculans. Int. Wader Stud. 20:129-154.
Moores N. 2006. South Korea's shorebirds: a review of abundance, distribution, threats and conservation status. Stilt 50:62-72.
Nam HK and MH Kim. 2017. Determinations of shorebirds diets during spring migration stopovers in Korean rice fields. Korean J. Environ. Biol. 35:452-460.
Nisbet ICT. 2001. Detecting and measuring senescence in wild birds: experience with long-lived seabirds. Exp. Gerontol. 36:833-843.
Piersma T, A Koolhaas and A Dekinga. 1993. Interactions between stomach structure and diet choice in shorebirds. Auk 110:552-564.
Porter JM and SG Sealy. 1982. Dynamics of sea bird multispecies feeding flocks: age-related feeding behavior. Behaviour 81:91-109.
Richardson H and NAM Verbeek. 1987. Diet selection by yearling Northwestern Crows (Corvus caurinus) feeding on littleneck clams (venerupis japonica). Auk 104:263-269.
Schwemmer P and S Garthe. 2011. Spatial and temporal patterns of habitat use by Eurasian oystercatchers (Haematopus ostralegus) in the eastern Wadden Sea revealed using GPS data loggers. Mar. Biol. 158:541-550.
Skorka P and JD Wojcik. 2008. Habitat utilisation, feeding tactics and age related feeding efficiency in the Caspian Gull Larus cachinnans. J. Ornithol. 149:31-39.
Slater PJB. 1983. The development of animal behavior. In Animal Behaviour: Genes, Development, and Learning (Halliday TR and PJB Salter eds.). Freeman, New York, USA.
Staav R and T Fransson. 2006. EURING of longevity records for European birds. European Union for Bird Ringing. http://www.euring.org/data_and_codes/longevity.htm.
Sullivan KA. 1988a. Age-specific profitability and prey choice. Anim. Behav. 36:613-615.
Sullivan KA. 1988b. Ontogeny of time budgets in Yellow-eyed juncos: Adaptation to ecological constraints. Ecology 69:118-124.
Sutherland WJ, DWF Jones and RW Hadfield. 1986. Age differences in the feeding ability of Moorhens Gallinula chloropus. Ibis 128:414-418.
Van de Pol M, Y Vindenes, BE Saether, S Engen, BJ Ens, K Oosterbeek and JM Tinbergen. 2011. Poor environmental tracking can make extinction risk insensitive to the colour of environmental noise. Proc. R. Roc. Lond. Ser. B-Biol. Sci. 278:3713-3722.
Whitfield DP. 1990. Individual feeding specializations of wintering turnstone Arenaria interpres. J. Anim. Ecol. 59:193-211.
Wunderle JM. 1991. Age-specific foraging proficiency in birds. pp. 273-324. In Current Ornithology, VOL. 8 (Power DM ed.). Plenum Press, New York, USA.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
출판사/학술단체 등이 한시적으로 특별한 프로모션 또는 일정기간 경과 후 접근을 허용하여, 출판사/학술단체 등의 사이트에서 이용 가능한 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.