CAD/CAM 의치상 레진과 열중합 의치상 레진의 두께에 따른 굴곡 강도 비교 Comparison of flexural strength according to thickness between CAD/CAM denture base resins and conventional denture base resins원문보기
목적: 이 논문의 목적은 CAD/CAM 의치상 레진과 열중합 의치상 레진의 굴곡 강도를 비교해보고, 두께에 따른 굴곡 강도 변화도 비교해보는 것이다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 열중합 의치상 레진은 Lucitone 199® (C-LC)을 사용하였다. 3D printing 의치상 레진으로는 DIOnavi - Denture (P-DO)와 DENTCA - Denture Base II (P-DC)를 사용하였다. 밀링PMMA 블록으로는 Vipi Block Gum (M-VP)과 M-IVoBase® CAD (M-IV)를 사용하였다. 시편의 최종 규격은 65.0 mm × 12.7 mm × 1.6 mm / 2.0 mm / 2.5 mm였다. 굴곡 강도와 굴곡 탄성율을 측정하기 위해 3점 굽힘 시험을 실시하였다. 그리고 파절된 시편의 단면을 주사전자현미경 (SEM) 을 사용하여 분석하였다. 데이터의 정규성을 확인한 뒤 일원분산분석(one-way ANOVA)을 사용하여 유의 수준 P = 0.05로 설정하여 그룹 간의 차이를 평가한 뒤, 사후 분석을 위해 Tukey HSD test를 시행하였다. 결과: 동일 두께 내에서, P-DO를 제외한 나머지 CAD/CAM 의치상 레진들과 열중합 의치상 레진의 굴곡 강도는 유의한 차이를 나타내었다. M-VP는 열중합 의치상 레진 보다 굴곡 강도가 높게 나타났고, P-DC와 M-IV는 낮은 굴곡 강도를 보였다. 굴곡 탄성률은 M-VP에서 제일 높게 나타났고 C-LC, P-DO, P-DC, M-IV 순으로 낮아졌으며 재료간에 모두 유의한 차이가 나타났다. 두께에 따른 굴곡 강도는, C-LC에서는 2.5 mm가 1.6 mm보다 유의하게 높은 굴곡 강도를 보였고, P-DC, M-VP는 2.5 mm와 2.0 mm에서 1.6 mm보다 유의하게 높은 굴곡 강도가 나타났다. M-IV에서는 두께가 증가할수록 유의한 굴곡 강도 증가가 나타났다. SEM 분석 결과 서로 다른 재료들의 파절된 단면은 각기 다른 양상을 띄었다. 결론: 본 연구에서 사용된 CAD/CAM 의치상 레진의 굴곡 강도는 각 재료의 성분 및 특성에 따라 다양하게 나타났다. CAD/CAM 의치상 레진의 굴곡 강도는 두께가 감소하여도 1.6 mm 이상의 두께에서는 ISO 20795-1:2013에서 제시하는 굴곡 강도보다 높게 나타났다. 하지만 보다 얇은 두께의 의치를 임상적으로 사용하기 위해서는, 더 낮은 두께의 의치상 레진의 다른 특성들에 관한 추가적인 연구가 필요하다.
목적: 이 논문의 목적은 CAD/CAM 의치상 레진과 열중합 의치상 레진의 굴곡 강도를 비교해보고, 두께에 따른 굴곡 강도 변화도 비교해보는 것이다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 열중합 의치상 레진은 Lucitone 199® (C-LC)을 사용하였다. 3D printing 의치상 레진으로는 DIOnavi - Denture (P-DO)와 DENTCA - Denture Base II (P-DC)를 사용하였다. 밀링 PMMA 블록으로는 Vipi Block Gum (M-VP)과 M-IVoBase® CAD (M-IV)를 사용하였다. 시편의 최종 규격은 65.0 mm × 12.7 mm × 1.6 mm / 2.0 mm / 2.5 mm였다. 굴곡 강도와 굴곡 탄성율을 측정하기 위해 3점 굽힘 시험을 실시하였다. 그리고 파절된 시편의 단면을 주사전자현미경 (SEM) 을 사용하여 분석하였다. 데이터의 정규성을 확인한 뒤 일원분산분석(one-way ANOVA)을 사용하여 유의 수준 P = 0.05로 설정하여 그룹 간의 차이를 평가한 뒤, 사후 분석을 위해 Tukey HSD test를 시행하였다. 결과: 동일 두께 내에서, P-DO를 제외한 나머지 CAD/CAM 의치상 레진들과 열중합 의치상 레진의 굴곡 강도는 유의한 차이를 나타내었다. M-VP는 열중합 의치상 레진 보다 굴곡 강도가 높게 나타났고, P-DC와 M-IV는 낮은 굴곡 강도를 보였다. 굴곡 탄성률은 M-VP에서 제일 높게 나타났고 C-LC, P-DO, P-DC, M-IV 순으로 낮아졌으며 재료간에 모두 유의한 차이가 나타났다. 두께에 따른 굴곡 강도는, C-LC에서는 2.5 mm가 1.6 mm보다 유의하게 높은 굴곡 강도를 보였고, P-DC, M-VP는 2.5 mm와 2.0 mm에서 1.6 mm보다 유의하게 높은 굴곡 강도가 나타났다. M-IV에서는 두께가 증가할수록 유의한 굴곡 강도 증가가 나타났다. SEM 분석 결과 서로 다른 재료들의 파절된 단면은 각기 다른 양상을 띄었다. 결론: 본 연구에서 사용된 CAD/CAM 의치상 레진의 굴곡 강도는 각 재료의 성분 및 특성에 따라 다양하게 나타났다. CAD/CAM 의치상 레진의 굴곡 강도는 두께가 감소하여도 1.6 mm 이상의 두께에서는 ISO 20795-1:2013에서 제시하는 굴곡 강도보다 높게 나타났다. 하지만 보다 얇은 두께의 의치를 임상적으로 사용하기 위해서는, 더 낮은 두께의 의치상 레진의 다른 특성들에 관한 추가적인 연구가 필요하다.
