참고문헌 (124)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press. 

2. Anderson, H. (2000). Kuhn's account of family resemblance: A solution to the problem of wide-open texture. Erkenntnis, 52(3), 313-337. 

   상세보기

3. Archer, M. S. (2000). Being Human: The Problem of Agency. Cambridge University Press. 

4. Auerbach, A. J., & Schussler, E. E. (2017). Curriculum alignment with Vision and Change improves student scientific literacy. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 16(ar29), 1-9. 

5. Barker, P., Chen, X., & Andersen, H. (2003). Kuhn on concepts and categorization. In T. Nickles (Ed.), Thomas Kuhn (pp. 212-245). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

6. Biesta, G. & Prestley, M. (2013). Capacities and the curriculum. In Prestley, M., & Biesta, G. (Eds.). Reinventing Curriculum (pp. 35-49). Bloomsbury Academic. 

7. Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving Scientific Literacy: From Purposes to Practices. NH: Heinemann. 

8. Cho, C. -K. (2014). Revision of geography national curriculum in UK and debates about knowledge. Journal of the Korean Geographical Soceity, 49(3), 456-471. 

9. Cho, Y. (1997). Socialization and Education. Seoul: Kyoyookbook. 

10. Choi, K., Lee, H., Shin, N., Kim, S. -W., & Krajcik, J. (2011) Re-conceptualization of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st century. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 670-697. 

    상세보기

11. Choi, S. (2018). Practices of competency-based curriculum: Cases at the high school level. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1), 169-196. 

    상세보기

12. DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582-601. 

    상세보기

13. Elam, S. (1971). Performance-based teacher education. What is the State of the Art?, Washington: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. 

14. Ewens, T. (1979). Analyzing the impact of competence-based approaches on liberal education. In Grant, G. (ed.). On Competence: A Critical Analysis of Competence-Based Reforms in Higher Education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. 

15. Fensham, P. J. (1985). Science for all: A reflective essay. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 17(4), 415-435. 

    상세보기

16. Fensham, P. J. (2007). Competences, from within and without: New challenges and possibilities for scientific literacy. In C. Linder, L. Ostman, & P. Wickman (eds.), Promoting scientific literacy: Science education research in transaction. Proceedings of the Linnaeus Tercentenary Symposium held at Uppsala University (pp. 113-119). Uppsala: Uppsala University. 

17. Fensham, P. J. (2009). Real world contexts in PISA science: Implications for context-based science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 884-896. 

    상세보기

18. Ha, H., & Kim, H. -B. (2019). A theoretical investigation on agency to facilitate the understanding of student-centered learning communities in science classrooms. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(1), 101-113. 

    원문보기 상세보기

19. Han, H. (2020). A study of the relationship between subject knowledge and competence by revisiting P. H. Hirst's curriculum theory. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(3), 131-155. 

    상세보기

20. Han, H. -C., Kim, K. -C., Lee, J. -Y., Chang. K. -S. (2018). Exploring issues for effective implementation of competency-based curriculum through analysis of domestic research trends. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 21(3), 1-24. 

    상세보기

21. Harlen, W. (2001). The assessment of scientific literacy in the OECD/PISA project. Studies in Science Education, 36(1), 79-103. 

    상세보기

22. Hodge, S. (2007). The origins of competency-based training. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 47(2), 179-209. 

    상세보기

23. Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645-670. 

    상세보기

24. Hurd, P. DeH. (1958). Scientific literacy: Its meaning for American schools. Educational Leadership, 16, 13-16. 

25. Hurd, P. DeH. (1998). Scientific literacy: New minds for a changing world. Science Education, 82(3), 407-416. 

    상세보기

26. Hwang, G. (2017), Critical review of issues in general competece education. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(3), 241-271. 

27. Hwang, G. (2021). Research for setting major features of the general guideline of the 2022 Revised National Curriculum. In Proceedings of the Public Hearing for Research for Preparing Major Features of the General Guideline of the 2022 Revised National Curriculum (pp. 3-32). 

28. Jeon, S. -J., Kwak, Y., Koh, H. Y., Lee, Y. S., & Choi, S. Y. (2017). The needs analysis of science literacy required for Koreans in the future soceity. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(3), 441-452. 

    원문보기 상세보기

29. Jeong, Y. T. (1985). Today and Tomorrow of Science Education. Seoul: Korea Broadcasting System. 

30. Kahle, J. B. (2007). Systematic reform: Research, vision, and politics. In Abell, S. K., & Lederman, N. G. (Eds.), Handbook of Research in Science Education (pp. 911-941). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 

31. Kim, C. -J. (1989). Students' intuitive ideas in Earth Science. Journal of Korean Earth Science Society, 10(2), 229-235. 

