$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

복원된 양재천에서 복원 효과 평가 및 평가 결과에 기초한 개선방안
An Evaluation on Restoration Effect in the Restored Yangjae Stream and the Improvement Plan Based on the Result 원문보기

생태와 환경 = Korean journal of ecology and environment, v.53 no.4, 2020년, pp.390 - 407  

김아름 (서울여자대학교 생명환경공학과 대학원) ,  김동욱 (서울여자대학교 생명환경공학과 대학원) ,  임봉순 (서울여자대학교 생명환경공학과 대학원) ,  설재원 (서울여자대학교 생명환경공학과 대학원) ,  이창석 (서울여자대학교 생명환경공학과)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

This study was carried out to evaluate the restoration effect in the restored Yangjae stream and to draw up an adaptive management plan based on the results. As the result of evaluation on the restoration effect, the restored Yangjae stream was evaluated with low naturalness in both terms of the mor...

주제어

참고문헌 (94)

  1. An, J.H., C.H. Lim, S.H. Jung, A.R. Kim and C.S. Lee. 2016. Effects of climate change on biodiversity and measure for them. Journal of Wetlands Restoration 18: 481-487 (Korean literature). 

  2. An, J.H., C.H. Lim, S.H. Jung, A.R. Kim, D.M. Woo and C.S. Lee. 2017. Restoration plan of Changwon and Nam streams based on the results of diagnostic assessment Journal of Korean Society on Water Environment 33: 511-524 (Korean literature). 

  3. An, J.H., C.H. Lim, Y.K. Lim, K.B. Nam and C.S. Lee. 2014. A review of restoration project evaluation and post management for ecological restoration of the river. Restoration Ecology 4: 15-34 (Korean literature). 

  4. Aronson, J.C., E. Le Floch, C. Ovalle and R. Pontanier. 1993. Restoration and rehabilitation of degraded ecosystems in arid and semi-arid lands. II. Case studies in southern Tunisia, Central Chile and northern Cameroon. Restoration Ecology 3: 168-187. 

  5. Aronson, J.C. and E. Le Floch. 1996. Vital landscape attributes: missing tools for restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 4: 377-387. 

  6. Barbour, M.T., J. Gerritsen, B.D. Snyder snd J.B. Stribling. 1999. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers. United States Environmental Protection Agency. DC, Office of Water. 

  7. Bennett, S.J., A. Simon, J.M. Castro, J.F. Atkinson, C.E. Bronner, S.S. Blersch and A.J. Rabideau. 2013. The evolving science of stream restoration. In: Stream Restoration in Dynamic Fluvial Systems. Hoboken, Wiley Online Library. 

  8. Boromisza, Z., A. Gergely, E. Jakli and C. Xuecheng. 2019. Landscape, ecological and visual impacts of a stream restoration in Hungary. In: Proceedings of the Fabos Conference on Landscape and Greenway Planning, Vol. 6, Article 4. 

  9. Bradshaw, A.D. 1984. Ecological principles and land reclamation practice. Landscape Plan 11: 35-48. 

  10. Cantonati, M., S. Poikane, C.M. Pringle, L.E. Stevens, E. Turak, J. Heino, J.S. Richardson, R. Bolpagni, A. Borrini, N. Cid, M. Ctvrtlikova, D.M.P. Galassi, M. Hajek, I. Hawes, Z. Levkov, L. Naselli-Flores, A.A. Saber, M. Di Cicco, B. Fiasca, P.B. Hamilton, J. Kubecka, S. Segadelli and P. Znachor. 2020. Characteristics, main impacts, and stewardship of natural and artificial freshwater environments: consequences for biodiversity conservation. Water 12: 260. 

  11. Choi, Y.D. 2004. Theories for ecological restoration in changing environment: toward 'futuristic' restoration. Ecology Restoration 19: 75-81. 

  12. Deffner, J. and P. Haase. 2018. The societal relevance of river restoration. Ecology and Society 23: 35 

  13. Doll, B.A., G.L. Grabow, K.R. Hall, J. Halley, W.A. Harman, G.D. Jennings and D.E. Wise. 2003. Stream Restoration: A Natural Channel Design Handbook, NC Stream Restoration Institute. NC State University, Raleigh. 