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the flexural strength of CAD/CAM denture base resins with conventional denture base resins based on their thicknesses. Materials and Methods: For the conventional denture base resins, Lucitone 199® (C-LC) was used. DIOnavi - Denture (P-DO) and ...
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the flexural strength of CAD/CAM denture base resins with conventional denture base resins based on their thicknesses. Materials and Methods: For the conventional denture base resins, Lucitone 199® (C-LC) was used. DIOnavi - Denture (P-DO) and DENTCA Denture Base II (P-DC) were taken for the 3D printing denture base resins. For the prepolymerized PMMA resins, Vipi Block Gum (M-VP) and M-IVoBase® CAD (M-IV) were used. The final dimensions of the specimens were 65.0 mm x 12.7 mm x 1.6 mm / 2.0 mm / 2.5 mm. The 3-point bend test was implemented to measure the flexural strength and flexural modulus. Microscopic evaluation of surface of fractured specimen was conducted by using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). After testing the normality of the data, one-way ANOVA was adopted to evaluate the differences among sample groups with a significance level of P = 0.05. The Tukey HSD test was performed for post hoc analysis. Results: Under the same thicknesses, there are significant differences in flexural strength between CAD/CAM denture base resins and conventional denture base resins except for P-DO and C-LC. M-VP showed higher flexural strength than conventional denture base resins, P-DC and M-IV displayed lower flexural strength than conventional denture base resins. Flexural modulus was highest in M-VP, followed by C-LC, P-DO, P-DC, M-IV, significant differences were found between all materials. In the comparison of flexural strength according to thickness, flexural strength of 2.5 mm was significantly higher than that of 1.6 mm in C-LC. Flexural strength of 2.5 mm and 2.0 mm was significantly higher than that of 1.6 mm in P-DC and M-VP. In M-IV, as the thickness increases, significant increase in flexural strength appeared. SEM analysis illustrates different fracture surfaces of the specimens. Conclusion: The flexural strength of different CAD/CAM denture base resins used in this study varied according to the composition and properties of each material. The flexural strength of CAD/CAM denture base resins was higher than the standard suggested by ISO 20795-1:2013 at a thickness of 1.6 mm or more though the thickness decreased. However, for clinical use of dentures with lower thickness, further researches should be done regarding other properties at lower thickness of denture base resins.
