$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

[국내논문] 그린뉴딜 시대의 유역 생태계 관리: 생태계서비스를 중심으로
Watershed ecosystem management in the Green New Deal era: focusing on ecosystem services 원문보기

물과 미래 : 한국수자원학회지 = Water for future, v.53 no.6, 2020년, pp.6 - 23  

천정윤 (한국환경정책.평가연구원 물국토연구본부 자연환경연구실) ,  박윤선 (한국환경정책.평가연구원 물국토연구본부 자연환경연구실) ,  차은지 (한국환경정책.평가연구원 물국토연구본부 자연환경연구실) ,  김준성 (한국환경정책.평가연구원 물국토연구본부 자연환경연구실) ,  홍현정 (한국환경정책.평가연구원 물국토연구본부 자연환경연구실) ,  김충기 (한국환경정책.평가연구원 물국토연구본부 자연환경연구실)

초록이 없습니다.

주제어

참고문헌 (49)

  1. Yoon, J. Y., 2020, Development Direction of Korean New Deal: The Green New Deal, KEI Environmental Forum, 2020.5.28. Seoul, Korea. pp. 1-20. 

  2. Lee, J. H., 2007, Vision and Policy Direction of Water Environmental Policy, Bulletin of Korea environmental preservation association, 29(367), 8-11. 

  3. Lee, C.H. et al. (2016) An Integrated Approach to Environmental Valuation via Impact Pathway Analysis, Korea Environment Institute. 

  4. Ahn, S.E. et al. (2017) An Integrated Approach to Environmental Valuation via Impact Pathway Analysis, Korea Environment Institute. 

  5. Ahn, S.E. et al. (2018) An Integrated Approach to Environmental Valuation via Impact Pathway Analysis, Korea Environment Institute. 

  6. Kim, H.N. et al. (2019) An Integrated Approach to Environmental Valuation via Impact Pathway Analysis, Korea Environment Institute. 

  7. Ministry of Environment. (2018) Ecosystem Services Evaluation and Pilot Mapping Project I, Ministry of Environment (ME) 

  8. Ministry of Environment. (2019) Ecosystem Services Evaluation and Pilot Mapping Project II, Ministry of Environment (ME) 

  9. Jung et al. (2015). Development of Natural Resources Valuation Assessment for Decision-Making Process. Ministry of Environment. 

  10. Ministry of Environment, (2003). The basin of life. 

  11. Committee for the Management of the Geum River Basin (2018). Research on estabilizing conflict resolusion and operation plan for integrated drainage basin management. 146p. 

  12. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), (2020). Healthy Watersheds Program. https://www.epa.gov/hwp/examples-biological-condition-assessments-watershed-health 

  13. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), (2020). Developing a Watershed Vulnerability Index https://www.epa.gov/hwp/developing-watershed-vulnerability-index 

  14. Battle River Watershed Alliance (BRWA). (2020). Watershed Management Planning. https://www.battleriverwatershed.ca/watershed-management-planning/ 

  15. Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development, (2014). Approved Water Management Plan for the Battle River Basin, p.82. 

  16. Conservation Ontario, (2020). https://conservationontario.ca/policy-priorities/integrated-watershed-management/ 

  17. Ministry of Environment (ME), 2016, The 2nd Strategic Plan for Water Environment Management, pp. 1-96. 

  18. Ministry of Environment (ME), 2019, A study on the establishment of a healthy integrated water management system from ditch to estuary. 

  19. Slocombe, D. S. (1993). Implementing Ecosystem-Based Management. BioScience, 43(9),612-622. 

  20. Caldwell, L. K. (1970). The ecosystem as a criterion for public land policy. Nat. Res. J. 10(2), 203-221. 

  21. Mcintosh, R. P. (1985). The Background of Ecology: Concept and Theory. Cambridge University Press, New York. 

  22. Ahn, S. E., & Kim, G. (2016). Economic Values of Freshwater Ecosystem Services from Demand and Supply Perspectives. J. Korean Soc. Environ. Eng., 38(10), 580-587. 

  23. Yang, W., & Lu, Q. (2018). Integrated evaluation of payments for ecosystem services programs in China: a systematic review. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 4(3), 73-84. 

  24. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA). (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC.: Island Press. 

  25. Goldstein, J. H., Caldarone, G., Duarte, T. K. Ennaanay, D., Hannahs, N., Mendoza, G., Polasky, S., Wolny, S., & Daily, G. C. (2012). Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 109, 7565-7570. 

  26. Chun, J., Kim, C.-K, Kang, W., Park. H., Kim, G., & Lee, W.-K. (2019). Sustainable Management of Carbon Sequestration Service in Areas with High Development Pressure: Considering land Use Changes and Carbon Costs. Sustainability, 11(18):5116. 

  27. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT), (2016). The National Atlas of Korea. National Geography Information Institute (NGII). Suwon, Korea. 

  28. Kim, M.-K., Kwon, S.-I., Jung. G.-B., Hong, S.-C., Chae, M.-J., Yun, S.-G., & So, K.-H. (2013). Small-Scale Pond Effects on Reducing Pollutants Load from a Paddy Field. Korean Journal of Environmental Agriculture, 32, 355-358. 

