$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

[국내논문] 침입생물 연구에 대한 메타개체군 이론의 활용 가능성: 침입 성공을 중심으로
Availability of the metapopulation theory in research of biological invasion: Focusing on the invasion success 원문보기

환경생물 = Korean journal of environmental biology, v.40 no.4, 2022년, pp.525 - 549  

송재준 (고려대학교 환경생태공학과) ,  홍진솔 (고려대학교 오정리질리언스연구원) ,  조기종 (고려대학교 환경생태공학과)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

개체군은 진화적 단위이자 개체군 통계적 단위로서, 생물학적 침입의 과정은 개체군의 생태적, 진화적 동태에 기인한다. 개체군의 공간구조는 개체군 동태에 영향을 줄 수 있으며, 분산이 반드시 동반되는 생물학적 침입에 대한 연구에서는 공간구조를 고려할 필요가 있다. 메타개체군 이론은 공간구조를 가진 개체군에 대한 대표적인 접근으로, 주로 생태학 및 진화생물학 연구에 활용되고 있다. 메타개체군은 공간적 구조를 가진 개체군의 동의어로 여겨지기도 하지만, 용어의 모호한 사용을 피하기 위해서는 절멸 가능성이 고려되는 경우에 한해 정의되어야 한다는 비판이 있다. 침입 초기 단계의 개체군은 높은 절멸 가능성을 가지는 경우가 많으므로, 메타개체군 이론을 적용하기에 용이하다. 한편, 침입 초기 개체군의 생태적·유전적 특성은 분산의 영향을 크게 받기 때문에, 메타개체군 이론은 개체군 수준에서 침입성의 변화와 침입 가능성을 설명하는 강력한 도구가 될 수 있을 것으로 생각된다. 그러나, 한국에서 침입생물에 대한 생태학적 연구는 주로 종 수준의 분포 변화에 대해 이루어지고 있고, 메타개체군 개념을 적용한 경우가 드문 실정이다. 메타개체군 이론을 활용한다면, 국내 연구가 상대적으로 미진했던 개체군 단위의 침입 기작을 보다 상세히 규명할 수 있을 것으로 생각된다. 본 연구에서는 실제 침입생물에 미치는 메타개체군의 영향을 쉽게 파악하기 위해 침입생물 메타개체군이 자연적인 분산 거리를 넘어서 연결되는지 여부에 따라 장거리와 중거리 두 가지 규모로 나누는 체계를 활용할 것을 제안하였다. 메타개체군 개념에 입각한 침입생물 연구가 침입의 기작을 이해하고 장래의 침입 리스크를 예측·관리하는 데에 도움을 줄 것으로 기대한다.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

The process of biological invasion is led by the dynamics of a population as a demographic and evolutionary unit. Spatial structure can affect the population dynamics, and it is worth being considered in research on biological invasion which is always accompanied by dispersal. Metapopulation theory ...

주제어

참고문헌 (158)

  1. Adke SR and JE Moyal. 1963. A birth, death, and diffusion process. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 7:209-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(63)90048-9 

  2. Baguette M. 2004. The classical metapopulation theory and the?real, natural world: a critical appraisal. Basic Appl. Ecol. 5:213-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2004.03.001 

  3. Banks PB, AE Byrom, RP Pech and CR Dickman. 2018. Reinvasion is not invasion again. BioScience 68:792-804. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biy076 

  4. Barrett SC. 2015. Foundations of invasion genetics: the Baker and?Stebbins legacy. Mol. Ecol. 24:1927-1941. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13014 

  5. Blackburn TM, P Pysek, S Bacher, JT Carlton, RP Duncan, V Jarosik, JRU Wilson and DM Richardson. 2011. A proposed unified?framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26:333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.03.023 

  6. Bonte D and Q Bafort. 2018. The importance and adaptive value?of life-history evolution for metapopulation dynamics. J.?Anim. Ecol. 88:24-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12928 

  7. Byeon DH, S Jung and WH Lee. 2018. Review of CLIMEX and?MaxEnt for studying species distribution in South Korea. J.?Asia-Pac. Biodivers. 11:325-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japb.2018.06.002 

  8. Byeon SY, HJ Oh, S Kim, SH Yun, JH Kang, SR Park and HJ Lee. 2019. The origin and population genetic structure of the 'golden tide' seaweeds, Sargassum horneri, in Korean waters. Sci.?Rep. 9:1-13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44170-x 

  9. Byers JE, WG McDowell, SR Dodd, RS Haynie, LM Pintor and?SB Wilde. 2013. Climate and pH predict the potential range?of the invasive apple snail (Pomacea insularum) in the southeastern United States. PLoS One 8:e56812. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056812 

