참고문헌 (60)

1. 강완, 김상미, 박만구, 백석윤, 오영열, 장혜원 (2014). 초등수학교육론. 서울: 경문사. 

2. 권낙원, 김민환, 한승록, 추광재 (2011). 교사를 위한 교육과정론. 서울: 공동체. 

3. 김경희 (2000). 게슈탈트 심리학. 서울: 학지사. 

4. Adhikari, K. (2020). Ausubel's learning theory: Implications on Mathematics Teaching. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Khagendra-Adhikari 

5. Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 

6. Beth, E. W., & Piaget, J. (1966). Mathematical epistemology and psychology. Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Company. 

7. Birdwell, J. K., & Clason, R. G. (1970). Comment In J. K. Birdwell & R. G. Clason (Eds.), Reading in the History of Mathematics Education (pp. 361-362). Washington, D. C.: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 

8. Brownell, W. A. (1935). Psychological considerations in the learning and the teaching of arithmetic. In W. D. Reeve (Ed.), The teaching of arithmetic, tenth yearbook (pp. 1-31). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of mathematics. 

9. Brownell, W. A. (1945). When is arithmetic meaningful? Journal of Educational Research, 38, 481-498. 

   상세보기

10. Bruner, J. S. (1960). The Process of Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 

11. Bruner, J. S., & Kenney, H. J. (1965). Representation and mathematics learning. Society for Research in Child Development, 30(1), 50-59. 

12. Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 

13. Cobb, P. (1988). The tension between theories of learning and instruction in mathematics education. Educational Psychologist, 23(2), 87-103. 

    상세보기

14. Copley, J. (1992). The integration of teacher education and technology: a constructivist model. In D. Carey, R. Carey, D. Willis, and J. Willis (Eds.), Technology and Teacher Education, 681. Charlottesville, VA: AACE. 

15. Dienes, Z. P. (1960). Building up mathematics. London: Hutchinson. 

16. Duffy, T. M. and Jonassen, D. H. (1991). New implications for instructional technology?. Educational Technology, 31(3), 7-12. 

17. Duffy, T. M. and Jonassen, D. H. (1992). Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 

18. Eisner, E. W. (1979). The educational imagination. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc. 

19. English, L. D., & Halford, G. S. (1995). Mathematics education: Models and processes. Mahawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 

20. Ernest, P. (1991). The philosophy of mathematics education. London: The Falmer Press. 

21. Ernest, P. (1998). Social constructivism as a philosophy of mathematics. New York, NY: State University of New York Press. 

22. Ernest, P. (2018). 수학학습심리학 (박성선 역). 서울: 경문사. (원저 2011년 출판). 

23. Ernest, P. (2021). What is the philosophy of mathematics education?. Retrieved from https://socialsciences.exeter.ac.uk/education/research/centres/stem/publications/pmej/pome18/PhoM_%for_ICME_04.htm. 

24. Freudenthal, H. (1973). Mathematics as an educational task. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Company. 

25. Freudenthal, H. (1991) Revisiting mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 

26. Gagne, R. M. (1970). The conditions of learning (2nd Ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc. 

27. Gagne, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction (4rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc. 

28. Ginsberg, H., & Opper, S. (2006). 피아제의 인지발달이론 (김정민 역). 서울: 학지사. (원저 1969년 출판). 

29. Glasersfeld, E. von (1984). Radical constructivism. In P. Watzlawick (Ed.), The invented reality, 17-40. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 

30. Glasersfeld E. von (1989). Constructivism in education. In T. Husen & N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (pp. 162-163). Oxford: Pergamon. 

31. Glasersfeld, E. von (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of Knowing and Learning. London: The Falmer Press. 

32. Glasersfeld, E. von (1996). Aspects of radical constructivism and its educational recommendations. In L. P. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, G. A. Goldin & B. Greer (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning (pp. 307-314). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. 

33. Graven, M., & Hedy-Metzuyanim, E. (2019). Mathematics identity research: the state of the art and future directions. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education 51(3), 361-377. 

34. Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Objectivism versus constructivism: do we need a new philosophical paradigm?. Journal of Educational Research, 39(3), 5-14. 

35. Kilpatrick, J. (2020). History of research in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 267-272). New York, NY: Springer. 

36. Kline, M. (1973). Why J ohnny can't add: The failure of the New Math. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press. 

37. Kneller, G. F. (1971). Introduction to the philosophy of education(2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons. 

38. Konold, C. & Johnson, D. K. (1991). Philosophical and psychological aspects of constructivism. In L. P. Steffe (Ed.), Epistemological foundations of mathematical experience (pp. 1-13). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag. 

39. Lambdin, D. V., & Walcott, C. (2007). Changes through the years. In W. G. Martin, & M. E. Strutchens, & P. C. Elliott (Eds.), The learning of mathematics, sixty-ninth yearbook (pp. 3-26). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of mathematics. 

40. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author. 

41. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principle and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author 

42. Novak, J. D. (2011). A theory of education: meaningful learning underlies the constructive integration of thinking, feeling, and acting leading to empowerment for commitment and responsibility. Aprendizagem Significativa em Revista/Meaningful Learning Review 1(2), 1-14. 

43. Omstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2004). Curriculum: Foundations, principle, and issues(4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon. 

44. Richey, R. C. (1986). The theoretical and conceptual bases of instructional design. London: Kogan Page, Ltd. 

45. Richey, R. C. (1993). Instructional design theory and a changing field. Educational Technology, 33(2), 16-21. 

46. Richey, R. C., Klein, J. D. & Tracey, M. W. (2011). The instructional design knowledge base. New York, NY: Routledge. 

47. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press. 

48. Runes, D. D. (1962). Dictionary of philosophy (15th ed.), Paterson, NJ: Littlefield, Adams & Co. 

49. Saettler, P. (1998). Antecedents, Origins, and theoretical evolution of AECT. Techtrends, 43(1), 51-57. 

50. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2004). The math wars. Educational Policy, 18(1), 253-286. 

    상세보기

51. Tam, M. (2000). Constructivism, instructional design, and technology: Implications for transforming distance learning. Educational Technology & Society, 3(2), 50-60. 

52. Thorndike, E. L. (1922). The psychology of arithmetic. New York, NY: MacMillan. 

53. Treffers, A. (1987) Three dimensions. A model of goal and theory description in mathematics instruction-The Wiskobas project. D. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Company. (Original work published in 1978). 

54. Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., Drijvers, P. (2014). Encyclopedia of mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Realistic mathematics education (pp. 521-525). Dordrecht: Springer. 

55. Van Engen, H. (1949). Analysis of meaning in arithmetic, The Elementary School Journal. 49(7), 395-400. 

56. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 

57. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and Language. Massachusetts: MIT Press. (Original work published in 1934). 

58. Wertheimer, M. (1922). Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt, I: Prinzipielle Bemerkungen. Psycologische Forschung 1, 47-58. 

59. Wertheimer, M. (1945). Productive thinking. New York: Harper. 

60. Wheeler, R. H. (1935). The new psychology of learning. In W. D. Reeve (Ed.), The teaching of arithmetic, tenth yearbook (pp. 233-250). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of mathematics. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

김창일 (53)