$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

공공기관의 공공성 이행 검토: 의료분쟁조정중재원 사례를 중심으로
The Publicness of Public Institutions: Case Study on the Korea Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Agency 원문보기

Health policy and management = 보건행정학회지, v.31 no.3, 2021년, pp.280 - 291  

양화인 (고려대학교 행정학과)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Background: Based on the fact that the Korea Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Agency is a public institution established by social demands for medical disputes, this study reviews the publicness of public organization and discusses its policy implications. Methods: Through Moore's strategic...

주제어

표/그림 (6)

참고문헌 (29)

  1. Choi HS, Lee CJ, Han SJ, Hyun HY. Searching for the relationship between public service delivery system and performance in the field of health care service. Korean Public Adm Q 2013;25(2):619-647. 

  2. Lee JY. Korean health care system and a suggestion for its improvement. J Soc Sci 2000;19(2):63-79. 

  3. Ryu IH. Medical litigation, an expensive fight. Kyunghyang. 2019 Aug 3. 

  4. Kim YK. The characteristics and remedies of Medical Diputes Mediation Act. Soongsil Law Rev 2013;29:185-212. 

  5. Jung Y, Lee GC, You MS. Publicness in private health care organizations: developing a model for analysis and measuring a current status. Health Soc Welf Rev 2016;36(4):344-373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15709/hswr.2016.36.4.344. 

  6. Park YH. A smooth solution to medical disputes between patients and doctors (focusing on the Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Act). Justice 2021;182(2):437-481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29305/tj.2021.02.182.2.437. 

  7. Oh SY. A study on the legal nature and operation of Korea Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Agency. Soongsil Law Rev 2020;47:357-387. 

  8. Han JH. Medical disputes from the physician's aspect. Korean J Med 2019;94(6):459-462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3904/kjm.2019.94.6.459. 

  9. Kim KH. A study on the adjustment system and role of an expert witness based on the Medical Dispute Settlement Act. J Arbitr Stud 2020;30(1):185-198. 

  10. Paik WK. Public administration and publicness in Korea. Korean Soc Public Adm 2007;18(2):1-22. 

  11. Bozeman B. All organizations are public: bridging public and private organizational theories. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass; 1987. 

  12. Kim SM, Kim EH. Issues and tasks in setting up the concept of publicness in social service. J Korea Contents 2020;20(9):628-637. 

  13. Moore MH. Recognizing public value. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 2013. 

  14. Choi HS, Han SJ. Factors impacting public officials' behavior in creating public values: comparison of groups with different inclination for innovation. J Govern Stud 2019;25(3):139-178. 

  15. Alford J, Douglas S, Geuijen K, 't Hart P. Ventures in public value management: introduction to the symposium. Public Manag Rev 2017;19(5):589-604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1192160. 

  16. Kwon HW. Prospects of the role of government and the structure of governance in the post-COVID19 era: focusing on the notion of public value. J Gov Stud 2020;15(3):1-35. 

  17. Lee SH. A study on social and public values. Proceedings of the Winter Academic Presentation of the Korean Public Administration Review; 2018 Dec 14-15; Seoul, Korea. Seoul: Korean Association for Public Administration; 2018. pp. 1103-1118. 

  18. Lim J, Choi G. Public value generating mechanisms using open data policies. Entrue J Inf Technol 2017;16(1):37-49. 

  19. Shin HH. Future vision of the medical dispute mediation system due to the revision of the law. Proceedings of the 5th Anniversary of the Medical Dispute Mediation System Implementation Seminar Materials; 2017 May 25; Seoul, Korea. Seoul: Korea Medical Dispute Mediation Arbitration Agency; 2017. pp. 1-46. 

  20. Meyer JW, Rowan B. Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. Am J Sociol 1977;83(2):340-363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/226550. 

  21. Napoli PM. Foundations of communications policy: principles and process in the regulation of electronic media. Cresskill (NJ): Hampton Press; 2001. 

  22. Heo WJ. Democratic legitimacy of the Constitutional Court. Const Law 2012;18(3):559-600. 

  23. Yoon GS. Logic of justification and intermediate organization's dilemma. Korean Public Adm Rev 1997;31(2):2093-2109. 

  24. Cho HS, Lee SH, Shon MS, Yang SH, Lee HR. Reasons why patients and families choose medical dispute. J Korean Acad Fam Med 1998;19(3):274-291. 

  25. Rhee HS, Lee JH, Rhim KH, Choi MK. The thoughts of patients on medical accidents and disputes in Korea. Korea J Hosp Manag 2006;11(1):1-30. 

  26. Easton D. A system analysis of political life. New York (NY): Wiley; 1967. 

  27. Korea Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Agency. Statistical yearbook. Seoul: Korea Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Agency; 2014-2020. 

  28. Korea Consumer Agency. Consumer damage relief annual report and casebook. Eumseong: Korea Consumer Agency; 2013-2018. 

  29. Yang JH. Media framing of a social conflict: a case study of medical doctors' strike in Korea. Korean J Journal Commun Stud 2001;45(2):284-315. 

섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로