  10. Callaway RM and WM Ridenour. 2004. Novel weapons: invasive success and the evolution of increased competitive?ability. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2:436-443. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0436:nwisat]2.0.co;2 

  11. Carriere Y, DW Crowder and BE Tabashnik. 2010. Evolutionary?ecology of insect adaptation to Bt crops. Evol. Appl. 3:561-573. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4571.2010.00129.x 

  12. Catford JA, R Jansson and C Nilsson. 2009. Reducing redundancy?in invasion ecology by integrating hypotheses into a single?theoretical framework. Divers. Distrib. 15:22-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00521.x 

  13. Catlin DH, SL Zeigler, MB Brown, LR Dinan, JD Fraser, KL Hunt?and JG Jorgensen. 2016. Metapopulation viability of an endangered shorebird depends on dispersal and human-created habitats: piping plovers (Charadrius melodus) and prairie rivers.?Mov. Ecol. 4:1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-016-0072-y 

  14. CBD. 2022. Invasive Alien Species. Convention on Biological?Diversity. UN Environment Programme. Retrieved January 8,?2022, from https://www.cbd.int/invasive/. 

  15. Chapman DS, L Makra, R Albertini, M Bonini, A Paldy, V Rodinkova,?B Sikoparija, E Weryszko-Chmielewska and JM Bullock.?2016. Modelling the introduction and spread of non-native?species: International trade and climate change drive ragweed invasion. Glob. Change Biol. 22:3067-3079. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13220 

  16. Choi DS, JS Park, MJ Kim, JS Kim, SY Jeong, JS Jeong, J Park?and I Kim. 2018. Geographic variation in the spotted-wing?drosophila, Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae), based?on mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mitochondrial DNA Part A?29:312-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/24701394.2016.1278534 

  17. Choi HS, SY Jeong, KH Lee, JS Jeong, JS Park, NR Jeong, MJ?Kim, W Lee and I Kim. 2021. Population genetic analysis of?Salurnis marginella (Hemiptera: Flatidae). Int. J. Indust. Entomol. 43:67-77. https://doi.org/10.7852/ijie.2021.43.2.67 

  18. Choi KH. 2009. Risk assessment of ballast water-mediated?invasions of phytoplankton: a modeling study. Ocean Sci. J.?44:221-226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12601-009-0021-4 

  19. Choi MB, SA Lee, HY Suk and JW Lee. 2013. Microsatellite?variation in colonizing populations of yellow-legged Asian?hornet, Vespa velutina nigrithorax, in South Korea. Entomol.?Res. 43:208-214. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-5967.12027 

  20. Chun YJ, B Fumanal, B Laitung and F Bretagnolle. 2010. Gene?flow and population admixture as the primary post-invasion?processes in common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia)?populations in France. New Phytol. 185:1100-1107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03129.x 

  21. Colautti RI and DM Richardson. 2009. Subjectivity and flexibility in?invasion terminology: too much of a good thing? Biol. Invasions 11:1225-1229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-008-9333-z 

  22. Colautti RI, JM Alexander, KM Dlugosch, SR Keller and SE Sultan. 2017. Invasions and extinctions through the looking glass of?evolutionary ecology. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B-Biol.?Sci. 372:20160031. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0031 

  23. Coutts SR, KJ Helmstedt and JR Bennett. 2018. Invasion lags:?The stories we tell ourselves and our inability to infer process from pattern. Divers. Distrib. 24:244-251. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12669 

  24. Crooks JA. 2005. Lag times and exotic species: The ecology and?management of biological invasions in slow-motion1. Ecoscience 12:316-329. https://doi.org/10.2980/i1195-6860-12-3-316.1 

  25. Davidson AM, M Jennions and AB Nicotra. 2011. Do invasive?species show higher phenotypic plasticity than native species and, if so, is it adaptive? A meta-analysis. Ecol. Lett.?14:419-431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01596.x 

  26. den Boer PJ. 1986. The present status of the competitive exclusion principle. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1:25-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(86)90064-9 

  27. Detwiler JT and CD Criscione. 2014. Recently introduced invasive?geckos quickly reach population genetic equilibrium dynamics. Biol. Invasions 16:2653-2667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-014-0694-1 

  28. Dlugosch KM and IM Parker. 2008. Founding events in species?invasions: genetic variation, adaptive evolution, and the role?of multiple introductions. Mol. Ecol. 17:431-449. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2007.03538.x 

  29. Dormann CF. 2007. Promising the future? Global change projections of species distributions. Basic Appl. Ecol. 8:387-397.?https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2006.11.001 

  30. Drake JM. 2004. Allee effects and the risk of biological invasion.?Risk Anal. 24:795-802. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00479.x 

  31. Drake JM and DM Lodge. 2006. Allee effects, propagule pressure and the probability of establishment: risk analysis for biological invasions. Biol. Invasions 8:365-375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-004-8122-6 