32. Kim, H., & Kim. J. G. (2019). Development of science-art convergence STEAM education program for aesthetic sensibility competency: Making illustrated poem using pressed flower. School Science Journal, 13(4), 431-440. 

    

33. Kim, L. -J. (2019). Exploring the concept of "aesthetic sensitivity competency". The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(3), 1-28. 

    상세보기

34. Klopfer, L. E., & Champagne, A. B.(1990). Ghosts of crisis past. Science Education, 74(2), 133-154 

    상세보기

35. Kolsto, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85(3), 291-310. 

    상세보기

36. Korea Ministry of Education [KMOE] (1981). Elementary School Curriculum. 

37. Korea Ministry of Education [KMOE] (1988a). Elementary School Curriculum. 

38. Korea Ministry of Education [KMOE] (1988b). High School Curriculum. 

39. Korea Ministry of Education [KMOE] (1997). Science Curriculum. 

40. Korea Ministry of Education [KMOE] (2015a). General Guideline of the 2015 Revised National Curriculum.. 

41. Korea Ministry of Education [KMOE] (2015b). Science Curriculum. 

42. Korea Ministry of Education [KMOE] (2021). Plans for proceeding future curriculum with peoples. 

43. Korea Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [KMOEST] (2011). Science Curriculum. 

44. Korea Ministry of Education, Korea Ministry of Science and ICT, & Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity [KMOE, KMOSCIT, & KOFAC] (2019). Korean Science Education Standards for the Next Generation: Scientific Literacy for All Koreans. 

45. Korean Federation of Science & Technology Societies [KOFST] (1979). Proceeding strategies for the movement of scientifying all people. The Science & Technology, 12(7), 6-7. 

46. Kortland, J. (2000). A problem-posing approach to teaching for scientific literacy: The case of decision-making about packaging waste. In O. de Jong, E. R. Savelsbergh, A. Alblas (Eds.), Teaching for Scientific Literacy: Context, Competency, Curriculum (pp. 15-25). Utrecht: CDβ Press. 

47. Kwak, Y. (2016). Competency-Based Curriculum in Science. Paju: Kyoyookbook. 

48. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 

49. Lang, M., Drake, S., & Olson, J. (2006). Discourse and the new didactics of scientific literacy. Journal of Curriculum studies, 38(2), 177-188. 

    상세보기

50. Laugksch, R. C. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84(1), 71-94. 

    상세보기

51. Lee, G. -G., Han, S. -R., Bae, C. -H., & Hong, H. -G. (2019). Hilary Putnam's internal realism and its implications for science curriculum. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(1), 1-27. 

52. Lee, G. -G., & Hong, H. -G. (2017). A comparison of 「Integrated Science」 and 「Converged Science」 of the 2015 Revised National Curriculum through core concepts. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(6), 981-992. 

    원문보기 상세보기

53. Lee, G. -G., Park, J., Lee, S. -K., Hong, H. -G., Shim, H. S., & Shin, M. -K. (2019). Exploring multi-faceted understandings and issues regarding science subject matter competency: Considering the relationship with general core competency. Journal of Science Education, 43(1), 94-118. 

    원문보기 상세보기

54. Lee, H. -S., & Yoo, P. K. (2020). The effects of the science lesson applying the backward design model on science core competency of 2015 Revised Science, science process skills, and scientific communication ability. Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education, 32(1), 211-221. 

    상세보기

55. Lee, M. -J. (2004). The issues in the current studies on the science curriculum reform. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 24(5), 916-929. 

56. Lee, M. -J. (2009). Toward to the definition of 'scientific literacy'. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 28(4), 487-494. 

57. Lee, M. -J. (2014). Characteristics and trends in the classifications of scientific literacy definitions. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(2), 55-62. 

    원문보기 상세보기

58. Lee, S. E. (2018). Exploring an alternative direction for a competece-based curriculum in an age of uncertainty: An "ontological approach." The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1), 45-69. 

    상세보기

59. Lottero-Perdue, P. S., & Brickhouse, N. W. (2002). Learning on the job: The acquisition of scientific competence. Science Education, 86(6), 756-782. 

    상세보기

60. McEneaney, E. H. (2003). The worldwide cachet of scientific literacy. Comparative Education Review, 47(2), 217-237. 

    상세보기

61. McPhail, G., & Rata, E. (2016). Comparing curriculum types: 'Powerful knowledge' and '21st century learning'. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 51(1), 53-68. 

