본 연구는 해양수산부의 선원정책 기본계획을 통해 수립된 정책의 중요도를 파악하고자 하는 목적에서 실시되었다. 선원정책의 중요도를 확인하기 위해 선원정책 기본계획에 의해 수립된 3대 주 정책과 15개 보조정책을 대상으로 AHP분석을 통해 연구를 진행하였다. 설문조사의 신뢰성을 조사하기 위해 회수된 응답지 34부를 대상으로 비일관성 비율을 조사한 결과 25부가 연구결과의 신뢰성이 확보된 것으로 확인되었다. 분석 결과, 주 정책 중에서는 안정적 선원 수급체계 구축정책이 가장 중요한 것으로 나타났고, 보조 정책 중에서는 일자리와 연계된 해기사 양성 정책이 가장 중요한 것으로 나타났다. 그룹별로 정부에서는 안정적인 선원 수급체계를 구축하는 것이 정책의 우선순위로 인식하는 반면, 선원의 경우 근로여건 개선 및 복지확대가 중요하다고 판단하여 차이가 발생하고 있는 것으로 조사되었다. AHP분석을 통한 선원정책의 중요도를 분석한 본 연구는 다음과 같은 의의를 갖는다. 첫째, 선원정책을 집행함에 있어 중요도를 구분하여 정책별 예산 배분 등의 효율성을 제고할 수 있는 가이드라인을 제시하였다. 둘째, 그룹별 중요도의 차이를 활용하여 선원정책 기본계획 수립을 위한 기초자료로 활용할 수 있다.
본 연구는 해양수산부의 선원정책 기본계획을 통해 수립된 정책의 중요도를 파악하고자 하는 목적에서 실시되었다. 선원정책의 중요도를 확인하기 위해 선원정책 기본계획에 의해 수립된 3대 주 정책과 15개 보조정책을 대상으로 AHP분석을 통해 연구를 진행하였다. 설문조사의 신뢰성을 조사하기 위해 회수된 응답지 34부를 대상으로 비일관성 비율을 조사한 결과 25부가 연구결과의 신뢰성이 확보된 것으로 확인되었다. 분석 결과, 주 정책 중에서는 안정적 선원 수급체계 구축정책이 가장 중요한 것으로 나타났고, 보조 정책 중에서는 일자리와 연계된 해기사 양성 정책이 가장 중요한 것으로 나타났다. 그룹별로 정부에서는 안정적인 선원 수급체계를 구축하는 것이 정책의 우선순위로 인식하는 반면, 선원의 경우 근로여건 개선 및 복지확대가 중요하다고 판단하여 차이가 발생하고 있는 것으로 조사되었다. AHP분석을 통한 선원정책의 중요도를 분석한 본 연구는 다음과 같은 의의를 갖는다. 첫째, 선원정책을 집행함에 있어 중요도를 구분하여 정책별 예산 배분 등의 효율성을 제고할 수 있는 가이드라인을 제시하였다. 둘째, 그룹별 중요도의 차이를 활용하여 선원정책 기본계획 수립을 위한 기초자료로 활용할 수 있다.
This study aimed to determine the importance of the policies formulated through the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries' master plan for Seafarer's policy. To confirm the importance of the Seafarer's policy, AHP analysis was conducted on the 3 main policies and 15 auxiliary policies establish...
This study aimed to determine the importance of the policies formulated through the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries' master plan for Seafarer's policy. To confirm the importance of the Seafarer's policy, AHP analysis was conducted on the 3 main policies and 15 auxiliary policies established by the master plan for Seafarer's policy. To analyze the reliability of the survey, we investigated the inconsistency ratio of 34 respondents retrieved. We found that 25 respondents validated the reliability of the findings. The analysis showed that the policy of establishing a stable supply and demand system was the most important among the main policies for seafarers, while the policy of fostering seafarers linked to jobs was the most important one among the auxiliary policies. By group, the government recognized establishing a stable supply and demand system as a priority of policy. Dif erences were found on the fact that improving working conditions and expanding welfare were important for seafarers. This study, which analyzed the importance of the Seafarer's policy through AHP analysis, has the following implications. We established guidelines to enhance efficiency, such as budget allocation by policy according to the importance in implementing Seafarer's policies. Furthermore, our study can be used as basic data for establishing a master plan for Seafarer's policy by comparing differences in importance per group.