  32. Dubart M, JH Pantel, JP Pointier, P Jarne and P David. 2019.?Modeling competition, niche, and coexistence between an?invasive and a native species in a two-species metapopulation. Ecology 100:e02700. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2700 

  33. Duncan RP, TM Blackburn and D Sol. 2003. The ecology of bird?introductions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34:71-98. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132353 

  34. Elith J and JR Leathwick. 2009. Species distribution models:?ecological explanation and prediction across space and time.?Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40:677-697. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120159 

  35. Estoup A, V Ravigne, R Hufbauer, R Vitalis, M Gautier and B?Facon. 2016. Is there a genetic paradox of biological invasion? Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 47:51-72. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-121415-032116 

  36. Facon B, RA Hufbauer, A Tayeh, A Loiseau, E Lombaert, R Vitalis,?T Guillemaud, JG Lundgren and A Estoup. 2011. Inbreeding?depression is purged in the invasive insect Harmonia axyridis. Curr. Biol. 21:424-427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.01.068 

  37. Facon B, P Jarne, JP Pointier and P David. 2005. Hybridization?and invasiveness in the freshwater snail Melanoides tuberculate: hybrid vigour is more important than increase in genetic?variance. J. Evol. Biol. 18:524-535. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00887.x 

  38. Facon B, JP Pointier, P Jarne, V Sarda and P David. 2008. High?genetic variance in life-history strategies within invasive populations by way of multiple introductions. Curr. Biol. 18:363-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.01.063 

  39. Fountain T, L Duvaux, G Horsburgh, K Reinhardt and RK Butlin. 2014. Human-facilitated metapopulation dynamics in an?emerging pest species, Cimex lectularius. Mol. Ecol. 23:1071-1084. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12673 

  40. Freckleton RP and AR Watkinson. 2002. Large-scale spatial?dynamics of plants: metapopulations, regional ensembles?and patchy populations. J. Ecol. 90:419-434. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2002.00692.x 

  41. Fronhofer EA, A Kubisch, FM Hilker, T Hovestadt and HJ Poethke. 2012. Why are metapopulations so rare? Ecology 93:1967-1978. https://doi.org/10.1890/11-1814.1 

  42. Gertzen EL, B Leung and ND Yan. 2011. Propagule pressure,?Allee effects and the probability of establishment of an invasive species (Bythotrephes longimanus). Ecosphere 2:1-17.?https://doi.org/10.1890/es10-00170.1 

  43. Glemin S. 2003. How are deleterious mutations purged? Drift?versus nonrandom mating. Evolution 57:2678-2687. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb01512.x 

  44. Gould SJ and ES Vrba. 1982. Exaptation - a missing term in the?science of form. Paleobiology 8:4-15. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0094837300004310 

  45. Guiney MS, DA Andow and TT Wilder. 2010. Metapopulation?structure and dynamics of an endangered butterfly. Basic?Appl. Ecol. 11:354-362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2009.09.006 

  46. Guisan A and W Thuiller. 2005. Predicting species distribution:?offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol. Lett. 8:993-1009. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00792.x 

  47. Hahn MA and LH Rieseberg. 2017. Genetic admixture and heterosis may enhance the invasiveness of common ragweed.?Evol. Appl. 10:241-250. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12445 

  48. Han JE, BH Choi and M Kwak. 2018. Genetic diversity and?population structure of endangered Neofinetia falcata?(Orchidaceae) in South Korea based on microsatellite analysis.?J. Species Res. 7:354-362. https://doi.org/10.12651/JSR.2018.7.4.354 

  49. Hanski I. 1997. Metapopulation dynamics: from concepts and observations to predictive models. pp. 69-91. In: Metapopulation Biology (Hanski IA and ME Gilpin, eds.). Academic Press.?San Diego, CA. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-012323445-2/50007-9 

  50. Hanski I. 1998. Metapopulation dynamics. Nature 396:41-49.?https://doi.org/10.1038/23876 

  51. Hanski I and M Gilpin. 1991. Metapopulation dynamics: brief history and conceptual domain. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 42:3-16.?https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1991.tb00548.x 

  52. Hanski IA and D Simberloff. 1997. The metapopulation approach,?its history, conceptual domain, and application to conservation. pp. 5-26. In: Metapopulation Biology (Hanski IA and?ME Gilpin, eds.). Academic Press. San Diego, CA. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-012323445-2/50003-1 

  53. Harding KC and JM McNamara. 2002. A unifying framework for?metapopulation dynamics. Am. Nat. 160:173-185. https://doi.org/10.1086/341014 