  14. Ellenberg, H. 1986. Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen in okologischer Sicht, Eugen Ulmer Verlag, Stuttgart, 1334. 

  15. Farina, A. 2006. Principles and methods in landscape ecology. Towards a science of landscape. Springer, Netherlands. 

  16. Florsheim, J.L., J.F. Mount and A. Chin. 2008. Bank erosion as a desirable attribute of rivers. Bioscience 58: 519-529. 

  17. Fokkens, B. 2006. The Dutch strategy for safety and river flood prevention. In Extreme hydrological events: new concepts for security. Springer: Dordrecht, Nederland, pp. 337-352. 

  18. Freedman, B. 1995. Environmental Ecology: The Ecological Effects of Pollution, Disturbance, and Other Stresses, 2nd ed. Academic Press, San Diego. 

  19. Gardali, T., A.L. Holmes, S.L. Small, N. Nor, G.R. Geupel and G.H. Golet. 2006. Abundance patterns of land birds in restored and remnant riparian forests on the Sacramento River, California, USA. Restoration Ecology 14: 391-403. 

  20. Gilvear, D. and R. Bryant. 2016. Analysis of Remotely sensed data for fluvial geomorphology and river science. In: Tools in Fluvial Geomorphology, 2nd ed. Chichester, John Wiley & Sons. 

  21. Goodwin, C.N., C.P. Hawkins and J.L. Kershner. 1997. Riparian restoration in the Western United States: overview and perspective. Restoration Ecolology 5: 4-14. 

  22. Golet, G.H., D.L. Brown, M. Carlson, T. Gardali, A. Henderson, K.D. Holl, C.A. Howell, M. Holyoak, J.W. Hunt, G.M. Kondolf, E.W. Larsen, R.A. Luster, C. McClain, C. Charles Nelson, S. Paine, W. Rainey, Z. Rubin, F. Shilling, J.G. Silveira, H. Swagerty, N.M. Williams and D.M. Wood. 2013. Successes, failures and suggested future directions for ecosystem restoration of the middle Sacramento River, California. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science. 11. 

  23. Gunn, J.M. (ed.). 1995. Restoration and Recovery of an Industrial Region. Springer-Verlag, New York. 

  24. Higgs, E.S. 1997. What is good ecological restoration?. ProEnvironment/ProMediu 11: 338-348. 

  25. Hobbs, R. 2009. Woodland restoration in Scotland: ecology, history, culture, economics, politics and change. Journal of Environmental Management 90: 2857-2865. 

  26. Hobbs, R.J. and D.A. Norton. 1996. Toward a conceptual framework for restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 4: 93-110. 

  27. Hong, S.K. and C.S. Lee. 1997. Development and roles of landscape ecology as an emerging opportunity for ecology. Korean Journal of Ecology 20(3): 217-227. 

  28. Hull, R.B. and P.H. Gobster. 2000. Restoring forest ecosystems: the human dimension. Journal of Forestry 98: 32-36. 

  29. Jung, S.H., A.R. Kim, J.H. An, C.H. Lim, H.S. Lee and C.S. Lee. 2020. Abnormal shoot growth in Korean red pine as a response 6 to microclimate changes due to urbanization in Korea. International Journal of Biometeorology 64: 571-584. 

  30. Jung, S.H., A.R. Kim, J. Seol, B.S. Lim and C.S. Lee. 2018. Characteristics and reference information of riparian vegetation for realizing ecological restoration classified by reach of the river in Korea. Journal of Korean Society on Water Environment 34: 447-461 (Korean literature). 

  31. Kauffman, J.B., R.L. Beschta, N. Otting and D. Lytjen. 1997. An ecological perspective of riparian and stream restoration in the western United States. Fisheries 22: 12-24. 

  32. Kent, M. and P. Cocker. 2011. Vegetation Description and Analysis: A Practical Approach. CRC Press, Florida. 

  33. Kerans, B.L. and J.R. Karr. 1994. A benthic index of biotic integrity (B-IBI) for rivers of the Tennessee Valley. Ecological Applications 4 (4): 768-785. 

  34. Kondolf, G.M. 1997. Application of the pebble count: notes on purpose, method, and variants. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 33: 79-87. 

