$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

영양표시타입이 가정간편식 건강성 평가와 구매의도에 미치는 영향
Effect of Type of Nutrition Labeling on the Healthfulness Evaluation and Purchase Intentions of Home Meal Replacements (HMR) in South Korea 원문보기

대한지역사회영양학회지 = Korean journal of community nutrition, v.27 no.5, 2022년, pp.387 - 396  

조미영 (배재대학교 식품영양학과)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of the types of nutrition labeling on the processing fluency, health evaluation and purchase intentions of home meal replacements. Methods: This online experimental study was conducted from December 29 to 31, 2019 and included 134 part...

주제어

#home meal replacement (HMR)   #nutrition labeling type   #processing fluency   #healthfulness evaluation   #purchase intention  

참고문헌 (45)

  1. Nestle M. What to Eat. 1st ed. New York: North Point Press; 2016. p. 10. 

  2. Park JO. Analysis of comparisons of eating-out, dietary lifestyles, and healthy dietary competencies among middle-aged consumers according to obesity status and gender for implications of consumer education. J Nutr Health 2018; 51(1): 60-72. 

  3. Kim D, Ahn BI. Eating out and consumers' health: Evidence on obesity and balanced nutrition intakes. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17(2): 586. 

    상세보기

  4. Kim DM, Kim KH. The changes in obesity prevalence and dietary habits in Korean adults by residential area during the last 10 years: Based on the 4th (2007-2009) and the 7th (2016-2018) Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data. Korean J Community Nutr 2021; 26(1): 37-47. 

  5. Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency. 2020 National Health Statistics [internet]. Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency; 2022 [cited 2022 Sep 23]. Available from: https://www.data.go.kr/data/3043716/fileData.do. 

  6. Brown HM, Rollo ME, de Vlieger NM, Collins CE, Bucher T. Influence of the nutrition and health information presented on food labels on portion size consumed: A systematic review. Nutr Rev 2018; 76(9): 655-677. 

    상세보기

  7. Roberts SB, Das SK, Suen VM, Pihlajamaki J, Kuriyan R, Steiner-Asiedu M et al. Measured energy content of frequently purchased restaurant meals: Multi-country cross sectional study. BMJ 2018; 363. 

    상세보기

  8. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. Standards and specifications for food, partial amendment notice (Notification No. 2021-114). Cheongju: Ministry of Food and Drug Safety; 2021. 

  9. Korea Agro-Fisheries & Food Trade Corporation. Processed food detailed market status (home meal replacement). Naju: Korea AgroFisheries & Food Trade Corporation; 2022. p. 5. 

  10. Maeil Business News Korea. Even if the restaurant disappears, the convenience food remains...Double-digit growth to '5 trillion market' [internet]. Maeil Business News Korea; 2022 [cited 2022 Sep 23]. Available from: https://www.mk.co.kr/news/business/view/2022/03/192754/. 

  11. US FDA. Guidance for Industry: Food Labeling Guide [internet]. US FDA; 2013 [cited 2022 Sep 23]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/guidance-industry-food-labeling-guide. 

  12. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. Children's health guard traffic light sign leaflet [internet]. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety; 2011 [cited 2022 Oct 23]. Available from: https://impfood.mfds.go.kr/CFBCC02F02/getCntntsDetail?cntntsSn278197&cntntsMngId00005. 

  13. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. Compulsory labeling of sodium content comparison on packaging such as hamburgers [internet]. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety; 2011 [cited 2022 Oct 23]. Available from: https://impfood.mfds.go.kr/CFBBB02F02/getCntntsDetail?cntntsSn282378. 

  14. Newman CL, Howlett E, Burton S. Effects of objective and evaluative front-of-package cues on food evaluation and choice: The moderating influence of comparative and noncomparative processing contexts. J Consum Res 2016; 42(5): 749-766. 

    상세보기

  15. Berning JP, Chouinard HH, McCluskey JJ. Consumer preferences for detailed versus summary formats of nutrition information on grocery store shelf labels. J Agric Food Ind Organ 2008; 6(1): 1-22. 

  16. Schwarz N. Meta-cognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making. J Consum Psychol 2004; 14(4): 332-348. 

    상세보기

  17. Lee AY, Aaker JL. Bringing the frame into focus: The influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. J Pers Soc Psychol 2004; 86(2): 205-211. 

    상세보기

  18. Lee JS. Awareness, satisfaction, and usage patterns of female -consumers for food-nutrition labeling in Busan. J Korean Diet Assoc 2018; 24(4): 312-329. 

  19. Lee DB, Kim MH, Choi MK. Recognition of nutritional labeling and intake status of processed foods and snacks among high school students in Incheon. J Korean Diet Assoc 2021; 27(1): 15-25. 

  20. Kang SH, Choi MK. Use of nutrition labeling according to gender and the obesity degree of high school students in Chungnam. J Korean Diet Assoc 2021; 27(3): 149-161. 

  21. Bae YJ, Park SY, Bak HR. Evaluation of dietary quality and nutritional status according to the use of nutrition labeling and nutrition claims among university students in Chungbuk area: Based on Nutrition Quotient. Korean J Community Nutr 2020; 25(3): 179-188. 

  22. Yun SH, Choi MK. Assessment of nutrient contents using food and nutrition labeling of meal kit sold in Korea. J East Asian Soc Diet Life 2022; 32(2): 103-112. 