  54. Harding KC, JM McNamara and RD Holt. 2006. Understanding?invasions in patchy habitats through metapopulation theory.?pp. 371-403. In: Conceptual Ecology and Invasion Biology:?Reciprocal Approaches to Nature (Cadotte MW, SM Mcmahon and T Fukami, eds.). Springer. Dordrecht, Netherlands.?https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4925-0_17 

  55. Harrison S. 1991. Local extinction in a metapopulation context: an?empirical evaluation. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 42:73-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-284120-0.50008-5 

  56. Hassell MP, HN Comins and RM Mayt. 1991. Spatial structure?and chaos in insect population dynamics. Nature 353:255-258. https://doi.org/10.1038/353255a0 

  57. Hastings A and S Harrison. 1994. Metapopulation dynamics and?genetics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 25:167-188. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.25.110194.001123 

  58. Hayes KR and SC Barry. 2008. Are there any consistent predictors of invasion success? Biol. Invasions 10:483-506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-007-9146-5 

  59. Heger T, WC Saul and L Trepl. 2013. What biological invasions 'are'?is a matter of perspective. J. Nat. Conserv. 21:93-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2012.11.002 

  60. Hendry AP. 2018. A critique for eco-evolutionary dynamics.?Funct. Ecol. 33:84-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13244 

  61. Huey RB, GW Gilchrist and AP Hendry. 2005. Using invasive species to study evolution. pp. 139-164. In: Species Invasions:?Insights into Ecology, Evolution, and Biogeography (Sax DF,?JJ Stachowicz and SD Gaines, eds.). Sinauer Sunderland.?Sunderland, MA. 

  62. Hufbauer RA. 2008. Biological invasions: paradox lost and paradise gained. Curr. Biol. 18:R246-R247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.01.038 

  63. Hufbauer RA, B Facon, V Ravigne, J Turgeon, J Foucaud, CE Lee,?O Rey and A Estoup. 2012. Anthropogenically induced adaptation to invade (AIAI): contemporary adaptation to humanaltered habitats within the native range can promote invasions. Evol. Appl. 5:89-101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4571.2011.00211.x 

  64. Hufbauer RA, M Szucs, E Kasyon, C Youngberg, MJ Koontz, C Richards, T Tuff and BA Melbourne. 2015. Three types of?rescue can avert extinction in a changing environment. Proc.?Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 112:10557-10562. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1504732112 

  65. Inman RM, BL Brock, KH Inman, SS Sartorius, BC Aber, B Giddings, SL Cain, ML Orme, JA Fredrick, BJ Oakleaf, KL Alt, E?Odell and G Chapron. 2013. Developing priorities for metapopulation conservation at the landscape scale: wolverines?in the western United States. Biol. Conserv. 166:276-286.?https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.07.010 

  66. IUCN. 2018. Invasive Alien Species and Sustainable Development. International Union for Conservation of Nature. Gland,?Switzerland. Retrieved January 26, 2018, from https://www.iucn.org/resources/issues-briefs/invasive-alien-species-and-sustainable-development. 

  67. Ives AR and WH Settle. 1997. Metapopulation dynamics and?pest control in agricultural systems. Am. Nat. 149:220-246.?https://doi.org/10.1086/285988 

  68. Jeong IH, B Park, GS Lee, Q Wu, F Li, Z Zhang and Y Zhu. 2020.?Comparison of B and Q biotype distribution, insecticidal?mortality, and TYLCV viruliferous rate between Korean?and Chinese local populations of Bemisia tabaci. Korean J.?Environ. Biol. 38:616-624. https://doi.org/10.11626/kjeb.2020.38.4.616 

  69. Jeong JS, MJ Kim, JS Park, KH Lee, YH Jo, JI Takahashi, YS Choi?and I Kim. 2021. Tracing the invasion characteristics of the?yellow-legged hornet, Vespa velutina nigrithorax (Hymenoptera: Vespidae), in Korea using newly detected variable mitochondrial DNA sequences. J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 24:135-147.?https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2021.03.004 

  70. Jeschke JM and DL Strayer. 2008. Usefulness of bioclimatic?models for studying climate change and invasive species.?Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1134:1-24. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1439.002 

  71. Jung SW, JH Lee, T Kawai, PJ Kim and S Kim. 2022. Distribution?status of invasive alien species (Procambarus clarkii (Girard,?1852)) using biomonitoring with environmental DNA in?South Korea. Korean J. Environ. Ecol. 36:368-380. https://doi.org/10.13047/kjee.2022.36.4.368 

  72. Jung SY, JW Lee, HT Shin, SJ Kim, JB An, TI Heo, JM Chung and?YC Cho. 2017a. Invasive Alien Plants in South Korea. Korea?National Arboretum. Pocheon, Korea. 

