최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기정보관리학회지 = Journal of the Korean society for information management, v.37 no.1, 2020년, pp.127 - 151
원종삼 (대법원 법원도서관) , 이지연 (연세대학교 문헌정보학과)
법률에 대한 최종 해석 권한은 법원에 있다. 법원은 개인과 개인의 분쟁, 개인과 국가 사이의 법률적 다툼에 대하여 최종적인 판단을 내린다. 사건의 당사자나 대리인들은 쟁점사항에 대하여 같은 법조문을 놓고 다른 법률해석을 주장하더라도, 궁극적으로 서로 다른 법률해석은 통일된 방향으로 변화되어야 한다. 주석서의 견해에 대하여 법률가들이 다양한 의견을 나누고 새로운 법령, 판례, 법이론 등을 확인하는 과정을 통해 법률해석에 통일을 이룰 수 있다. 법률가가 재판업무 및 법학연구를 위하여 주석서를 활용하는 과정에서 최신의 법령과 판례, 법이론의 현재와 법률가의 다양한 의견을 추가하여 활용할 수 있는 방안을 제안하였다.
The court has the responsibility to determine the final interpretation of the law. The court hands down final decisions on personal disputes and conflicts between individuals and the state. Legal commentaries will stay true to their intention of providing diverse legal theories and enabling a unifie...
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
핵심어 | 질문 | 논문에서 추출한 답변 |
---|---|---|
정보행태란? | 정보행태(information behavior)는 정보추구를 포함하는 개념이며 능동적 및 수동적 정보추구와 정보이용을 포함하여 정보자원이나 정보매체를 이용하는 것과 관련된 인간의 총체적 행태이다. 따라서 정보행태에는 타인과의 면대면 의사소통뿐만 아니라 텔레비전 광고를 시청하는 것과 같이 주어진 정보를 활용하고자 하는 의도 없이 정보를 수동적으로 수용하는 것도 포함된다(Wilson, 2000). | |
개정판이 간행되기 전까지의 주석서의 문제점은? | 주석서는 개정판이 간행되기 전까지 새로운 국내외 법령, 판례, 법이론을 확인 할 수 없어 해당 도서나 논문을 검색하여야 하고 온라인으로 제공되지 않아 개정내용과 해석 그리고 법률가의 다양한 의견을 파악할 수 없다. | |
오프라인으로 작업이 어려운 재판업무와 법학연구를 위하여 필요한 서비스는? | 하지만 인쇄물 등 오프라인에서는 이와 같은 작업이 어려운 현실이다. 따라서 법률가인 법관, 검사, 변호사, 법학자가 온라인상에서 법률해석에 따른 다양한 의견을 나눌 수 있는 집단지성 형태의 주석서에 대한 법률정보 서비스가 필요하다. |
Kang, Min-Koo (2003). Unified Court - The 21st century open trial court with judicial information. Seoul: Pakyoungsa.
Kwak, Yoon-Jik (1992). Civil law commentary(1). Seoul: Pakyoungsa.
Kim, Kwang-Jin (1996). A study on the user behavior of legal information by legal practitioners. Graduate School of Sung Kyun Kwan University, Department of Library & Information Science.
Kim, Na-Won, & Park, Ji-Hong (2009). Exploring medical doctors' medical information seeking behaviors. Journal of Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 26(3), 435-449. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2009.26.3.435
Kim, Nam-Hee (2009). A study on service model of law library based on library 2.0. Graduate School of Information Science Soongsil University, Department of Knowledge Management.
Kim, Min-Gyu (2013). A study on information use attitudes of legal information service users. Graduate School of Chung-Ang University, Department of Library and Information Science.
Kim, Jung-Suk (2010). Studying law school students' information search process related to schoolwork. Sung kyun kwan University, Library and Information Science.
Kim, Zeung-Han (1973). (Theory?Case) Civil law commentary(1). Seoul: Korea Institute Judicial Administrative.
Kim, Ji-Hyun (2015). A study on the lawyer's legal information seeking behaviors for the law practice. The Graduate School Hansung University, Major in Library and Information Science, Deparment of Library and Information Science.
Kim, Hwang-Woo (2012). A study of the information seeking behaviors of law school students. The Graduate School, Chonbuk National University, Department of Library and Information Science.