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the flexural strength of CAD/CAM denture base resins with conventional denture base resins based on their thicknesses. Materials and Methods: For the conventional denture base resins, Lucitone 199® (C-LC) was used. DIOnavi - Denture (P-DO) and DENTCA Denture Base II (P-DC) were taken for the 3D printing denture base resins. For the prepolymerized PMMA resins, Vipi Block Gum (M-VP) and M-IVoBase® CAD (M-IV) were used. The final dimensions of the specimens were 65.0 mm x 12.7 mm x 1.6 mm / 2.0 mm / 2.5 mm. The 3-point bend test was implemented to measure the flexural strength and flexural modulus. Microscopic evaluation of surface of fractured specimen was conducted by using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). After testing the normality of the data, one-way ANOVA was adopted to evaluate the differences among sample groups with a significance level of P = 0.05. The Tukey HSD test was performed for post hoc analysis. Results: Under the same thicknesses, there are significant differences in flexural strength between CAD/CAM denture base resins and conventional denture base resins except for P-DO and C-LC. M-VP showed higher flexural strength than conventional denture base resins, P-DC and M-IV displayed lower flexural strength than conventional denture base resins. Flexural modulus was highest in M-VP, followed by C-LC, P-DO, P-DC, M-IV, significant differences were found between all materials. In the comparison of flexural strength according to thickness, flexural strength of 2.5 mm was significantly higher than that of 1.6 mm in C-LC. Flexural strength of 2.5 mm and 2.0 mm was significantly higher than that of 1.6 mm in P-DC and M-VP. In M-IV, as the thickness increases, significant increase in flexural strength appeared. SEM analysis illustrates different fracture surfaces of the specimens. Conclusion: The flexural strength of different CAD/CAM denture base resins used in this study varied according to the composition and properties of each material. The flexural strength of CAD/CAM denture base resins was higher than the standard suggested by ISO 20795-1:2013 at a thickness of 1.6 mm or more though the thickness decreased. However, for clinical use of dentures with lower thickness, further researches should be done regarding other properties at lower thickness of denture base resins.
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
문제 정의
Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to compare flexural strength and flexural modulus of CAD/CAM denture base resins with conventional denture base resins based on different thicknesses. The null hypotheses were set as follows.
가설 설정
1. The flexural strength and flexural modulus of CAD/CAM denture base resins P-DO not have significant differences with those of conventional denture base resins.
제안 방법
All specimens were evaluated to investigate any voids or irregularities. Based on the standard of ISO 20795-1:2013, the specimens were polished with the 500-grit, 1000-grit and 1500-grit abrasive papers (DAESUNG, Incheon, Korea) under water cooling.
The flexural strength of different CAD/CAM denture base resins used in this study varied according to the composition and properties of each material.
This study also evaluated the changes in flexural strength depending on the thickness of denture base resins. Some materials showed a significant decrease in flexural strength as the thickness reduced.
This study used one type of conventional denture base resin, two types of 3D printing denture base resins and two types of CAD/CAM denture base resins for milling. The information regarding the five different types of denture base resins adopted in this study is described in the Table 1.
Two samples were randomly selected from each groups and executed a surface analysis for the fractured section of specimens by using a SEM (×500, × 1000 magnification) (ZEISS GeminiSEM 500, Carl Zeiss Co., Oberkochen, Germany).
대상 데이터
Avadent PMMA pucks (Avadent Digital Dental Solutions, Scottsdale, USA) and Tizian Blank PMMA (Schütz Dental, Rosbach, Germany) were taken for CAD/CAM denture base resins.
0 mm. In this study, 150 rectangle shaped specimens were used, 15 subgroups were set depending on the materials and thickness. The number of specimens of each subgroup was designed to be 10.
The materials were divided into three groups with different thicknesses: 1.6 mm, 2.0 mm, 2.5 mm. The lengths between supports of each thicknesses were 25.
The specimens for 3D printing denture base resins were produced by requesting standard tessellation language (STL) files from DENTCA™ CAD/CAM DENTURE (DENTCA - Denture Base II, DENTCA Inc., Torrance, USA) and DIO (DIOnavi - Denture; DIO IMPLANT CO., LTD, Busan, Korea).
데이터처리
, Armonk, USA) software program. A normality test was implemented with a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate differences between groups. Tukey HSD test was used for post-hoc analysis (P = 0.
이론/모형
The 3-point bend test was conducted based on the standard of ASTM D790.19 In this study, a universal testing machine (QM100TS Universal Testing Machine, Instron Ltd, Norwood, USA) was used. Specimens were laid on supports with a diameter of 5.
The maximum strength was recorded with Newton’s (N) measurement and the modulus of elasticity was calculated automatically by using the linear of the stress-strain curve in the software program.
A normality test was implemented with a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate differences between groups. Tukey HSD test was used for post-hoc analysis (P = 0.05).
성능/효과
2. As the thickness of denture base resins reduces, the flexural strength of denture bases resins decreases significantly.
48 (MPa) each. They concluded that CAD/CAM denture base resins have significantly higher flexural strength than conventional denture base resins.
They concluded that Ivobase® CAD has significantly lower flexural strength than the conventional denture base resins.