  35. Kondolf, G.M. and E.R. Micheli. 1995. Evaluating stream restoration projects. Environmental Management 19: 1-15. 

  36. Kondolf, G.M. and S. Li. 1992. The pebble count technique for quantifying surface bed material size in instream flow studies. Rivers 3: 80-87. 

  37. Le, H.D., C. Smith, J. Herbohn and S. Harrison. 2012. More than just trees: assessing reforestation success in tropical developing countries. Journal of Rural Studies 28: 5-19. 

  38. Lee, C.S. 2003. Landscape ecological characteristics and use of ecological information in the northern area of the CCZ. Environmental ecological survey analysis and impact assessment workshop of the DMZ: 165-192. 

  39. Lee, C.S. 2016. Role and task of restoration ecology in changing environment: Trends and issues in academic study, Biology. The National Academy of Sciences 5: 481-527 (Korean literature). 

  40. Lee, C.S. and A.N. Lee. 2004. Restoration Effects Confirmed in the Environmental Forests Created on the Bases of Ecological Principles. Journal of Environmental Biology 22(1): 220-226. 

  41. Lee, C.S. and Y.H. You. 2001. Development and Outlook of Restoration Ecology as an Ecology for the Future. Korean Journal of Ecology 24(3): 191-202. 

  42. Lee, C.S., A.N. Lee and Y.C. Cho. 2008. Restoration Planning for the Seoul Metropolitan Area, Korea. p. 393-419. In: Ecology, Planning, and Management of Urban Forests: International Perspectives (Carreiro, M.M. et al., ed.). Springer, New York. 

  43. Lee, C.S., J.M. Oh and N.J. Lee. 2002. Riverine environment and riparian plant. Donghwagisul Pub. Co., Seoul. 

  44. Lee, C.S., A.N. Lee, Y.C. Cho, H.C. Shin and H.S. Woo. 2004. Effects of partial restoration practiced by a method suitable for the riverine environment in Korea. Proceedings of 16th International Conference, Society for Ecological Restoration International, August 24-26, 2004, Victoria, Canada, pp. 1-10. 

  45. Lee, C.S., J.H. An, J.H. Pee, S.M. Lee and J.S. Lee. 2011a. Futuristic direction of river restoration in Korea under changing climate change. Restoration Ecology 2: 137-143 (Korean literature). 

  46. Lee, C.S., J.S. Moon, H.S. Woo, H.G. Ahn, G.H. Cho, Y.S. Bae and H.G. Byun. 2006. An analysis on landscape structure and biodiversity of the Bokha River as a model to restore the degraded urban river. Journal of Ecology Field Biology 29: 113-124. 

  47. Lee, C.S., S.G. Hong, H.J. Cho and J.M. Oh. 1999. Riverine environment and riparian plant. Donghwagisul Pub. Co., Seoul. 

  48. Lee, C.S., Y.C. Cho, H.C. Shin, J.S. Moon, B.C. Lee, Y.S. Bae, H.G. Byun and H. Yi. 2005. Ecological Response of Streams in Korea under Different Management Regimes. Water Engineering Research 6(3):131-147. 

  49. Lee, C.S., Y.C. Cho, H.C. Shin, S.M. Lee and H.J. Cho. 2007a. Effects of partial restoration practiced by a method suitable for the riverine environment in Korea. Journal of Ecology and Field Biology 30: 155-162. 

  50. Lee, C.S., Y.C. Cho, W.S. Woo, S.A. Park and E.S. Seol. 2007b. Diagnosis of restoration effects and improving plan in the restored Cheonggye stream. Journal of Water Resources Association 2007: 1135-1139 

  51. Lee, C.S., Y.C. Cho, H.C. Shin, G.S. Kim and J.H. Pi. 2010. Control of an invasive alien species, Ambrosia trifida with restoration by introducing willows as a typical riparian vegetation. Journal of Ecology and Field Biology 32: 207-215. 

  52. Lee, C.S., Y.M. Jeong and H.S. Kang. 2011b. Concept, direction, and task of ecological restoration. Restoration Ecology 2: 59-71 (Korean literature). 

  53. Lee, H.S., H.M. Yoo and C.S. Lee. 2003. Distribution pattern of white snakeroot as an invasive alien plant and restoration strategy to inhibit its expansion in Seoripool park, Seoul. Korean Journal of Biological Science 7: 197-205. 

