$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

초임 중등 과학교사들의 협력적 성찰을 통한 수업 전문성 발달
Development of Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Novice Secondary Science Teachers through Collaborative Reflection 원문보기

한국과학교육학회지 = Journal of the Korean association for science education, v.42 no.1, 2022년, pp.77 - 96  

신민경 (서울대학교) ,  김희백 (서울대학교)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

본 연구는 초임 중등 과학교사들의 협력적 성찰이 어떻게 각자의 수업 전문성 발달을 촉진하였는지 탐색하고자 수행되었다. 이를 위해 충분한 라포가 형성되어 있는 이들을 의도적으로 연구 참여자로 선정하였다. 각 교사가 진행한 수업, 사전 의견 나누기, 사후 면담, 9차례의 협력적 성찰 과정을 통해 자료를 수집하였고 모든 자료는 전사한 후 분석하였다. 연구 결과 세 교사는 모두 협력적 성찰을 반복해서 진행하면서 수업 전문성 발달과 수업 실행 변화를 보였다. 민영의 경우 교사 주도의 수업을 진행하는 한계를 보였으나, 학생의 과학 학습에 관한 지식과 과학 교수전략에 관한 지식을 발달시켰고 수업 내 학생들의 권한을 확대해나갈 수 있게 되었다. 소영의 경우 학문적 엄격성을 강조하면서 다소 교육과정에 벗어나는 학습 내용을 선정하는 한계를 보였으나, 학생의 과학 학습에 관한 지식과 과학 교육과정에 관한 지식을 발달시켰고 교육과정 범위 내에서 학생들이 이해할 수 있는 수준에 대해 고려할 수 있게 되었다. 마지막으로 지연은 활동을 이론 설명과 분리하여 따로 진행하는 한계를 보였으나, 협력적으로 활동을 개선하고 다시 실행해보는 과정을 통해 단순한 활동 수행을 넘어서 활동을 통해 설명을 구성하고 모형구성 활동을 제시하기까지 탐구 활동의 영역을 확장할 수 있었다. 본 연구에서 협력적 성찰이 교사의 수업 전문성 발달을 촉진할 수 있었던 요인은 크게 세 가지이다. 첫 번째로 서로 다른 교수 지향을 지닌 세 교사가 각기 다른 관점에서 상호작용하는 과정은 서로가 생각하지 못한 부분에 대해 다양한 의견을 제시하면서 성찰을 촉진하였다. 두 번째로 수업 실행을 기반으로 주기적으로 진행한 협력적 성찰은 구체적이고 실제적인 피드백을 가능하게 하여 문제 인식과 수업 전문성 발달을 촉진하였다. 세 번째로 세 교사가 충분한 라포를 형성하고 있고 동등한 지위를 지닌 환경은 비난에 대한 두려움 없이 자신의 어려움이나 갈등을 거리낌 없이 표현하도록 도왔으며 생산적인 성찰을 할 수 있는 환경을 조성하였다. 본 연구 결과는 동료 교사들 간의 협력적 성찰을 통한 수업 전문성 발달에 대한 이해를 돕는다. 또, 앞으로의 교사교육 프로그램에서 서로의 수업 실행을 기반으로 협력적 성찰을 촉진할 수 있는 공동체 형성이 필요하다는 시사점을 제공한다.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

This study investigated how collaborative reflection between novice secondary science teachers promoted the development of teaching professionalism. We intentionally selected research participants who shared sufficient rapport. Data were collected by videotaping the classes taught by participants, p...

주제어

표/그림 (15)

참고문헌 (100)

  1. Abell, S. K., Bryan, L. A., & Anderson, M. A. (1998). Investigating preservice elementary science teacher reflective thinking using integrated media case-based instruction in elementary science teacher preparation. Science Education, 82(4), 491-509. 

  2. Akerson, V. L., & Hanuscin, D. L. (2007). Teaching nature of science through inquiry: Results of a 3-year professional development program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(5), 653-680. 

  3. Alles, M., Seidel, T., & Groschner, A. (2018). Toward better goal clarity in instruction: How focus on content, social exchange and active learning supports teachers in improving dialogic teaching practices. International Education Studies, 11(1), 11-24. 

