최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기한국심리학회지 : 법, v.12 no.2, 2021년, pp.121 - 149
김혜진 (고려대학교 심리학부) , 이상민 (고려대학교 심리학부) , 허태균 (고려대학교 심리학부) , 최승혁 (고려대학교 심리학부)
Statement Validity Analysis (SVA) is utilized in criminal investigations and the court to assess the credibility of given statements. During this procedure, the criteria for Criteria-Based Content Analysis (CBCA) are used to evaluate whether statements include the characteristics reflecting actual e...
경찰청 (2017). 진술분석전문가 의견 작성 매뉴얼. 서울: 경찰청.
고은영, 채규만 (2011). 성폭력 피해 아동의 진술에 대한 준거기반 내용분석의 활용 가능성 연구. 한국범죄심리연구, 7, 5-22.
김미영 (2016). 진술분석 절차에 관한 연구. 경기대학교대학원 박사학위논문.
김현정 (2009). 성폭력 피해 아동의 진술 신빙성 평가도구의 상대적 유용성 비교. 경기대학교대학원 박사학위논문.
김현정 (2010). CBCA와 RM을 이용한 성폭력 피해 아동의 진술 신빙성 평가. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 15(3), 355-379.
신우종 (2015). 체계적 고찰과 메타분석의 개요. Hanyang Med Review, 35(1), 9-17.
윤대중 (2019). 통합적 심리증거 수사기법의 효율성에 대한 사례연구. 충남대학교대학원 박사학위논문.
윤여훈 (2008). 아동들의 가해.피해 진술에 대한 준거기반 내용분석의 타당성 연구. 강원대학교대학원 석사학위논문.
이미선 (2018). 비밀을 이야기 하지 않는 아동의 진술특성: 준거기반내용분석 (CBCA)을 중심으로. 피해자학연구, 26(3), 71-95.
이수정 (2010). 아동 성폭력 패해 진술에 대한 신빙성 분석도구들의 타당도 연구. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 24(2), 105- 116.
이수정, 유진옥 (2010). 지적장애인 성폭력 피해자의 진술 특성에 대한 실증연구. 한국경찰연구, 9(2), 161-184.
정의철, 이창호 (2017). 아동학대 사건에 대한 뉴스 프레임 분석과 대안 모색: 평택 아동학대 사건을 중심으로. 한국방송학보, 31(2), 77-108.
조은경 (2004). 성폭력 피해 아동의 진술 타당도 분석 및 활용방안에 관한 연구. 한국형사정책연구원 연구총서.
홍성열 (2007). 진술분석기법의 타당성연구. 대검찰청용역연구과제.
홍세희 (2013). 메타분석의 이론과 적용. 서울: 에스앤엠 리서치 그룹.
황성동 (2014). 알기 쉬운 메타분석의 이해. 서울: 학지사.
Amado, B. G., Arce, R., & Farina, F. (2015). Undeutsch hypothesis and criteria-based content analysis: A meta-analytic review. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 7(1), 3-12.
Amado, B. G., Arce, R., Farina, F., & Vilarino, M. (2016). Criteria-Based content analysis (CBCA) reality criteria in adults: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 16(2), 201-210.
Akehurst, L., Kohnken, G., & Hofer, E. (2001). Content credibility of accounts derived from live and video presentations. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 6, 65-83.
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. (2009). An introduction to meta-analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Boychuk, T. (1991). Criteria-Based Content Analysis of children's statements about sexual abuse: A field-based validation study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University.
Esplin, P. W., Boychuk, T., & Raskin, D. C. (1988). A field validity study of Criteria-Based Content Analysis of children's statements in sexual abuse cases. Paper presented at the NATO Advanced Study Institute on Credibility Assessment, Maratea, Italy.
Hauch, V., Sporer, S. L., Masip, J., & Blandon-Gitlin, I. (2017). Can credibility criteria be assessed reliably? A meta-analysis of Criteria-based Content Analysis. Psychological Assessment, 29(6), 819-834.
Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic Press.
Huitt, W., & Hummel, J. (2003). Piaget's theory of cognitive development. Educational psychology interactive, 3(2), 1-5.
Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (1988). Gender differences in verbal ability: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 53-69.
Kohnken, G. (1996). Social psychology and the law. In G. R. Semin and K. Fiedler (eds.), Applied social psychology (pp. 257-82). London: Sage.
Kohnken, G. (1999). Statement validity assessment. preconference programme of applied courses "Ases ing credibility", organised by the European Asociation of Psychology and Law, Dublin, Ireland.
Kohnken, G. (2004). Statement Validity Analysis and the 'detection of the truth'. In P. A. Granhag & L. A. Stromwall (Eds.), Deception detection in forensic contexts (pp. 41-63). Cambrige, England: Cambrige University Press.
