[논문]조직 양면성과 장기 성과: 상대적 탐색 및 활용의 조절효과

이준겸; 유건재

doi:10.5392/jkca.2022.22.02.270

[국내논문] 조직 양면성과 장기 성과: 상대적 탐색 및 활용의 조절효과
Organizational Ambidexterity and Long-term Performance: The Moderating Effect of Relative Exploration and Exploitation 원문보기

한국콘텐츠학회논문지 = The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, v.22 no.2, 2022년, pp.270 - 280

초록
AI-Helper

조직 양면성과 장기 성과 간의 관계를 조절하는 변수에 관한 일련의 연구가 있었지만, 전략적 관점에서의 조절변수에 관한 연구는 부족하였다. 본 연구는 기업의 상대적 탐색과 활용이 조직 양면성과 장기 성과와의 관계에 미치는 조절효과를 8,916개의 기업 표본을 바탕으로 분석하였다. 가설 검증 결과, 조직 양면성은 기업의 장기 성과(Tobin's q)에 유의한 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 기업의 상대적 탐색은 그 관계에 긍정적인 조절효과를 보이고, 기업의 상대적 활용은 부정적인 조절효과를 보이는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 조직 양면성 연구와 전략 연구를 통합했다는 점에서 의미를 가진다. 조직 양면성이 장기 성과의 미치는 긍정적 영향은 기업이 차별화 전략을 사용할 때 더 강화되고 지속되는 반면, 원가우위 전략을 사용할 때는 더 약화되고 지속되기 어렵다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

There has been a stream of literature studying moderators of the relationship between organizational ambidexterity and firm performance, but there remains a lack of research on moderators with a strategic perspective. We examined the effect of organizational ambidexterity on a firm's long-term performance and the moderating effect of a firm's relative exploration and exploitation based on a sample of 8,916 firms. We found a positive relationship between organizational ambidexterity and long-term performance measured by Tobin's q. The results also suggest that a firm's relative exploration positively moderates the relationship between organizational ambidexterity and long-term performance, whereas exploitation negatively moderates this relationship. We contribute to the current ambidexterity literature by integrating it with strategy literature. We found that the positive relationship between organizational ambidexterity and long-term performance is enlarged and long-lasting when a firm is a differentiator. In contrast, this positive relationship is lessened and short-lasting when a firm is a cost-leader.

주제어

표/그림 (3)

표 Table 1. Descriptive statistics and correlations
표 Table 2. Results of the empirical analysis
그림 Figure 1. Moderating effect of relative exploration/exploitation on the effect of ambidexterity on Tobin's q

AI 본문요약
AI-Helper

문제 정의

This study investigates the moderators between organizational ambidexterity and firm performance by adopting a strategic perspective. We use relative exploration and exploitation to reflect the strategic position in the industry.

가설 설정

H2: Relative exploration positively moderates the relationship between organizational ambidexterity and long-term performance.
H3: Relative exploitation negatively moderates the relationship between organizational ambidexterity and long-term performance.

제안 방법

First, this study attempts to integrate ambidexterity literature with strategy literature. This research differs from previous studies by adopting strategic internal factors, relative exploration and exploitation, as moderators between organizational ambidexterity and firm performance. Relative exploration (exploitation), which indicates that a firm has an orientation toward differentiation (cost-leadership), positively (negatively) moderates the positive effect of organizational ambidexterity on long-term performance.
This study attempted to extend the understanding of organizational ambidexterity by incorporating a strategic perspective (differentiation and cost-leadership measured by relative exploration and exploitation). However, some limitations exist.