  4. Appleton, K., & Kindt, I. (1999). Why teach primary science? Influences on beginning teachers' practices. International Journal of Science Education, 21(2), 155-168. 

  5. Attard, K. (2012). Public reflection within learning communities: An incessant type of professional development. European Journal of Teacher Education, 35(2), 199-211. 

  6. Aydin, S., Demirdogen, B., Akin, F. N., Uzuntiryaki-Kondakci, E., & Tarkin, A. (2015). The nature and development of interaction among components of pedagogical content knowledge in practicum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 46, 37-50. 

  7. Bae. M., & Kim. H. (2010). A case study on teachers' teaching professionalism for secondary science-gifted students. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 30(4), 412-428. 

  8. Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3-15. 

  9. Brown, P., Friedrichsen, P., & Abell, S. (2013). The development of prospective secondary biology teachers PCK. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(1), 133-155. 

  10. Bryan, L. A., & Tippins, D. J. (2006). Employing case-based pedagogy within a reflection orientation to elementary science teacher preparation. Elementary Science Teacher Education: International Perspectives on Contemporary Issues and Practice, 299-315. 

  11. Buschor, C. B., & Kamm, E. (2015). Supporting student teachers' reflective attitude and research-oriented stance. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 14(3), 231-245. 

  12. Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge and Action Research. London: Falmer. 

  13. Cha. G., Ju. E., & Jang. S. (2015). The change process of elementary science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge in professional learning community. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 15(1), 191-213. 

  14. Cho. H. & Youn. K. (2009). A study on the relationship between the developmental stage and the instructional professionalism of elementary school teachers. The Korea Association of Yeolin Education, 17(2), 183-207. 

  15. Cho. H., Han. I., Kim. H., & Yang. I. (2008). Analysis of elementary teachers' views on barriers in implementing inquiry-based instructions. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 28(8), 901-921. 

  16. Cho. S., & Baek. J. (2015). A case study on the inquiry guidance experiences of pre-service science reachers: Resolving the dilemmas between cognition and practice of inquiry. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(4), 573-584. 

  17. Choe. S., & Hwang. H. (2008). The research on pedagogical content knowledge in mathematics reaching. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 11(4), 569-593. 

  18. Clara, M., Mauri, T., Colomina, R., & Onrubia, J. (2019). Supporting collaborative reflection in teacher education: a case study. European Journal of Teacher Education, 42(2), 175-191. 

  19. Clermont, C. P., Krajcik, J. S., & Borko, H. (1993). The influence of an intensive in-service workshop on pedagogical content knowledge growth among novice chemical demonstrators. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(1), 21-43. 

  20. Danielowich, R. (2007). Negotiating the conflicts: Reexamining the structure and function of reflection in science teacher learning. Science Education, 91(4), 629-663. 

  21. DuFour, R. (2004). What is a "professional learning community?". Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6-11. 

  22. Eshchar-Netz, L., & Vedder-Weiss, D. (2021). Teacher learning in communities of practice: The affordances of co-planning for novice and veteran teachers' learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(3), 366-391. 

  23. Finkelstein, C., Jaber, L. Z., & Dini, V. (2019). "Do I feel threatened? No... I'm learning!"-Affective and relational dynamics in science professional development. Science Education, 103(2), 338-361. 

  24. Friedrichsen, P., & Dana, T. (2005). Substantive-level theory of highly regarded secondary biology teachers' science teaching orientations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(2), 218-244. 

  25. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945. 

  26. Gess-Newsome, J., & Lederman, N. G. (1993). Preservice biology teachers' knowledge structures as a function of professional teacher education: A year-long assessment. Science Education, 77(1), 25-45. 

  27. Go. M., & Nam. J. (2013). The change in beginning science teachers' reflective practice in their teaching performance through collaborative mentoring. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(1), 94-113. 

  28. Go. M., Lee. S., Choi. J., & Nam. J. (2009). The effect of cooperative mentoring on beginning science teachers' reflective practice. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 29(5), 564-579. 

