[논문]예비과학교사의 교육실습 과학수업에서의 발문에 대한 반성 분석

김성훈; 전유선; 강훈식; 노태희

doi:10.14697/jkase.2022.42.1.97

예비과학교사의 교육실습 과학수업에서의 발문에 대한 반성 분석
An Analysis of Pre-service Science Teachers' Reflection of Questions During Science Instruction in Teaching Practicum 원문보기

한국과학교육학회지 = Journal of the Korean association for science education, v.42 no.1, 2022년, pp.97 - 109

김성훈 (서울대학교) , 전유선 (서울대학교) , 강훈식 (서울교육대학교) , 노태희 (서울대학교)

초록
AI-Helper

이 연구에서는 교육실습에서 예비과학교사의 과학수업 중 발문에 대한 반성의 특징을 생산적 반성 관점에서 분석하였다. 분석에서 사용된 생산적 반성은 '학습자와 학습', '지도', '내용 지식', '평가' 네가지 측면을 가지고 있다. 서울특별시에 소재한 사범대학 화학교육과에 재학 중이고, 교육실습에 참여하는 예비과학교사 5명이 연구에 참여하였다. 예비과학교사는 교육실습에서 진행한 자신의 1차시 과학수업 동영상을 보면서 발성 사고법을 통해 자신의 수업 중 발문에 대해 반성하였다. 발성 사고 후 반구조화된 면담도 시행하였다. 연구결과, 예비과학교사들은 수업의 여러 측면 중 '지도' 측면과 '학습자와 학습' 측면을 비교적 많이 고려하였고 뒤이어 '내용 지식'을 많이 고려하였으나 '평가'는 상대적으로 적게 고려하였다. 통합 수준으로는 2가지 측면의 통합이 주로 나타났고, 3가지 측면의 통합이 일부 나타났다. 그러나 4가지 측면의 통합은 매우 드물게 나타났다. 주로 '학습자와 학습' 및 '지도' 측면과 다른 측면이 통합이 나타났고, '내용 지식'과 다른 측면의 통합도 비교적 많았으나, '평가' 측면과 다른 측면의 통합은 매우 적게 나타났다. 통합적 반성은 발문을 하나씩 반성한 예비과학교사보다 여러 개의 발문을 묶어 반성한 예비과학교사에게서 더 많이 나타났다. 또한, 예비과학교사는 자신의 발문을 개선하는 대안을 제시하는 데 어려움을 보였으며, 발문의 형태를 개선하기보다는 발문과 관련된 수업 운영 방식을 수정하는 방향으로 수업을 개선하려는 모습을 보였다. 이를 바탕으로 예비과학교사의 발문 관련 전문성 향상 방안에 대한 실제적인 시사점에 대해 논하였다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

In this study, we investigated pre-service teachers' reflection of questions during science instruction in teaching practicum from the perspective of productive reflection. The productive reflection used in this analysis has four aspects of learners and learning, subject matter knowledge, instruction, and assessment. Five pre-service teachers participated in this study. They reflected on their questions with one class video by using think-aloud method. Semi-constructed interviews were also conducted. The analyses of the results reveal that the aspect of 'instruction' and the 'learners and learning' were frequently included in their reflections. 'subject matter knowledge' was often included in their reflection while 'assessment' was hardly included. The integrations of the two aspects appear most often, those of three aspects appear only sometimes. However, four aspects appear very rarely. The integrations of 'learners and learning' and 'instruction' with the other aspects were most frequent, and the integrations of 'content knowledge' with the other aspects were often. However, the integration of 'assessment' was very few. There were more productive reflections from pre-service teachers who reflect on several questions in context than who reflected on questions one by one. In addition, they exhibited some difficulties in suggesting alternatives to improve their questions. They tried to modify the teaching method related to the questions rather than revise the form of questions. Based on the results, practical implications to improve expertise related to the questions of pre-service teachers were discussed.

주제어

표/그림 (4)

표 Table 1. Lessons of pre-service teachers
표 Table 2. Coding criteria for analyzing reflection of questions
표 Table 3. Numbers and percentages of the areas of reflection considered in pre-service teachers' reflection of questions
표 Table 4. Numbers of integrations among areas in pre-service teachers' reflection of questions

참고문헌 (41)

Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Eiteljorg, E., & Pittman, M. E. (2008). Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 417-436.

상세보기
Brookhart, S. M. (2015). How to make decisions with different kinds of student assessment data. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Cha, J., Choi, W., & Noh, T. (2009). Analysis of pre-service science teachers' web-based reflective journals written during teaching practicum. Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 133-141.
Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 815-843.

상세보기
Cho, M., Jang, J., Yoo, J., Kim, S., & Lee, H. (2010). Analysis of questioning used in science classes based on teaching and learning purposes and processes. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 10(2), 407-428.
Choi, C. I., Cho, M.-J., & Yeo, S.-I. (2012). Analysis on teachers' perception of questioning and teaching practices in elementary science class. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 31(1), 57-70.

원문보기 상세보기
Chung, A., Maeng, S.-H., Lee, S.-K., & Kim, C.-J. (2007). Pre-service science teachers' areas of practice concern and reflections on the science classes in student-teaching. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 27(9), 893-906.
Davis, E. A. (2006). Characterizing productive reflection among preservice elementary teachers: Seeing what matters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(3), 281-301.

상세보기
Eshach, H., Dor-Ziderman, Y., & Yefroimsky, Y. (2014). Question asking in the science classroom: Teacher attitudes and practices. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(1), 67-81.

