최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기
This study empirically conduct structural equivalence analysis based on social network analysis in picking up on overall structural characteristics of technological knowledge exchange in a regional cluster. Previous conceptual studies so far have argued that performance differences among structurall...
핵심어 | 질문 | 논문에서 추출한 답변 |
---|---|---|
구조적 등위성이란? | 이후 Burt(1987)는 의사들의 네트워크 구조와 신약 적용 사이의 관계를 다시 분석하여 사회적 전파확산이 개인적인 사회 네트워크의 응집(cohesion)보다 구조적 등위성에 의해 더욱 쉽게 창출된다는 것을 보였다. 여기서, 응집은 두 주체들이 직접적 친분 관계(혹은 연결)에 있다는 것을 반영하고 구조적 등위성은 두 주체가 네트워크 내 다른 주체들과 구조적으로 동일한 관계에 있다는 개념이다. | |
Nahapiet와 Ghoshal은 사회적 자본의 구성요소를 어떤 차원으로 설명하였는가? | Coleman(1988)은 사회적 자본이란 네트워크에 참여하는 구성원들 관계에서 형성되거나 개체 간 관계에 내재되어 활용 가능한 현재 또는 잠재된 모든 자원 즉, 사회관계 속에서 파생되는 자원을 의미한다고 하였다. 이후, Nahapiet & Ghoshal(1998)은 사회적 자본의 구성요소를 구조적 차원, 관계적 차원, 인지적 차원의 세 가지 차원으로 설명하였는데, 본 연구에서 관심을 갖는 구조적 차원은 네트워크 내 주체들 간의 연결 패턴 즉, 주체들 간에 형성되는 사회 구조의 형태를 의미한다. 비록 이러한 차원을 반영하기 위해 중심성, 밀도, 공백, 규모 등과 같은 다양한 사회네트워크 분석 지표들이 제시되었지만 이들은 대부분 주체들 사이의 직접적인 연결 관계에 초점을 두고 있다. | |
구조적 내재성에 기반한 구조적 등위성은 어떤 의미에서 기원하는가? | 구체적으로 본 연구는 사회네트워크 분석이 제공하는 다양한 지표 중에서 구조적 내재성에 기반한 구조적 등위성(structural equivalence)에 초점을 둔다. 이 개념은 만약 두 주체들이 모든 다른 주체들과 동일한 관계를 갖는다면 정확히 구조적으로 등위이다는 의미에서 기원한다. 어떤 주체들이 구조적으로 등위적이라는 것은 이 주체들이 정확히 대체가능한 매우 분명한 주체들을 반영하기 때문에 그 위치와 역할을 이해하기 쉽게 만든다(Hour & Kan, 2014). |
안재광, 김진한. (2014). "한국 산업 클러스터에서 기업 간 네트워크 구조와 지역 혁신역량의 역할". 한국생산관리학회지, 제25권 제1호, pp. 23-45.
Aharonson, B.S., J.A. Baum and M.P. Feldman (2007), "Desperately seeking spillovers? Increasing returns, industrial organization and the location of new entrants in geographic and technological space.", Industrial and Corporate Change, 16 (1), pp. 89-130.
Alba. R.D. (1973), "A Graph Theoretic Definition of a Sociomctric Clique", Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 3 (1), pp. 113-126.
Amit, R. and P. Shoemaker (1993), "Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent", Strategic Management Journal, 14 (1), pp. 33-46.
Anderson, H., V. Havila, P. Andersen and A. Halinen (1998), "Position and Role Conceptualizing Dynamics in Business Networks", Scandinavian Journal of Management, 14 (3), pp. 167-186.
Anderson, J. and S. Jay (1984), "Physician Utilization of Computers: A Network Analysis of the Diffusion Process", Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 6 (3/4), pp. 21-35.
Audretsch, D.B. (1995), "Firm profitability, growth, and innovation", Review of Industrial Organization, 10 (5), pp. 579-588.
Berten, H. and R. van Rossem (2011), "Mechanisms of peer influence among adolescents: cohesion versus structural equivalence", Sociological Perspectives, 54 (2), pp. 183-204.
Boorman, S.A. and H.C. White (1976), "Social structure from multiple networks. Ii. Role structures", American Journal of Sociology, 81 (6), pp. 1384-1446.
