[논문]한강 주요 하천의 겨울철 조류상 변화 장기 모니터링: 기존 생물다양성과 계통적 생물다양성 평가 및 비교

윤성호; 홍미진; 최진환; 이후승; 유정칠

doi:10.14249/eia.2021.30.3.164

한강 주요 하천의 겨울철 조류상 변화 장기 모니터링: 기존 생물다양성과 계통적 생물다양성 평가 및 비교
Wintering Avifauna Change Long-term Monitoring in Major Watershed Tributariesin Han River: Fundamental and Phylogenetic Biodiversity Assessment and Comparison 원문보기

환경영향평가 = Journal of environmental impact assessment, v.30 no.3, 2021년, pp.164 - 174

윤성호 (경희대학교 생물학과.한국조류연구소) , 홍미진 (경희대학교 생물학과.한국조류연구소) , 최진환 (경희대학교 생물학과.한국조류연구소) , 이후승 (한국환경정책.평가연구원) , 유정칠 (경희대학교 생물학과.한국조류연구소)

초록
AI-Helper

개체수와 종수에 기초한 기존 생물다양성 평가와 달리, 계통적 다양성 평가는 계통유전적 다양성 및 생태적 다양성도 평가할 수 있다. 본 연구에서는 서울특별시 철새보호구역으로 지정되어 다년간의 생태모니터링이 용이한 한강의 주요 하천인 중랑천, 청계천 및 안양천의 지난 9년간의 겨울철 조류상 장기 모니터링 결과를 이용하여 기존의 다양성 평가와 계통적 다양성 평가를 각각 수행한 뒤 각 결과가 내포하는 정보에 대해 고찰했다. 분석결과 중랑천과 안양천은 전반적으로 조류 개체수가 시계열적으로 감소한 반면 청계천은 개체수 변동이 없었다. 종 풍부도는 청계천에서 시간에 따라 소폭 상승한 반면, 중랑천과 안양천은 연도별로 차이가 없었다. 기존 종 다양도는 안양천을 제외한 중랑천과 청계천에서 시간에 따라 증가했는데, 계통적 종 다양도는 청계천에서만 증가하는 추세를 보였다. 이러한 생물다양성 평가 지수의 변동은 각 조사구역 내에서 발생한 공사 등의 인위적 요인에 의한 것으로 판단되며, 종 다양도와 계통적 종 다양도는 같은 결과를 반영하지 않는다는 것을 보여준다. 따라서 본 연구는 생물다양성 평가에 있어 유전 및 생태적 관점과 같은 다양한 시각에서 고려할 필요가 있음을 시사한다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

Information on biodiversity plays an important role in conservation planning for ecosystem. As existing biodiversity indices are calculated and predicted only based on the number of individuals and species, it is difficult to explain aspects of genetic and ecological diversity. Phylogenetic diversity can indirectly evaluate ecological diversity as well as genetic diversity overlooked by existing biodiversity assessments. In this study, typical metrics of biodiversity (e.g., species diversity, species richness, etc.) and phylogenetic diversity were evaluated together using a long-term monitoring data of winter birds in Jungrang, Cheonggye and Anyang stream where are designated as Seoul migratory bird reserves. Then discussed the meaning of each assessmentresult. In Jungrang and Anyang stream, the number of individuals generally decreased overtime, whereas in Cheonggye stream, there was no significant change. In addition, species abundance increased over time slightly in Cheonggye stream, while there was no significant change in Jungrang and Anyang stream. Species diversity temporally increased in Jungrang and Cheonggye stream, excluding Anyang stream, but phylogenetic diversity showed a tendency to increase only in Cheonggye stream. These changes in the biodiversity assessment indices are thought to be due to anthropogenic disturbances such as construction that occurred within each site, and it was shown that species diversity and phylogenetic diversity do not always lead to the same assessment results. Therefore, this study suggests that biodiversity assessment needs to be considered from various contexts such as genetic and ecological perspectives.