  29. Grimmett, P. P., MacKinnon, A. M., Erickson, G. L., & Riecken, T. J. (1990). Reflective practice in teacher education. In Clift, R. T., Houston & Pugach, M. C. (Eds.), Encouraging Reflective Practice in Education. (pp.20-38). New York: Teachers' College Press. 

  30. Grossman, P. L. (1990). The Making of a Teacher: Teacher Knowledge and Teacher Education. New York: Teachers College Press. 

  31. Han. H., Lee. S., Kim. C., Lee. G., Kim. H., Oh. P., & Maeng. S. (2009). A case study on changes in science teachers' teaching practices using the biographical approach. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 29(1), 22-42. 

  32. Han. Y., Jeun. E., & Paik. S. (2014). Analysis of scientific inquiry elements in middle school science textbooks, teachers' cognition, and an experiment case. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(1), 349-357. 

  33. Hord, S. M. (1997). Professional Learning Communities: Communities of Continuous Inquiry and Improvement. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory. 

  34. Hord, S. M., & Sommers, W. A. (2008). Leading Professional Learning Communities: Voices from Research and Practice. Thousand Oaks. CA: Corwin Press. 

  35. Hudson, P., Skamp, K., & Brooks, L. (2005). Development of an instrument: Mentoring for effective primary science teaching. Science Education, 89(4), 657-674. 

  36. Huling-Austin, L. (1992). Research on learning to teach: Implications for teacher induction and mentoring programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 43(3), 173-180. 

  37. Jang. S. (2006). Prospective elementary school teachers' perceptions of inquiry-oriented teaching practice, with an emphasis on students' scientific explanation. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 25(1), 96-108. 

  38. Jarvis, J., Dickerson, C., Thomas, K., & Graham, S. (2014). The action-reflection-modelling (ARM) pedagogical approach for teacher education: A Malaysia-UK project. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 39(3), 89-118. 

  39. Jeong. J., Lee. K., & Kim. J. (2006). Analysis of inquiry teaching levels of beginning science teachers in middle school science laboratories. Journal of the Korean earth science society, 27(4), 364-373. 

  40. Jo. A. (2016). Understandings of Pedagogical Content Knowledge on the Middle School Science Teacher's Teaching Practice in a 'Co-Construction of Scientific Models'. (Doctoral dissertation). Seoul National University, Seoul. 

  41. Joung. K., & Kang. H. (2011). A case study on the use of coteaching in science instruction for science-gifted elementary students. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 31(2), 239-255. 

  42. Kim, Y. (2019). Beginning Science Teachers' Understanding of Scientific Inquiry and Their Perceptions of Inquiry-based Science Classes in Teacher Learning Community. (master's thesis). Ewha Womans University, Seoul. 

  43. Kim, Y., & Silver, R. E. (2016). Provoking reflective thinking in post observation conversations. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(3), 203-219. 

  44. Kim. C., Maeng. S., Cha. H., & Park. Y., & Oh. P. (2006). A case study of the interaction between a novice science teacher and an experienced teacher: priorities about science teaching and motivational ZPD. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 26(3), 425-439. 

  45. Kim. N. (2013). A case study of joint lesson planning and implementation in an elementary school's professional learning community(PLC) of an environment class: Focused on professionality of teaching environment. Journal of Korean Society for Environmental Education, 26(3), 315-335. 

  46. Kim. S. (2009). A research on teachers' reflective practice in classroom instruction. The Korean Society for The Study of Teacher Education, 26(2), 101-121. 

  47. Kim. S., Maeng. J., & Park. S. (2013). A case study on the learning community of the elementary school teachers. CNU Journal of Educational Studies, 34(1), 227-247. 

  48. Kim. Y., & Choi. A. (2019). Understanding of scientific inquiry developed by beginning science teachers in professional learning community. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(2), 221-232. 

  49. Ko. M., Nam. J.,, & Lim. J. (2009). Two case studies of the development of beginning science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 29(1), 54-67. 