Breschi, S. and F. Malerba (2001), "The geography of innovation and economic clustering: some introductory notes", Industrial and Corporate Change, 10 (4), pp. 817-833.
Burgelman, R.A., C.M. Christensen and S.C. Wheelright (2009), Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Burt, R. S. and G. Janicik (1996), Social contagion and social structure. In D. Iacobucci (Ed.), Networks in marketing (pp. 32-49), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Burt, R.S. (1976), " Positions in networks", Social Forces, 55 (1), pp. 93-122.
Burt, R.S. (1987), "Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence", American Journal of Sociology, 92 (6), pp. 1287-1335.
Burt, R.S. (1992), Structural holes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Burt, R.S. (1978), "Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence as a Basis for Network Subgroups", Sociological Methods & Research, 7 (2), pp. 189-212.
Burt, R.S. and T. Uchiyama (1989), "The Conditional Significance of Communication for Interpersonal Influence." pp. 67-87 in The Small World, edited by M. Kochen. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.",.
Burt. R.S. (1982), Towards a Structural Theory of Action, New York: Academic Press.
Chen, J., Z. Zhu and H.Y. Xie (2004), "Measuring intellectual capital: a new model and empirical study", Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5 (1), pp. 195-212.
Chisea, V., P. Coughlan and C.A. Voss (1996), "Development of a Technological Innovation Audit", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13 (2), pp. 105-136..
Christensen, C.M. (1997), The Innovators Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA. .
Christensen, J.F. (1995), "Asset Profile for Technological Innovation", Research Policy, 24 (5), pp. 727-745.
Churchill, G.A. (1991), Marketing Research: Methodological Foundations, Fort Worth. TX: Dryden Press.
Cohen, S.S., and G. Fields (1999), "Social capital and capital gains in Silicon Valley", California management review, 41 (2), pp. 108-130.
Coleman, J., E. Katz and H. Menzel (1957), "The Diffusion of an Innovation Among Physicians", Sociometry, 20 (4), pp. 253-270 .
Coleman, J.S. (1988), "Social capital in the creation of human capital", American Journal of Sociology, 94 , pp. S95-S120.
DiMaggio, P.J. (1986), "Structural analysis of organizational fields: A blockmodel approach.", Research in Organizational Behavior, 8 , pp. 335-370.
Doreian, P., V. Batagelj and A. Ferligoj (2004), "Generalized blockmodeling of two-mode network data.", Social networks, 26 (1), pp. 29-53..
Eisingerich, A.B., S.J. Bell and P. Tracey (2010), "How can clusters sustain performance? The role of network strength, network openness, and environmental uncertainty", Research Policy, 39 (2), pp. 239-253.
Fritsch, M., and M. Kauffeld-Monz (2010), "The impact of network structure on knowledge transfer: an application of social network analysis in the context of regional innovation networks", Annals of Regional Science, 44 (1), pp. 21-38.
Galaskiewicz, f. and R. Burt (1991), " Interorganization Contagion in Corporate Philanthropy", Administrative Science Quarterly, 36 (1), pp. 88-105.
Granovetter, M.S. (1973), The Strength of Weak Ties, American Journal of Sociology, 78 (6), pp. 1360-1380.
Granovetter, M.S. (1985), "Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness", American Journal of Sociology, 91 (3), pp. 481-510.
Hannan, M.T., and J. Freeman (1989), Organizational Ecology, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Hour, S. and L. Kan (2014), "Structural and regular equivalence of community detection in social networks", In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining,, pp. 808-813.
Inkpen, A.C. and E.W.K. Tsang (2005), "Social Capital Network and Knowledge Transfer", Academy of Management Review, 30 (1), pp. 146-165.
Kuwashima, Y. (2018), "Structural Equivalence Explains Contagion: A Case of Cosmetics", Annals of Business Administrative Science, 17 (1), pp. 23-30 .
Lorrain, F. and H.C. White (1971), "Structural Equivalence of Individuals in Social Networks", The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1 (1), pp. 49-80.
Marsden, P.V. and N.E. Friedkin (1993), " Network Studies of Social Influence", Sociological Methods & Research, 22 (1), pp. 127-151 .
Nadel S.F. (1957), The Theory of Social Structure, London: Cohen and West .