  54. Leps, M., A. Sundermann, J.D. Tonkin, A.W. Lorenz and P. Haase. 2016. Time is no healer: increasing restoration age does not lead to improved benthic invertebrate communities in restored river reaches. Science of the Total Environment 557: 722-732. 

  55. Lim, C.H, J.H. Pi, A.R. Kim, H.J. Cho, K.S. Lee, Y.H. You, K.H. Lee, K.D. Kim, J.S. Moon, H. Lee and C.S. Lee. 2020. Diagnostic evaluation and systematization of the reference information for river restoration in South Korea. International J Environmental Research and Public Health. In Press. 

  56. Lisle, T.E., J.M. Buffington, P.R. Wilcock and K. Bunte. 2015. Can rapid assessment protocols be used to judge sediment impairment in gravel-bed streams? A commentary. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 51: 373-387. 

  57. McDonald, T., G.D. Gann, J. Jonson and K.W. Dixon. 2016. International Standards for the Practice of Ecological Restoration-Including Principles and Key Concepts. DC, Society for Ecological Restoration. 

  58. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC. 

  59. Miller, S.W., P. Budy and J.C. Schmidt. 2010. Quantifying macroinvertebrate responses to in-stream habitat restoration: applications of meta-analysis to river restoration. Restoration Ecology 18: 8-19. 

  60. National Research Council (NRC). 1992. Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems: Science, Technology, and Public Policy. National Academy Press, DC. 

  61. Noss, R.F. 1990. Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conservation Biology 4: 355-364. 

  62. Odum, E.P. and G.W. Barrett. 2005. Fundamentals of Ecology. Thomson Brooks/Cole, Belmont. 

  63. Ormerod, S.J. 2003. Restoration in applied ecology: editor's introduction. Journal of Applied Ecology 40: 44-50. 

  64. Palmer, M.A., E.S. Bernhardt, J.D. Allan, P.S. Lake, G. Alexander, S. Brooks, J. Carr, S. Clayton, C.N. Dahm, J.F. Shah, D.L. Galat, S.G. Loss, P. Goodwin, D.D. Hart, B. Hassett, R. Jenkinson, G.M. Kondolf, R. Lave, J.L. Meyer, T.K. O'Donnell, L. Pagano and E. Sudduth. 2005. Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 42: 208-217. 

  65. Palmer, M.A., H.L. Menninger and E. Bernhardt. 2010. River restoration, habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity: a failure of theory or practice?. Freshwater Biology 55: 205-222. 

  66. Petts, G. and P. Calow. 1996. River restoration. Blackwell Science, London. 

  67. Petts, G.E., H. Moller and A.L. Roux. 1989. Historical Changes of Large Alluvial Rivers: Western Europe. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester. 

  68. Postel, S. and B. Richter. 2003. Rivers for Life: Managing Water for People and Nature. Island Press, DC. 

  69. Purcell, A.H., C. Friedrich, H. Vincent and V.H. Resh. 2002. An assessment of a small urban stream restoration project in Northern California. Restoration Ecology 10: 685-694. 

  70. Rosgen, D.L. 2001. A practical method of computing streambank erosion rate. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Federal Interagency Sedimentation Conference, Reno, NV, USA, 25-29 March 2001. 

  71. Rubin, Z., G.M. Kondolf, B. Rios-Touma. 2017. Evaluating Stream Restoration Projects: what do we Learn from monitoring?. Water 9: 174. 

  72. Ruiz-Jaen, M.C. and T.M. Aide. 2005a. Restoration success: how is it being measured? Restoration Ecology 13: 569-577. 

  73. Ruiz-Jaen, M.C. and T.M. Aide. 2005b. Vegetation structure, species diversity, and ecosystem processes as measures of restoration success. Forest Ecology and Management 218: 159-173. 

  74. Salinas, M.J. and J. Guiraldo. 2002. Riparian plant restoration in summer-dry riverbeds of Southeastern Spain. Restoration Ecology 10: 695-702. 

  75. Seabrook, L., C.A. McAlpine and M.E. Bowen. 2011. Restore, repair or reinvent: options for sustainable landscapes in a changing climate. Landscape and Urban Planning 100(4): 407-410. 

