[논문]치위생(학)과 학생의 온라인 수업 질에 대한 만족도 조사 연구

심현주; 이선희

doi:10.22156/cs4smb.2021.11.05.176

치위생(학)과 학생의 온라인 수업 질에 대한 만족도 조사 연구
A Survey Study on Online Learning Quality Satisfaction in Dental Hygiene Students 원문보기

융합정보논문지 = Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, v.11 no.5, 2021년, pp.176 - 189

초록
AI-Helper

본 연구는 치위생(학)과 학생의 온라인 수업 질에 대한 만족도를 파악하고자 2021년 2월 3일부터 2월 17일까지 강원도 내 대학의 치위생(학)과 재학생 최종 228명을 대상으로 조사하였다. 분석결과, 좋은 수업 구성요소 별 온라인 수업 만족도는 중요도에 비하여 전반적으로 낮게 인식하였으며, 학습환경의 만족도가 중요도에 비하여 낮게 나타났다. 좋은 수업 세부 구성요소 별 온라인 수업의 중요도와 만족도의 차이는 수업의 체계성, 온라인 학습환경, 수업내용의 전달력에서 비교적 큰 차이를 보였다. 온라인 학습 콘텐츠 필요도는 수업자료와 VOD가 높게 나타났으며, 수업운영 유형의 만족도는 비실시간 수업이 높게 나타났다. 따라서 온라인 수업의 교수-설계 수립 시 질 개선을 위한 지속적인 노력이 필요하다고 생각된다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

This study was aimed to grasp online learning quality satisfaction in Dental Hygiene students. A survey was conducted targeting finally 228 dental hygiene students at a university in Gangwon Province from February 3, 2021 to February 17. As a result of analysis, the online class satisfaction by good instruction component was lower overall than importance. The learning environment satisfaction was lower than its importance. A difference between importance and satisfaction with online learning by detailed good instruction component showed a relatively big difference in systematic class, online learning environment, ability to convey the class contents. The need for online learning content was high in teaching material and VOD. The class operation type satisfaction was high in a non-real time class. Accordingly, a continuous effort is conceivably necessary for improving quality given the teaching-design establishment of online learning.

주제어

표/그림 (8)

표 Table 1. Definition of variables
표 Table 2. Importance of online class in good instruction components according to learners' characteristics. (Unit: M±SD)
표 (Continued) Table 2. Importance of online class in good instruction components according to learners’ characteristics. (Unit: M±SD)
표 Table 3. Importance of online class in the detailed good instruction components according to learners' characteristics. (Unit: M±SD)
표 Table 4. Satisfaction with online class in tgood instruction components according to learners' characteristics. (Unit: M±SD)
표 Table 5. Satisfaction with online class in the detailed good instruction components according to learners' characteristics. (Unit: M±SD)
표 Table 6. Satisfaction with a class operation type depending on learners' characteristics.
표 Table 7. Necessity for the online learning contents depending on learners' characteristics. (Unit: M±SD)

참고문헌 (25)

J. S. Kim. (2015). Effective Methods and the Characteristics of Good Teaching that Multi-majoring Learners Recognize in Large Lecture Room. Korean Journal of Youth Studies, 22(12), 703-726.
S. Saiyad, A. Virk, B. Mahajan & T. Singh (2020). Online Teaching in Medical Training: Establishing Good Online Teaching Practices from Cumulative Experience. International Journal of Applied Basic Medical Research, 10(3), 149-155. DOI : 10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_358_20

상세보기
Y. H. Lee, Y. J. Park & J. H. Yun. (2020). Exploring the"Types"through Case Analysis on Operation of Distance Education in Universities Responding to COVID-19. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 28(3), 211-234. DOI : 10.18230/tjye.2020.28.3.211

상세보기
J. G. Ruiz, M. J. Mintzer & R. M. Leipzig. (2006). The impact of E-learning in medical education. Acad Med, 81(3), 207-212. DOI : 10.1097/00001888-200603000-00002

상세보기
R. Ellaway & K. Masters. (2008). AMEE Guide 32: E-Learning in medical education Part 1: Learning, teaching and assessment. Med Teach, 30(5), 455-473. DOI : 10.1080/01421590802108331

상세보기
S. H. Kim & Y. H. Cho. (2018). Proliferation of Online Learning and the Implications for Teaching and Learning in Future University Education. Journal of Lifelong Learning Society, 14(4), 51-78. DOI : 10.26857/JLLS.2018.11.14.4.51