This study aimed to determine the importance of the policies formulated through the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries' master plan for Seafarer's policy. To confirm the importance of the Seafarer's policy, AHP analysis was conducted on the 3 main policies and 15 auxiliary policies established by the master plan for Seafarer's policy. To analyze the reliability of the survey, we investigated the inconsistency ratio of 34 respondents retrieved. We found that 25 respondents validated the reliability of the findings. The analysis showed that the policy of establishing a stable supply and demand system was the most important among the main policies for seafarers, while the policy of fostering seafarers linked to jobs was the most important one among the auxiliary policies. By group, the government recognized establishing a stable supply and demand system as a priority of policy. Dif erences were found on the fact that improving working conditions and expanding welfare were important for seafarers. This study, which analyzed the importance of the Seafarer's policy through AHP analysis, has the following implications. We established guidelines to enhance efficiency, such as budget allocation by policy according to the importance in implementing Seafarer's policies. Furthermore, our study can be used as basic data for establishing a master plan for Seafarer's policy by comparing differences in importance per group.
Baek, I. H. and S. H. Moon(2005), A Study on Deciding Port Development Priority, Journal of Korean Navigaition and Port Research, Vol. 29, No. 8, pp. 701-707.
Chen, C. F.(2006), Applying the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Approach to Convention Site Selection, Journal of Travel Research, Vol. 45, pp. 167-174.
Harker, P. T. and L. Vargas(1987), The Theory of Ratio Scaled Estimated : Satty's Analytical Hierarchy Process, Management Science, Vol. 33, No. 11, pp. 1385-1403.
Jeon, Y. W., S. H. Hong, and T. K. Kim(2018), A Study on Policy Measures for the Betterment of Seafarer's Welfare, Journal of Korea Maritime Law Association, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 23-66.
Ju, J. K. and M. K. Lee(2016), A Study on the Direction of the Policy of Seafarer for Enhancing the Safety Environment of Domestic Passengerships, Journal of Korean Association of Maritime Police Science, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 217-239.
Kang, M. K. and H. Y. Kim(2019), Empirical Analysis for Improvement of Safety Management of Coastal Passenger Ship - Focusing on Safety Practitioners -, Journal of Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety, Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 511-518.
Kim, T. G. and H. S. Kim(2014), Study on establishing Green Port Policy in Korea to meet Ports' Characteristics: Development of Ulsan Green Port Policy by using AHP, Journal of Navigation and Port Research, Vol. 38, No. 5, pp. 549-559.
Korea Seafarer's Welfare & Employment Center(2019), Korean Seafarer's Statistical Year Book in 2019, p. 5.
MOF(2019), Ministry of Ocean and Fisheries, Master Plan for Seafarer's Policy (2019-2023).
Moon, K. J. and S. H. Lee(2015), An Analysis of priority assessment to execute policy which use AHP - Focusing on tourism industrial policy in Jeju Special Self-Governing Province -, Journal of The Korean Regional Development Association, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 207-223.
Noh, C. K.(2005), A Study on Indemnity Management System of Remote Island Route Using AHP, Journal of Navigation and Port Research, Vol. 29, No. 5, pp. 371-376.
Satty, T. L.(1983), The Analytical Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority, Setting, Resource Allocation, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Suh, B. K.(1987), A Study on Countermeasure for Securing International Competition Power of Korean Seamen, Journal of Shipping and Logistics, Vol. 5, pp. 61-110.
Yu, E. H. and H. G. Park(2019), Analysis of Competitiveness Factors of Small and Medium-Sized Ports using AHP Method: Focused on Comparison between Daesan and Pyongtaek, Dangjin Ports, Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 155-183.
AI-Helper
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.