  73. Jung JM, S Jung, DH Byeon and WH Lee. 2017b. Model-based?prediction of potential distribution of the invasive insect pest,?spotted lanternfly Lycorma delicatula (Hemiptera: Fulgoridae), by using CLIMEX. J. Asia-Pac. Biodivers. 10:532-538.?https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japb.2017.07.001 

  74. Jung N, SY Chae and JW Lee. 2021. Invasion dynamics of a population growth model with the Allee effect in a one-dimensional patchy structure. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 79:499-503.?https://doi.org/10.1007/s40042-021-00236-6 

  75. Kanarek AR, CT Webb, M Barfield and RD Holt. 2015. Overcoming?Allee effects through evolutionary, genetic, and demographic?rescue. J. Biol. Dyn. 9:15-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513758.2014.978399 

  76. Kang JH, DA Yi, AV Kuprin, C Han and YJ Bae. 2021. Phylogeographic investigation of an endangered longhorn beetle,?Callipogon relictus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), in Northeast?Asia: Implications for future restoration in Korea. Insects?12:555. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12060555 

  77. Keane RM and MJ Crawley. 2002. Exotic plant invasions and the?enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:164-170.?https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-5347(02)02499-0 

  78. Kim DE. 2018. Management system of invasive alien species?threating biodiversity in Korea and suggestions for the improvement. J. Environ. Impact Assess. 27:33-55. https://doi.org/10.14249/eia.2018.27.1.33 

  79. Kim E, W Song, E Yoon and H Jung. 2016a. Definition of invasive?disturbance species and its influence factor. J. Korean. Env.?Res. Tech. 19:155-170. https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2016.19.1.155 

  80. Kim J, G Ni, T Kim, JY Chun, EM Kern and JK Park. 2019. Phylogeography of the highly invasive sugar beet nematode, Heterodera schachtii (Schmidt, 1871), based on microsatellites.?Evol. Appl. 12:324-336. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12719 

  81. Kim J, T Kim, YC Lee, JY Chun, EM Kern, J Jung and JK Park.?2016b. Characterization of 15 microsatellite loci and genetic?analysis of Heterodera schachtii (Nematoda: Heteroderidae)?in South Korea. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 64:97-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2015.11.013 

  82. Kim JE and KG An. 2021. Long-term distribution trend analysis of?largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides), based on National?Fish Database, and the ecological risk assessments. Korean?J. Environ. Biol. 39:207-217. https://doi.org/10.11626/kjeb.2021.39.2.207 

  83. Kim SB and DS Kim. 2018. A tentative evaluation for population?establishment of Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) by?its population modeling: Considering the temporal distribution?of host plants in a selected area in Jeju, Korea. J. Asia-Pac.?Entomol. 21:451-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2018.01.022 

  84. Kim A, YC Kim and DH Lee. 2020a. Home range and daily activity?of nutria (Myocastorcoypus) using radio tracking in South?Korea. J. Environ. Impact Assess 29:182-197. https://doi.org/10.14249/eia.2020.29.3.182 

  85. Kim YR, JE Jang, HK Choi and HJ Lee. 2020b. Phylogeographic?and population genetic study of a Korean endemic freshwater fish species, Zacco koreanus. Korean J. Environ. Biol.?38:650-657. https://doi.org/10.11626/KJEB.2020.38.4.650 

  86. Kolar CS and DM Lodge. 2001. Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:199-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02101-2 

  87. Kwon DH, SJ Kim, TJ Kang, JH Lee and DH Kim. 2017. Analysis?of the molecular phylogenetics and genetic structure of an invasive alien species, Ricania shantungensis, in Korea. J. Aisa?Pac. Entomol. 20:901-906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2017.06.008 

  88. Kubisch A, RD Holt, HJ Poethke and EA Fronhofer. 2014. Where?am I and why? Synthesizing range biology and the eco-evolutionary dynamics of dispersal. Oikos 123:5-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.00706.x 

  89. Lamy T, JP Pointier, P Jarne and P David. 2012. Testing metapopulation dynamics using genetic, demographic and ecological?data. Mol. Ecol. 21:1394-1410. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05478.x 

  90. Latombe G, S Canavan, H Hirsch, C Hui, S Kumschick, MM?Nsikani, LJ Potgieter, TB Robinson, WC Saul, SC Turner, JRU?Wilson, FA Yannelli and DM Richardson. 2019. A four-component classification of uncertainties in biological invasions:?implications for management. Ecosphere 10:e02669. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2669 

  91. Laugier GJM, G Le Moguedec, W Su, A Tayeh, L Soldati, B Serrate, A Estoup and B Facon. 2016. Reduced population size?can induce quick evolution of inbreeding depression in the?invasive ladybird Harmonia axyridis. Biol. Invasions 18:2871-2881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1179-1 