  29. Carpenter, S. R., Mooney, H. A., Agard, J., Capistrano, D., Defries, R. S., Draz, S., Dietz, T., Duraiappah, A. K., Oteng-Yeboah, A., Pereira, H. M., Perrings, C., Reid, W. V., Sarukhan, J., Scholes, R. J., & Whyte, A. (2009). Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 106, 1305-1312. 

  30. Chung, M.G., and Kang, H. (2013). A Review of Ecosystem Service Studies: Concept, Approach and Future Work in Korea. Journal of Ecology and Environment, 36, 1-9. 

  31. Fu, C., and Y. Q. Lin. (2009). "On Livelihood Assets of Immigrants of the Returning Fannland to Lake in Poyang Lake Region." Journal of Nanchang University 40:77-82. 

  32. Holling, C. S., & Meffe, G. K. (1996). Command and Control and the Pathology of Natural Resource Management. Conservation Biology, 10, 328-337. 

  33. Lu, Y., He. T., (2014). Assessing the Effects of Regional Payment for Watershed Services Program on Water Quality Using an Intervention Analysis Model. Sci. Total Environ. 493:1056-1064. 

  34. Rodriguez, J. P., Beard., Jr., T. D., Bennett, E. M., Cumming, G. S., Cork, S. J., Agard, J., Dobson, A. P., Peterson, G. D. (2006). Trade-offs across Space, Time and Ecosystem Services. Ecology and Society, 11, 28. 

  35. Rong, Y., F. Yuan, and L. Ma. 2014. "Effectiveness of Exclosures for Restoring Soils and Vegetation Degraded by Overgrazing in the Junggar Basin, China." Grassland Science 60:118-124. 

  36. Metzger, M. J., Rounsevell, M. D. A., Acosta-Michlik, L., Leemans, R., & Schroter, D. (2006). The vulnerability of ecosystem services to land use change. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 114, 69-85. 

  37. Kim, J.-E. (2014). The value of Ecosystem Services based on Land Use in Shinangun, Jeonnam, Korea. Korean Journal of Ecology and Environment, 47(3), 202-213. 

  38. Cole, L. E., Bhagwat, S. A., & Willis, K. J. (2014). Recovery and resilience of tropical forests after disturbance. Nat Commun, 5, 3906. 

  39. Barlow, J., Gardner, T. A., Araujo, I. S., 햢ila-Pires, T. C., Bonaldo, A. B., Costa, J. E., Esposito, M. C., Ferreira, L. V., Hawes, J., Hernandez. M. I. M., Hoogmoed, M.S., Leite, R. N., Lo-Man-Hung, N. F., Malcolm, J. R., Martins, M. B., Mestre, L. A. M., Miranda-Santos, R., Nunes-Gutjahr, A. L., Overal, W. L., Parry, L., Peters, S. L., Ribeiro-Junior, M. A., da Silva, M. N. F., da Silva Motta, C., & Peres, C. A. (2007). Quantifying the biodiversity value of tropical primary, secondary, and plantation forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 18555-18560. 

  40. Gibson, L., Lee, T. M., Koh, L. P., Brook, B. W., Gardner, T. A., Barlow, J., Peres, C. A., Bradshaw, C. J. A., Laurance, W. F., Lovejoy, T. E., & Sodhi, N. S. (2011). Primary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversity. Nature, 478, 378. 

  41. United Nations (2016) Sustainable Development Goals. 

  42. Chu, J. M., Moon, H. J., Lee, H. W., Ahn, S. E., Lee, N. J., et al. (2014). Comparison of Payments for Envionmental Services and Cooperation Studies between Korea and China, Korea Environment Institute: Sejong, Korea, pp. 1-108. 

  43. Zhang, Q. 2016. "Economic Incentive Effect Analysis of Grassland Ecological Subsidy Award Mechanism." Gansu Social Sciences 5:234-238. 

  44. Van, E., H. Lin, Y. Dang, and C. Xia. 2014. "The Spatiotemporal Changes of Vegetation Cover in Beijing-Tianjin Sandstorm Source Control Region during 20002012." Acta Ecologica Sinica 34:5007-5020. 

  45. Xu, W., Xiao, Y., Zhang, J., Yang, W., Zhang, L., Hull, V., ... & Jiang, L. (2017). Strengthening protected areas for biodiversity and ecosystem services in China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(7), 1601-1606. 

  46. Wu Yang & Qiaoling Lu (2018) Integrated evaluation of payments for ecosystem services programs in China: a systematic review, Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 4:3, 73-84, 

  47. Zheng, H., B. E. Robinson, Y.-C. Liang, S. Polasky, D.-C. Ma, F.-C. Wang, M. Ruckelshaus, Z.-Y. Ouyang, and G.C. Daily. 2013. "Benefits, Costs, and Livelihood Implications of a Regional Payment for Ecosystem Service Program." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110: 16681-16686. 

  48. SFA. 2014. Analysis Report of 2014 National Forestry Statistical Report. Beijing: State Forestry Administration.dings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(41), 16681-16686. 

  49. Liu, J. 2015. "On the Incentive Effect of Ecological Transfer Payments on Environment Governance of Local Governments: Evidence from 46 Eastern Prefecture-Level Cities." Journal of Finance and Economics 02: 54-65. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로