$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

Risk-informed approach to the safety improvement of the reactor protection system of the AGN-201K research reactor 원문보기

Nuclear engineering and technology : an international journal of the Korean Nuclear Society, v.52 no.4, 2020년, pp.764 - 775  

Ahmed, Ibrahim (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Kyung Hee University) ,  Zio, Enrico (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Kyung Hee University) ,  Heo, Gyunyoung (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Kyung Hee University)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Periodic safety reviews (PSRs) are conducted on operating nuclear power plants (NPPs) and have been mandated also for research reactors in Korea, in response to the Fukushima accident. One safety review tool, the probabilistic safety assessment (PSA), aims to identify weaknesses in the design and op...

주제어

참고문헌 (38)

  1. International Atomic Energy Agency, Periodic Safety Review for Nuclear Power Plants, IAEA Safety Standards, Specific Safety Guide No. SSG-25, Vienna, Austria, 2013. 

  2. US Nuclear Regulatory Commision, PRA Procedures Guide: A Guide to the Performance of Probabilistic Risk Assessments for Nuclear, Power Plants, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG/CR-2300, 1983. 

  3. T.L. Chu, G. Martinez-Guridi, M. Yue, J. Lehner, P. Samanta, Traditional Probabilistic Risk Assessment Methods for Digital Systems, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG/CR-6962, 2008. 

  4. T.D. Le Duy, D. Vasseur, A practical methodology for modeling and estimation of common cause failure parameters in multi-unit nuclear PSA model, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 170 (2018) 159-174. 

  5. T. Hakata, Seismic PSA method for multiple nuclear power plants in a site, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 92 (2007) 883-894. 

  6. H. Kim, J.T. Kim, G. Heo, Failure rate updates using condition-based prognostics in probabilistic safety assessments, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 175 (2018) 225-233. 

  7. W.E. Vesely, Principles of resource-effectiveness and regulatory-effectiveness for risk-informed applications: reducing burdens by improving effectiveness, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 63 (1999) 283-292. 

  8. M.J. Delaney, G.E. Apostolakis, M.J. Driscoll, Risk-informed design guidance for future reactor systems, Nucl. Eng. Des. 235 (2005) 1537-1556. 

  9. W.E. Vesely, G.E. Apostalakis, Developments in risk-informed decision-making for nuclear power plants, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 63 (1999) 223-224. 

  10. Y. Mizuno, H. Ninokata, D.J. Finnicum, Risk-informed design of IRIS using a level-1 probabilistic risk assessment from its conceptual design phase, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 87 (2005) 201-209. 

  11. K.N. Fleming, Issues and Recommendations for Advancement of PRA Technology in Risk-Informed Decision Making, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG/CR-6813, 2003. 

  12. J.Y. Oh, S.W. Hwang, Risk-informed approach for design optimization during low power and shutdown operation, Ann. Nucl. Energy 130 (2019) 293-300. 

  13. R. Khalil Ur, G. Heo, Risk informed design of I&C architecture for research reactors, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 62 (2015) 293-299. 

  14. International Atomic Energy Agency, Safety of Research Reactors, IAEA Safety Standards Series: Specific Safety Requirements No. SSR-3, 2016. Vienna, Austria. 

  15. International Atomic Energy Agency, Safety of Nuclear Power Plants: Design, IAEA Safety Standards Series: Specific Safety Requirements No. SSR-2/1 (Rev. 1), 2016. Vienna, Austria. 

  16. K.U. Rahman, K. Jin, G. Heo, Risk-informed design of hybrid I&C architectures for research reactors, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 63 (2016) 351-358. 

  17. M.-H. Kim, Utilization of AGN-201K for education and research in Korea, in: Res. React. Fuel Manag. Trans., 2011. Rome, Italy. 

  18. Z.W. Birnbaum, On the importance of different components in a multicomponent system, Multivar. Anal. 2 (1968). 

  19. W.E. Vesely, T.C. Davis, R.S. Denning, N. Saltos, Measures of risk importance and their applications, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG/CR (United States. Nucl. Regul. Comm.) 3385 (1983). 

