$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

디자인씽킹을 활용한 가정교과 협력적 소비 교육 프로그램의 개발 및 적용 효과: 중학생의 협력적 문제해결 역량 향상을 중심으로
Development and Effect of Cooperative Consumption Education Program Using Design Thinking in Home Economics Education: Focusing on the Improvement of Cooperative Problem Solving Competency of Middle School Students 원문보기

韓國 家政科敎育學會誌 = Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, v.33 no.3, 2021년, pp.85 - 105  

김선하 (상현중학교) ,  박미정 (한국교원대학교 가정교육과)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

이 연구의 목적은 중학교 가정 교과 수업에서 디자인씽킹을 활용한 협력적 소비 교육 프로그램을 개발하고 실행하여 학생들의 협력적 문제해결역량에 미치는 영향을 알아보는데 있다. 이에 ADDIE 모형에 따라 디자인씽킹에 기반 한 협력적 소비 교육 프로그램을 개발하고, 총 25명의 학생을 대상으로 실행한 후 평가를 실시하였으며, 연구 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 선행연구를 바탕으로 협력적 소비의 실천을 위한 '공유학교 만들기'를 주제로 D. school의 디자인씽킹 프로세스에 기반한 소비교육 프로그램을 개발하였다. 8차시의 교수·학습 과정안과 워크북을 전문가 타당도 검증한 결과, 문항 평균 4.72(5점 만점), CVI 평균 0.93으로 내용 타당도와 현장 적합성이 우수하다고 검증받았다. 둘째, 협력적 소비 교육 프로그램을 실행하고, 수정·보완된 협력적 문제해결역량 도구를 활용한 사전-사후검사와 개방형 설문조사를 실시한 결과를 종합해볼 때, 학생들이 협력적 소비에 대한 지식과 필요성을 인식하여 실천의식이 향상됨과 함께 개발한 프로그램이 협력적 문제해결역량을 향상시키는 데 유의미한 효과가 있음을 확인하였다. 후속연구로 연구 대상의 확대, 디자인씽킹을 적용한 가정 교과 프로그램 및 소비자 역량 강화를 위한 프로그램 연구, 개발을 제언하였다. 이 연구는 디자인씽킹을 활용한 협력적 소비 교육 프로그램이 청소년의 협력적 문제해결역량 향상에 효과가 있음을 확인하였으며, 가정교과에서 변화하는 소비환경에 따른 소비자 교육 변화 요구에 부응하여 '협력적 소비'를 주제로 소비 교육 프로그램을 개발했다는 점에서 의의가 있다.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

The purpose of this study is to develop and implement cooperative consumption education programs using design thinking in middle school home economics education classes to understand the impact on students' cooperative problem solving competency. Accordingly, a cooperative consumption education prog...

주제어

참고문헌 (43)

  1. Botsman, R., & Rogers, R. (2010). What's mine is yours: The rise of collaborative consumption. New York: Harper Collins. 

  2. Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Reviews, 86(6), 84-92. 

  3. Choi, K. S., & Park, M. S. (2016). The effect of consumer education on knowledge, attitude, intention, motivation, and consumption value for collaborative consumption of undergraduate students. Journal of Consumption Culture, 19(3), 175-196. 

  4. Fehring, R. J. (1987). Methods to validate nursing diagnoses. Heart & Lung, 16(6), 625-629. 

  5. Hamari, J., Sjoklint, M., & Ukkonen, A. (2015). The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(9), 2047-2059. doi: 10.1002/asi.23552 

  6. Huh, K., Ryu, S., & Han, S. (2007). An analysis of content of consumer education in middle school based on the 7th curriculum. Consumer Policy and Education Review, 3(1), 79-97. 

  7. IDEO. (2011). Design thinking for educators. Author: Riverdale. 

  8. Jeon, M. Y. (2013). The development and application of ethical clothing consumption education program for "technology home economics" subject in high school. Unpublished master's thesis, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea. 

  9. Jung, J. (2018). Analysis of collaborative consumption intentions and their predictive factors in high school students. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 30(2), 103-116. doi: 10.19031/jkheea.2018.06.30.2.103 

  10. Jung, J., & Choi, K. (2017). Effects of high school student' educational experience and expected benefits on the participation intention of collaborative consumption. Family and Environment Research, 55(4), 351-362. doi: 10.6115/fer.2017.026 

  11. Kang, B. J., & Choi, M. H. (2013). An exploratory study on the prospect and challenges of the sharing economy. Journal of Policy Development, 13(1), 143-170. 

  12. Kim, J.-S. (2014). Analysis on the contents of school consumer education - Focusing on unit of 'adolescents consumption life' in Technology Home Economics textbooks used in the 2009 revised curriculum -. Korean Journal of Human Ecology, 23(1), 63-84. doi: 10.5934/kjhe.2014.23.1.63 

  13. Kim, M. Y. (2018). Development and effect of design thinking based education program in high school chemistry. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea National University of Education, Chung Buk, Korea. 

  14. Kim, N. E. (2020). Developing home economics education programs for sustainable development: Focusing on changemaker education with the theme of 'improving consumer life'. Family and Environment Research, 58(3), 279-298. doi: 10.6115/fer.2020.021 

  15. Korea Consumer Agency. (2017). 소비자정책 과거, 현재 그리고 미래 [Consumer policy past, present and future]. Chung Buk: Author 

  16. Lee, D., Yoon, J., & Kang, S.-J. (2015). The suggestion of design thinking process and its feasibility study for fostering group creativity of elementary-secondary school students in science education. Journal of The Korean Association for Science Education, 35(3), 443-453. 

