최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기環境復元綠化 = Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, v.23 no.1, 2020년, pp.49 - 62
심윤진 ((주)그룹한 어소시에이트 연구소) , 김선령 (국립생태원 멸종위기종복원센터) , 윤광배 (국립생태원 멸종위기종복원센터) , 정진우 (국립생태원 멸종위기종복원센터) , 박선욱 (국립생태원 멸종위기종복원센터) , 박용수 (국립생태원 멸종위기종복원센터)
This study was conducted as a basic study to develop the HSI(Habitat Suitability Index) model of Pelophylax chosenicus based on the research on the ecological and habitat status of Pelophylax chosenicus and the literature research on the HSI model. The habitat variables of Pelophylax chosenicus are ...
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
핵심어 | 질문 | 논문에서 추출한 답변 |
---|---|---|
양서류가 중요한 분류군으로 간주되고 있는 이유는 무엇인가? | 그러나 최근 급격한 기후변화와 서식지 파괴로 인한 개체수 감소에 따라 양서류는 전 세계적으로 멸종될 위험에 처해 있는 중요한 분류군으로 간주되고 있다(Wake and Vredenburg,2008). | |
양서류란 무엇인가? | 양서류는 생태계의 건강성을 평가할 수 있는유용한 생물지표 종이며(Vitt et al., 1990; | |
서식지 적합성 지수 사용의 장점은 무엇인가? | , 2017). 서식지에 영향을 줄 수 있는서식지의 질을 대변하는 환경 요소들을 정량화함으로써 연구지역의 환경을 정량적으로 평가및 예측할 수 있으며, 주관적 판단이나 타당성이 없는 가정을 배제한 비교적 객관적인 평가를가능하게 하는 장점을 지닌다(Gibson et al.,2004). 또한 구성요소와 변수에 따른 기준 도출을 통해 특정 생물종의 서식을 위한 요구조건을제시할 수 있으며 이를 통해 서식지 모형을 제시할 수 있는 근거가 된다(Shim et al., 2014). |
Cheong SW. HC Sung. DS Park and SR Park. 2009. Population Viability Analysis of a Gold-spotted Pond Frog(Rana chosenica) Population: Implications for Effective Conservation and Re-introduction. Korean J. Environ. Biol. 27(1) : 73-81. (in Korean with English summary)
Cho GY. 2017. A Study on the Restoration Model for "Bufo gargarizans" Habitat Using HSI (Habitat Suitability Index): Focused On Wonheung-ee Small Reservoirs Replacement Habitat. Master's Thesis, Sangmyung University. (in Korean with English summary)
ChungNam Institute(CNI). 2015. Habitat Evaluation Procedures Manual. Paju: Hanul Publishing Group. (in Korean)
Gascon, C. 2007. Amphibian conservation action plan: proceedings IUCN/SSC Amphibian Conservation Summit 2005. IUCN.
Gibson, L. A.. B. A. Wilson. D. M. Cahill and J. Hill. 2004. Modelling habitat suitability of the swamp antechinus (Antechinus minimus maritimus) in the coastal heathlands of southern Victoria, Australia, Biological Conservation. 117(2) : 143-150.
Graves, B. M. and S. H. Anderson. 1987. Habitat suitability index models: bullfrog. Research report to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 82/10.138.
Heyer, W. R.. M. A. Donnelly. R. W. McDiarmid. L. A. C. Hayek and M. S. Foster. 1994. Measuring and monitoring biological diversity: Standard methods for amphibians. Washington and London: Smithsonian Institution Press. pp. 1-15.
Kei, N.. J. i. Shiraiwa and S. Kazama. 2011. Evaluation of seasonal habitat variations of fresh water fishes, fireflies, and frogs using a habitat suitability index model that includes river water temperature. Journal of Ecological Modelling 222(21) : 3718-3726.
Kim SR. JH Lee. JY Song. MH Chang. HC Sung and DG Cho. 2013. A Study on the Habitat Restoration Model for Chinemys reevesii. J. Korea Env. Res. Tech. 16(2) : 115-125. (in Korean with English summary)
Lee SC. 2004. Study on In-situ and Ex-situ, and Restoration Strategy Planning for the Protected Wildlife Anura (Rana plancyi chosenica Okada) in Korea. Master's Thesis, University of Incheon. (in Korean with English summary)
Matsui, M. 2004. Pelophylax chosenicus. In: IUCN 2010. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2010.1.
Min MS. SK Park. J Che. DS Park and H Lee. 2008. Genetic Diversity among Local Populations of the Gold-spotted Pond Frog, Rana plancyi chosenica(Amphibia: Ranidae), Assessed by Mitochondrial Cytochrome b Gene and Control Region Sequences. Korean journal of systematic zoology 24(1) : 25-32.