  20. M.C. Cheok, G.W. Parry, R.R. Sherry, Use of importance measures in riskinformed regulatory applications, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 60 (1998) 213-226. 

  21. J.G. Cho, B.J. Yum, Development and evaluation of an uncertainty importance measure in fault tree analysis, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 57 (1997) 143-157. 

  22. M. Van Der Borst, H. Schoonakker, An overview of PSA importance measures, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 72 (2001) 241-245. 

  23. M. Modarres, M. Agarwal, Consideration of probabilistic uncertainty in riskbased importance ranking, in: Proc. PSA '96, ANS, 1996. 

  24. S.H. Han, H.-G. Lim, S.-C. Jang, J.-E. Yang, AIMS-psa: a software for integrated PSA, in: 13th Int. Conf. Probabilistic Saf. Assess. Manag., PSAM 13), Seoul, Korea, 2016. 

  25. M.-H. Kim, Reactor upgrade of AGN-201 in KHU, Korea, in: Res. React. Fuel Manag. Trans., 2008. Hamburg, Germany. 

  26. International Atomic Energy Agency, Manual on Reliability Data Collection for Research Reactor PSAs, IAEA-TECDOC-636, Vienna, Austria, 1992. 

  27. I. Ahmed, G. Heo, Preliminary unavailability analysis OF shutdown system for AGN-201K research reactor, in: Res. React. Fuel Manag. Trans., Dead-Sea, Jordan, 2019. 

  28. International Atomic Energy Agency, Generic Component Reliability Data for Research Reactor PSA, IAEA-TECDOC-930, Vienna, Austria, 1997. 

  29. B.J. Garrick, W.C. Gekler, L. Goldfisher, R.H. Karcher, B. Shimizu, J.H. Wilson, Reliability Analysis of Nuclear Power Plant Protective Systems, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, NH-190, 1967. 

  30. N.A. Walter, P.M. Watson, Component Failure Rates and Their Role in Reliability Prediction, Technical report TR-71-31, 1971. 

  31. International Atomic Energy Agency, Component Reliability Data for Use in Probabilistic Safety Assessment, IAEA-TECDOC-478, Vienna, Austria, 1988. 

  32. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, CCF parameter estimations, 2015 update. http://nrcoe.inel.gov/resultsdb/ParamEstSpar/, 2016. 

  33. A.D. Swain, Accident Sequence Evaluation Program: Human Reliability Analysis Procedure, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG/CR-4772, 1987. 

  34. A.D. Sawin, H.E. Guttmann, Handbook of Human Reliability Analysis With Emphasis on Nuclear Power Plant Applications, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG/CR (United States. Nucl. Regul. Comm.)1278, 1983. 

  35. Exida, IEC 61508 Overview Report: A Summary of the Iec 61508 Standard For Functional Safety of Electrical/Electronic/Programmable Electronic Safety-Related Systems, Exida, Sellersville, PA 18960, USA, 2006. http://www.win.tue.nl/-mvdbrand/courses/sse/1213/iec61508_overview.pdf. (Accessed 5 May 2019). 

  36. J.L. Bergstrom, An Overview of ISA 84 Standard for Safety Instrumented Systems (SIS) and the Safety Life Cycle, Process Eng. Assoc. LLC, 2015, in: http://www.processengr.com/ppt_presentations/safety_lifecycle_training_2015.pdf. (Accessed 5 May 2019). 

  37. J.C. Whitaker, Power Vacuum Tubes Handbook, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, New York, 1994. 

  38. J.-K. Lee, K.-I. Jeong, G.-O. Park, K.-Y. Sohn, A Quantitative reliability analysis of FPGA-based controller for applying to nuclear instrumentation and control system, J. Korea Inst. Electron. Commun. Sci. 9 (2014) 1117-1123. 

LOADING...

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

GOLD

오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로