  50. Koellner, K., Jacobs, J., Borko, H., Schneider, C., Pittman, M. E., Eiteljorg, E., Bunning, Kim., & Frykholm, J. (2007). The problem-solving cycle: A model to support the development of teachers' professional knowledge. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 9(3), 273-303. 

  51. Korthagen, F. A. (1999). Linking reflection and technical competence: The logbook as an instrument in teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 22(2-3), 191-207. 

  52. Korthagen, F. A., Kessels, J., Koster, B., Lagerwerf, B., & Wubbels, T. (2001). Linking Practice and Theory: The Pedagogy of Realistic Teacher Education. Mahwah. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 

  53. Kwon. H., Kim. C., & Choi. S. (2006). Orientations and execution of beginning secondary science teachers' teaching practices: Motivating and understanding students. Journal of Korean Earth Science Society, 27(3), 289-301. 

  54. Lee. G. (2005). Analysis of Teaching Behavioral Elements, Inquiry Elements, and Inquiry Levels in the Laboratory Practices of Beginning Middle School Science Teachers. (Doctoral dissertation). Korea National University of Education, Cheongju. 

  55. Lee. H., & So. Y. (2017). EFL teachers' professional development through collaborative reflection: A case study with two English teacher. The SNU Journal of Educational Research, 26(3), 117-147. 

  56. Lee. K. (2009). An analysis of earth science teachers' topic-specific pedagogical content knowledge: A case of pre-service and in-service teachers. Journal of the Korean earth science society, 30(3), 330-343. 

  57. Lee. S. (2013). A case study on professional learning community of teachers in science education based on the collaboration of a national university of education and its affiliated elementary school. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 32(4), 437-451. 

  58. Lee. Y., & Kwak. S. (2011). An analytical study on research trends of pedagogical content knowledge(PCK). The Journal of Educational Research, 9(3), 112-131. 

  59. Lim. C. (2003). Science teaching practice and science teaching efficacy beliefs by development of elementary school teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of the Korean earth science society, 24(4), 258-272. 

  60. Lin, H. S., Hong, Z. R., Yang, K. K., & Lee, S. T. (2013). The impact of collaborative reflections on teachers' inquiry teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 35(18), 3095-3116. 

  61. Loucks-Horsley, S. (1998). The role of teaching and learning in systemic reform: A focus on professional development. Science Educator, 7(1), 1-6. 

  62. Louis, K. S., Marks, H. M., & Kruse, S. (1996). Teachers' professional community in restructuring schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33(4), 757-798. 

  63. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge (pp. 95-132). Springer, Dordrecht. 

  64. McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2006). Building School-Based Teacher Learning Communities: Professional Strategies to Improve Student Achievement (Vol. 45). London: Teachers College Press. 

  65. McNeill, K. L., Pimentel, D. S., & Strauss, E. G. (2013). The impact of high school science teachers' beliefs, curricular enactments and experience on student learning during an inquiry-based urban ecology curriculum. Internation Journal of Science Education, 35(15), pp.2608-2644. 

  66. Ministry of Education(MOE). (2015). 2015 revised science curriculum. Notification No.2015-74 [issue 9]. Sejong: Ministry of Education. 

  67. Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. J., Morrison, J. R., & Kalman, H. K. (2019). Designing Effective Instruction. John Wiley & Sons. 

  68. Nam. J., Kim. H., Ko. M., & Ko. M. (2010). The change in beginning science teachers' inquiry-oriented teaching practice through mentoring program. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 30(5), 544-556. 

  69. Nilsson, P. (2008). Teaching for understanding: The complex nature of pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service education. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1281-1299. 

  70. Noh. T., Kang. S., & Kang. H. (2012). A case study on the use of mentoring as a method of improving novice teachers' teaching professionalism in secondary science-gifted education. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(2), 331-345. 

  71. Oh. P. (2014). Characteristics of teacher learning and changes in teachers' epistemic beliefs within a learning community of elementary science teachers. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 33(4), 683-699. 

  72. Park. H., Seong. S., & Jeong. D. (2011). The effect of mentoring on beginning chemistry teacher's teaching practice. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 31(8), 1055-1076. 

