$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

미래사회 과학 역량에 대한 교사 인식과 역량기반 과학교육을 위한 교사 전문성 탐색
Teacher Perception of Science Competency and Science PCK for Competency-Based Science Education in the Future Society 원문보기

한국과학교육학회지 = Journal of the Korean association for science education, v.42 no.2, 2022년, pp.265 - 275  

곽영순 (한국교원대학교) ,  홍석영 (제천제일고등학교)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

본 연구에서는 미래사회의 과학교육에 초점을 맞추어 미래사회를 살아갈 학생들에게 길러주어야 할 핵심역량, 그리고 이러한 핵심역량을 길러주기 위한 역량기반 교육을 실현하는 주체인 미래학교 과학 교사에게 필요한 역할과 전문역량 내용교수지식(PCK) 측면에서 탐색하였다. 이를 위해 전국의 지구과학 전공 과학 교사를 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였으며, 105건의 유효한 응답을 확보하였다. 연구결과를 미래사회를 살아갈 학생들에게 길러주어야 할 핵심역량, 역량기반 교육을 위한 과학 교사의 역할, 역량기반 교육을 위해 필요한 과학 교사의 역할과 교사 전문역량의 구조적 관계 등의 측면에서 논의하였다. 학생역량과 교사 전문역랑의 관계, 그리고 교사의 역할과 전문역량 간의 구조를 살펴보기 위해 네트워크 분석을 실시하였다. 주요 연구결과를 살펴보면 미래사회 학생의 핵심역량으로는 의사소통과 협업 능력이, 과학 교사의 역할로는 협업 중심 활동 기회 제공이 가장 중요한 것으로 나타났다. 교사 역할과 교사 전문역량의 구조적 관계를 살펴보면 과학수업실천과 관련된 전문역량과 관련하여 협업 중심 활동 기회 제공, 다양한 소재와 콘텐츠 활용 등과 같은 역할과 뚜렷한 관계가 나타났다. 연구결과를 토대로 학생이 필요로 하는 핵심역량에 대한 교사의 인식 제고에 근거한 학생의 행위 주체성 촉진 방안, 교사 역할과 전문역량 구성요소의 관련성, 교사 전문역량의 총체성 등을 제안하였다.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

In this study, focusing on science education in the future society, we explored students' key competencies to be cultivated for the future society, and the role and PCK expertise necessary for science teachers, who are the main agents of competency-based education to nurture these key competencies. ...

주제어

표/그림 (8)

참고문헌 (41)

  1. Ahn, Y., & Byun, T. (2020). Analysis of teachers' perceptions on the subject competencies of integrated science. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 40(2), 97-111. 

  2. Alake-Tuenter, E., Biemans, H. J., Tobi, H., Wals, A. E., Oosterheert, I., & Mulder, M. (2012). Inquiry-based science education competencies of primary school teachers: A literature study and critical review of the American National Science Education Standards. International Journal of Science Education, 34(17), 2609-2640. 

  3. Barak, M. (2017). Science teacher education in the twenty-first century: A pedagogical framework for technology-integrated social constructivism. Research in Science Education, 47(2), 283-303. 

  4. Carlsen, W. S. (1987). Why do you ask? The effect of science teacher subject-matter knowledge on teacher questioning and classroom discourse. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, D.C. 

  5. Corres, A., Rieckmann, M., Espasa, A., & Ruiz-Mallen, I. (2020). Educator competences in Sustainability Education: A systematic review of frameworks. Sustainability, 12(23), 9858. 

  6. Foulger, T. S., Graziano, K. J., Schmidt-Crawford, D., & Slykhuis, D. A. (2017). Teacher educator technology competencies. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 25(4), 413-448. 

  7. Friesen, S., & Brown, B. (2020). Teacher leaders: developing collective responsibility through design-based professional learning, Teaching Education, DOI: 10.1080/10476210.2020.1856805 

  8. Hakim, A. (2015). Contribution of competence teacher (pedagogical, personality, professional competence and social) on the performance of learning. The International Journal of Engineering and Science, 4(2), 1-12. 

  9. Hong, S., Ahn, Y., & Choi, Y. (2019). Teachers' Teaching Competency Modeling in Future Schooling. Journal of Education & Culture, 25(3), 365-388. 

  10. Jeong, H., Roh, S., Jung, J. W., & Cho, Y. H. (2020). The challenge of the spread of Covid-19 to education: High quality remote learning for everyone. Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 645-669. 

  11. Kang, N. H., Kang, H., Maeng, S., Park, J., & Jeong, E. (2020). Teacher Competency in Competency-Focused Science Teaching in the South Korean Context: Teacher Self-Assessment Instrument Development and Application. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 6(2), 480-513. 