성능/효과

Relative exploration (exploitation), which indicates that a firm has an orientation toward differentiation (cost-leadership), positively (negatively) moderates the positive effect of organizational ambidexterity on long-term performance. Consequently, the positive relationship between organizational ambidexterity and long-term performance is more intense and long-lasting when a firm is a differentiator. In contrast, this positive relationship is less intense and short-lasting when a firm is a cost-leader.
It is difficult for this firm to add exploration activities to exploitation. Consequently, this firm requires more effort to be ambidextrous. This implies that the effect of ambidexterity is lessed when the firm adopted cost-leadership.
Our contributions to the current ambidexterity literature are two-fold. First, this study attempts to integrate ambidexterity literature with strategy literature. This research differs from previous studies by adopting strategic internal factors, relative exploration and exploitation, as moderators between organizational ambidexterity and firm performance.
Our contributions to the current ambidexterity literature are two-fold. First, this study attempts to integrate ambidexterity literature with strategy literature.
This research differs from previous studies by adopting strategic internal factors, relative exploration and exploitation, as moderators between organizational ambidexterity and firm performance. Relative exploration (exploitation), which indicates that a firm has an orientation toward differentiation (cost-leadership), positively (negatively) moderates the positive effect of organizational ambidexterity on long-term performance. Consequently, the positive relationship between organizational ambidexterity and long-term performance is more intense and long-lasting when a firm is a differentiator.
The results also suggest that a firm's relative exploration (exploitation) positively (negatively) moderates the relationship between organizational ambidexterity and long-term performance.
The results confirm the positive relationship between organizational ambidexterity and long-term performance as measured by Tobin's q
This finding implies that this firm is more likely to be prepared to be ambidextrous. Thus, the effect of ambidexterity on long-term performance is enlarged when the firm pursue differentiation. In contrast, high relative exploitation implies that a firm is more likely to rely on a cost-leadership strategy.

후속연구

Under such conditions, the results of this study may not be applicable. Future studies should examine the moderating effect of relative exploration and exploitation on the relationship between organizational ambidexterity and long-term performance using a sample of small- and medium-sized firms.

참고문헌 (37)

P. Junni, R. M. Sarala, V. A. S. Taras, and S. Y. Tarba, "Organizational ambidexterity and performance: A meta-analysis," Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol.27, No.4, pp.299-312, 2013.

상세보기
D. A. Levinthal and J. G. March, "The myopia of learning," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.14, No.S2, pp.95-112, 1993.

상세보기
J. Birkinshaw and K. Gupta, "Clarifying the distinctive contribution of ambidexterity to the field of organization studies," Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol.27, No.4, pp.287-298, 2013.

상세보기
A. Y. Lewin, C. P. Long, and T. N. Carroll, "The coevolution of new organizational forms," Organization Science, Vol.10, No.5, pp.535-550, 1999.

상세보기
S. Raisch and F. Hotz, "Shaping the context for learning: Corporate alignment initiatives, environmental munificence, and firm performance. Strategic reconfigurations: building dynamic capabilities," in rapid-innovation-based industries. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp.62-85, 2010.
S. A. Zahra, H. J. Sapienza, and P. Davidsson, "Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: A review, model and research agenda," Journal of Management Studies, Vol.43, No.4, pp.917-955, 2006.

상세보기
M. H. Lubatkin, Z. Simsek, Y. Ling, and J. F. Veiga, "Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration," Journal of Management, Vol.32, No.5, pp.646-672, 2006.

상세보기
J. J. Ebben and A. C. Johnson, "Efficiency, flexibility, or both? Evidence linking strategy to performance in small firms," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.26, No.13, pp.1249-1259, 2005.

상세보기
D. Lavie, U. Stettner, and M. L. Tushman, "Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations," Academy of Management Annals, Vol.4, No.1, pp.109-155, 2010.

상세보기
S. Raisch, J. Birkinshaw, G. Probst, and M. L. Tushman, "Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance," Organization Science, Vol.20, No.4, pp.685-695, 2009.

상세보기
W. K. Smith and M. L. Tushman, "Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams," Organization Science, Vol.16, No.5, pp.522-536, 2005.

상세보기
J. G. March, "Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning," Organization Science, Vol.2, No.1, pp.71-87, 1991.

상세보기
D. Lavie and L. Rosenkopf, "Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation," Academy of Management Journal, Vol.49, No.4, pp.797-818, 2006.