Nahapiet, J. and S. Ghoshal (1998), "Social Capital, Intellectual Capital and the Organizational Advantage", The Academy of Management Review, 23 (2), pp. 242-266..
Nunnally, J.C. (1978), Psychometric Theory, Mcgraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
OECD(2018),OSLO MANUAL 2018.
Pallotti, F. and A. Lomi (2011), "Network influence and organizational performance: The effects of tie strength and structural equivalence", European Management Journal, 29 (5), pp. 389-403.
Pallotti, F., and A. Lomi (2011), "Network influence and organizational performance: The effects of tie strength and structural equivalence", European Management Journal, 29 (5), pp. 389-403.
Pizarro, N. (2007), "Structural identity and equivalence of individuals in Social Networks: beyond duality", International Sociology, 22 (6), pp. 767-792.
Porter, M.E. (1998), "Clusters and the new economics of competition", Harvard Business Review, pp. 77-90.
Prell, C. (2012), Social Network Analysis: history, Theory, and Methodology, Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications Inc.
Robinson, D.K., A. Rip and V. Mangematin (2007), "Technological agglomeration and the emergence of clusters and networks in nanotechnology", Research Policy, 36 (6), pp. 871-879.
Rosenthal, S.S. and W.C. Strange (2003), "Geography, industrial organization, and agglomeration", Review of Economics and Statistics, 85 (2), pp. 377-393.
Rugman, A.M. and J.R. D'Cruz, (2002), "The Canadian experience International Business: Critical Perspectives on Business and Management 4, pp. 237-258 (Rugman, Alan M., and Joseph R. D'cruz.(1993)."The"double diamond"model of international competitiveness: The Canadian experience." Management international review, 33 (2-1), pp.17-40.)".
Scott, J. (1991), Social Network Analysis: A Handbook, Sage London.
Scott, J. (2000), Social network analysis: A handbook, 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications.
Scott, J. (2012), Social Network Analysis: A Handbook, Thousand Oaks California: SAGE Publications Inc.
Souitaris, V. (2002), "Technological Trajectories as Moderators of Firm-Level Determinants of Innovation", Research Policy, 31 (6), pp. 877-898..
Stuart, T. and O. Sorenson (2003), "The geography of opportunity: spatial heterogeneity in founding rates and the performance of biotechnology firms", Research Policy, 32 (2), pp. 229-252.
Stuck, J., T. Broekel and J.R. Diez (2016), "Network Structures in Regional Innovation Systems", European Planning Studies, 24 (3), pp. 423-442.
Subramaniam, M. and M.A. Youndt (2005), "The Influence of Intellectual Capital on the Types of Innovative Capabilities", The Academy of Management Journal, 48 (3), pp. 450-463.
Tallman, S., M. Jenkins, N. Henry and S. Pinch (2004), "Knowledge, clusters, and competitive advantage", Academy of Management Review, 29 (2), pp. 258-271.
Thorgren, S., J. Wincent and D. Ortqvist (2009), "Designing interorganizational networks for innovation: An empirical examination of network configuration, formation and governance", Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 26 (3), pp. 148-166.
Tsai, W. and S. Ghoshal (1998), "Social Capital and Value Creation the Role of Intrafirm Networks", The Academy of Management Journal, 41 (4), pp. 464-476.
Uzzi, B. (1997), "Social structure and compelition in inter-firm networks: The paradox of embeddedness", Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, pp. 35-67.
Uzzi, B. (1996), "The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: the network effect", American Sociological Review, 61 (4), pp. 674-698.
Wang, C.L. and P.K. Ahmed (2004), "The Development and Validation of the Organisational Innovativeness Construct Using Confirmatory Factor Analysis", European Journal of Innovation Management, 7 (4), pp. 303-313.
Wasserman, S. and K. Faust (1994), Social Network Analysis : Methods and Applications, NY: Cambridge University Press.
White, H.C., S.A. Boorman and R.L. Breiger (1976), "Social structure from multiple networks: Blockmodels of roles and positions", American journal of sociology, 81 (4), pp. 730-780.
Yam, R.C.M., W. Lo, E.P.Y. Tang and A.K.W. Lau (2011), "Analysis of Sources of Innovation Technological Innovation Capabilities and Performance: An Empirical Study of Hong Kong Manufacturing Industries", Research Policy, 40 (3), pp. 391-402.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.