국방무기체계 획득영향요인 상호관계 분석 : 함정획득지연 사례 및 요인 분석을 중심으로 A Methodology for Analyzing on the Correlation of Factors Affecting the Acquisition of Military Weapons Systems : Focused on Factor Analysis of Naval Ship Acquisition Delay Cases원문보기
Naval weapons systems of the Republic of Korea are acquired through the Defense Planning Management System. Recently, acquisition of some naval ships have been delayed, and the causes of the delays have been recognized as inappropriate project management at the Execution Phase. However, we argue tha...
Naval weapons systems of the Republic of Korea are acquired through the Defense Planning Management System. Recently, acquisition of some naval ships have been delayed, and the causes of the delays have been recognized as inappropriate project management at the Execution Phase. However, we argue that the delay problem in naval ships acquisition should be approached, with due regard for the entire Defense Planning Management System. That is, We should try to investigate from Planning Phase to those of Programming, Budgeting and Execution Phases. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the actual cases of the delay in naval acquisition at all phases of the Defense Planning Management System. Based on the investigation, we tried to identify the naval ship Acquisition Delay Factors and find out the Weights of those factors. As the next step, we calculated the Influence Measures on the naval missions, including the Cost of Naval Capability Gap derived from the delays in acquisition of naval ships. As a final step, we calculated the Acquisition Delay Measures based on the interrelationship between the Acquisition Delay Factors and the Influence Measures. Then we evaluated and analyzed what the results stand for. Finally, we made suggestions for future improvement. The improvement suggestions we made for preventing delay in acquisition of naval ships in this study are as follows. First, we need a shift in perception. It is necessary to measure the Acquisition Delay Factors in acquiring naval ships and manage them from the Planning Phase. Second, resolution must be concerted efforts. All relevant agencies, not just a few, should work together to resolve the problems of acquisition delay. Third, analysis must be based on the accumulation of data. This allows the elaborating of naval ship Acquisition Delay Factors and Delay Measures. If this research method is applied to other military weapons systems in the future, we may be able to not just identify the Acquisition Delay Factors in acquisition of other military weapons systems, but also pursue improvement in those cases.
Naval weapons systems of the Republic of Korea are acquired through the Defense Planning Management System. Recently, acquisition of some naval ships have been delayed, and the causes of the delays have been recognized as inappropriate project management at the Execution Phase. However, we argue that the delay problem in naval ships acquisition should be approached, with due regard for the entire Defense Planning Management System. That is, We should try to investigate from Planning Phase to those of Programming, Budgeting and Execution Phases. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the actual cases of the delay in naval acquisition at all phases of the Defense Planning Management System. Based on the investigation, we tried to identify the naval ship Acquisition Delay Factors and find out the Weights of those factors. As the next step, we calculated the Influence Measures on the naval missions, including the Cost of Naval Capability Gap derived from the delays in acquisition of naval ships. As a final step, we calculated the Acquisition Delay Measures based on the interrelationship between the Acquisition Delay Factors and the Influence Measures. Then we evaluated and analyzed what the results stand for. Finally, we made suggestions for future improvement. The improvement suggestions we made for preventing delay in acquisition of naval ships in this study are as follows. First, we need a shift in perception. It is necessary to measure the Acquisition Delay Factors in acquiring naval ships and manage them from the Planning Phase. Second, resolution must be concerted efforts. All relevant agencies, not just a few, should work together to resolve the problems of acquisition delay. Third, analysis must be based on the accumulation of data. This allows the elaborating of naval ship Acquisition Delay Factors and Delay Measures. If this research method is applied to other military weapons systems in the future, we may be able to not just identify the Acquisition Delay Factors in acquisition of other military weapons systems, but also pursue improvement in those cases.
Cho, M.-H. and Choi, B.-W., A Study on Quality Improvement Methodology based on SE and M&S for Navy Ship Acquisition Process, Journal of the Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2012, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 198-213.
Choi et al., A Study on Improving the Acquisition Policy for Naval Ship, Research Report, Hannam University Industry-Academic Collaboration Foundation, 2017.
Choi, S.B., Evaluation on Improving Work of National Defense Capabilities for 10 years and Study on Comprehensive Policy for Defense Acqusition Management System, Research Report, Korea Institute for Defense Analyses, 2017.
Hwang, J.-O., Hur, J.-H., Oh, H.-S., and Choi, B.-W., A Study on Improvement of Naval Ship Acquisition Process, Journal of Military Science and Technology Studies, 2018, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 31-39.
Introduction to Defense Acquisition Program, Defense Acquisition Program Administration, 2008, p. 4.
Jeon et al., A Study on Analyzing the Case of Delivery Delay and Improving the Acquisition Policy for Naval Ships, Research Report, Security Management Institute, 2018.
Jung, Y.-T., Jeong, B.J., Choi, B.-W., and Yim, D.-S., A Methodology for Analyzing Effects of the Cooperative Engagement Capability System Applied to Naval Operations, Journal of Society of Korea Industrial and System Engineering, Vol. 42, No. 1, 2019, pp. 95-105.
Kim et al., A Study on Efficient Test & Evaluation Methods in Naval Ship Acquisitions, Journal of the Korea Institute of Military Science and Technology, 2016, Vol. 19, No. 6, pp. 703-711.
Kim, D.-E., A Study on the Effect of Warship Acquisition System Change on Quality and Delivery Deadline, Journal of The Korea Association of Defense Industry Studies, 2018, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 47-65.
Kim, J.-H. and Kim, S.-C., A Plan for Improving the Naval Ship Acquisition Program Focused on the R&D Procedures, Journal of The Korea Foundry Society, 2011, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 161-184.
Kim, J.-H., A Study on Improving Process for Minimizing the Acquisition Period of Naval Ship, Research Report, Hannam University Industry-Academic Collaboration Foundation, 2011.
Kim, J.-T., Kim, I.-K., and Jung, S., A Study on New Relationship Between DAPA and Navy for Ship's Design and Constructing Work, Research Report, Korea Institute for Defense Analyses, 2007.
Lee, O.-K., An Empirical Study on the Relationship of Success Factors and Requirements Management Factors in Project for Improvement of Defense Capability, [dissertation], [Seoul, Korea] : Kwangwoon University, 2011.
Naval Ship Program Management Guide Book, Defense Acquisition Program Administration, 2016, pp. 20-21.
Order of Defense Planning Management, Ministry of National Defense, 2017.
Saaty, T.L., How to make a decision; The Analytic Hierarchy Process, Interfaces, Vol. 24, No. 6, 1994, pp. 19-43.
Shin, J.-H., A Study on the Improvement of Naval Ship Research and Development Program under Changing Acquisition Environment, [dissertation], [Chanwon, Korea] : Kyungnam University, 2014.
Shin, S.-W., Oh, C.-K., Yim, D.-S., and Choi, B.-W., Economical & Technological Ripple Effects in Acquiring New Weapon System : Focused on Ground, Sea, Air Weapon System, Journal of Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, Vol. 41, No. 4, 2018, pp. 111-122.
AI-Helper
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.