National Institute of Biolocgical Resources (NIBR). 2018. Endangered species at a glance. (in Korean)
National Institute of Ecology(NIE). 2018. Guidelines for Creating Alternative Habitats of Pelophylax chosenicus. (in Korean)
Oldham, R. S.. J. Keeble. M. J. S. Swan and M. Jeffcote. 2000. Evaluating the suitability of habitat for the great crested newt (Triturus cristatus). Herpetological Journal, 10(4) : 143-156.
Park HR. KS Koo. SM Park. HJ Kang. JH Choi and HC Sung. 2019. Move Distance and Home Range of American Bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus). Proceedings of the Korean Society of Herpetologists Conference 12 : 13. (in Korean)
Ra NY. 2010. Habitat and Behavioral Characteristics, Captive Breeding and Recovery Strategy of the Endangered Gold-Spotted Pond Frog(Rana plancyi chosenica). Ph.D dissertation, Kangwon National University. (in Korean with English summary)
Ra NY. JH Lee and DS Park. 2007. Growth of Golden Frog Larvae, Rana plancyi chosencia by Different Food Tyoes. Korean J. Environ. Biol. 25(1) : 8-15. (in Korean with English summary)
Shim YJ. 2004. A study on the site selection of wetland replacement using Korean redfrog (Runa amurensis coreana Okada) habitat suitability index: focusing on Pangyo residential development site. Master's Thesis, Seoul National University. (in Korean with English summary)
Shim YJ. DG Cho. S Park. DJ Lee. YH Seo. SH Kim. DH Kim. SB Ko. JY Cha and HC Sung. 2014. Development of Habitat Suitability Index for Habitat Restoration of Narrow-mouth Frog(Kaloula borealis). J. Korea Env. Res. Tech. 17(2) : 109-123. (in Korean with English summary)
Shim YJ. DG Cho. JP Hong. DH Kim. YS Park and HC Sung. 2015. Site Selection of Narrow-mouth Frog(Kaloula borealis) Habitat Restoration Using Habitat Suitability Index. J. Korean Env. Res. Tech. 18(2) : 33-44. (in Korean with English summary)
Sung HC. SM Cha. SK Cheong. DS Park and SR Park. 2007a. Monitoring local populations and breeding migration patterns of the Gold-spotted Pond Frog, Rana plancyi chosenica. Journal of Ecology and Field Biology 30(2) : 121-126.
Sung HC. SM Cha. SK Kim. DS Park. SR Park and SK Cheong. 2007b. Monitoring extensive breeding populations and daily call activity of the gold-spotted pond frog, Rana plancyi chosenica in Chungju City and Chungwon Gun. Korean Journal of Environmental Biology 25(2) : 94-99. (in Korean with English summary)
Tole, L. 2006. Choosing reserve sites probabilistically: A Colombian Amazon case study. Journal of Ecological Modelling 194(4) : 344-356.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1980. Habitat as a basis for environmental assessment. Ecological Services Manual, 101.
Vitt, L. J.. J. P. Caldwell. H. M. Wilbur and D. C. Smith. 1990. Amphibians as harbingers of decay. BioScience 40 : 418.
Wake, D. B. and V. T. Vredenburg. 2008. Are we in the midst of the sixth mass extinction? A view from the world of amphibians. Proceedings of the National Academy Sciences of United States America 105(1) : 11466-11473.
Wyman R. L. 1990. What's happening to the amphibians? Conservation Biology. 4 : 350-352.
Yang SY. 1978. Check list of Korean amphibians. Inha University IIR(5) : 81-90. (in Korean)
Yang SY. JB Kim. MS Min and JH Suh. 1999. Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Two Korean Pond Frog Species, Rana nigromaculata and R. plancyi (Anura, Ranidae), with a Survey of Temporal Genetic Variation in R. nigromaculata. Korean journal of biological sciences 3(3) : 275-284. (in Korean with English summary)
Yang SY. JB Kim. MS Min. JH Suh and YJ Kang. 2001. Monograph of Korean amphibia. Academy Book, Seoul, South Korea. Homepage of the Korean DAPTF.
Yoon IB. JI Kim and SY Yang. 1998. Study on the food hatibs of Rana nigromaculata Hallowell and Rana plancyi chosenica Okada(Salientia;Ranidae) in Korea. Korean Journal of Environmental Biology 16(2) : 69-76. (in Korean with English summary)
http://map.ngii.go.kr
https://egis.me.go.kr
https://soil.rda.go.kr
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.