This study was conducted to reduce the exposure dose to the breast and adjacent organs as the number of Mammography increased. Therefore, it has been designed a shield in lead, bismuth + tungsten, and bismuth that does not require to be equipped by the patient, in which each type of shield was compa...
This study was conducted to reduce the exposure dose to the breast and adjacent organs as the number of Mammography increased. Therefore, it has been designed a shield in lead, bismuth + tungsten, and bismuth that does not require to be equipped by the patient, in which each type of shield was compared and analyzed of radiation exposure dose to breast, thyroid, and eye. Using a mammography machine, optically stimulated luminescent dosimeter(OSLD) was inserted to bilateral breast, thyroid, and eye of a dosimetry phantom to measure dose radiated onto the phantom. Shielding device was made in different thickness of 2mm, 3mm, and 5mm and dose evaluation was performed by measuring the dose while using lead, bismuth, and bismuth + tungsten prosthesis. When each shields combined with shielding device, were compared of dose, all showed similar does reduction in the dose to breast, thyroid, and eye in both cranialcaudal and mediolateraloblique view. Based on the current study, bismuth and bismuth + tungsten can replace conventional lead shield and it is anticipated to safely and conveniently reduce radiation exposure to breast, thyroid, and eye with the shield that does not require to be equipped.
This study was conducted to reduce the exposure dose to the breast and adjacent organs as the number of Mammography increased. Therefore, it has been designed a shield in lead, bismuth + tungsten, and bismuth that does not require to be equipped by the patient, in which each type of shield was compared and analyzed of radiation exposure dose to breast, thyroid, and eye. Using a mammography machine, optically stimulated luminescent dosimeter(OSLD) was inserted to bilateral breast, thyroid, and eye of a dosimetry phantom to measure dose radiated onto the phantom. Shielding device was made in different thickness of 2mm, 3mm, and 5mm and dose evaluation was performed by measuring the dose while using lead, bismuth, and bismuth + tungsten prosthesis. When each shields combined with shielding device, were compared of dose, all showed similar does reduction in the dose to breast, thyroid, and eye in both cranialcaudal and mediolateraloblique view. Based on the current study, bismuth and bismuth + tungsten can replace conventional lead shield and it is anticipated to safely and conveniently reduce radiation exposure to breast, thyroid, and eye with the shield that does not require to be equipped.
ICRP. The 2007 Recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection: ICRP Publication 103. Ann. ICRP 37,2007:2-4.
Cho YI. Evaluation of the usefulness of 3D printed shielding materials using monte carlo simulation during mammography. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology. 2020;14(3):295-301.
Park HH. The evaluation of performance and usability of bismuth, tungsten based shields. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology. 2018;41(6):611-6.
Jung MY, Kweon DC, Kweon SI. Effectiveness of bismuth shield to reduce eye lens radiation dose using the photoluminescence dosimetry in computed tomography. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology. 2009;32(3):307-12.
Choi WJ, Kim DH. A study on the shielding of orbit by 3D printed filament in brain CT. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology. 2021;15(2):101-8.
Sechopoulos I, Hendrik E. Mammography and the risk of thyroid cancer. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2012;198(3):705-7.
Koo BY, Kim JW. A study on the usefulness of breast shielding apron for reducing exposure dose in mammography. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology. 2019;42(2):99-104.
Hong E. Lee IJ. The usefulness of Al face block fabrication for reducing exposure dose of thyroid glands in mammography. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology. 2013;36(1):11-7.
Clement CH, Rehani MM, Ciraj-Bjelac O, VaVV E, Miller DL, Walsh S, et al. Radiological protection in fluoroscopically guided procedures performed outside the imaging department. Annals of the ICRP 2010;40(6):1-102.
Kim HS, Kim HS, Moon HS, Park JB, Oh JH, Woo WH, et al. Radiography imaging. Seoul: Daihaks; 2009;492-500.
Kang BS, Kim YL, Kim WY, Kim YH, Kim JH, Na SK, et al. Radiation therapy. Seoul: Daihaks; 2010;161-171.
Kim DS, Ahn SM. Evaluation of the fetal dose during prophylactic placement of internal iliac artery balloon occlusion catheters in placenta accreta. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology. 2016;39(3):313-21.
AI-Helper
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.