$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

학습노력, 태도 및 성취목표가 수학 학업성취도에 미치는 직·간접적인 영향에 대한 종단연구: 초·중학생을 대상으로
A Longitudinal Study on the Influence of Learning Effort, Attitude, and Achievement Goal on Mathematics Academic Achievement : For elementary and secondary school students 원문보기

Journal of the Korean Society of Mathematical Education. Series C : Education of primary school mathematics, v.24 no.1, 2021년, pp.1 - 20  

김용석 (성균관대학교)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

수학 학업성취도에 영향을 미치는 요인들은 끊임없이 변화하면서 수학 학업성취도에 직·간접적인 영향을 미치고 있기 때문에 그 성장을 예측하고 분석할 수 있는 종단연구가 필요하다. 본 연구는 서울교육종단연구의 2011년도(초등학교 5학년)부터 2014년(중학교 2학년)까지 학생들에 대한 종단자료를 활용하여 수학 학업성취도의 종단적인 변화양상이 유사한 그룹으로 분류하여 그룹별 학습노력과 학습태도, 성취목표의 직·간접적인 영향을 살펴보았다. 연구결과 1그룹(2277명, 67.7%)의 수학 학업성취도에는 학습노력과 학습태도가 직접적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며, 3그룹(958명, 28.5%)의 수학 학업성취도에는 학습태도가 직접적인 영향, 학습노력은 학습태도를 매개로 하여 간접적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 2그룹(127명, 3.8%)의 수학 학업성취도에는 학습태도와 학습노력, 성취목표 모두 영향을 미치지 못하는 것으로 나타났다.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Factors influencing mathematics academic achievement are constantly changing and have direct and indirect effects on mathematics achievement, so longitudinal studies that can predict and analyze their growth are needed. This study uses longitudinal data on students from 2011 (5th grade of elementary...

주제어

표/그림 (19)

참고문헌 (48)

  1. Kwak, S. R. (2009). The effects of school factors on academic achievement. Korean journal of educational research, 47(3), 93-120. 

  2. Kim, S. S., Kim, Y. B., Kang, S. C., Kim, H. C., & Shin, J. H. (2007). Korean Education Longitudian Study 2005(III): Descriptive reoprt. Seoul: KEDI. 

  3. Kim, S. H., Kang, D. H., Moon, S. M., Yoon, W. S., & Park, S. H. (2016). Research on the achievement score for the academic achievement test for the 7th year Seoul National University of Education, Seoul Institute for Education Policy, Institute of Education and Research Information. 

  4. Kim, Y. B., & Kang, H. S. (2017). Student Achievement Growth among Middle School Students. Journal of Korean Education, 44(1), 33-61. 

  5. Kim, Y. S. (2020). A longitudinal study on the effect of learner's internal and external factors on mathematics academic achievement: For middle and high school students. Doctoral thesis, Sungkyunkwan University. 

  6. Kim, J. H. (1998). A Study on the Teacher Class Evaluation of High School Students. Doctoral thesis, Chungnam University. 

  7. Kim, J. H. (2001). Relationships of Self-esteem, Self-efficacy, Learning Attitude and Subject Fondness in Academic Achievement at High School Level: A Regression Analysis. Korean Journal of Education Research, 39(4), 349-366. 

  8. Kim, J. Y., Park, I. Y., & Si, K. J. (2014). Factors affecting within-school achievement gap and school classification based on the NAEA scale score change. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 27, 1057-1082. 

  9. Kim, J. W., Yang., J. Y., Lee, C. A., & Hong, S. H. (2019). Changes in Retiree's Depression after Retirement: Applying Growth Mixture Model, survey research, 20(1), 45-72. 

  10. Kim, H. M., Kim, Y. S., & Han, S. Y. (2018). A Longitudinal Analysis on the Relationships Among Mathematics Academic Achievement, Affective Factors, and Shadow Education Participation, School Mathematics, 20(2), 287-306. 

  11. No, G. S. (2014). Well-informed Thesis Statistical analysis. Han Bit Academy. 

  12. Park, S. H., & Yoon, W. S. (2018). Seoul Education Longitudibal Study 8th User Manual. Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education Education Research Information Service Education Policy Research Institute. 

  13. Park, C. R. (2003). A study on the descent of the function-chapter in the middle school. Master's thesis, Mokpo University Graduate School of Education. 

  14. Sung, E. M. (2011). Structural Equation Model Analyzing Relationships of Visualization Tendency, Learning Attitude for the Subject, and Academic Ability for Primary School Students. The Journal of Elementary Education, 24(3), 27-50. 

  15. So, Y. H. (2008). A path analysis on the relationship of perceived social support, academic self-efficacy, achievement motivation, and academic achievement by a school grade. The Journal of Child Education, 17(2), 49-64. 

  16. Song, M. Y., Kim, S. S., Yi, H, S., & Kim J, Y. (2011). Investigation on Contextual Variables Affecting Academic Achievement. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 24(2), 261-289. 