Moon, Yong-Ho (1998). Informatization and its impact on Judicial Practice (The present status and the future views about search for legal informations). Judicial Materials, 79, 303-304.
Lee, Jee-Yeon (2006). An overview of developing & applying information use behavior models. Proceedings of the 13th Conference of Korean Society for Information Management, 5-10.
Jun, Gyung-Gun (2004). Lectures on the law information. Seoul: Pakyoungsa.
Jong, Sang-Jo (2007). Copyright law commentary. Seoul: Pakyoungsa.
Jong, Sang-Jo, & Park Seong Soo (2010). Patent law commentary. Seoul: Pakyoungsa.
Ju, Min-Ji (2013). Information needs and information-seeking behaviors of law school students. The Graduate School Yonsei University, Department of Library and Information Science.
Choi, Mi-soon (2007). A review of the research trends on the information seeking behavior of legal professionals. DOSEOGWAN, 62(2), 25-30.
Han, Seung-Hee, & Lee Jee Yeon (2006). Searching behavior of scientists and technologists based on their information needs. Proceedings of the 13th Conference of Korean Society for Information Management, 17-22.
Chancellor, R. (2010). Legal information seeking in a time-constrained environment: A conceptual model for lawyers. International Journal of Legal Information, 38(3), 282-294. https//doi:10.1017/S0731126500005886
Chancellor, R. (2015). Getting it from the source: What librarians think about lawyer search behavior. Law Library Journal, 107(2), 287-295.
Choo. (1998). The knowing organization: How organizations use information to construct meaning, create knowledge, and make decisions. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cole, C., Carol C. Kuhlthau. (2000). Information and information seeking of novice versus expert lawyers: How experts and value. The New Review of Information Behaviour Research, 1, 103-116.
Ellis, D. (1989). A behavioral model for information retrieval system design. Journal of Information Science, 15(4-5), 237-247.
Hainsworth, Melody May (1992). Information-seeking behavior of judge of the florida district courts of appeal. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The Florida State University, USA.
Hong, M. J. (1997). Information needs and research behavior of legal professionals in Korea. Annual Review of Library and Information Science, 26, 291-331.
Leckie, Gloria J., Pettigrew, Karen E., & Sylvain, Christian (1996). Modeling the information seeking of professionals: A general model derived from research on engineers, health care professionals, and lawyers. The Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy, 66(2), 180. https://doi.org/10.1086/602864
Makri, S. (2008). A study of lawyers' information behaviour leading to the development of two methods for evaluating electronic resources. Unpublished Doctoral thesis, University College London. Retrieved from https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/2337/1/MakriPhD.pdf
Makri, S., Blandford, A., & Cox, A. L. (2008). Investigating the information-seeking behaviour of academic lawyers: From ellis’s model to design. Information Processing & Management, 44(2), 613-634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2007.05.001
Otike, Japhet (1999). The information needs and seeking habits of lawyers in england: A pilot study. The International Information & Library Review, 31(1), 19-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.1999.10762486
Rai, P. (2013). Information seeking behavior of legal researcher towards use of electronic legal resource: a study. Proceedings of the 9th International CALIBER, INFLIBNET Centre, Gandhinagar, March 21-23, 62-73.
Solomon, Y., Bronstein, J. (2016). Serendipity in legal information seeking behavior, Aslib Journal of Information Management, 68(1), 112-134. https://doi.org/10.1108/ajim-04-2015-0056
Sutton, S. (1994). The role of attorney mental models of law in case relevance determinations: an exploratory analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45, 186-200.
Thanuskodi, S. (2009). Information-seeking behaviour of law faculty at central law college, salem. Library Philosophy and Practice. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/282
Vale, M. E. (1988). Information structure and the information seeking behavior of lawyers. Unpublished Doctoral disseration, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Wilkinson, M. A. (2001). Information sources used by lawyers in problem-solving: An empirical exploration. Library & Information Science Research, 23, 257-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0740-8188(01)00082-2
Wilson, T. D. (2000). Human information behavior. Information Science, 3(2), 49-55. https://doi.org/10.28945/576
Winter, S. (2008). Law firm libraries in the 21st century. Legal Information Management, 8(1), 28-31. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1472669608000066
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.