  73. Park. J. (2017). Understanding Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Pre-service Chemistry Teachers Considered in the Processes of Making Written Test Items. (Doctoral dissertation). Seoul National University, Seoul. 

  74. Park. J., Nam. J., & Kwon. J. An analysis on beginning secondary science teachers' problems in their teaching practice through collaborative mentoring. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(4), 557-564. 

  75. Park. J., Nam. J., Kang. E., Park. J., & Son. J. (2019). The relationship between mentor teachers' mentoring characteristics and mentee teachers' reflective practice in collaborative mentoring for beginning science teachers. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(1), 115-128. 

  76. Park. S. (2006). In search of paradigms for developing professionalism for social studies teachers as cooperative designers. Social Studies Education, 45(3), 189-208. 

  77. Park. S., Han. S., & Lee. M. (2008). Reconsideration of the research trend for the reflection on teaching. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 8(2), 403-422. 

  78. Postholm, M. B. (2008). Teachers developing practice: Reflection as key activity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(7), 1717-1728. 

  79. Ross, E. W. (1992). Teacher personal theorizing and reflective practice in teacher education. In Teacher Personal Theorizing: Connecting Curriculum Practice, Theory, and Research (pp.179-190). State University of New York Press. 

  80. Schon, D. (1983). Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books. 

  81. Shim. S. (2020). Exploring how a high school science teacher's understanding and facilitation of scientific modeling shifted through participation in an professional learning community. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 40(1), 29-40. 

  82. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. 

  83. Son. S. (2005). Teacher education & evaluation in terms of teacher's instructional expertise. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 22(1), 89-108. 

  84. Tillema, H., & van der Westhuizen, G. J. (2006). Knowledge construction in collaborative enquiry among teachers. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 12(1), 51-67. 

  85. Tobin, K. (2014). Twenty questions about cogenerative dialogues. In Transforming Urban Education. (pp. 181-190). SensePublishers, Rotterdam. 

  86. Van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teacher' practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137-158. 

  87. Van Driel, J. H., Jong, O. D., & Verloop, N. (2002). The development of preservice chemistry teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Science Education, 86(4), 572-590. 

  88. Van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & De Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 673-695. 

  89. Van Geert, P. (1994). Vygotskian dynamics of development. Human Development, 37(6), 346-365. 

  90. Van Manen, M. (1977). Linking ways of knowing with ways of being practical. Curriculum Inquiry, 6(3), 205-228. 

  91. Vedder-Weiss, D., Segal, A., & Lefstein, A. (2019). Teacher face-work in discussions of video-recorded classroom practice: Constraining or catalyzing opportunities to learn?. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(5), 538-551. 

  92. Volkmann, M. J., & Anderson, M. A. (1998). Creating professional identity: Dilemmas and metaphors of a first-year chemistry teacher. Science Education, 82(3), 293-310. 

  93. Wallace, C. S., & Kang, N. H. (2004). An investigation of experienced secondary science teachers' beliefs about inquiry: An examination of competing belief sets. Journal of Research in Science Teacing, 41(9), 936-960. 

  94. Wopereis, I. G., Sloep, P. B., & Poortman, S. H. (2010). Weblogs as instruments for reflection on action in teacher education. Interactive Learning Environments, 18(3), 245-261. 

  95. Yang. J. & Choi. A. (2020). Science teachers' orientation toward scientific inquiry-based teaching. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 64(3), 210-224. 

  96. Yang. J. (2019). Construction of PCK for Scientific Practice-based Instruction and Types of Integration Between PCK Components Developed by the Teacher Learning Community. (Doctoral dissertation). Ewha Womans University, Seoul. 

  97. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage. 

  98. Yoon, H. G., & Kim, M. (2010). Collaborative reflection through dilemma cases of science practical work during practicum. International Journal of Science Education, 32(3), 283-301. 

  99. Zeichner, K. M. (1981). Reflective teaching and field-based experience in teacher education. Interchange, 12(4), 1-22. 

  100. Zeichner, K., & Liston, D. (1987). Teaching student teachers to reflect. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 23-49. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로