  12. KEDI. (2019). A study on the OECD Education 2030 project: Implementation strategies of future-oriented competency-based education(RR 2020-03). Jincheon: KEDI. 

  13. Kennedy, M. M. (1998). Education reform and subject matter knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 35(3), 249-263. 

  14. KICE. (2018). Development of training programs to enhance teacher competency in the intelligent information society I: Teaching and learning competency modeling (RRI 2018-3). Jincheon: KICE. 

  15. Ko, E., & Jeong, D. (2014). Study on Korean science teachers' perception in accordance with the trends of core competencies in science education worldwide. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 34(6), 535-547. 

  16. KOFAC (2015). 2015 Revised curriculum draft development research II-Science curriculum. BD15110002. Seoul: KOFAC. 

  17. KOFAC (2018). A development of Korean science education standards (KSES) for the next generation. Seoul: KOFAC. 

  18. KOFAC (2019). Developing Performance Expectations, School Implementation Strategies, Evaluation Indicators of the Korean Science Education Standards (KSES) for the Next Generation. Seoul: KOFAC. 

  19. Krell, M., Redman, C., Mathesius, S., Kruger, D., & Van Driel, J. (2020). Assessing pre-service science teachers' scientific reasoning competencies. Research in Science Education, 50(6), 2305-2329. 

  20. Kuruba, M. (2019) Role Competency Matrix: A Step-By-Step Guide to an Objective Competency Management System. New York: Springer. 

  21. Kwak, Y. (2012). Research on Ways to Improve Science Teaching Methods to Develop Students' Key Competencies. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 32(5), 855-865. 

  22. Lederman, N. G., & Gess-Newsome, J. (1992). Do subject matter knowledge, pedagogical knowledge, and pedagogical content knowledge constitute the ideal gas law of science teaching?. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 3(1), 16-20. 

  23. Lee, H. (2016). Conceptualization of an SSI-PCK Framework for Teaching Socio-scientific Issues. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 36(4), 539-550. 

  24. Lim, J., Ryu, J., & Kiim, B. (2017). An Exploratory Study on the Direction of Education and Teacher Competencies in the 4th Industrial Revolution. Journal of Korean Education, 44(2), 5-32. 

  25. Martin, F., Budhrani, K., Kumar, S., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2019). Award-winning faculty online teaching practices: Roles and competencies. Online Learning, 23(1), 184-205. 

  26. Ministry of Education [MOE] (2015). The general explanation of 2015 revised national curriculum. Notification No. 2015-74 [issue 1]. Sejong: Author. 

  27. Naumescu, A. K. (2008). Science Teacher Competencies in a Knowledged Based Society. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 1(1), 25-31. 

  28. OECD (2003). Definition and selection of competencies: Theoretical and conceptual foundation. Paris: OECD. 

  29. OECD (2019). OECD Future of education and skills 2030 conceptual learning framework: A series of concept notes. Paris: OECD. 

  30. Paek, J., Jung, C.H., & Song M. (2015). Developing Competency Model for Secondary School Teachers. Journal of Skills and Qualifications, 4(2), 85-110. 

  31. Park, J., Seo, C., & Han, S. (2005). A guide to job analysis for the development of vocational education and training courses. Korea Vocational Competency Development Institute Research Data 2005-2. 

  32. Raiker, A. (2020). Praxis, Pedagogy and Teachers' Professionalism in England. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal 10(3), 11-30. 

  33. Rushton, E. A., & Reiss, M. J. (2019). From science teacher to 'teacher scientist': Exploring the experiences of research-active science teachers in the UK. International Journal of Science Education, 41(11), 1541-1561. 

  34. Ryan, G., Emmerling, R. J., & Spencer, L. M. (2009). Distinguishing high- performing European executives: The role of emotional, social and cognitive competencies. Journal of Management Development, 28(9), 859-875. 

  35. Selvi, K. (2010). Teachers' competencies. Cultura International Journal of Philosophy of Culture and Axiology, 7(1), 167-175. 

  36. Son, M., & Jeong, D. (2018). A study of science teachers' perception on knowledge information processing competency. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 38(5), 693-703. 

  37. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22. 

  38. Tatto, M. T. (2021). Developing teachers' research capacity: the essential role of teacher education. Teaching Education, 32(1), 27-46. 

  39. Yang. S. H. & Lee, J. (2020). Building a teacher training program that mimics novice scientists' expertization for improving science teachers' research capacity. School Science Journal, 14(2), 193-208. 

  40. Yulianto, Y. (2021). The Needs of Training to Improve Teacher Competence in Preparing Society 5.0. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 20(1), 275-286. 

  41. Zeidler, D. L. (2002). Dancing with maggots and saints: Visions for subject matter knowledge, pedagogical knowledge, and pedagogical content knowledge in science teacher education reform. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 27-42. 

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

FREE

Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로