  92. Lee CE. 2002. Evolutionary genetics of invasive species. Trends?Ecol. Evol. 17:386-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-5347(02)02554-5 

  93. Lee CS and Y Moh. 2020. A study on the risk assessment system for the harmful marine species: the legal problems and?solutions. Korean J. Environ. Biol. 38:691-704. https://doi.org/10.11626/KJEB.2020.38.4.691 

  94. Lee KH, JS Jeong, JS Park, MJ Kim, NR Jeong, SY Jeong, GS?Lee, W Lee and I Kim. 2021a. Tracing the invasion and expansion characteristics of the flatid planthopper, Metcalfa pruinosa (Hemiptera: Flatidae), in Korea using mitochondrial DNA?sequences. Insects 12:4. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12010004 

  95. Lee S, Y Lee and S Lee. 2020. Population genetic structure of Anoplophora glabripennis in South Korea: Invasive populations in?the native range? J. Pest Sci. 93:1181-1196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-020-01245-3 

  96. Lee WH, JM Jung, HS Lee, JH Lee and S Jung. 2021b. Evaluating the invasion risk of longhorn crazy ants (Paratrechina?longicornis) in South Korea using spatial distribution model.?J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 24:279-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2021.01.007 

  97. Lenda M, M Zagalska-Neubauer, G Neubauer and P Skorka. 2010. Do invasive species undergo metapopulation dynamics? A case study of the invasive Caspian gull, Larus cachinnans, in Poland. J. Biogeogr. 37:1824-1834. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02344.x 

  98. Levins R. 1969. Some demographic and genetic consequences?of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bull.?Entomol. Soc. Am. 15:237-240. https://doi.org/10.1093/besa/15.3.237 

  99. Lodge DM, S Williams, HJ MacIsaac, KR Hayes, B Leung, S Reichard, RN Mack, RB Moyle, M Smith, DA Andow, JT Carlton?and A McMichael. 2006. Biological invasions: recommendations for US policy and management. Ecol. Appl. 16:2035-2054. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[2035:birfup]2.0.co;2 

  100. MacArthur RH and EO Wilson. 1967. The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton University Press. Princeton, NJ. 

  101. Mackay-Smith A, MK Dornon, R Lucier, A Okimoto, FM de?Sousa, M Rodriguero, V Confalonieri, AA Lanteri and AS?Sequeira. 2021. Host-specific gene expression as a tool for?introduction success in Naupactus parthenogenetic weevils.?PLoS One 16:e0248202. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.23.432442 

  102. Marchini GL, NC Sherlock, AP Ramakrishnan, DM Rosenthal and?MB Cruzan. 2016. Rapid purging of genetic load in a metapopulation and consequences for range expansion in an invasive plant. Biol. Invasions 18:183-196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-015-1001-5 

  103. Maron JL and M Vila. 2001. When do herbivores affect plant invasion? Evidence for the natural enemies and biotic resistance?hypotheses. Oikos 95:361-373. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.950301.x 

  104. Marsico TD, JW Burt, EK Espeland, GW Gilchrist, MA Jamieson,?L Lindstrom, GK Roderick, S Swope, M Szucs and ND Tsutsui. 2010. PERSPECTIVE: Underutilized resources for studying the evolution of invasive species during their introduction,?establishment, and lag phases. Evol. Appl. 3:203-219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4571.2009.00101.x 

  105. McCallum H and A Dobson. 2002. Disease, habitat fragmentation and conservation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B-Biol. Sci.?269:2041-2049. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2079 

  106. McManus LC, EW Tekwa, DE Schindler, TE Walsworth, MA?Colton, MM Webster, TE Essington, DL Forrest, SR Palumbi,?PH Mumby and ML Pinsky. 2021. Evolution reverses the?effect of network structure on metapopulation persistence.?Ecology 102:e03381. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3381 

  107. McRae BH. 2006. Isolation by resistance. Evolution 60:1551-1561. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb00500.x 

  108. Ministry of Environment. 2014. Research of Medium- and LongTerm Management Plan for Alien Species. Ministry of Environment. Sejong, Korea. pp. 3-8. 

  109. Moore KA and SC Elmendorf. 2006. Propagule vs. niche limitation: untangling the mechanisms behind plant species' distributions. Ecol. Lett. 9:797-804. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00923.x 

  110. Nackley LL, AG West, AL Skowno and WJ Bond. 2017. The nebulous ecology of native invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 32:814-824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2017.08.003 

  111. Nakazawa T. 2015. Introducing stage-specific spatial distribution into the Levins metapopulation model. Sci. Rep. 5:1-7.?https://doi.org/10.1038/srep07871 

  112. National Institute of Ecology. 2020a. Nationwide Survey of?Non-Native Species in Korea (2020). National Institute of?Ecology. Seocheon, Korea. 