    상세보기

62. Millar, R. (2013). Improving science education: Why assessment matters. In Corrigan, D., Gunstone, R., & Jones, A. (Eds.). Valuing Assessment in Science Education: Pedagogy, Curriculum, Policy (pp. 55-68). Springer, Dordrecht. 

63. Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future: The report of a seminar series funded by the Nuffiled Foundation. (Retrieved September 30th, 2021 from https://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Beyond-2000.pdf) 

64. Mun, K., Lee, H., Kim, S. W., Choi, K., Choi, S. Y., & Krajcik, J. S. (2015). Cross-cultural comparison of perceptions on the global scientific literacy with Australian, Chinese, and Korean middle school students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 437-465. 

    상세보기

65. National Commission on Excellence in Education [NCEE] (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. The Elementary School Journal, 84(2), 113-130. 

    상세보기

66. National Research Council [NRC] (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 

67. National Research Council [NRC] (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 

68. National Research Council [NRC] (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 

69. National Science Teachers Association [NSTA] (1971). NSTA position statement on school science education for the 70's. The Science Teacher, 38, 46-51. 

70. Neville, A. J. (2009). Problem-based learning and medical education forty years on. Medical Principles and Practice, 18(1), 1-9. 

    상세보기

71. Next Generation Science Standards [NGSS] Lead States (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 

72. Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224-240. 

    상세보기

73. Ohn, J. D. (2021). Research for preparing criteria for the development of the 2022 Revised National Curriculum. In Proceedings of the Public Hearing for Research for Preparing Major Features of the General Guideline of the 2022 Revised National Curriculum (pp. 67-84). 

74. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD] (2000). Measuring Student Knowledge and Skills: The PISA 2000 Assessment of Reading, Mathematical, and Scientific Literacy. Paris: OECD. 

75. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD] (2001). Knowledge and Skills for Life: First Results from the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2000. Paris: OECD. 

76. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2005). The Definition and Selection of Key Competencies: Executive Summary. Paris: OECD. 

77. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD] (2006). Assessing Scientific, Reading, and Mathematical Literacy: A Framework for PISA 2006. Paris: OECD. 

78. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD] (2009). PISA 2009 Assessment Framework: Key Competencies in Reading, Mathematics, and Science. Paris: OECD. 

79. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD] (2013). PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. Paris: OECD. 

80. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD] (2017). PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic, Financial Literacy and Collaborative Problem Solving (revised ed.). Paris: OECD. 

81. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD] (2019a). OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030: OECD Learning Compass 2030 - A Series of Concept Notes. Paris: OECD. 

82. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD] (2019b). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework.. Paris: OECD. 

83. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD] (2020). Curriculum Overload: A Way Forward. Paris: OECD. 

84. Orpwood, G. (2001). The role of assessment in science curriculum reform. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 8(2), 135-151. 

    상세보기

85. Park, J. (2016). Discussions about the three aspects of scientific literacy: Focus on integrative understanding, settlement in curriculum, and civid education. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(3), 413-422. 

    원문보기 상세보기

86. Park, J., Yoon, H. -G., & Kwon, S. (2019). Suggesting a model of science competency and applying it to science curriculum. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(2), 207-220. 

    원문보기 상세보기

87. Park, S. I., Lim, C. I., Lee, J. K., Choi, J. I., Lim, J. H., ..., Lee, J. E. (2012). Principles and Applications of Educational Technology. Paju: Kyoyookbook. 

88. Park, S. J. (ed.) (1985). Science Education. Seoul: Kyoyookbook. 

89. Park, S. J., Kim, D. S., Kim, Y. S., Woo, K. H., Lee, J. Y., & Han, B. S. (1983). Educational anticipation of general science museum and its proceeding methods. National Science Museum. 

90. Presidential Commission on Education Reform [PCER] (1996). Education Reform Report for Establishing New Education System. (Seoul: PCER). 

91. Research Group of the Core Competences for Chinese Students' Development (2016). The Core Competences for Chinese Students' Development [中？？生？展核心素？]. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press. 

92. Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In Abell, S. K., & Lederman, N. G. (Eds.), Handbook of Research in Science Education (pp. 729-780). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 

93. Roberts, D. A., & Bybee, R. W. (2014). Scientific literacy, science literacy, and science education. In Lederman, N. G., & Abell, S. K. (Eds.) Handbook of Research on Science Education, Volume II (pp. 559-572). Routledge. 

