[논문]QFD 기반의 해체공사 공법선정과 FMEA 위험성평가 통합 모델

이형용; 조재호; 손보식; 채명진; 김현수; 전재열

doi:10.5345/jkibc.2021.21.6.629

QFD 기반의 해체공사 공법선정과 FMEA 위험성평가 통합 모델
QFD-Based Integrated Model of Dismantling Method Selection and FMEA Risk Assessment for Work Stage 원문보기

한국건축시공학회지 = Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction, v.21 no.6, 2021년, pp.629 - 640

이형용 (Department of Architectural Engineering, Dankook University) , 조재호 (Department of Architectural Engineering, Dankook University) , 손보식 (Department of Architectural Engineering, Namseoul University) , 채명진 (Construction Management, Central Connecticut State University) , 김현수 (Department of Architectural Engineering, Dankook University) , 전재열 (Department of Architectural Engineering, Dankook University)

초록
AI-Helper

2018년 국토교통부 통계에 따르면 재건축 연한이 도래한 주거용 건축물은 2018년 기준 약 37%에 달한다, 해체물량의 증가는 해체산업의 성장과 함께 환경 및 안전사고 등 많은 부작용을 일으키고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 해체공법 선정에 있어 안전성, 경제성, 환경성 등을 종합적으로 고려하여 현장 적용에 가장 적합한 공법 의사결정 방법을 제시하고, 특히 해체공사의 안전성을 고려하여 현장 공법 적용 시 위험요인에 대한 사전평가를 통해 공법선정뿐만 아니라 선정 공법의 현장 적용성을 평가한다. 이를 위해 본 연구는 QFD 기반의 TOPSIS 해체공법선정과 FMEA 위험성평가 통합모델을 제안한다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

According to statistics from the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport in 2018, approximately 37% of residential buildings in Korea need to be reconstructed. Due to the rapid growth of the demolition industry, many side effects such as environmental destruction and safety accidents are becoming a problem in the demolition of existing buildings. This study proposes a decision-making process for selecting the most suitable dismantling method for field application by comprehensively considering safety, economic feasibility, and environmental characteristics. In particular, field applicability is evaluated by evaluating risk factors for the selected method. To this end, this study proposes the TOPSIS method for the selection of the dismantling method using the QFD development concept, and the FMEA method as a continuous development process of the selected method.

주제어

표/그림 (9)

그림 Figure 1. QFD-based dismantling method selection and FMEA risk assessment concept model
그림 Figure 2. Process of dismantling method selection and FMEA risk assessment
그림 Figure 3. HOQ and Dismantling method selection concept diagram
그림 Figure 4. QFD base FMEA detailed flowchart
표 Table 1. Defining the Requirement function, setting the importance
표 Table 2. Evaluation scale of technical characteristics
표 Table 3. Technical characteristic value of dismantling methods
표 Table 4. Calculating the general preference score of dismantling methods
표 Table 5. FMEA risk asessment of selected dismantling work stage

참고문헌 (20)

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Green Architecture Department. Architectural Statistics Collection Book. Sejong (Korea): Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport; 2019.
Ministry of Employment and Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Agency. Safety Work Procedures for Dismantling Construction. Sejong (Korea): Ministry of Employment and Labor; 2017. p. 4-8.
Chun JY, Cho JH, Kim HS, Chae MJ, Hong EH, Kim TY, Yoon JH, Lee HY, Sin CH. A study on the management system improvement plan to strengthen the professionalism of the dismantling work. Yongin (Korea): Dankook University BIG MV Book; 2019. p. 81-3.
Kim, HJ. Methods to establish a separation and dismantling process to improve resource recycling efficiency. Construction Engineering and Management. 2004 Dec;5(6):42-5.
Kim GJ. An evaluation model of user-oriented preference analysis based on QFD-TOPSIS for design alternative selection of apartment housing remodeling. [dissertation]. [Yongin (Korea)]: Dankook University. 2016; p. 62-76.
Hong EH. A study on performance assessment information system for building remodeling. [dissertation]. [Yongin (Korea)]: Dankook University. 2014. p. 20-6.
Hwang CL, Yoon K. Multiple attribute decision making methods and applications. New York: Springer; c1981. Chapter, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems; p. 58-191. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9_3
Yoon, K. A reconciliation among discrete compromise situations. The Journal of the Operational Research Society. 1987 Mar; 38(3):277-86. https://doi.org/10.2307/2581948

상세보기
Hwang CL, Lai YJ, Liu TY. A new approach for multiple objective decision making. Computers & Operations Research. 1993 Oct;20(8):889-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(93)90109-V

상세보기
Assari A. Mahesh TM, Assari E. Role of public participation in sustainability of historical city: usage of TOPSIS method. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2012 Apr;5(3):2289-94. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2012/v5i3.2

상세보기
Yu JH, Song JW, Kim CD. Construction safety management using FMEA technique for selecting priority order. Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2008 Dec;9(6):185-93.
Korea Institute of Construction Technology. A Comaparative Study on Demolition Methods in the Boildings. Goyang (Korea): Korea Institute of Construction Technology; 1998. p. 137-45.
Korea Housing Corporation. A Study on the Demolition Method of Structure(I). Jinju (Korea): Korea Housing Corporation; 1996. p. 103-12.
Kim BS, Kim TH, Park CS. A selection model of demolition method considering the characteristics of remodeling project. Proceeding of Architectural Institute of Korea; 2002 Oct 26; Gunsan, Korea. Seoul (Korea): Architectural Institute of Korea; 2002. p. 443-6.
Lee HM, GoSS. A study on the system development for optimum method selection in demolition works. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea. 2008 May;24(5)193-200.
Lee JY, Gu CW, Kim TW, Lee CS. A study on selection of demolition techniques. Proceedings of the conference Korea Construction Management Association; 2019 Nov 15; Goyang, Korea. Seoul (Korea): Korea Construction Management Association; 2019. p. 193-7.
Sung YH, Noh HS, Ahn YS. Development of selection model for building dismantling method using AHP technique. Proceedings of the conference Korea Construction Management Association; 2019 Nov 15; Goyang, Korea. Seoul (Korea): Korea Construction Management Association; 2019. p. 283-7.
Kim HH, Lee G. A quantitative analysis of fatal accidents related to cranes using the FMEA method. Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction. 2007 Jun;7(3):115-122. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIC.2007.7.3.115

원문보기 상세보기
Hong YT, Yu JH, Lim GH, Lee HS. Evaluation of time-affecting factors in high-rise building construction using FMEA. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea. 2004 Oct;20(10):173-92.
Kim KH, Choi JS, Shin SH, Yang CH. Analysis of the risk factors in demolition. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea. 2008 Jan;24(1):151-8.

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증