상세보기
Y. O. Nam. (2020). An Analysis of Needs of College Student by Major Field on Faculty Competency Factors Affecting the Quality of Online Classes. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20(22), 975-997. DOI : 10.22251/jlcci.2020.20.22.975

상세보기
H. R. Mohammad, M. G. Abdalla & A. Khaled. (2020). Challenges to Online Medical Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Cureus, 12(7), e8966. DOI : 10.7759/cureus.8966

상세보기
Williamson B, Eynon R & Potter J. (2020). Pandemic Politics, Pedagogies and Practices: Digital Technologies and Distance Education During the Coronavirus Emergency. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(2), 107-114. DOI : 10.1080/17439884.2020.1761641

상세보기
D. S. Kim & M. H. Lee. (2019). Perception on Online Learning of Faculty Members in Higher Education. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 19(13), 845-867. DOI : 10.22251/jlcci.2019.19.13.845

상세보기
Bao W. (2020). COVID-19 and Online Teaching in Higher Education: A Case Study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 113-115. DOI : 10.1002/hbe2.191.

상세보기
N. I. Kim. (2020). A Study on the Satisfaction of Non-face-to-face Online Class -Focused on K University. The Journal of Humanities and Social science (HSS21), 11(5), 1145-1158. DOI : 10.22143/HSS21.11.5.83

상세보기
W. K. Choi. (2020). Comparison Between Online and Offline General English Classes in a Graduate School: A Case Study Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of the Korea English Education Society, 19(4), 223-245. DOI : 10.18649/jkees.2020.19.4.223
M. J. Park. (2008). Students' Perceptions of Good Teaching in Higher Education -An Essay-Review of College Students-. Chungnam National University Humanities Research, 35(3), 229-253.
S. J. Yune. (2012). Analysis of Good College Teaching Characteristics by Multi-faceted Approach. Jounal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education, 24(6), 963-976.

원문보기 상세보기
M. J. Oh. (2019). Analysis of Teachers' and Students' Perceptions of "Good Lecture Component Factors" at College and Educational Needs. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 27(1), 1-22. DOI : 10.18230/tjye.2019.27.1.1

상세보기
S. H. Kang. (2003). An Examination of the Effectiveness of Realtime and Non-realtime Cyber Lessons for Middle School Students. Educational Technology International, 19(3), 231-259.

상세보기
Y. M. Jeon, K. R. Kim & J. S. Cho. (2016). A Study on the Effect of LMS on the Self-regulated Learning Competency and Learning Satisfaction in Higher Education. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 22(1), 55-84. DOI : 10.15833/KAFEIAM.22.1.055

상세보기
J. W. Do. (2020). An Investigation of Design Constraints in the Process of Converting Face-to-face course into Online Course. Journal of Education & Culture, 26(2), 153-173. DOI : 10.24159/joec.2020.26.2.153
H. K. Jho. (2018). Exploration of Predictive Model for Learning Outcomes of Students in the E-learning Environment by Using Machine Learning. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(21), 553-572. DOI : 10.22251/jlcci.2018.18.21.553

상세보기
K. Chiasson, K. Terras & K. Smart. (2015). Faculty Perceptions of Moving a Face-to-Face Course to Online Instruction. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 12(3), 231-240. DOI : 10.19030/tlc.v12i3.9315

상세보기
J. B. Williams & A. Wong. (2009). The Efficacy of Final Examinations: A Comparative Study of Closed-book, Invigilated Exams and Open-book, Open-web Exams. Br J Educ Technol, 40(2), 227-236. DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00929.x

상세보기
K. H. Kim & S. B. Kang. (2019). An Exploratory Study of University Freshmen's Perceptions of Class Choice and Good Teaching. The Korean Society of Culture and Convergence, 41(6), 415-444. DOI : 10.33645/cnc.2019.12.41.6.415

상세보기
J. W. Jung & E. Y. Cho. (2019). A Study on the Conceptual Model of Effective Instruction based on Student Perspectives at C University. The Research Institue of Korean Education, 37(3), 155-177. DOI : 10.22327/kei.2019.37.3.155

상세보기
B. N. Kim. (2010). A comparison study on the instruction effects of blended learning and traditional face-to face learning in university. Master thesis. Sungshin Women's University, Seoul.

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증