상세보기
Gaudin, C., & Chalies, S. (2015). Video viewing in teacher education and professional development: A literature review. Educational Research Review, 16, 41-67.

상세보기
Ho, D. G. E. (2005). Why do teachers ask the questions they ask? Regional Language Centre Journal, 36(3), 297-310.

상세보기
Jegal, M., & Kim, H.-N. (2015). Coping strategy and epistemological belief of elementary science gifted students' in real science anomalous situations. The Journal of the Korean Society for the Gifted and Talented, 14(1), 73-96.
Jung, J., & Lee, B. (2016). Analysis on the mismatch between instructional design and teaching practice of pre-service science teachers in teaching practicum. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(2), 435-443.

원문보기 상세보기
Kang, H., & Kim, Y.-S. (2003). Research articles: A study on the improvement of student teachers' teaching skills through self-reflection. Biology Education, 31(1), 72-86.
Kang, H. (2013). Characteristics of elementary science-gifted education teachers' reflection on their science teaching. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 57(6), 789-800.

원문보기 상세보기
Kang, K. (2016). Narrative inquiry on effects of portfolio application on pre-service science teachers' reflective thinking. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(2), 221-229.

원문보기 상세보기
Kawalkar, A., & Vijapurkar, J. (2013). Scaffolding science talk: The role of teachers questions in the inquiry classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), 2004-2027.

상세보기
Kayima, F., & Jakobsen, A. (2020). Exploring the situational adequacy of teacher questions in science classrooms. Research in Science Education, 50(2), 437-467.

상세보기
Kim, H.-J., Hong, H.-G., & Hong, J.-H. (2013). Influence of reflective thinking facilitation program on reflection areas and levels in pre-service science teachers' teaching practice. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(6), 1087-1102.

원문보기 상세보기
Kim, J. (2018). The concept and educational implication of process-focused assessment. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction. 18(20), 839-859.

상세보기
Kim, S. Y. (2018). Exploration of preservice biology teachers' reflective thinking on science teaching practices through field experiences -Based on core reflection strategy-. Biology Education, 46(2), 165-175.

상세보기
Kwon, J., Kim, B., Kang, N., Choi, B., Kim, H., Baek, S., Yang, I., Kwon, Y., Cha, H., Woo, J., & Jung, J. (2012). Science education. Paju: Kyoyookbook Press.
Lee, H., & Kang, S. (2020). Elementary school teachers' and preservice elementary school teachers' actual and preferred types of science assessment. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 39(1), 15-25.

원문보기 상세보기
Lee, S.-G. (2012). An analysis of teacher's scientific questioning in elementary science classes. Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 5(3), 287-296.

원문보기 상세보기
Lee, S.-G. (2014). Analysis of questioning used in elementary science classes based on teaching and learning processes. Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 7(2), 276-285.

원문보기 상세보기
Luttenberg, J., & Bergen, T. (2008). Teacher reflection: The development of a typology. Teachers and Teaching, 14(5), 543-566.

상세보기
Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
Nieminen, P., Hahkioniemi, M., & Viiri, J. (2021). Forms and functions of on-the-fly formative assessment conversations in physics inquiry lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 43(3), 362-384.

상세보기
Noh, T., Yoon, J., Kim, J., & Lim, H. (2010). Pedagogical content knowledge factors considered by pre-service elementary teachers in planning and implementing of science teaching demonstration. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 29(3), 350-363.
Pultorak, E. G. (Ed.). (2010). The purposes, practices, and professionalism of teacher reflectivity: Insights for twenty-first-century teachers and students. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Ryu, K.-B., Lee, J.-W., Hwang, S., & Jeon, S.-H. (2017). Exploring the characteristics of pre-service teacher's continuous, repetitive reflection on the teaching practicum through narrative inquiry. Biology Education, 45(4), 587-598.

상세보기
Schon, D. A. (1983). Reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Shim, H.-P., Ryu, K.-B., Jeon, S.-H., & Hwang, S. (2015). Analyzing the pre-service science teacher community's reflection on their instructions from the cultural historical activity theoretical perspective: A case of three years of biological laboratory class. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(3), 523-536.

원문보기 상세보기
Shin, A.-K. (2007). Reflective thinking on verbal interaction of the pre-service teachers in elementary science classes. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 26(4), 428-439.
Southerland, S. (2012). Questioning strategies and leading discussions. In J. Settlage, & S. A. Southerland (Eds.), Teaching science to every child: Using culture as a starting point (pp. 263-287). New York: Routledge.
Star, J. R., & Strickland, S. K. (2008). Learning to observe: Using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers' ability to notice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(2), 107-125.

상세보기
Van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers' practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137-158.

상세보기
Yang, C., & Kang, H. (2013). Analysis of secondary beginning science-gifted education teachers' reflection on science teaching through coteaching. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(2), 373-389.

원문보기 상세보기
Yang, K. C., & Yoon, H.-G. (2012). Characteristics of elementary teachers' reflection on their science teaching examined through their reflective journals. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 31(3), 372-385.

원문보기 상세보기
Yoon, H.-G. (2012). Analysis of pre-service elementary teachers' reflection on their science teaching in terms of productive reflection. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(4), 703-716.

원문보기 상세보기
Yoon, H.-G., & Song, Y. (2017). Change of pre-service elementary teachers' professional visions through video-based reflection on science classroom. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(4), 553-564.

원문보기 상세보기

저자의 다른 논문 :

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증