  76. Shields, F.D., R.E. Lizotte, S.S. Knight, C.M. Cooper and D. Wilcox. 2010. The stream channel incision syndrome and water quality. Ecological Engineering 36: 78-90. 

  77. Society for Ecological Restoration (SER). 2004. The SER Primer on Ecological Restoration. Society for Ecological Restoration International, Arizona, USA. 

  78. Society for Ecological Restoration International Science and Policy Working Group (SERI, PWG). 2004. The SER International Primer on Ecological Restoration. www.ser. org and Tucson: Society for Ecological Restoration International. 

  79. Suding, K.N. 2011. Toward an era of restoration in ecology: successes, failures, and opportunities ahead. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 42: 465-487. 

  80. Summers, J.K., L.M. Smith, J.L. Case and R.A. Linthurst. 2012. A review of the elements of human well-being with an emphasis on the contribution of ecosystem services. Ambio 41: 327-340. 

  81. Swanson, S. and P.L. Wagner. 2003. Flows for floodplain forests: A successful riparian restoration. BioScience 53: 647-656. 

  82. Thorpe, A.S. and A.G. Stanley. 2011. Determining appropriate goals for restoration of imperiled communities and species. Journal of Applied Ecology 48: 275-279. 

  83. Weber, C., U. Aberg, A.D. Buijse, F.M.R. Hughes, B.G. McKie, H. Piegay, P. Roni, S. Vollenweider and S. Susanne Haertel-Borer. 2017. Goals and principles for programmatic river restoration monitoring and evaluation: collaborative learning across multiple projects. In: Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water. 2017: e1257. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1257. 

  84. Whitacre, H.W., B.B. Roper and J.L. Kershner. 2007. A Comparison of Protocols and Observer Precision for Measuring Physical Stream Attributes1. Hoboken, Wiley Online Library. 

  85. White, P.S. and J.L. Walker. 1997. Approximating nature's variation: Selecting and using reference information in restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 5: 338-349. 

  86. Whittier, T.R., J.L. Stoddard, D.P. Larsen and A.T. Herlihy. 2007. Selecting reference sites for stream biological assessments: best professional judgment or objective criteria. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 26: 349-360. 

  87. Wild, T.C., J.F. Bernet and E.L. Westling. 2011. Deculverting: reviewing the evidence on the 'daylighting' and restoration of culverted rivers. Journal of Water Environment 25: 412-421. 

  88. Wohl, E., S.N. Lane and A.C. Wilcox. 2015. The science and practice of river restoration. Water Resources Research 51: 5974-5997. 

  89. Woo, H.S., S.U. Choi, B.M. Yoon and K.H. Cho. 2004. Effect of flow-regime change due to damming on the river morphology and vegetation cover in the downstream River Reach: A case of Hapchon Dam on the Hwang River. Journal of Korea Water Resources Association 37: 56-66. 

  90. Woolsey, S., F. Capelli, T. Gonser, E. Hoehn, M. Hostmann, B. Junker, A. Paetzold, C. Roulier, S. Schweizer, S.D. Tiegs, K. Tockner, C. Weber and A. Peter. 2007. A strategy to assess river restoration success. Freshwater Biology 52: 752-769. 

  91. Wortley, L., J.M. Hero and M. Howes. 2013. Evaluating ecological restoration success: A review of the literature. Restoration Ecology 21: 537-543. 

  92. Zeiringer, B., C. Seliger, F. Greimel and S. Schmutz. 2018. River Hydrology, Flow Alteration, and Environmental Flow. In: Riverine Ecosystem Management (Schmutz, S. and J. Sendzimir, eds.). Aquatic Ecology Series 8. SpringerOpen, NY. 

  93. Zeng, L., L. Zhou, D.L. Guo, D.H. Fu, P. Xu, S. Zeng, Q.D. Tang, A.L. Chen, F.Q., Luo, Y., Gui-Feng and G.F. Li. 2017. Ecological effects of dams, alien fish, and physiochemical environmental factors on homogeneity/heterogeneity of fish community in four tributaries of the Pearl River in China. Ecology and Evolution 7: 3904-3915. 

  94. Zonneveld, I.S. 1995. Land ecology: an introduction to landscape ecology as a base for land evaluation, land management and conservation. SPB Academic Publishing. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

GOLD

오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로