[논문]은둔형 습지 조류의 효과적인 조사 방법 탐색을 위한 국외 프로토콜의 시범 적용

이상연; 성하철

doi:10.11614/ksl.2019.52.2.143

[국내논문] 은둔형 습지 조류의 효과적인 조사 방법 탐색을 위한 국외 프로토콜의 시범 적용
Application of Standardized North American Marsh Bird Monitoring Protocols to Survey Inconspicuous Marsh Birds in Korea 원문보기

생태와 환경 = Korean journal of ecology and environment, v.52 no.2, 2019년, pp.143 - 150

이상연 (국립생태원 자연환경조사팀) , 성하철 (전남대학교 생물과학.생명기술학과)

초록
AI-Helper

은둔형 습지 조류는 습지 생태계를 구성하는 중요한 고차소비자임에도 불구하고, 눈에 잘 띄지 않는 습성과 신뢰도 있는 조사 방법의 부재로 인하여 국내에서는 서식 현황 및 개체군 경향성이 잘 알려져 있지 않다. 이에 본 연구는 조류 조사 시 가장 일반적으로 활용하는 수동적인 성격의 정점조사법과 탐지 효과를 증가시키는 것으로 알려진 음성조사법을 병행하는 방식의 은둔형 습지 조류를 대상으로 한 국외 프로토콜(Standardized North American Marsh Bird Monitoring Protocols; SNAMBMP)을 시범적으로 적용하였다. 그 결과, 흰눈썹뜸부기(Rallus indicus)와 쇠뜸부기사촌(Porzana fusca), 뜸부기(Gallicrex cinerea), 호사도요(Rostatula benghalensis) 4종이 탐지되었지만, 점유율이 매우 낮은 상태로 상당히 희귀한 개체군으로 판단된다. 다만, 흰눈썹뜸부기와 뜸부기의 경우 동종의 음성을 이용한 조사 방법이 다른 방법에 비해 효과적이라는 것을 확인할 수 있었다. 국내에 서식하는 은둔형 습지 조류의 종 인벤토리 확보 및 개체군 경향성 파악을 위해서는 생물다양성 확보를 목적으로 한 전국 단위의 생태계 조사 사업 지침에 SNAMBMP 방식의 조사 세부 지침을 추가 수록함과 더불어 조사 시 전 과정에 대한 녹음을 통해 음성 파일 확보를 제안한다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

Although inconspicuous marsh birds are an indicator of marsh health, there is little understanding of their status and population trends due to their behavioral characteristics and lack of reliable survey methods in Korea. We applied the Standardized North American Marsh Bird Monitoring Protocols(SNAMBMP) already validated in North America for effective survey of the marsh birds. We selected 29 sites with emergent marshes, rice fields and riparian forests in Seocheon-gun, Buyeo-gun and Gunsan-si. We conducted the survey with a combination of passive 5 minute point-count and vocal survey method (30 seconds call-broadcasting+30 seconds silence) that was targeted eight species 2~7 times/site from March to July 2017. Four species, Brown-cheeked Rail(Rallus indicus), Ruddy-breasted Crake (Porzana fusca), Watercock (Gallicrex cinerea) and Greater Painted-snipe (Rostatula benghalensis), were detected at one site respectively (naïve occupancy rate=0.035). Vocal survey method with conspecific call-broadcasting provided better on Brown-cheeked Rail and Watercock than the others. We suggest a combination of passive point-count and vocal survey method like SNAMBMP to monitor inconspicuous marsh birds at nationwide scale and collection of sound files through recording of the entire process during the survey.

Keyword

참고문헌 (37)

Adamus, P. 1998. Wetland bioassessment fact sheet: bird communities as indicators. Draft report. United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Standards, Washington D.C., USA.
Allen, T., S.L. Finkbeiner and D.H. Johnson. 2004. Comparison of detection rates of breeding marsh birds in passive and playback surveys at Lacreek National Wildlife Refuge, South Dakota. Waterbirds 27: 277-281.

상세보기
Burger, J. 1985. Habitat selection in temperate marsh-nesting birds, p. 253-282. In: Habitat selection in birds (Cody, M. ed.). Academic Press Inc, Florida, USA.
Burnham, K.P. and D.R. Anderson. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd ed. Springer, New York, USA.
Conway, C.J. 1995. Virginia Rail (Rallus limicola). In: The birds of North America. No. 173. (Poole, A., P. Stettenheim and F. Gill, eds.). The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Conway, C.J. and J.P. Gibbs. 2001. Factors influencing detection probabilities and the benefits of call-broadcast surveys for monitoring marsh birds. United States Geological Survey, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, Maryland, USA.
Conway, C.J. 2002. Standardized marsh bird monitoring protocols. United States Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division, Arizona Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Tuscon, Arizona, USA.
Conway, C.J., C. Sulzman and B.E. Raulston. 2004. Factors affecting detection probability of California Black Rails. The Journal of Wildlife Management 68: 360-370.

상세보기
Conway, C.J. and J.P. Gibbs. 2005. Effectiveness of call-broadcast surveys for monitoring marsh birds. The Auk 122: 26-35.

상세보기
Conway, C.J. 2009. Standardized North American Marsh Bird Monitoring Protocols. United States Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division, Arizona Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Tuscon, Arizona, USA.
Conway, C.J. and C.P. Nadeau. 2010. Effects of broadcasting conspecific and heterospecific calls on detection of marsh birds in North America. Wetlands 30: 358-368.

상세보기
Conway, C.J. 2011. Standardized North American Marsh Bird Monitoring Protocol. Waterbirds 34: 319-346.