    상세보기

  23. Liu PJ, Roberto CA, Liu LJ, Brownell KD. A test of different menu labeling presentations. Appetite 2012; 59(3): 770-777. 

    상세보기

  24. Kim E, Tang LR, Meusel C, Gupta M. Optimization of menu-labeling formats to drive healthy dining: An eye tracking study. Int J Hosp Manag 2018; 70: 37-48. 

  25. Morley B, Scully M, Martin J, Niven P, Dixon H, Wakefield M. What types of nutrition menu labelling lead consumers to select less energy-dense fast food? An experimental study. Appetite 2013; 67: 8-15. 

    상세보기

  26. Yepes MF. (2015). Mobile tablet menus: Attractiveness and impact of nutrition labeling formats on millennials' food choices. Cornell Hosp Q 2015; 56(1): 58-67. 

  27. van Horen F, Pieters R. When high-similarity copycats lose and moderate-similarity copycats gain: The impact of comparative evaluation. J Mark Res 2012; 49(1): 83-91. 

    상세보기

  28. Fang X, Singh S, Ahluwalia R. An examination of different explanations for the mere exposure effect. J Consum Res 2007; 34(1): 97-103. 

    상세보기

  29. Kozup JC, Creyer EH, Burton S. Making healthful food choices: The influence of health claims and nutrition information on consumers' evaluations of packaged food products and restaurant menu items. J Mark 2003; 67(2): 19-34. 

    상세보기

  30. Burton S, Tangari AH, Howlett E, Turri AM. How the perceived healthfulness of restaurant menu items influences sodium and calorie misperceptions: Implications for nutrition disclosures in chain restaurants. J Consum Aff 2014; 48(1): 62-95. 

    상세보기

  31. Lee SH, Lee SL. The effect of the use of nutrition labeling on dietary attitudes, dietary habits, nutrition knowledge and application of nutrition information to daily life among housewives in Gyeonggi-provincial area. Korean J Hum Ecol 2014; 23(3): 453-465. 

  32. Kim JM, Lee MH, Lee NH. Perception on nutrition labeling of the processed food among elementary school students and parents in Daegu area. Korean J Food Nutr 2014; 27(6): 1107-1118. 

  33. Bae YJ, Yeon JY. Dietary behaviors, processed food preferences and awareness levels of nutrition labels among female university students living in middle region by breakfast eating. J Korean Diet Assoc 2011; 17(4): 387-402. 

  34. Kim MH, Kim H, Lee WK, Kim SJ, Yeon JY. Food habits and dietary behavior related to using processed food among male college students residing in dormitory and self-boarding in Gangwon. Korean J Community Nutr 2013; 18(4): 372-385. 

  35. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. Report of consumer perception about nutrition label. Cheongju: Ministry of Food and Drug Safety; 2016. p. 18-19. 

  36. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. 2021 Consumer Attitude Survey on Processed Food [internet]. Statistics Korea; 2021 [cited 2022 Sep 23]. Available from: https://kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/kor_pi/8/6/1/index.board?bmoderead&aSeq387203&pageNo8&rowNum10&amSeq&sTarget&sTxt. 

  37. Korea Broadcast Advertising Corporation. 2019 Media & Consumer Research [internet]. Korea Broadcast Advertising Corporation; 2019 [cited 2022 Sep 23]. Available from: https://adstat.kobaco.co.kr/mcr/portal/dataSet/fileInfoPage.do?orderStateregDt&pageSize10&pageIndex1&searchText&datasetIdDS_MST_0000000442#. 

  38. Maeil Business News Korea. Buy and eat home-cooked food...The era of three meals a day [internet]. Maeil Business News Korea; 2022 [cited 2022 Sep 23]. Available from: https://www.mk.co.kr/news/culture/view/2022/03/200581/. 

  39. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. Processed food nutrition label [internet]. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety; 2020 [cited 2022 Sep 23]. Available from: https://www.foodsafetykorea.go.kr/portal/board/boardDetail.do 

  40. Korea Rural Economic Institute. Europe's HMR (Home Meal Replacement) Industry Status I [internet]. 2018 [updated 2019 Jul 11; cited 2022 Sep 23]. Available from: https://www.atfis.or.kr/home/board/FB0003.do?actread&bpoId3241&bcaId0&pageIndex2. 

  41. Walmart. Walmart's Great for You Icon [internet]. Walmart; 2018 [cited 2022 Sep 23]. Available from: https://corporate.walmart.com/globalresponsibility/hunger-nutrition/great-for-you. 

  42. Unilever. Smart Choices Program [internet]. Foodnavigator; 2009 [cited 2022 Sep 23]. Available from: https://www.foodnavigator-usa.com/Article/2009/10/27/Unilever-pulls-out-of-Smart-Choices-Program#. 

  43. PepsiCo. Good for You [internet]. PepsiCo; 2018 [cited 2022 Sep 23]. Available from: http://www.pepsico.com/Brands/BrandExplorer#goodfor-you. 

  44. Asia Economic. A convenience food that diversifies... Segmentation acceleration beyond convenience [internet]. Asia Economic; 2022 [cited 2022 Sep 23]. Available from: https://www.asiae.co.kr/article/2022052013281063350. 

  45. Jeong JY, Kim E, Yang IS, Ham S. Motivators and barriers to provision of nutritional information in restaurants. Korean J Hosp Tour 2015; 24(1): 227-243. 

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

GOLD

오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로