  17. Lee, H., & Park, Y. (2016). A Study of design thinking process for creative and convergence competency. Art Education Research Review, 30(2), 145-178. 

  18. Lee, J. (2019). Effects of design thinking-based education on elementary school students' affective domain development in emotional intelligence and creative personality. Unpublished master's thesis, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea. 

  19. Lee, J.-H. (2011). Effects of school consumer education on adolescents' cellular phone consumption life. Unpublished master's thesis, Chung-Ang University of Education, Seoul, Korea. 

  20. Lee, J. Y., & Yeo, J. S. (2016). Consumer participation and expansion plans of collaborative consumption. Consumer Policy and Education Review, 12(1), 95-118. doi: 10.15790/cope.2016.12.1.095 

  21. Lee, J. Y., & Yu, N. S. (2015). The analyses of duplicated contents of 'consumer life' area in technology & home economics and other subject textbooks for middle and high school students. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 27(4), 121-140. doi: 10.19031/jkheea.2015.12.27.4.121 

  22. Lee, Y. S. (2010). An analysis on the units of 'adolescence self-management' and 'adolescence consumption life' in technology. Home economics textbooks used in middle schools: Focusing on how the emphasis of the 2007 curriculum revision is reflected. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 22(3), 55-75. 

  23. Lim, Y.-J., & Park, M. J. (2019). A study on the definition of skills and sub-elements of practical art(technology.home economics) in the revised curriculum in 2015. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 32(1), 141-162 

  24. Ministry of Education (2015a). The national curriculum for the primary and secondary schools (Notification No. 2015-74). Sejong: Author. Retrieved from http://ncic.go.kr/mobile.dwn.ogf.inventoryList.do 

  25. Ministry of Education (2015b). A practical arts(technology and home economics) / information curriculum (Notification No. 2015-74). Sejong: Author. Retrieved from http://ncic.re.kr/mobile.dwn.ogf.inventoryList.do 

  26. Moon, Y.-H. (2013). Toward a critical approach to the study on school consumer educationin schools: an analysis of secondary home economics textbooks. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. 

  27. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2017). PISA 2015 results (volume V): Collaborative problem solving. Paris: OECD Publishing. 

  28. Park, J. (2020). A meta-analysis on the effect of consumer education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea. 

  29. Park, M. H., Park, M. S., Je, M. K., Park, M. H., Jung, J. W., & Choi, K. S. (2013). 가치소비시대의 소비자 의사결정 [Consumer values : how they affect consumer decision making]. Paju: Kyomunsa. 

  30. Park, M. J. (2018). Effectiveness of consumer education through home economics on middle school students' consumer competency. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 30(2), 1-20. doi: 10.19031/jkheea.2018.06.30.2.1 

  31. Park, M. K., & Kim, G. S. (2018). STEAM educational research for developing personality(cultivation of human nature) using design thinking. Journal of Cultural Product & Design, 55, 197-205. doi: 10.18555/kicpd.2018.55.18 

  32. Park, M. S., & Oh, S. Y. (2018). Why people participate in collaborative consumption? Analysis of car-sharing 'SOCAR' user's blog using text mining. Journal of Consumption Culture, 21(2), 121-143. doi: 10.17053/jcc.2018.21.2.006 

  33. Sim, H.-Y. (2009). Analysis on the effects of consumer education in middle school. Unpublished master's thesis, Sang-myung University, Seoul, Korea. 

  34. Sparks, S., & Lien-Gieschen, T. (1994). Modification of the diagnostic content validity model. Nursing Diagnosis, 5, 31-35. 

  35. Woo, Y., & Lee, H. (2018). Development and application of design thinking-based maker education program. Journal of Creative Information Culture, 4(1), 35-43. doi: 10.32823/jcic.4.1.201804.35 

  36. Yoo, J. W. (2016). Development of collaborative problem solving scale in digital age. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction. 16(7), 185-214. 

  37. Yoo, M.-R., & Koo, H.-G. (2018). A study on technology & home economics textbook comparison of middle school according to 2015 revised curriculum. Consumer Policy and Education Review, 14(3), 51-84. doi: 10.15790/cope.2018.14.3.051 

  38. Yoo, M. S. (2019). Development of clothing upcycling props in middle school home economics using design thinking techniques. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea University, Seoul, Korea. 

  39. Yoo, S. (2015). 논문작성을 위한 SPSS 실전통계분석 매개효과, 조절효과, 위계적 회귀분석을 중심으로 [SPSS statistical analysis for writing academical papers: Focusing on mediating effects, moderating effects, hierarchical regression analysis]. Seoul: Bullsbook. 

  40. Yoon, J., Kwon, J., & Kang, S. (2019) Verification of effectiveness of design thinking-based maker education program for middle school students. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 19(10), 561-584. doi: 10.22251/jlcci.2019.19.10.561 

  41. Yoon, S. (2020). Analysis of consumer education content presented in home economics and other subjects of middle school based on consumer competency. Unpublished master's thesis, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. 

  42. Yuk, H. Y. (2016). Design thinking-applied instructional plans for the increased creativity of children. Unpublished master's thesis, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul, Korea. 

  43. Yuk, K. M. (2020). Development of teaching-learning materials and analysis of learning experience based on design thinking in home economics curriculum: Focused on the units of sustainable consumption. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 32(1), 145-165. doi: 10.19031/jkheea.2020.03.32.1.145 

섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로