후속연구
For clinical use of dentures with lower thickness, further researches should be done regarding other properties at lower thickness of denture base resins.
Also the actual dentures in the oral environment function more complicatedly, undergoing several types of strength in several directions. Furthermore, additional studies on the other mechanical properties such as impact strength, fracture toughness should be done.
참고문헌 (35)
Zarb GA, Fenton AH. Prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients. 13th ed. St. Louis; Mosby/Elsevier; 2012. p. 133, 136, 140.
Anusavice KJ, Shen C, Rawls R. Phillips' science of dental materials. 12th ed. Philadelphia; Saunders/Elsevier; 2012. p. 94, 97, 480, 481, 483.
Ucar Y, Akova T, Aysan I. Mechanical properties of polyamide versus different PMMA denture base materials. J Prosthodont 2012;21:173-6.
Sasaki H, Hamanaka I, Takahashi Y, Kawaguchi T. Effect of long-term water immersion or thermal shock on mechanical properties of high-impact acrylic denture base resins. Dent Mater J 2016;35:204-9.
Kim SH, Watts DC. The effect of reinforcement with woven E-glass fibers on the impact strength of complete dentures fabricated with high-impact acrylic resin. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:274-80.
John J, Gangadhar SA, Shah I. Flexural strength of heat-polymerized polymethyl methacrylate denture resin reinforced with glass, aramid, or nylon fibers. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:424-7.
Huggett R, Bates JF, Packham DE. The effect of the curing cycle upon the molecular weight and properties of denture base materials. Dent Mater 1987;3:107-12.
El Ghazali S, Glantz PO, Strandman E, Randow K. On the clinical deformation of maxillary complete dentures. Influence of denture-base design and shape of denture-bearing tissue. Acta Odontol Scand 1989;47:69-76.
Murakami N, Wakabayashi N, Matsushima R, Kishida A, Igarashi Y. Effect of high-pressure polymerization on mechanical properties of PMMA denture base resin. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2013;20:98-104.
Neihart TR, Li SH, Flinton RJ. Measuring fracture toughness of high-impact poly(methyl methacrylate) with the short rod method. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:249-53.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 20795-1:2013. Dentistry - base polymers. Part 1: denture base polymers. Geneva: ISO;2015.
American Society for Testing and Materials International. ASTM D790. Standard test methods for flexural properties of unreinforced plastics and electrical insulating materials.
Gharechahi J, Asadzadeh N, Shahabian F, Gharechahi M. Flexural strength of acrylic resin denture bases processed by two different methods. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2014;8:148-52.
Neumeier TT, Neumeier H. Digital immediate dentures treatment: a clinical report of two patients. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:314-9.
Bidra AS, Taylor TD, Agar JR. Computer-aided technology for fabricating complete dentures: systematic review of historical background, current status, and future perspectives. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109:361-6.
Pereyra NM, Marano J, Subramanian G, Qeuk S, Leff D. Comparison of patient satisfaction in the fabrication of conventional dentures vs. DENTCA (CAD/CAM) dentures: A case report. J N J Dent Assoc 2015;86:26-33.
Kydd WL. The comminuting efficiency of varied occlusal tooth form and the associated deformation of the complete denture base. J Am Dent Assoc 1960;61:465-71.
Steinmassl PA, Wiedemair V, Huck C, Klaunzer F, Steinmassl O, Grunert I, Dumfahrt H. Do CAD/CAM dentures really release less monomer than conventional dentures? Clin Oral Investig 2017;21:1697-705.
Al-Dwairi ZN, Tahboub KY, Baba NZ, Goodacre CJ. A comparison of the flexural and impact strengths and flexural modulus of CAD/CAM and conventional heat-cured polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA). J Prosthodont 2020;29:341-9.
Arslan M, Murat S, Alp G, Zaimoglu A. Evaluation of flexural strength and surface properties of prepolymerized CAD/CAM PMMA-based polymers used for digital 3D complete dentures. Int J Comput Dent 2018;21:31-40.
Steinmassl O, Offermanns V, Stockl W, Dumfahrt H, Grunert I, Steinmassl PA. In vitro analysis of the fracture resistance of CAD/CAM denture base resins. Materials (Basal) 2018;11:401.
Gajewski VE, Pfeifer CS, Froes-Salgado NR, Boaro LC, Braga RR. Monomers used in resin composites: degree of conversion, mechanical properties and water sorption/solubility. Braz Dent J 2012;23:508-14.
Lee YS, Choi KK, Park SJ. Effect of resin matrix on degree of conversion and fracture toughness of dental composites. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2002;27:77-86.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.