$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

예비화학교사의 교육실습에서 담화 맥락을 고려한 발문 분석
An Analysis of Pre-service Chemistry Teachers' Questions in Their Teaching Practices Considering the Context of Discourse 원문보기

한국과학교육학회지 = Journal of the Korean association for science education, v.42 no.4, 2022년, pp.383 - 396  

김성훈 (서울대학교) ,  김지수 (서울대학교) ,  노태희 (서울대학교) ,  김민환 (서울대학교)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

이 연구에서는 교육실습에서 예비화학교사의 발문을 담화 맥락을 고려하여 분석하였다. 서울특별시에 소재한 사범대학 화학교육과에 재학 중이고, 교육실습에 참여한 예비화학교사 5명이 연구에 참여하였다. 연구참여자들의 한 차시 수업을 녹화하였고, 교수학습 자료를 수집하였으며, 면담도 수행하였다. 선행연구의 분석틀을 참고하여 발문을 내용 관련 발문, 정의적 발문, 폐쇄적 발문, 수사적 발문, 구조적 발문으로 발문을 분류하였고, 각 발문을 학생들의 응답을 토대로 적절한 발문과 교사 편의적 발문으로 분류하였다. 연구 결과, 몇 가지의 유형의 발문은 예비교사들이 맡은 수업 내용의 특성에 따라 빈도가 다르게 나타났다. 교사 편의적 발문을 한 후 예비교사들은 학생들의 응답을 유도하기보다는 교사가 답을 제시하는 방식으로 주로 수업을 진행하였다. 또한, 예비교사들은 학생들의 응답 내용을 활용하는 발문들과 정의적 발문은 거의 사용하지 않았다. 예비교사들은 폐쇄적 발문을 학생의 학습 정도를 간단하게 파악하고 상호작용을 촉진하기 위한 목적으로 활용하였다. 수사적 발문은 내용을 강조하기 위한 목적뿐 아니라 학생들의 주의 집중을 유발하거나 사고를 촉진하는 등 다양한 목적으로 사용되었다. 연구 결과를 바탕으로 예비화학교사의 발문 전문성을 향상하기 위한 방안을 논하였다.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

In this study, pre-service chemistry teachers' questions in their teaching practices were analyzed considering the context of discourse. Five pre-service teachers participated in the study. Their questions were analyzed by considering various data including class videos, interviews, and teaching-lea...

주제어

표/그림 (3)

참고문헌 (53)

  1. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Essex, UK: Pearson Education Limited. 

  2. Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of education goals: Handbook 1: Cognitive domain (Vol. 1). New York, NY: David McKay. 

  3. Blosser, P. E. (1973). Handbook of effective questioning techniques. Worthington, OH: Education Associates. 

  4. Carlsen, W. S. (1991). Questioning in classrooms: A sociolinguistic perspective. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 157-178. 

  5. Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 815-843. 

  6. Cho, K.-S., Park, M.-S., & Chung, D.-H. (2009). Development of teacher questioning for improvement of scientific creativity and its' application-case study for earth science class in high school. Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 122-132. 

  7. Cho, M., Jang, J., Yoo, J., Kim, S., & Lee, H. (2010). Analysis of questioning used in science classes based on teaching and learning purposes and processes: Two case studies. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 10(2), 407-428. 

  8. Cho, Y., & Woo, J. (1998). An analysis of types and characteristics of pre-service elementary school teachers' questioning in demonstrative science lessons. The Journal of Educational Studies, 27, 51-69. 

  9. Choi, C. I., Cho, M.-J., & Yeo, S.-I. (2012). Analysis on teachers' perception of questioning and teaching practices in elementary science class. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 31(1), 57-70. 

  10. Chung, H. (2021). Exploring middle school students' thinking process in science education program through the use of teacher's questions. (Doctoral dissertion). Ewha Womans University, Seoul. 