  113. National Institute of Ecology. 2020b. Investigating Ecological Risk?of Alien Species (2020). National Institute of Ecology. Seocheon, Korea. 

  114. Noda T and M Ohira. 2020. Transition in population dynamics of?the intertidal barnacle Balanus glandula after invasion: causes?and consequences of change in larval supply. J. Mar. Sci.?Eng. 8:915. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8110915 

  115. Nosil P, SM Flaxman, JL Feder and Z Gompert. 2020. Increasing?our ability to predict contemporary evolution. Nat. Commun.?11:1-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19437-x 

  116. Olivieri I, D Couvet and PH Gouyon. 1990. The genetics of transient populations: research at the metapopulation level.?Trends Ecol. Evol. 5:207-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(90)90132-w 

  117. Pannell JR and DJ Obbard. 2003. Probing the primacy of the?patch: what makes a metapopulation? J. Ecol. 91:485-488.?https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00784.x 

  118. Park CG, S Min, GS Lee, S Kim, Y Lee, S Lee, KJ Hong, SW?Wilson, SI Akimoto and W Lee. 2016a. Genetic variability of?the invasive species Metcalfa pruinosa (Hemiptera: Flatidae)?in the Republic of Korea. J. Econ. Entomol. 109:1897-1906.?https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/tow097 

  119. Park M, KS Kim and JH Lee. 2013. Genetic structure of Lycorma?delicatula (Hemiptera: Fulgoridae) populations in Korea: implication for invasion processes in heterogeneous landscapes.?Bull. Entomol. Res. 103:414-424. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007485313000011 

  120. Park T, H Jang, S Eom, K Son and JJ Park. 2022. Analysis and?estimation of species distribution of Mythimna seperata and?Cnaphalocrocis medinalis with land-cover data under climate change scenario using MaxEnt. Korean J. Environ. Biol.?40:214-223. https://doi.org/10.11626/kjeb.2022.40.2.214 

  121. Park YH, J Kim and H Jung. 2016b. Climate change and ecosystem-based management strategies of invasive alien species.?J. Environ. Policy Adm. 24:149-176. https://doi.org/10.15301/jepa.2016.24.4.149 

  122. Parry H, R Sadler and D Kriticos. 2013. Practical guidelines for?modelling post-entry spread in invasion ecology. NeoBiota?18:41-66. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.18.4305 

  123. Pelletier F, D Garant and AP Hendry. 2009. Eco-evolutionary?dynamics. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 364:1483-1489.?https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0027 

  124. Pergl J, P Pysek, I Perglova and V Jarosik. 2012. Low persistence?of a monocarpic invasive plant in historical sites biases our?perception of its actual distribution. J. Biogeogr. 39:1293-1302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02677.x 

  125. Petranka JW. 2007. Evolution of complex life cycles of amphibians: bridging the gap between metapopulation dynamics?and life history evolution. Evol. Ecol. 21:751-764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-006-9149-1 

  126. Pichlmueller F and JC Russell. 2018. Survivors or reinvaders??Intraspecific priority effect masks reinvasion potential. Biol.?Conserv. 227:213-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.09.020 

  127. Richardson DM, N Allsopp, CM D'antonio, SJ Milton and M Rejmanek. 2000a. Plant invasions - the role of mutualisms. Biol.?Rev. 75:65-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185x.1999.tb00041.x 

  128. Richardson DM, P Pysek and JT Carlton. 2010. A compendium?of essential concepts and terminology in invasion ecology.?pp. 409-420. In: Fifty Years of Invasion Ecology (Richardson?DM, ed.). Blackwell Publishing. Hoboken, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444329988.ch30 

  129. Richardson DM, P Pysek, M Rejmanek, MG Barbour, FD Panetta?and CJ West. 2000b. Naturalization and invasion of alien?plants: concepts and definitions. Divers. Distrib. 6:93-107.?https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-4642.2000.00083.x 

  130. Roman J and JA Darling. 2007. Paradox lost: genetic diversity and?the success of aquatic invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22:454-464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.07.002 

  131. Roura-Pascual N, L Brotons, AT Peterson and W Thuiller. 2009.?Consensual predictions of potential distributional areas for?invasive species: a case study of Argentine ants in the Iberian?Peninsula. Biol. Invasions 11: 1017-1031. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-008-9313-3 

  132. Ruesink JL, IM Parker, MJ Groom and PM Kareiva. 1995. Reducing the risks of nonindigenous species introductions. BioScience 45:465-477. https://doi.org/10.2307/1312790 

  133. Russell JC, SD Miller, GA Harper, HE Maclnnes, MJ Wylie and?RM Fewster. 2010. Survivors or reinvaders? Using genetic?assignment to identify invasive pests following eradication.?Biol. Invasions 12:1747-1757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9586-1 

  134. Ryoo M and JH Lee. 2002. Population Ecology. Seoul National University Press. Seoul.? 

  135. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. 2020. Global?Biodiversity Outlook 5. Montreal, Canada. 

