[논문]SGA에서 매수인의 계약해제권에 관한 연구: CISG와의 비교를 중심으로

민주희

doi:10.32599/apjb.11.3.202009.273

SGA에서 매수인의 계약해제권에 관한 연구: CISG와의 비교를 중심으로
A Comparative Study on the Right to Avoid the Contract of the Buyer under SGA and CISG 원문보기

Asia-Pacific journal of business = 아태비즈니스연구, v.11 no.3, 2020년, pp.273 - 290

민주희 (강원대학교 국제무역학과)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the buyer's right to avoid the contract under SGA and CISG. Design/methodology/approach - This paper has conducted literature reviews to analyze the right to avoid the contract of the buyer based on the comparative study. Findings - Under s. 11(3) of SGA, the breach of a condition and an intermediate which deprives the buyer substantially of the whole benefit of the contract may give rise to a right to treat the contract as repudiated. But under Art. 49 of CISG, the buyer has the right to terminate the contract where the seller's failure to performance amounts to a fundamental breach of contract. Regarding the breach of an intermediate and the breach under CISG, the buyer should take into account where the seller's breach is fundamental or not. Moreover, an anticipatory breach can give rise to a right to avoid the contract. The anticipatory breach of a condition justifies termination. The breach of an intermediate and the breach under CISG require an anticipatory fundamental breach of the contract. Under SGA, the buyer has to prove an anticipatory breach in fact but CISG does not require virtual certainty, which SGA has stricter criteria to assess an anticipatory breach. Research implications or Originality - Comparative study helps to understand the nature of provisions under SGA and CISG and suggests practical advice to choose applicable laws. SGA gives more certainty to classify a contractual term. In case of the breach of a condition including the anticipatory breach under SGA, the buyer does not have to ask how much serious the breach is. But CISG requires the fundamental breach of the contract, which means that the buyer has the more burden of proof compared with SGA.

주제어

참고문헌 (21)

Atiyah P. S., J. N. Adams and H. MacQueen (2010), Atiyah's Sale of Goods, Edinburgh, UK: Pearson.
Beal H. G., W. Bishop and M. P. Furmston (2007), Contract Case and Materials, Oxofrd, UK: Oxford University Press.
Beatson J., A. Burrows and J. Cartwright (2016), Anson's Law of Contract, Oxofrd, UK: Oxford University Press.
Bridge M. (2010), Benjamin's Sale of Goods, London, UK: Sweet and Maxwell.
Cartwright J. (2013), Contract Law: An Introduction to the English Law of Contract for the Civil Lawyer, Oxofrd, UK: Hart Publishihg.
Graffi L. (2003), "Case Law on the Concept "Fundamental Breach" in the Vienna Sales Convention", International Business Law Journal, 3, 338-349.
Guest A. G. (1994), Chitty on Contracts, London, UK: Sweet and Maxwell.
Heo Hai-Kwan (2009), "Inncent Party's Countermeasures under CISG against the Other Party's Anticipatory Breach of Contract", Korea Trade Review, 34(2), 91-115.
Honnold J. O. (2009), Uniform Law for International Sales under the 1980 United Nations Convention, Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherland: Wolters Kluwer.
Kroll, S., L. Mistelis and Viscasillas, P. P. (2018), UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG), Munchen, Germany: C.H.Beck.Hart.Nomos.
Lookofsky J. (2017), Understanding the CISG, Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherland: Wolters Kluwer.
Mankowski, P. (2019), Commercial Law, Munchen, Germany: C.H.Beck.Hart.Nomos.
Mckendrick, E. (2012), Contract law: Text, Cases and Materials, Oxofrd, UK: Oxford University Press.
Mckendrick, E. (2016), Goode on Commercial Law, London, UK: Penguin Books.
Min Joo-Hee (2014), "A Study on the Buyer's Remedies in Respect of Defects in Title under CISG", The International Commerce and Law Review, 61, 3-28.
Min Joo-Hee (2016), "A Study on the Right of the Suspension of Performance under SGA", Korea Trade Review, 41(5), 187-211.
Peacock D. (2003), "Avoidance and the Notion of Fundamental Breach under the CISG: An English Perspective", International Trade & Business Law, 8, 95-133.
Peel E. (2007), Treitel on The Law of Contract, London, UK: Sweet and Maxwell.
Schwenzer I. (2016), Commentary on the UN Convention on the International Sale of Goods(CISG), Oxofrd, UK: Oxford University Press.
Seok, Kwang-Hyun (2010), Law of International Sales Contract of Goods, Seoul, Korea: Parkyoungsa.
UNCITRAL (2016), Digest of Case Law on the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, Vienna, Austria: UNCITRAL.

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증

SGA에서 매수인의 계약해제권에 관한 연구: CISG와의 비교를 중심으로
A Comparative Study on the Right to Avoid the Contract of the Buyer under SGA and CISG 원문보기

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

주제어

참고문헌 (21)

이 논문을 인용한 문헌

관련 콘텐츠

원문 보기

원문 URL 링크

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트

연합인증

SGA에서 매수인의 계약해제권에 관한 연구: CISG와의 비교를 중심으로 A Comparative Study on the Right to Avoid the Contract of the Buyer under SGA and CISG 원문보기

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

주제어

참고문헌 (21)

이 논문을 인용한 문헌

관련 콘텐츠

원문 보기

원문 URL 링크

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트

SGA에서 매수인의 계약해제권에 관한 연구: CISG와의 비교를 중심으로
A Comparative Study on the Right to Avoid the Contract of the Buyer under SGA and CISG 원문보기