94. Ryder, J. (2001). Identifying science understanding for functional scientific literacy. Studies in Science Education, 36(1), 1-44. 

    상세보기

95. Ryder, J., & Banner, I. (2013). School teachers' experiences of science curriculum reform. International Journal of Science Education, 35(3), 490-514. 

    상세보기

96. Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2009). Scientific literacy, PISA, and socioscientific discourse: Assessment for progressive aims of science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 909-921. 

    상세보기

97. Seo, K (2020). Dilemmas of competecy-based curriculum. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(4), 5-31. 

    상세보기

98. Seoul National University Education Research Institute [SNUERI] (1994). The Dictionary of Educational Studies (revised ed.). Seoul: Haudongsul. 

99. Seoul National University Education Research Institute [SNUERI] (1998). The Encyclopedia of Education. Seoul: Haudongsul. 

100. Sewell Jr, W. H. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1-29. 

     상세보기

101. Shamos, M. (1995). The Myth of Scientific Literacy. Rutgers Yniversity Press. 

102. Shin Y. (2021). The process of competence-fostering science curricular restructuring and ways of elementary-secondary science curricular content. In Proceedings of the Public Hearing for Competence-fostering Science Curricular Restructuring Research (pp. 2-14). 

103. Sinnema, C., & Aitken, G. (2013). Emerging international trends in curriculum. In Prestley, M., & Biesta, G. (Eds.). Reinventing Curriculum (pp. 141-163). Bloomsbury Academic. 

104. Snaza, N. (2009). Thirteen theses on the question of state in curriculum studies. In Malewski, E. (Ed.). Curriculum Studies Handbook - The Next Moment (pp. 61-80). Routledge. 

105. So, K. -H. (2004). Curriculum Development - Major Issues and New Approaches -. Seoul: Kyoyookbook. 

106. So, K. -H. (2007). 'Competency' in the context of schooling: It's meaning and curricular implications. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 25(3), 1-21. 

     

107. So, K. -H. (2017). Understanding Curriculum. Paju: Kyoyookbook. 

108. Stuckey, M., Hofstein, A., Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Eilks, I. (2013). The meaning of 'relevance' in science education and its implications for the science curriculum. Studies in Science Education, 49(1), 1-34. 

     상세보기

109. Takayama, K. (2007). A nation at risk crosses the Pacific: Transnational borrowing of the US crisis discourse in the debate on education reform in Japan. Comparative Education Review, 51(4), 423-446. 

     상세보기

110. Turner, S. (2008). School science and its controversies; or, whatever happened to scientific literacy?. Public Understanding of Science, 17(1), 55-72. 

     상세보기

111. Ufer, S., & Neumann, K. (2018). Measuring competencies. In Fischer, C. F., Hmelo-Silver, S. G., & Reimann, P. (Eds.). International Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 433-443). New York, NY: Routledge. 

112. Valladares, L. (2021). Scientific literacy and social transformation. Science & Education, 30(3), 557-587. 

     상세보기

113. Wheelahan, L. (2007). How competency-based training locks the working class out of powerful knowledge: A modified Bernsteinian analysis. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 28(5), 637-651. 

     상세보기

114. White, R. & Gunstone, R. (1992). Probing Understanding. London. The Falmer Press. 

115. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design (expanded 2nd ed.). VA: ASCD. 

116. Willbergh, I. (2015). The problems of 'competence' and alternatives from the Scandinavian perspective of Bildung. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(3), 334-354. 

     상세보기

117. Williamson, B. (2013). The Future of the Curriculum - School Knowledge in the Digital Age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 

118. Wittgenstein, L. (2010). Philosophical Investigations. John Wiley & Sons. 

119. Yager, R. E. (1992). What we did not learn from the 60s about science curriculum reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(8), 905-910. 

     상세보기

120. Yao, J. X., & Guo, Y. Y. (2018). Core competences and scientific literacy: the recent reform of the school science curriculum in China. International Journal of Science Education, 40(15), 1913-1933. 

     상세보기

121. Yates, L., & Millar, V. (2016). 'Powerful knowledge' curriculum theories and the case of physics. The Curriculum Journal, 27(3), 298-312. 

     상세보기

122. Young, M. (2008) Bringing Knowledge Back in: From Social Constructivism to Social Realism in the Sociology of Education. Routledge. 

123. Young, M., & Muller, J. (2013). On the powers of powerful knowledge. Review of Education, 1(3), 229-250. 

     상세보기

124. Young, M., & Muller, J. (2015). Curriculum and the Specialization of Knowledge. London, Routledge. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

이경건 (9) 홍훈기 (47)