주제어

표/그림 (4)

그림 Figure 1. Maps of the three study sites, Anyang (a), Jungrang (b) and Cheonggye (c) tributary downstreams. Inner ranges of yellow lines represent survey ranges.
그림 Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree with observed bird species in three study sites. Circles represent bird species occurrences corresponding row in reserve areas corresponding column.
그림 Figure 3. Total number of avian species (a) and number of individuals (b) of three reserves following survey years. Points represent mean number of observed species and mean number of avian individuals, and vertical lines indicate these confidential intervals in the study site of total surveys during the survey year.
그림 Figure 4. Measures of species diversity indices following survey years, with three study area comparison: (a) Simpson's species diversity (H') and (b) phylogenetic diversity (PD). Points represent mean number of H', and PD respectively, and vertical lines indicate these confidential intervals in the study site of total surveys during the survey year.

참고문헌 (39)

Anderson MG, Rhymer JM, Rohwer FC. 1992. Philopatry, dispersal, and the genetic structure of waterfowl populations. In: Batt BDJ, Afton AD, Anderson MG, Ankney CD, Johnson DH, Kadlec JA, Krapu GL, editors. Ecology and management of breeding waterfowl. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis. pp. 365-395.
Bibby CJ, Burgess ND, Hill DA, Mustoe S. 2000. Bird census techniques, 2nd ed. Academic Press, London.
Bonn A, Gaston KJ. 2005. Capturing biodiversity: selecting priority areas for conservation using different criteria. Biodiversity and Conservation 14: 1083-1100.

상세보기
Cadotte MW, Davies TJ. 2016. Phylogenies in ecology: a guide to concepts and methods. Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
CBD. 2010. COP 10 decision X/2, the strategic plan for biodiversity 2011-2020 and the Aichi biodiversity targets. Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal.
Chao A, Chiu C-H, Jost L. 2010. Phylogenetic diversity measures based on Hill numbers. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 365(1558): 3599-3609.

상세보기
Clarke K, Warwick R. 2001. A further biodiversity index applicable to species lists: variation in taxonomic distinctness. Marine Ecology Progress Series 216: 265-278.

상세보기
Crozier R. 1997. Preserving the information content of species: genetic diversity, phylogeny, and conservation worth. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28: 243-268.

상세보기
Davies TJ, Buckley LB. 2011. Phylogenetic diversity as a window into the evolutionary and biogeographic histories of presentday richness gradients for mammals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 366(1576): 2414-2425.

상세보기
Davies TJ, Cadotte MW. 2011. Quantifying biodiversity: does it matter what we measure? In: Zachos FE, Habel JC, editors. Biodiversity hotspots. SpringerVerlag, Berlin, Heidelberg. pp.43-60.
Devictor V, Mouillot D, Meynard C, Jiguet F, Thuiller W, Mouquet N. 2010. Spatial mismatch and congruence between taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity: the need for integrative conservation strategies in a changing world. Ecology Letters 13(8): 1030-1040.

상세보기
Dugger BD, Feddersen JC. 2009. Using river flow management to improve wetland habitat quality for waterfowl on the Mississippi River, USA. Wildfowl 59: 62-74.

상세보기
Faith D. 1992. Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biological Conservation 61(1): 1-10.

상세보기
Fleishman E, Noss RF, Noon BR. 2006. Utility and limitations of species richness metrics for conservation planning. Ecological Indicators 6(3): 543-553.

상세보기
Flynn DF, Mirotchnick N, Jain M, Palmer MI, Naeem S. 2011. Functional and phylogenetic diversity as predictors of biodiversity ecosystem function relationships. Ecology 92(8): 1573-1581.

상세보기
Gerhold P, Partel M, Liira J, Zobel K, Prinzing A. 2008. Phylogenetic structure of local communities predicts the size of the regional species pool. Journal of Ecology 96(4): 709-712.

상세보기
Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK. 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecology Letters 4(4): 379-391.

상세보기
Greenwood PJ. 1980. Mating systems, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals. Animal Behaviour 28(4): 1140-1162.