상세보기
Dahl, T.E. 1990. Wetland losses in the United States 1780s to 1980s. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior, Washington D.C., USA.
Eddleman, W.R., F.L. Knopf, B. Meanley, F.A. Reid and R. Zembal. 1988. Conservation of North American rallids. Wilson Bulletin 100: 458-475.
Fielding, A.H. and P.F. Haworth. 1995. Testing the generality of bird-habitat models. Conservation Biology 9: 1466-1481.

상세보기
Gibbs, J.P. and S.M. Melvin. 1993. Call-response surveys for monitoring breeding waterbirds. Journal of Wildlife Management 52: 27-34.
Gill, F. and D. Donsker. 2019. IOC World Bird List (v9.1). doi: 10.14344/IOC.ML.9.1.
Glahn, J.F. 1974. Study of breeding rails with recorded calls in north-central Colorado. The Wilson Bulletin 86: 206-214.
Jeong, O.S. 2012. Bird survey guideline, p. 431-456. In: The fourth National Natural Environment Survey guideline (Hyun, J., H.R. Na, G. Park, J.W. Kim, H.T. Im, J.M. Hwang, Y.B. Cho, H.B. Song, S.C. Lee, O.S. Jeong and H.S. Oh. eds.). National Institute of Environmental Research, Incheon, Korea.
Jonhson, D.H. 1995. Point counts of birds: What are we estimating? p. 117-124. In: Monitoring bird populations by point counts (Ralph, C.J., J.R. Sauer and S. Droege. eds.). United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-GTR-149. Pacific South-West Research Station, Berkeley, California, USA.
Kerlinger, P. and D.S. Wiedner. 1991. Vocal behavior and habitat use of Black Rails in south Jersey. Records of New Jersey Birds 16: 58-62.
Lee, S.Y. and H.C. Sung. 2018. Application of the specific survey method to detect marsh birds. p. 22. In: 2018 OSK General Meeting and Spring Conference Excerpt Collection (Bing, G.C., Y.M. Yoo and W.S. Choi. eds.). The Ornithological Society of Korea, Daejeon, Korea.
Lewis, C. and D.G. Casagrande. 1997. Using avian communities to evaluate salt marsh restoration, p. 204-236. In: Restoration of an Urban Salt Marsh (Casagrande, D.G. ed.). Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies Bulletin Series 100, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Lor, S. and R.A. Malecki. 2002. Call-response surveys to monitor marsh bird population trends. Wildlife Society Bulletin 30: 1195-1201.

상세보기
Lynch, J. 1995. Effects of point-count duration, time-of-day, and aural stimuli on detectability of migratory and resident bird species in Quintana Roo, Mexico. p. 1-6. In: Monitoring bird populations by point counts (Ralph, C.J., J.R. Sauer and S. Droege. eds.). United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-GTR-149. Pacific South-West Research Station, Berkeley, California, USA.
MacKenzie, D.I., J.D. Nichols, G.B. Lachman, S. Droege, J.A. Royle and C.A. Langtimm. 2002. Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology 83: 2248-2255.

상세보기
Newbold, S. and J.M. Eadie. 2004. Using species-habitat models to target conservation: a case study with breeding Mallards. Ecological Applications 14: 1384-1393.

상세보기
Paine, C.R. 1999. Effectiveness of marsh bird monitoring methods, p. 41-42. In: Proceedings of the Marsh Bird Monitoring Workshop (Ribic, C.A., S.J. Lewis, S. Melvin, J. Bart. and B. Peterjohn. eds.). United States Fish and Wildlife Service Office of Migratory Bird Management, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Rehm, E.M. and G.A. Baldassarre. 2007. Temporal variation in detection of marsh birds during broadcast of conspecific calls. Journal of Field Ornithology 78: 56-63.

상세보기
Royle, J.A. and J.D. Nichols. 2003. Estimating abundance from repeated presence-absence data or point counts. Ecology 84: 777-790.

상세보기
Siegel, R.B., D.F. Desante and M.P. Nott. 2001. Using point counts to establish conservation priorities: how many visits are optimal? Journal of Field Ornithology 72: 228-235.

상세보기
Soehren, E.C., J.W. Tucker and D.G. Crow. 2009. Effectiveness of call-broadcast surveys for breeding marsh birds along coastal Alabama. Southeastern Naturalist 8: 277-293.

상세보기
Sung, H.C., S.K. Kim, S.W. Cheong, S.R. Park, D.C. Roh, K.W. Baek, J.H. Lee and D.S. Park. 2006. Estimating detection probabilities and site occupancy rates of three anuran species using call surveys in Haenam Gun, Korea. Journal of Ecology and Field Biology 29: 331-335.

원문보기 상세보기
Sutherland, W.J. 1995. Why census? p. 1-9. In: Ecological census techniques: a handbook (Sutherland, W.J. ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Tango, P.J., G.D. Therres, D.F. Brinker, M. O'Brien, E.A.T. Blom and H.L. Wierenga. 1997. Breeding distribution and relative abundance of marshbirds in Maryland: evaluation of a tape playback survey method. Final report. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis, USA.
Tiner Jr, R.W. 1984. Wetlands of the United States: Current status and recent trends. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Inventory, Washington D.C., USA.
Wetlands International. 2019. Waterbird Population Estimates. Retrieved from wpe.wetalnds.org on Saturday 2 Feb 2019.

저자의 다른 논문 :

활용도 분석정보

상세보기

다운로드

내보내기

활용도 Top5 논문

해당 논문의 주제분야에서 활용도가 높은 상위 5개 콘텐츠를 보여줍니다.
더보기 버튼을 클릭하시면 더 많은 관련자료를 살펴볼 수 있습니다.

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증