[논문]국내신도시 사례를 통해서 본 뉴어바니즘 도시설계요소 분석 -서울시 은평뉴타운 1구역을 중심으로-

나인수

doi:10.13161/kibim.2021.11.1.031

국내신도시 사례를 통해서 본 뉴어바니즘 도시설계요소 분석 -서울시 은평뉴타운 1구역을 중심으로-
An Analysis of New Urbanism Urban Design Factors in New Town -Case Study on Eunpyung New Town District 1 in Seoul - 원문보기

Journal of KIBIM = 한국BIM학회논문집, v.11 no.1, 2021년, pp.31 - 38

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

The design principles of new urbanism (NU) have been adopted for new towns-in town projects for inner city neighborhoods in Seoul, Korea Since 2000. Here, ten NU principles were matched to four urban design categories: streets, land use, housing and buildings, and public open spaces. These elements were analyzed for Eunpyung New Town project. Through the case, the applications and implications NU principles are explored. The principles of connectivity, quality architecture and urban design, increased density, green transportation, sustainability, and quality of life were positively and successively adopted for streets, land use, housing and buildings, and public open spaces. The principles of mixed-use and diversity and traditional neighborhood structure were only partially applied in land use, housing and buildings, and public open spaces. It should be note that the walkability principle is intended not for job-housing proximity, but for pedestrian-friendly street design.

주제어

표/그림 (11)

그림 Figure 1. Research flow
그림 Figure 2. Site location of eunpyung new town(ENT)
표 Table 1. Main planning Indices of ENT
그림 Figure 3. Site distribution by development stage
그림 Figure 4. Land use plan
표 Table 1. Land use area distribution
그림 Figure 5. Classification of characterized neighborhood
그림 Figure 6. Street network system
그림 Figure 7. Urban blocks and lots subdivision
그림 Figure 8. Open space network
그림 Figure 9. Channels and waterways network

참고문헌 (33)

Andersen, B. (2001). The Quest for Community: A study of Kentlands, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Bressi, W. T. (1994). Planning the American Dream, The New Urbanism: Toward an Architecture of Ccommunity, McGraw-Hill Press: NY, USA.
Burns, C. (1997). Urban or Suburban. Harvard Design Magazine, 1, pp. 46-61.
Calthorpe, P. (1993). The Next American Metropolis, Princeton Architectural Press: NY, USA.
Calthorpe, P. (1994). The Region. The New Urbanism: Toward an Architecture of Community, McGraw-Hill Press: NY, USA.
Charles C. T., Mark J. E. (1999). Valuing New Urbanism: The Case of Kentlands, Real Estate Economics, 27(3), pp. 425-451.

상세보기
Crane, R. (1996). Cars and Drivers in the New Suburabs: Linking Access to Travel in Neotraditional Planning Journal of American Planning Association, 62(1), pp. 51-65.

상세보기
Crane, R. (1996). On Form vs. Function: Will the New Urbanism Reduce Traffic, of Increase It?, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 15, pp. 117-126.

상세보기
Duany, A., Plater-Zyberk, E. (1991). Towns and Town-Making Principles, Harvard Graduate School of Design. Rizzoli: NY, USA.
Ellin, N. (1996). Postmodern Urbanism, Blackwell Publishers: MA, USA.
Ewing, R. H. (1994). Characteristics, Causes, and Effects of Sprawl: A Literature Review, Environmental and Urban Studies, 21(2), pp. 1-15.
Fainstein, S. (2000). New Directions in Planning Theory. Urban Affairs Review, 35(4), pp. 451-478.

상세보기
Flemming, D. (1998). The Space of Argument: Urban Design, Civic Discourse, and the Dream of the Good City. Argumentation, 12, pp. 147-166.

상세보기
Ford, L. R. (1999). Lynch Revisited: New Urbanism and Theories of Good City Form. Cities, 16(4), pp. 247-257.

상세보기
Fulton, W. (1996). The New Urbanism: Hope or Hype for American Communities? Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge: MA, USA.
Gordon, P., Richardson, W. (1996). Beyond Polycentricity: The Dispersed Metropolis, Los Angeles, 1970-1990 Journal of American Planning Association, 62(3), pp. 289-295.

상세보기
Hall, K., Porterfield, G. (2001). Community by Design. McGraw-Hill Press: NY, USA.
Harvey, D. (1997). The New Urbanism and the Communitarian Trap. Harvard Design Magazine, 1, pp. 68-69.
Katz, P. (1994). The New Urbanism: Toward an Architecture of Ccommunity, McGraw-Hill Press: NY, USA.
Kayden, J. (2005). What's the Mission of Harvard's Urban Planning Program?, Harvard Design Magazine, 22, pp. 1-4.
Kim, H. S. (2006). Is New Urbanism Modern or Postmodern?. Journal of Korean Urban Management Association, 19(2), pp. 49-74.
Kim, H. S. (2006). Reality of New Urbanism: The Case of Kentlands, the U.S.A. The Korea Spatial Planning Review, 51, pp. 109-130.
Kim, H. S. (2007). Applicability of New Urbanism to Korea: Survey of Residents of the Seoul Metropolitan Area, The Korea Spatial Planning Review, 55, pp. 155-178.

상세보기
Kim, J. (2001). Sense of Community in Neotraditional and Conventional suburban development, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Michigan, MI, USA.
Lee C. M., Ahn, K. H. (2003). Is Kentlands better than Radburn? Journal of American Planning Association, 69(1), pp. 50-71

상세보기
Moule, E., Polyzoides S. (1994). The street, the Block, and the Building, The New Urbanism: Toward an Architecture of Ccommunity, McGraw-Hill Press: NY, USA.
Newman, P. W. G., Kenworthy, J. R. (1988). The Transport Energy Trade-Off: Fuel Efficient Traffic vs Fuel Efficient Cities. Transportation Research Record, 22(3), pp. 163-174.

상세보기
Oranje, M. (2002). Planning and the postmodern Turn, Planning futures, New Directions for Planning Theory Routledge: London, UK.
Park, J. H., Lee, J. R. (2012). A Study on the Possibility to Apply the Characteristics of New Urbanism and Our Country in a New City Business Seen from the Point of View of Modernism and Post-modernism, Journal of the Korean Digital Architecture Interior Association, 12(4), pp. 107-116.
Park, Y. C., Ryu, J. S. (2000). Prospects and Limitations of Urban Design Prototypes in New Urbanism. Journal of Architectural Institution of Korea, 139, pp. 77-86.
Talen, E. (1999). Sense of Community and Neighborhood Form: An Assessment of the Social Doctrine of New Urbanism. Urban Studies, 36(8), pp. 1361-1379.

상세보기
Woodhull, J. (1992). Sustainable Cities: How Alternative Forms of Development Can Reduce Traffic Congestion, EHM Eco-Home Media: CA, USA.
Principles of New Urbanism. Available online: http://newurbanism.org(Accessed on 5 Dec 2020)

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증