$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

조건부스펙트럼을 적용한 원전 격납건물의 비선형 동적 해석 기반 지진취약도평가
Application of Conditional Spectra to Seismic Fragility Assessment for an NPP Containment Building based on Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis 원문보기

한국지진공학회논문집 = Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea, v.25 no.4, 2021년, pp.179 - 189  

신동현 (인천대학교 일반대학원 건축학과) ,  박지훈 (인천대학교 도시건축학부) ,  전성하 (인천대학교 산학협력단)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Conditional spectra (CS) are applied to the seismic fragility assessment of a nuclear power plant (NPP) containment building for comparison with a relevant conventional uniform hazard response spectrum (UHRS). Three different control frequencies are considered in developing conditional spectra. The ...

주제어

참고문헌 (32)

  1. EPRI, Seismic Fragility and Seismic Margin Guidance for Seismic Probabilistic Risk Assessments. EPRI 3002012994. EPRI Palo Alto. CA. c2018. 

  2. Choi IK, Ahn SM, Choun YS. Seismic Fragility Analysis of PSC Containment Building by Nonlinear Anaysis. Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. 2006 Feb;10(1):63-74. 

  3. Choi IK, Choun YS, Ahn SM, Seo JM. Probabilistic seismic risk analysis of CANDU containment structure near-fault earthquakes. Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute. Republic of Korea. 2008 Jun;238(6):1382-1391. 

  4. Kim MK, Choi IK. Effect of Evaluation Response Spectrum on the Seismic Risk of Structure. Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. 2009 Dec;13(6):39-46. 

  5. Hahm D, Seo JM, Choi IK, Rhee HM. Uniform Hazard Spectrum Evaluation Method for Nuclear Power Plants on Soil Sites based on the Hazard Spectra of Bedrock Sites. Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. 2012 Jun;16(3):35-42. 

  6. Baker JW. Conditional Mean Spectrum: Tool for Ground-Motion Selection. Journal of Structural Engineering. 2011 Mar;137(3):322-331. 

  7. ASCE/SEI 7-16. Minimum Design Loads and Associated Creteria for Buildings and other Structures. c2017. 

  8. Haselton CB, Baker JW, Stewart JP, Whittaker AS, Luco N, Fry A, Hamburger RO, Zimmerman RB, Hooper JD, Charney FA, Pekelnicky RG. Response History Analysis for the Design of New Buildings in the NEHRP provisions and ASCE/SEI 7 Standard: part I - overviwe and Specification of Ground Motions. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute. 2017 May;33(2):373-395. 

  9. Haselton CB, Fry A, Hamburger RO, Baker JW, Zimmerman RB, Luco N, Elwood KJ, Hooper JD, Charney FA, Pekelinicky RG, Whittaker AS. Response History Analysis for the Design of New Buildings in the NEHRP Provisions and ASCD/SEI 7 Standard:Part II-Structural Aanlysis Procedures and Acceptance Criteria. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute. 2017 May;33(2):397-417. 

  10. Jarrett JA, Zimmerman RB, Charney FA, Jalalian A. ResponseHistory Analysis for the Design of New Buildings in the NEHRP Provisions and ASCE/SEI 7 Sthandard: Part IV-A Study of Assumptions. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute. 2017 May;33(2):449-468. 

  11. Zimmerman RB, Baker JW, Hooper JD, Bono S, Haselton CB, Engel A, Hamburger RO, Celikbas A, Jalalian A. Response History Analysis for the Design of New Buildings in the NEHRP Provisions and ASCD/SEI 7 Standard : Part III - Example Applications Illustrating the Recommended Methodology. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute. 2017 May;33(2):419-447. 

  12. Renault P. PEGASOS refinement project: new findings and challenges from a PSHA for Swiss Nuclear Power Plants, Transactions, SMiRT 21. 2011 Nov;Div-IV:Paper ID# 561. 

  13. Renault P, Kurmann D. Comparison of uniform hazard spectra and conditional spectra approach in the framework of fragility curve development. Transactions. SMiRT 22. 2013 Aug;Div-IV. 

  14. Renault P, Proske D, Kurmann D, Asfura AP. Evaluation of the seismic risk of a NPP building using the conditional spectra approach. Transactions. SMiRT 23. 2015 Aug;Div-IV. 

  15. Renault P, Asfura AP. Comparison of approaches for selecting and adjusting time histories to be used in seismic fragility analyses. Transactions. SMiRT 25. 2019 Aug;Div-IV. 

  16. Reed JW, Kennedy RP. Methodology for developing seismic fragilities, EPRI TR-103959. Electric Power Research Institute. Palo Alto. CA. c1994. 

  17. Park WH, Park JH. Seismic Fragility Assessment of NPP Containment Structure based on Conditional Mean Spectra for Multiple Earthquake Scenarios. Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. 2019 Nov;23(6):301-309. 

  18. Park WH, Seismic Fragility Analysis of Nuclear Power Plant Containment Structures Based on Conditional Spectrum. Incheon National University. 2019 Dec. 

  19. Korea Electrical Power Corporation. Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co., LTD. APR1400 DESIGN CONTROL DOCUMENT TIER2. APR1400-K-X-FS-14002-NP REVISION 0. Republic of Korea. c2014. 

  20. Japan Electric Association (JEA). Technical Guidelines for A Seismic Design of Nuclear Power Plants. JEAG-4601. Japan Electric Association. Tokyo. Japan. c1991. 

  21. Chang GA, Mander JB. Seismic energy based fatigue damage analysis of bridge columns: part 1 - evaluation of seismic capacity, NCEER Technical Rep. No. NCEER-94-0006, c1994. 

  22. Ogaki Y, Kobayashi M, Takeda T, Yamaguchi T, Yoshizaki K, Sugano S. Shear strength tests of prestressed concrete containment vessels. SMiRT-6. 1981;13(22)J4/3. 

  23. American Society of Civil Engineers. Seismic Design Criteria for Structures, Systems, and Components in Nuclear Facilities. ASCE/SEI 43-05. American Society of Civil Engineers. c2005. 

  24. Atkinson GM, Boore DM. Earthquake Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for Eastern North America. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 2006;96(6):2181-2205. 

  25. Lin T, Harmsen SC, Baker JW, Luco N. Conditional spectrum computation incorporating multiple causal earthquakes and ground motion prediction models. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2013;103(2A):1103- 1116. 

  26. Al Atik L, Abrahamson NA. An improved method for non-stationary spectral matching. Earthquake Spectra. 2010;26(3):601-617. 

  27. Jayaram N, Lin T, Baker JW. A Computationally Efficient GroundMotion Selection Algorithm for Matching a Target Response Spectrum Mean and Variance. Earthquake Spectra. 2011 Aug;27(3):797-815. 

  28. Helton JC, Davis FJ. Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2003;81(1):23-69. 

  29. Vamvatsikos DC, Cornell CA. Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2002;31(3):491-514. 

  30. Jiang L, Zhong J, He M, Yuan W. Optimal seismic intensity measure selection for isolated bridges under pulse-like ground motions. Advances in Civil Engineering. c2019. 

  31. Khosravikia F, Clayton P. Updated evaluation metrics for optimal intensity measure selection in probabilistic seismic demand models. Engineering Structures 2020;202(109899). 

  32. Baker JW. Efficient analytical fragility function fitting using dynamic structural analysis. Earthquake Spectra. c2014. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

GOLD

오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로