  136. Seebens H, E Briski, S Ghabooli, T Shiganova, HJ MacIsaac and?B Blasius. 2019. Non-native species spread in a complex?network: the interaction of global transport and local population dynamics determines invasion success. Proc. R. Soc.?B-Biol. Sci. 286:20190036. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.0036 

  137. Signorile AL, J Wang, PWW Lurz, S Bertolino, C Carbone and DC?Reuman. 2014. Do founder size, genetic diversity and structure influence rates of expansion of North American grey?squirrels in Europe? Divers. Distrib. 20:918-930. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12222 

  138. Simberloff D. 2009. The role of propagule pressure in biological?invasions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40:81-102. 

  139. Skellam JG. 1951. Random dispersal in theoretical populations.?Biometrika 38:196-218. https://doi.org/10.2307/2332328 

  140. Smedbol RK, A McPherson, MM Hansen and E Kenchington. 2002. Myths and moderation in marine 'metapopulations'??Fish. Fish. 3:20-35. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-2979.2002.00062.x 

  141. Smith MA and DM Green. 2005. Dispersal and the metapopulation paradigm in amphibian ecology and conservation:?are all amphibian populations metapopulations? Ecography?28:110128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.04042.x 

  142. Szacki J. 1999. Spatially structured populations: how much do?they match the classic metapopulation concept? Landsc.?Ecol. 14:369-379. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008058208370 

  143. Tamburello N, BO Ma and IM Cote. 2019. From individual movement behaviour to landscape-scale invasion dynamics and?management: a case study of lionfish metapopulations. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 374:20180057. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0057 

  144. The Government of the Republic of Korea. 2019. Second Management Plan for Alien Species. Sejong, Korea. 

  145. Theoharides KA and JS Dukes. 2007. Plant invasion across space?and time: factors affecting nonindigenous species success?during four stages of invasion. New Phytol. 176:256-273.?https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02207.x 

  146. Tsutsui ND, AV Suarez and RK Grosberg. 2003. Genetic diversity,?asymmetrical aggression, and recognition in a widespread invasive species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100:1078-1083.?https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0234412100 

  147. Uesugi A, DJ Baker, N de Silva, K Nurkowski and KA Hodgins.?2020. A lack of genetically compatible mates constrains the?spread of an invasive weed. New Phytol. 226:1864-1872.?https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16496 

  148. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1999. Executive Order 13112 -?Invasive Species, Section 1. Definitions. Washington, D.C. 

  149. USDA-APHIS-PPQ. 2019. Guidelines for the USDA-APHISPPQ Weed Risk Assessment Process. US Department of?Agriculture (USDA), Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service(APHIS), Plant Protection and Quarantine(PPQ). Raleigh,?NC. 

  150. Verhoeven KJ, M Macel, LM Wolfe and A Biere. 2011. Population?admixture, biological invasions and the balance between?local adaptation and inbreeding depression. Proc. R. Soc.?B-Biol. Sci. 278:2-8. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.1272 

  151. Simon-Porcar VI, JL Silva and M Vallejo-Marin. 2021. Rapid local?adaptation in both sexual and asexual invasive populations?of monkeyflowers (Mimulus spp.). Ann. Bot. 127:655-668.?https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.19.423575 

  152. Wells JV and ME Richmond. 1995. Populations, metapopulations, and species populations: what are they and who?should care? Wildl. Soc. Bull. 458-462. 

  153. Whitlock MC and DE McCauley. 1999. Indirect measures of?gene flow and migration: F ST ≠1/(4Nm+1). Heredity 82:117-125. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6884960 

  154. Williams CK, I Parer, BJ Coman, J Burley and ML Braysher. 1995.?Managing Vertebrate Pests: Rabbits. Australian Government?Publishing Service. Canberra. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.1996.tb10031.x 

  155. Williams MI and RK Dumroese. 2013. Preparing for climate?change: forestry and assisted migration. J. For. 111:287-297.?https://doi.org/10.5849/jof.13-016 

  156. Williamson M and A Fitter. 1996. The varying success of invaders. Ecology 77:1661-1666. https://doi.org/10.2307/2265769 

  157. Wilson JRU, EE Dormontt, PJ Prentis, AJ Lowe and DM Richardson. 2009. Something in the way you move: dispersal?pathways affect invasion success. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24:136-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.007 

  158. Wright S. 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics?16:97-159. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/16.2.97 

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

FREE

Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로