최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기한국초등수학교육학회지 = Journal of elementary mathematics education in Korea, v.24 no.1, 2020년, pp.129 - 149
조진우 (경인교육대학교)
This study reports the results of analyzing the learning opportunities about the plane figures provided by the first and second grade mathematics textbooks. The plane figures that students learn during this period are important in that it serves as the basis for the later geometric education. With a...
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
강문봉, 김정하 (2015). 평면도형의 넓이 지도 방법에 대한 고찰: 귀납적 방법 대 문제해결식 방법. 수학교육학연구, 25(3), 461-472.
교육부 (2015). 수학과 교육과정. 교육부 고시 제215-74호(별책8)
교육부 (2017a). 수학 1-2. 서울: 천재교육.
교육부 (2017b). 수학 2-1. 서울: 천재교육
교육부 (2017c). 수학 교사용 지도서 1-2. 서울: 천재교육.
교육부 (2017d). 수학 교사용 지도서 2-1. 서울: 천재교육.
권석일, 박교식 (2011). 우리나라 초등학교 수학 교과서에서의 입체도형 관련 지도 내용에 대한 분석과 비판. 수학교육학연구, 21(3), 221-237.
김선희, 이종희 (2003). 통계 자료의 정리와 표현에서 중학생들의 기호화와 해석화 과정 분석. 수학교육학연구, 13(4), 463-483.
김수미, 정은숙 (2005). 범례 제시를 통한 도형 개념 지도 방안. 수학교육학연구, 15(4), 401-417.
김수민, 김선희 (2018). 수학 문제 해결 과정의 의사소통에 대한 기호학적 분석. 학교수학, 20(1), 131-147.
박진형, 이경화 (2013). 수학적 모델링 과정에서 수학화의 기호학적 분석. 수학교육학연구, 23(2), 95-116.
우정호 (2017). 학교수학의 교육적 기초 (중). 서울: 서울대학교출판문화원.
최병철 (2017). 개념 형성 과정에 관여하는 표현의 기호학적 분석. 수학교육학연구, 27(4), 663-678.
Banicky, L. (2000). Opportunity to learn (Education Policy Brief, vol. 7). College of Human Resources, Education, and Public Policy, University of Delaware. http://udspace.udel.edu/bitstream/handle/19716/2446/opp%20to?sequence1 에서 2020년 1월 15일 인출.
Begle, E. G. (1973). Some lessons learned by SMSG. Mathematics Teacher, 66(3), 207-14.
Charalambous, C. Y., Delaney, S., Hsu, H. Y., & Mesa, V. (2010). A comparative analysis of the addition and subtraction of fractions in textbooks from three countries. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12(2), 117-151.
Cohen, D. K., Raudenbush, S. W. & Ball, D. L. (2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 25(2), 119-142.
Ding, M., & Li, Xiaobao. (2010). A comparative analysis of the distributive property in U.S. and Chinese elementary mathematics textbooks. Cognition and Instruction, 28(2), 146-180.
Duval, R. (1995). Semiosis et pensee humaine. Berna: Peter Lang.
Duval, R. (2008). Eight problems for a semiotic approach in mathematics education. In Semiotics in mathematics education (pp. 39-61). Brill Sense.
Frege, G. (1948). Sense and reference. The Philosophical Review, 57(3), 209-230.
Grouws, D., Smith, M., & Sztajn, P. (2004). The preparation and teaching practices of United States mathematics teachers: Grades 4 and 8. In P. Kloosterman & F. Lester (Eds.), Results and interpretations of the 1990 through 2000 mathematics assessments of the national assessment of educational progress. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Li, Y. (2000). A comparison of problems that follow selected content presentations in American and Chinese mathematics textbooks. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(2), 234-241.
McDonnell, L. M. (1995). Opportunity to learn as a research concept and a policy instrument. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(3), 305-322.
Peirce, C. S. (1998). The essential Peirce: selected philosophical writings. Vol. 2 (1893-1913). (Peirce Edition Project, eds). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Pepin, B., & Haggarty, L. (2001). Mathematics textbooks and their use in English, French and German classrooms. ZDM, 33(5), 158-175.
Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211-246.
Reys, B. J., Reys, R. E., & Chavez, O. (2004). Why Mathematics Textbooks Matter. Educational Leadership, 61(5), 61-66.
Rezat, S. & Strasser, R. (2012). From the didactical triangle to the socio-didactical tetrahedron. ZDM , 44(5), 641-651.
Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., Valverde, G. A., Houang, R. T., & Wiley, D. E. (1997). Many visions, many aims: A cross-national investigation of curricular intentions in school mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Schimidt, W. H., McKnihgt, C. C., Houang, R. T., Wang, H., Wiley, D. E., Cogan, L. S., & Wolfe, R. G. (2001). Why schools matter: A cross-national comparison of curriculum and learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Seeger, F. (2008). Intentionality and sign. In L. Radford, G. Schubring, & F. Seeger (Eds.), Semiotics in mathematics education: Epistemology, history, classroom and culture (pp. 1-18). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Stein, M. K., Remillard, J., & Smith, M. S. (2007). How curriculum influences student learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 319-369). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Tarr, J. E., Chavez, O., Reys, R. E., & Reys, B. J. (2006). From the written to the enacted curricula: The intermediary role of middle school mathematics teachers in shaping students' opportunity to learn. School Science and Mathematics, 106(4), 191-201.
Thompson, D. R., Senk, S. L., & Johnson, G. J. (2012). Opportunities to learn reasoning and proof in high school mathematics textbooks. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(3), 253-295.
Thompson, D. R., & Huntley, M. A. (2014). Researching the enacted mathematics curriculum: learning from various perspectives on enactment. ZDM, 46(5), 701-704.
Tornroos, J. (2005). Mathematics textbooks, opportunity to learn and student achievement. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 31(4), 315-327.
Valverde, G. and L. Bianchi and R. Wolfe and W. Schmidt and R. Houang, (2002), According to the book: using TIMSS to investigate the translation of policy into practice through the world of textbooks, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Van Dormolen, J., (1986), Textual Analysis, In Christiansen, B and A.G. Howson and M. Otte, Perspectives on mathematical education. Dordrecht: Reidel, 141-171.
Vygotsky, L. S. (2011). The dynamics of the schoolchild’s mental development in relation to teaching and learning. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 10(2), 198-211.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.