  11. Chung, H., & Shin, D. (2021). Exploring limitations in applying Blosser's question category system for science. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 42(2), 221-244. 

  12. Chung, J. I., Kim, M. H. & Kang, J. H. (2009). A case study of the science class for the gifted by the elementary teachers: Focused on questioning and feedback. Journal of the Society for the International Gifted in Science, 3(2), 125-135. 

  13. Chuska, K. (1995). Improving classroom questions: A teacher's guide to increasing student motivation, participation and higher-level thinking. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation. 

  14. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1990). Research on teaching and teacher research: The issues that divide. Educational Researcher, 19(2), 2-11. 

  15. Duit, R., & Treagust, D. (1998). Learning in science: From behaviourism towards social constructivism and beyond. In B. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International Handbook of Science Education (pp. 3-26). 

  16. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Eshach, H., Dor-Ziderman, Y., & Yefroimsky, Y. (2014). Question asking in the science classroom: Teacher attitudes and practices. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(1), 67-81. 

  17. Gallagher, J. J., & Aschner, M. J. (1963). A preliminary report on analyses of classroom interaction. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development, 9(3), 183-194. 

  18. Gayle, B. M., Preiss, R. W., & Allen, M. (2006). How effective are teacher-initiated classroom questions in enhancing student learning. In B. M. Gayle, R. W. Preiss, N. Burrell, & M. Allen (Eds.), Classroom communication and instructional processes: Advances through metaanalysis (pp. 279-293). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 

  19. Ho, D. G. E. (2005). Why do teachers ask the questions they ask? Regional Language Centre Journal, 36(3), 297-310. 

  20. Jeong, J. E. (2017). Development and application of teaching-learning materials applying question sheets in high school science to improve scientific creativity. (Doctoral Dissertion). Korea National University of Education, Cheongju. 

  21. Jhun, Y. (2021). Analysis of pre-service biology teacher's class applying the science instructional model and question types. The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 32(2), 223-238. 

  22. Jo, I. H., Son, Y.-A., & Kim, D. R. (2012). Analysis of question patterns appearing in teaching demonstrations which applied science teachings model prepared by a pre-service biology teacher. Journal of Science Education, 36(2), 167-185. 

  23. Jung, M. S., Chun, M., & Chae, H. K. (2007). The case analysis of teacher's questioning and feedback through verbal interactions in the classes of the gifted in science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 27(9), 881-892. 

  24. Kang, K.-H. (2009). Analysis of difficulties experienced by pre-service secondary science teachers in student-teacher practice. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 29(5), 580-591. 

  25. Kang, K.-H. (2014). Analysis on the types of questions and the structure of the discourse used in pre-service science teachers' microteaching. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 64(12), 1172-1180. 

  26. Kang, K.-H. (2017). Effect on pre-service physic teachers' questioning ability according to application of a questioning strategy program - Focusing on question type and wait-time. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 67(1), 56-63. 

  27. Kang, K.-H. (2019). The types of questions and the question-answer series presented in pre-service biology teachers' microteaching. Biology Education, 47(2), 107-116. 

  28. Kawalkar, A., & Vijapurkar, J., (2013). Scaffolding science talk: The role of teachers' questions in the inquiry classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), 2004-2027. 

  29. Kayima, F. (2016). Question classification taxonomies as guides to formulating questions for use in chemistry classrooms. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(3), 353-364. 

  30. Kayima, F., & Jakobsen, A. (2020). Exploring the situational adequacy of teacher questions in science classrooms. Research in Science Education, 50(2), 437-467. 

  31. Kim, D. H., & Kim, H. N. (2011). Case analysis of verbal interaction of science-gifted elementary students in their science classes. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 31(8), 1145-1157. 

  32. Kim, H., & Lee, B. (2016). The types and coping methods of dilemmas of pre-service science teachers during student teaching. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(4), 657-668. 