상세보기
N. Venkatraman, C. H. Lee, and B. Iyer, "Strategic ambidexterity and sales growth: A longitudinal test in the software sector," In Unpublished Manuscript, 2007.
D. E. DSouza, P. Sigdyal, and E. Struckell, "Relative ambidexterity: A measure and a versatile framework," Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol.31, No.2, pp.124-136, 2017.

상세보기
J. Jusko, R&D spending: By the numbers, IndustryWeek, 2008.
F. Blindenbach-Driessen and J. van den Ende, "The locus of innovation: The effect of a separate innovation unit on exploration, exploitation, and ambidexterity in manufacturing and service firms," Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol.31, No.5, pp.1089-1105, 2014.

상세보기
F. Vermeulen and H. Barkema, "Learning through acquisitions," Academy of Management Journal, Vol.44, No.3, pp.457-476, 2001.

상세보기
Z. Lin, H. Yang, and I. Demirkan, "The performance consequences of ambidexterity in strategic alliance formations: Empirical investigation and computational theorizing," Management Science, Vol.53, No.10, pp.1645-1658, 2007.

상세보기
M. Holmqvist, "Experiential learning processes of exploitation and exploration within and between organizations: An empirical study of product development," Organization Science, Vol.15, No.1, pp.70-81, 2004.

상세보기
K. Atuahene-Gima, "Resolving the capability-rigidity paradox in new product innovation," Journal of Marketing, Vol.69, No.4, pp.61-83, 2005.

상세보기
C. Argyris and D. Schon, Organizational learning: a theory of action perspective, Addison-Wesley, 1996.
S. Auh and B. Menguc, "Balancing exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of competitive intensity," Journal of Business Research, Vol.58, No.12, pp.1652-1661, 2005.

상세보기
F. Allen, "Strategic management and financial markets," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.14, No.S2, pp.11-22, 1993.

상세보기
M. Lubatkin and R. E. Shrieves, "Towards reconciliation of market performance measures to strategic management research," Academy of Management Review, Vol.11, No.3, pp.497-512, 1986.

상세보기
L. A. Bebchuk and A. Cohen, "The costs of entrenched boards," Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.78, No.2, pp.409-433, 2005.

상세보기
L. D. Brown and M. L. Caylor, "Corporate governance and firm valuation," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol.25, pp.409-434, 2006.

상세보기
P. Gompers, J, Ishii, and A. Metrick, "Corporate governance and equity prices," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.118, No.1, pp.107-156, 2003.

상세보기
G. Ahuja and R. Katila, "Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.22, No.3, pp.197-220, 2001.

상세보기
C. Quintana-Garcia and C. A. Benavides-Velasco, "Innovative competence, exploration and exploitation: The influence of technological diversification," Research Policy, Vol.37, No.3, pp.492-507, 2008.

상세보기
L. Rosenkopf and A. Nerkar, "Beyond local search: boundary?spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.22, No.4, pp.287-306, 2001.

상세보기
H. Wang and J. Li, "Untangling the effects of overexploration and overexploitation on organizational performance: The moderating role of environmental dynamism," Journal of Management, Vol.34, No.5, pp.925-951, 2008.
D. Shefer and A. Frenkel, "R&D, firm size and innovation: an empirical analysis," Technovation, Vol.25, No.1, pp.25-32, 2005.

상세보기
N Nohria and R. Gulati, "Is slack good or bad for innovation?," Academy of Management Journal, Vol.39, No.5, pp.1245-1264, 1996.

상세보기
M. De Visser and D. Faems, "Exploration and exploitation within firms: the impact of CEO s' cognitive style on incremental and radical innovation performance," Creativity and Innovation Management, Vol.24, No.3, pp.359-372, 2015.

상세보기
P. G. Audia and J. A. Goncalo, "Past success and creativity over time: A study of inventors in the hard disk drive industry," Management Science, Vol.53, No.1, pp.1-15, 2007.

상세보기
M. Gittelman, "A note on the value of patents as indicators of innovation: Implications for management research," Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol.22, No.3, pp.21-27, 2008.

상세보기

저자의 다른 논문 :

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증