결합제 분사 방식 3D 프린팅 기술을 활용한 소아 생식기 차폐체 제작 및 유용성 평가 Production and Utility Assessment of Pediatric Genital Shields Using 3D Printing Technology with Colorjet 3D Printing원문보기
In this study, the aim was to assess the shielding performance of different 3D printing materials, specifically those produced using FDM, SLA, and CJP methods, with a focus on their application as shielding devices in clinical settings. Additionally, the weight of lead shielding materials can evoke ...
In this study, the aim was to assess the shielding performance of different 3D printing materials, specifically those produced using FDM, SLA, and CJP methods, with a focus on their application as shielding devices in clinical settings. Additionally, the weight of lead shielding materials can evoke reluctance in pediatric patients undergoing X-ray imaging. A total of 12 materials were printed using their respective 3D printers. These materials were then subjected to X-ray testing using diagnostic X-ray equipment and an exposure meter. The goal was to evaluate their shielding capabilities in comparison to 1 mm lead. The results of this evaluation revealed that VisiJet PXL-Pastel, produced using the CJP method, exhibited the highest shielding performance. Therefore, VisiJet PXL-Pastel by CJP method was selected for the creation of a shielding device designed for pediatric reproductive organs. Subsequent tests demonstrated that both the newly created shielding device and conventional lead shielding equipment achieved the same maximum shielding rate at 50 kVp. Specifically, the shielding rate for the 3D printed device was measured at 84.53%, while the conventional lead shielding equipment, categorized as Apron1 (85.74%), Apron2 (99.98%), and Apron3 (99.04%), demonstrated similar performance. In conclusion, the CJP-produced VisiJet PXL-Pastel material showcased excellent radiation shielding capabilities, allowing for anatomical observations of the target organs and their surrounding structures in X-ray images. Furthermore, its lower weight in comparison to traditional lead shielding materials makes it a clinically practical and useful choice, particularly for pediatric applications.
In this study, the aim was to assess the shielding performance of different 3D printing materials, specifically those produced using FDM, SLA, and CJP methods, with a focus on their application as shielding devices in clinical settings. Additionally, the weight of lead shielding materials can evoke reluctance in pediatric patients undergoing X-ray imaging. A total of 12 materials were printed using their respective 3D printers. These materials were then subjected to X-ray testing using diagnostic X-ray equipment and an exposure meter. The goal was to evaluate their shielding capabilities in comparison to 1 mm lead. The results of this evaluation revealed that VisiJet PXL-Pastel, produced using the CJP method, exhibited the highest shielding performance. Therefore, VisiJet PXL-Pastel by CJP method was selected for the creation of a shielding device designed for pediatric reproductive organs. Subsequent tests demonstrated that both the newly created shielding device and conventional lead shielding equipment achieved the same maximum shielding rate at 50 kVp. Specifically, the shielding rate for the 3D printed device was measured at 84.53%, while the conventional lead shielding equipment, categorized as Apron1 (85.74%), Apron2 (99.98%), and Apron3 (99.04%), demonstrated similar performance. In conclusion, the CJP-produced VisiJet PXL-Pastel material showcased excellent radiation shielding capabilities, allowing for anatomical observations of the target organs and their surrounding structures in X-ray images. Furthermore, its lower weight in comparison to traditional lead shielding materials makes it a clinically practical and useful choice, particularly for pediatric applications.
Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency. Status？of diagnostic x-ray equipment in the Republic of Korea. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56786/PHWR.2022.15.51.3021
Ministry of Health and Welfare. OECD health statistics 2022. 2023. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2023.46.1.15
Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency.？Assessment of radiation exposure of Korean population by medical radiation. Retrieved from https://www.kdca.go.kr/filepath/boardDownload
ICRP. The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. ICRP？Publication 103. Ann. ICRP. 2007;37. Retrieved from？https://www.icrp.org/publication.asp?idICRP%20Publication%20103
Lim CS, Kim SH. A study on the radiation dose managements in the nuclear medicine department.？Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation？Society. 2009;10(7):1760-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2009.10.7.1760
Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, Berdon W. Estimated？risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric？CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:289-96. Retrieved？from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Martin-Law-2/publication/26684135_Pediatric_64-MDCT_Coronary_Angiography_With_ECG-Modulated_Tube_Current_Radiation_Dose_and_Cancer_Risk/links/5f3a7020458515b72927739a/Pediatric-64-MDCT-Coronary-Angiography-With-ECG-Modulated-Tube-Current-Radiation-Dose-and-Cancer-Risk.pdf
Kim K, Kang S, Noh S, Jung B, Cho C, Heo Y, Park？J. Absorbed spectrum comparison of lead and tungsten in continuous x-ray energy using monte carlo？simulation. Journal of the Korean Society of？Radiology. 2012;6(6):483-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7742/jksr.2012.6.6.483
Kim JY, Kim JH, Kim HW, Roh JH, Lee KH, Cheon？BC, Nam SM. A review of lead poisoning cases reported？for recent 30 years in Korea. Korean Journal of？Medicine; 2004:17-624. Retrieved from https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/wpr-195200
Bae, M, Lee H. A study on radiation shielding materials for protective garments using Monte Carlo？simulation. Journal of Korean Society for Quality？Management. 2015;43(3):239-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2015.43.3.239
Park KS, Choi WJ, Kim DH. Evaluation of metal？composite filaments for 3D printing. Journal of the？Korean Society of Radiology. 2021;5(5):697-704.？DOI: https://doi.org/10.7742/jksr.2021.15.5.697
Oh WK. Customized model manufacturing for patients with pelvic fracture using FDM 3D printer.？The Journal of the Korea Contents Association.？2014;14(11):370-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2014.14.11.370
Lee H, Kim D. Assessment of radiation shielding？ability of printing materials using 3D printing？technology: FDM 3D printing technology. Journal？of the Korean Society of Radiology. 2018;12(7):909-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7742/jksr.2018.12.7.909
Park KS, Kim DH. Evaluation of 3D printing filaments for radiation shielding using high density？polyethylene and bismuth. Journal of the Korean？Society of Radiology. 2022;16(3):233-40. DOI:？https://doi.org/10.7742/jksr.2022.16.3.233
Jang HM, Yoon J. Usefulness evaluation and fabrication of the radiation shield using 3D printing？technology. Journal of the Korean Society of？Radiology. 2019;13(7):1015-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7742/jksr.2019.13.7.1015
Lee H, Kim D. Assessment of radiation shielding？ability of printing materials using 3D printing？technology: FDM 3D printing technology. Journal？of the Korean Society of Radiology. 2018;12(7):？909-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7742/jksr.2018.12.7.909
Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency.？Korean diagnostic reference level for general radiography and mammography in 2022. 2023. DOI:？https://doi.org/10.56786/PHWR.2023.16.31.2
Chui SH, Park JE, Chun WK, Ju YJ, Yang NH, Dong？KR. Usability evaluation through gonad shielding？production of pediatric patients by gender and age？rating. Journal of Radiation Industry. 2015;9(2):69-75. Retrieved from https://koreascience.kr/article/JAKO201526863114452.page
Kim YH, Choi JH, Kim SS, Oh YH, Lee CH, Cho？PK, ... Kim CM. Evaluation of effective dose during？X-ray training in a radiological technology program in Korea. Journal of Radiation Research and？Applied Sciences. 2018;11(4):383-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2018.08.001
Cho YI. Feasibility of the 3D printing materials？for radiation dose reduction in interventional？radiology. Journal of Radiological Science and？Technology. 2020;43(3):169-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2020.43.3.169
Cho YI, Kim JH. Evaluation of the effectiveness？of the shielding device and the organ dose of subject？during bone mineral density. Journal of Radiological？Science and Technology. 2020;43(3):187-94. DOI:？https://doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2020.43.3.187
AI-Helper
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.