참고문헌 (28)

1. Baek S. J., Choi Y. G., Zeno' Paradox from the Paradigms of Standard Analysis and Nonstandard Analysis, School Mathematics 20(2) (2018), 307-318. 

   상세보기

2. Baek S. J., Choi Y. G., A Historical and Mathematical Study on Continuum - Focusing on the Composition and Infinite Division-, Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics 30(4) (2020), 575-599. 

   상세보기

3. J. L. Bell, The Continuous and the Infinitesimal in Mathematics and Philosophy, Polimetrica, 2005. 

4. M. Black, Achilles and the Tortoise, Analysis 11(5) (1951), 91-101. 

   상세보기

5. P. Blszczyk, M. G. Katz, D. Sherry, Ten Misconceptions from the History of Analysis and Their Debunking, Foundations of Science 18(1) (2013), 43-74. 

   상세보기

6. F. Cajori, The Purpose of Zeno's Arguments on Motion, Isis 3(1) (1920), 7-20. 

   상세보기

7. B. Dainton, Time and Space, Acumen, 2010. 

8. R. Ely, Student Obstacles and Historical Obstacles to Foundational Concepts of Calculus, Dissertation of the Doctor of Philosophy in the University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2007. 

9. Go S. E. et al., High School Textbook of Calculus. Sinsago, 2019. 

10. Han D. H., Zeno's Re-examination, School Mathematics 2(1) (2000), 243-257. 

11. T. L. Heath, The Thirteen Books of Euclid's Elements, Cambridge University Press, 1956. 이무현 역, 기하학 원론-평면기하, 교우사, 1998. 

12. Hwang S. W. et al., High School Textbook of Calculus, Mirae-n, 2019. 

13. H. J. Keisler, Foundations of infinitesimal calculus, 2009, http://www.enzoexposito.it/Analisi_Non_Standard/Keisler_Elementary_Calculus_Foundations.pdf(Jan. 10. 2019). 

14. P. Kitcher, The Nature of Mathematical Knowledge, Oxford University Press, 1984. 

15. Lee D. G., A Study on the Students' Process of Solving Zeno' Paradox Task(Half Paradox and Achilles Paradox) Based on the Analysis of Students's Expressions, School Mathematics 21(2) (2019), 391-417. 

    상세보기

16. Lee J. Y. et al, High School Textbook of Calculus, Chunjae Education, 2019. 

17. G. Longo, The Mathematical Continuum, from Intuition to Logic, In Naturalizing Phenomenology: Issues in Comtemporary Phenomenology and Cognitive Sciences (J. Petitot, F. J. Varela, B. Pachoud, J. Roy eds.), Stanford University Press, 1999. 

18. W. I. McLaughlin, S. L. Miller, An Epistemological Use of Nonstandard Analysis to Answer Zeno's Objections against Motion, Synthese 92(3) (1992), 371-384. 

    상세보기

19. National Institute of Korean Language, Standard Korean Language Dictionary, https://stdict.korean.go.kr/search/searchView.do?word_no452458&searchKeywordTo3 (Dec,.15.2020). 

20. W. C. Salmon, Space, Time, and Motion: A Philosophical Introduction, University of Minnesota Press, 1980. 

21. W. C. Salmon, Zeno's Paradoxes, Hackett Publishing Company, 2001. 

22. A. Sfard, Mathematical Practices, Anomalies and Classroom Communications Problems., In Constructing Mathematical Knowledge: Epistemology and Mathematics Education (P. Ernest, ed.), The Falmer Press, 1994, 248-273. 

23. S. Shapiro, Philosophy of Mathematics: Structure and Ontology, Oxford University Press, 1997. 

24. H. Stein, Logos, Logic, and Logistike: Some Philosophical Remarks on Nineteenth-Century Transformation of Mathematics., In History and Philosophy of Modern Mathematics (W. Aspray, & P, Kitcher ed.), University of Minnesota Press, 238-259. 1988. 

25. D. Tall, Mathecatical Intuition, with Special Reference to Limiting Processes, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Berkeley, 1980, 170-176. 

26. D. Tall, Advanced Mathematical Thinking, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991. 류희찬, 조완영, 김인수 역, 고등수학적 사고, 경문사, 2003. 

27. J. F. Thomson, Tasks and Super-tasks, Analysis 15(1) (1954) 1-13. 

    상세보기

28. H. Weyl, The Continuum: a Critical Examination of the Foundation of Analysis, Courier Corporation, 1994.