  33. Kim, K., Yoon, J., Park, J., & Noh, T. (2011). The components of pedagogical content knowledge considered by secondary science preservice teachers in planning and implementing teaching demonstrations. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 31(1), 99-114. 

  34. Kim, O.-B., An, U.-H., Kim, E.-A., Ko, M.-S., & Yang, I. (2013). Analysis of the types of teachers' questioning in verification laboratory instruction and discovery laboratory instruction. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(7), 1354-1366. 

  35. Kim, S., Jeon, Y., Kang, H., & Noh, T. (2022). An analysis of pre-service science teachers' reflection of questions during science instruction in teaching practicum. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 42(1), 97-109. 

  36. Kim, S., & Lee, H. (2017). Types of questioning revealed in socioscientific issues (SSI) classes for elementary students. Journal of LearnerCentered Curriculum and Instruction, 17(22), 305-324. 

  37. Lee, J.-H., Kim, D.-J., Hwang, H.-S., Park, S.-Y., Baek, I.-H., & Park, K.-T. (2010). Comparative analysis of verbal interaction between teachers and students for the gifted and the general science class in middle school. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 20(3), 721-741. 

  38. Lee, S.-G. (2012). An analysis of teacher's scientific questioning in elementary science classes. Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 5(3), 287-296. 

  39. Louca, L. T., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tzialli, D. (2012). Identification, interpretationevaluation, response: An alternative framework for analyzing teacher discourse in science. International Journal of Science Education, 34(12), 1823-1856. 

  40. Maskiewicz, A. C. (2015). Navigating the challenges of teaching responsively: An insider's perspective. In A. D. Robertson, R. E. Scherr, & D. Hammer (Eds.), Responsive teaching in science and mathematics (pp. 123-143). New York, NY: Routledge. 

  41. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. 

  42. Nieminen, J. H., Asikainen, H., & Ramo, J. (2021). Promoting deep approach to learning and self-efficacy by changing the purpose of selfassessment: A comparison of summative and formative models. Studies in Higher Education, 46(7), 1296-1311. 

  43. Noh, T., Yoon, J., Kim, J., & Lim, H. (2010). Pedagogical content knowledge factors considered by pre-service elementary teachers in planning and implementing of science teaching demonstration. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 29(3), 350-363. 

  44. Redfield, D. L., & Rousseau, E. W. (1981). A meta-analysis of experimental research on teacher questioning behavior. Review of Educational Research, 51(2), 237-245. 

  45. Robertson, A., Richards, J., Elby, A., & Walkoe, J. (2015). Documenting variability within teacher attention and responsiveness to the substance of student thinking. In A. D. Robertson, R. Scherr, & D. Hammer (Eds.), Responsive teaching in science and mathematics (pp. 227-248). New York, NY: Routledge. 

  46. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Furtak, E. M. (2006). Informal formative assessment and scientific inquiry: Exploring teachers' practices and student learning. Educational Assessment, 11(3), 237-263. 

  47. Samson, G. E., Strykowski, B., Weinstein, T., & Walberg, H. J. (1987). The effects of teacher questioning levels on student achievement: A quantitative synthesis. The Journal of Educational Research, 80(5), 290-295. 

  48. Sanders, R. E. (1993). The art of effective trainer questioning. ISA Transactions, 32(1), 19-21. 

  49. Song, J., Joung, Y., Martin, S., Na, J., Chang, J., & Kim, D. (2018). Classroom and culture: Understanding the science classroom culture of East Asia. Seoul: Bookshill. 

  50. Stake, R. E. (2013). Multiple case study analysis. New York, NY: Guilford press. 

  51. Turner, J. C., & Meyer, D. K. (2000). Studying and understanding the instructional contexts of classrooms: Using our past to forge our future. Educational Psychologist, 35(2), 69-85. 

  52. Wellington, J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press. 

  53. Winne, P. H. (1979). Experiments relating teachers' use of higher cognitive questions to student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 49(1), 13-49. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

FREE

Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로