Kohnken, G., Schimossek, E., Aschermann, E., & Hofer, E. (1995). The cognitive interview and the assessment of the credibility of adults' statements. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(6), 671.
Merckelbach, H. (2004). Telling a good story: Fantasy proneness and the quality of fabricated memories. Personality and Individual Dif erences, 37, 1371-1382.
Oberlader, V. A. (2019). Meta-analyses on the validity of verbal tools for credibility assessment (doctoral dissertation). Bonn, Germany: University of Bonn.
Oberlader, V. A., Naefgen, C., Koppehele-Gossel, J., Quinten, L., Banse, R., & Schmidt, A. F. (2016). Validity of content-based techniques to distinguish true and fabricated statements: A meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 40, 440-457.
Oberlader, V. A., Quinten, L., Banse, R., Volbert, R., Schmidt, A. F., & Schonbrodt, F. D. (2021). Validity of content-based techniques for credibility assessment: How telling is an extended meta-analysis taking research bias into account?. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(2), 393-410.
Porter, S., & Yuille, J. C. (1996). The language of deceit: An investigation of the verbal clues to deception in the interrogation context. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 443-459.
Raskin, D. C., Esplin, F. W., & Horowitz, S. (1991). Investigative interviews and assessment of children in sexual abuse cases (Unpublished manuscript). University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.(as cited in Oberlader, 2005).
Roma, P., San Martini, P., Sabatello, U., Tatarelli, R., & Ferracuti, S. (2011). Validity of criteria-based content analysis (CBCA) at trial in free-narrative interviews. Child Abuse & Neglect, 35, 613-620.
Ruby, C. L., & Brigham, J. C. (1997). The usefulness of the Criteria-Based Content Analysis technique in distinguishing between truthful and fabricated allegations. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 3, 705-737.
Santtila, P., Roppola, H., Runtti, M., & Niemi, P. (2000). Assessment of child witness statements using Criteria-Based Content Analysis (CBCA): The effects of age, verbal ability, and interviewer's emotional style. Psychology, Crime and Law, 6(3), 159-179.
Schacter, D. L., & Addis, D. R. (2007). The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory: remembering the past and imagining the future. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362(1481), 773-786.
Sporer, S. L. (1997). The less travelled road to truth: verbal cues in deception detection in accounts of fabricated and self-experienced events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 373-397.
Sporer, S. L., Manzanero, A. L., & Masip, J. (2021). Optimizing CBCA and RM research: recommendations for analyzing and reporting data on content cues to deception. Psychology, Crime & Law, 27(1), 1-39.
Steller, M. (1989). Recent developments in statement analysis. In Credibility assessment (pp. 135-154). Springer, Dordrecht.
Steller, M., & Kohnken, G. (1989). Statement analysis: Credibility assessment of children's testimonies in sexual abuse cases. In D. C. Raskin (Ed.), Psychological methods in criminal investigation and evidence (pp. 217-245). New York: Springer.
Trankell, A. (1972). Reliability of evidence. Stockholm, Sweden: Beckmans.
Undeutsch, U. (1967). Beurteilung der glaubhaftigkeit von aussagen. Handbuch der psychologie, 11, 26-181.
Undeutsch, U. (1989). The development of statement reality analysis. In Credibility assessment (pp. 101-119). Springer, Dordrecht.
Vrij, A. (2005). Criteria-Based Content Analysis: A Qualitative Review of the First 37 Studies. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11(1), 3.
Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit; Pitfall and opportunities. John Wiley & Sons, LTD.
Vrij, A. (2019). Deception and truth detection when analyzing nonverbal and verbal cues. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(2), 160-167.
Vrij, A., Akehurst, L., Soukara, S., & Bull, R. (2002). Will the truth come out? The effect of deception, age, status, coaching, and social skills on CBCA scores. Law and human behavior, 26(3), 261-283.
Vrij, A., Akehurst, L., Soukara, S., & Bull, R. (2004). Detecting deceit via analyses of verbal and nonverbal behavior in children and adults. Human Communication Research, 30, 8-mentary: Is this child fabricating? Reactions to a new assessment technique. In J. Doris (Ed.), The suggestibility of children's recollections: Implications for eyewitness testimony (pp. 168-171). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
부산지방법원 동부지원 2019.12.10. 선고 2019 고합141, 2019전고8(병합) 판결.
인천지방법원 부천지원 2019.01.11. 선고 2018 고합143, 2018전고11(병합) 판결.
서울고등법원 2020.01.30. 선고 2019노630, 2019전노44(병합), 2019보노19(병합) 판결.
대법원 2020.05.14. 선고 2020도2433 판결.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
출판사/학술단체 등이 한시적으로 특별한 프로모션 또는 일정기간 경과 후 접근을 허용하여, 출판사/학술단체 등의 사이트에서 이용 가능한 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.