  17. Shin, H. S., Ryu, J. H., & An, J. E. (2010). Differences between middle school students' learning skills and academic achievement according to achievement goal orientation profile. Education Research, 48(2), 45-66. 

  18. Yeo, T. H., Lim, H. J., & Hwang, M. H. (2017). The Relationship between Self-Control and Academic Achievement: The Mediating Roles of Learned Helplessness and Learning Strategies, Education Culture Research, 23(1), 315-341. 

  19. Yoo, H. H. (2005). Analysis of predictive power of related variables on academic achievement. Doctoral thesis, Hongik University. 

  20. Lee, S. J. (2012). The Relationship of Academic Self-efficacy, Task value, Achievement goal, Academic efforts and Cognitive strategies to English academic achievement between Middle and High school Students in Korea. The Journal of Educational Research, 10(4), 103-124. 

  21. Lee, J. S. (2012). The influence of self-regulated learning, achievement-goal and academic volitional control on the academic achievement of elementary school students. Master's thesis, Hanyang University Graduate School of Education. 

  22. Lee, T. S. (2010). The Relationship between learning attitude and school life adjustment by school type. Journal of Learner Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 10(3). 373-388. 

  23. Chung, Y. K. (2020) Structural Relationship among Future Time Perspective, Motivation, Effort and Academic Achievement of Middle School Students. Educational research method, 32(3), 383-404. 

  24. Cho, H. C. (2011). The effects of academic motivation, self-determination, goal orientation, self-perception, implicit theory of intelligence and self-regulated learning strategies on learning attitude, behavior and outcomes. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 25(1), 33-60. 

  25. Choi, H. & Cho, M. (2014). Identifying latent classes in adolescent's self-determination motivation and testing determinants of classes, The korean journal of school psychology 11(1), 253-274. 

  26. Hong, S. U. (2009). Analysis of large-scale academic achievement evaluation data using growth model, Collection of the 3rd KICE Curriculum Evaluation Policy Forum. 

  27. Arbona, C. (2000). The development of academic achievement in school-aged children: Precursors to career development. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Handbook of counseling psychology (3rd ed., pp. 270-309). New York: John Wiley and Sons. 

  28. Bloom, B. S. (1976). Human characteristic and school learning. N.Y: McGraw-Hill. 

  29. Bruyn, E. H., Dekovic, M., & Meijnen, G. W. (2003). Parenting, goal orientations, classroom behavior and school success in early adolescence. Applied Development Psychology, 24(4), 393-412. 

  30. Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factory analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16-29. 

  31. DeRoon-Cassini, T. A., Mancini, A. D., Rusch, M. D., & Bonanno, G. A. (2010). Psychopathology and Resilience Following Traumatic Injury: A Latent Growth Mixture Model Analysis. Rehabilitation Psychology, 1(55), 1-11. 

  32. Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256-273. 

  33. Elliot, A. J. & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2×2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501-519. 

  34. Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (2000). The relative importance of perceived ease of use in IS adoption: A study of e-commerce adoption. Journal of the association for Information Systems, 1(1), 8. 

  35. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. 

  36. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. NY: The Guilford Press. 

  37. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130-149. 

  38. Mandel, H. P., & Marcus, S. I. (1988). The psychology of underachievement: Differential diagnosis and differential treatment. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 

  39. Meece, J. L., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Hoyle, R. H. (1988). Students' goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journalof Educational Psychology, 80, 514-523. 

  40. Muthen, B. O., & Shedden, K. (1999). Finite mixture modeling with mixture outcomes using the EM algorithm. Biometrics, 55, 463-469. 

  41. Muthen, B. (2004). Latent variable analysis: Growth mixture modeling and related techniques for longitudinal data. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), Handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences. 346-368. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. 

  42. Muthen, B. O., & Asparouhov, T. (2009). Growth mixture modeling: Analysis with non-Gaussian random effects. In Fitzmaurice, G., Davidian, M., Verbeke, G., & Molenberghs, G.(eds.), Longitudinal Data Analysis, pp.143-165. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press. 

  43. Natale, K., Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J. E. (2009). Children's school performance and their parents' causal attributions to ability and effort: A logitudinal study. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 14-22. 

  44. NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathmatics. Reston. VA: NCTM. 

  45. Sternberg, R. J., & Williams, W. M. (2010). Educational psychology(2nd ed.). NJ: Pearson/Merrill. 

  46. Wickrama, K. K., Lee, T. K., O'Neal, C. W., & Lorenz, F. O. (2016). Higher-order growth curves and mixture modeling with Mplus: A practical guide. Routledge. 

  47. Wright, D. B. (2017). Some Limits Using Random Slope Models to Measure Academic Growth. In Frontiers in Education. Frontiers, 2(58). 

  48. Ye, F., & Daniel, L. (2017). The Impact of Inappropriate Modeling of Cross-Classified Data Structures on Random-Slope Models. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 16(2), 25. 

섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로