상세보기
Hackett SJ, Kimball RT, Reddy S, Bowie RC, Braun EL, Braun MJ, Chojnowski JL, Cox WA, Han K-L, Harshman J, Huddleston CJ, Marks BD, Miglia KJ, Moore WS, Sheldon FH, Steadman DW, Witt CC, Yuri T. 2008. A phylogenomic study of birds reveals their evolutionary history. Science 320(5884): 1763-1768.

상세보기
Huang M, Liu X, Cadotte MW, Zhou S. 2020. Functional and phylogenetic diversity explain different components of diversity effects on biomass production. Oikos 129 (8): 1185-1195.

상세보기
IPBES. 2019. Summary for Policymarkers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. p. 56.
Jost L. 2006. Entropy and diversity. Oikos 113(2): 363-375.

상세보기
Kang SH. 2007. The aassessment of urban stream ecosystem for ecological management: on the case of Cheonggye-cheon. Dissertation for the degree of Philosophy. Sangmyung University, Seoul.
Kembel SW, Cowan PD, Helmus MR, Cornwell WK, Morlon H, Ackerly DD, Blomberg SP, Webb CO. 2010. Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinformatics 26(11): 1463-1464.

상세보기
Korea Meteorological Administration. 2017. Report on climate change forecast for Paris agreement in Seoul.
Kwon Y, Rho T, Lee H, Choung H. 2006. An approach to introduce biodiversity components in the environmental assessment system in Korea. Korea Environment Institute, Seoul. [Korean Literature]
Lawton JH, Bignell DE, Bolton B, Bloemers G, Eggleton P, Hammond PM, Hodda M, Holt R, Larsen T, Mawdsley N, Stork N, Srivastava D, Watt A. 1998. Biodiversity inventories, indicator taxa and effects of habitat modification in tropical forest. Nature 391(6662): 72-76.

상세보기
Leonard D, Clarke KR, Somerfield PJ, Warwick RM. 2006. The application of an indicator based on taxonomic distinctness for UK marine biodiversity assessments. Journal of Environmental Management 78(1): 52-62.

상세보기
Magurran AE, McGill BJ. 2010. Biological diversity: frontiers in measurement and assessment. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
Pavoine S, Love MS, Bonsall MB. 2009. Hierarchical partitioning of evolutionary and ecological patterns in the organization of phylogeneticallystructured species assemblages: application to rockfish (genus: Sebastes) in the Southern California Bight. Ecology Letters 12(9): 898-908.

상세보기
R Core Team. 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing.
Ricklefs RE, Jonsson KA. 2014. Clade extinction appears to balance species diversification in sister lineages of Afro-Oriental passerine birds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(32): 11756-11761.

상세보기
Riffell SK, Keas BE, Burton TM. 2001. Area and habitat relationships of birds in Great Lakes coastal wet meadows. Wetlands 21(4): 492-507.

상세보기
Robertson GJ, Cooke F. 1999. Winter philopatry in migratory waterfowl. Auk. 116(1): 20-34.

상세보기
Rodrigues A, Brooks TM, Gaston K. 2005. Integrating phylogenetic diversity in the selection of priority areas for conservation: does it make a difference? In: Purvis A, Gittleman JL, Brooks TM, editors. Phylogeny and conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. pp. 101-119.
Safi K, Cianciaruso MV, Loyola RD, Brito D, Armour-Marshall K, Diniz-Filho JAF. 2011. Understanding global patterns of mammalian functional and phylogenetic diversity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 366 (1577): 2536-2544.

상세보기
Shannon CE, Weaver W. 1949. The mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press Urbana.
Voskamp A, Baker DJ, Stephens PA, Valdes PJ, Willis SG. 2017. Global patterns in the divergence between phylogenetic diversity and species richness in terrestrial birds. Journal of Biogeography 44(4): 709-721.

상세보기
Wilson KA, Westphal MI, Possingham HP, Elith J. 2005. Sensitivity of conservation planning to different approaches to using predicted species distribution data. Biological Conservation 122(1): 99-112.

상세보기

저자의 다른 논문 :

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format