[논문]초등 일반 학생과 과학영재 학생이 만든 과학티콘의 특성 비교

이지은; 강훈식

doi:10.14697/jkase.2023.43.2.73

초등 일반 학생과 과학영재 학생이 만든 과학티콘의 특성 비교
Comparison of Characteristics of Scientific Emoticons Made by General and Science-Gifted Elementary Students 원문보기

한국과학교육학회지 = Journal of the Korean association for science education, v.43 no.2, 2023년, pp.73 - 86

초록
AI-Helper

이 연구에서는 초등 일반 학생과 과학영재 학생이 만든 과학티콘의 특성을 비교하였다. 이를 위해 경기도 소재 일반 초등학교의 초등학교 5학년 학생 53명과 서울특별시 소재 과학영재교육원 소속 초등학교 5학년 학생 35명을 선정하였다. 그리고 이 학생들이 만든 과학티콘의 개수와 유형을 비교하였다. 연구 결과, 일반 학생보다 과학영재 학생이 주어진 30분 이내에 과학티콘을 더 많이 만들었다. 과학티콘의 유형을 비교한 결과에서는 초등 일반 학생과 과학영재 학생 사이에 비슷한 부분도 있었고, 의미 있는 차이가 있는 부분도 있었다. 하지만 전반적으로 일반 학생보다 과학영재 학생이 과학티콘에 포함된 글의 '기술 형태'와 '생성 형태', 그림의 '표현 형태', 과학티콘에 포함된 '감정', '구성 수준', '과학 내용(교육과정 초과 여부, 과학 학문영역, 과학 지식 활용) 측면에서 더 다양한 유형의 과학티콘을 만드는 것으로 나타났다. 초등 일반 학생과 과학영재 학생이 만든 과학티콘에는 모두 오개념이 매우 적게 포함되어 있었다. 이에 대한 교육적 시사점을 논하였다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

This study compared the characteristics of scientific emoticons made by general and science-gifted elementary students. To do this, fifth graders (n=53) at a general elementary school in Gyeonggi province and fifth graders (n=35) at a gifted science education institute in Seoul were selected. Scientific emoticons written by the students were compared according to the number and types. Analysis of the results reveal that the science-gifted students made more scientific emoticons than the general students for thirty minutes. In the comparison of the types of scientific emoticons, there were some similarities and significant differences between general students and science-gifted students. Overall, however, it was found that science-gifted students made more various types of scientific emoticons than general students in 'form' aspects (e.g., generative form of text, descriptive form of text, and expressive form of image) and 'information' aspects (e.g., emotion, construction level, excess of curriculum level, scientific disciplines, and use of scientific knowledge) of the texts and the images in the scientific emoticons. The scientific emoticons made by general and science-gifted elementary students included very few misconceptions. Educational implications of these findings are discussed.

주제어

표/그림 (13)

표 Table 1. Framework of analysis
표 Table 2. Analysis of the number of scientific emoticon
표 Table 3. Chi-square test results of types by the form of scientific emoticon
그림 Figure 1. Examples of scientific emoticon by the description form of text
그림 Figure 2. Examples of scientific emoticon by the generation form of text
그림 Figure 3. Examples of scientific emoticon by the expression form of image
표 Table 4. Analysis of types by the information of scientific emoticon
그림 Figure 4. Examples of scientific emoticons by the emotion
그림 Figure 5. Examples of scientific emoticon by the construction level
그림 Figure 6. Examples of scientific emoticon by the knowledge of science curriculum included
그림 Figure 7. Examples of scientific emoticon including of misconceptions
그림 Figure 8. Examples of scientific emoticon by the knowledge of science curriculum included
그림 Figure 9. Examples of scientific emoticon by the construction level

참고문헌 (23)

Blackburn, R. A. R. (2019). Using infographic creation as tool for？science-communication assessment and a means of connecting students？to their departmental research. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(7),？1510-1514.

상세보기
Chang, I. (2015). A Study on the emotional expressions and users' tendency？toward emoticon. Journal of Brand Design Association of Korea, 16(1),？517-527.
Jeong, J., & Kang, H. (2022). Analysis on types of scientific emoticon made？by science-gifted elementary school students and their perceptions on？making scientific emoticons. Journal of the Korean Association for？Science Education, 42(3), 311-324.
Jeong, K., & Kang, H. (2021). Analysis on the use of visualization materials？in free inquiry reports for scientifically-gifted elementary school？students focusing on infographics. Journal of Korean Elementary？Science Education, 40(2), 253-266.
Kim, M. (2020). The effects of emoticon types & problem types on problem？solving process & discussion message. Doctor's thesis, Yeungnam？University.
Ko, Y., & Kim, K. (2020). A study on class process of emoticon design？with application of blended project based learning in specialized high？school. Design Research, 5(4), 414-427.
Kothari, D., Hall, A. O., Castaneda, C. A., & McNeil, A. J. (2019).？Connecting organic chemistry concepts with real-world contexts by？creating infographics. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(11),？2524-2527.

상세보기
Kwon, J., & Kang, H. (2019). Compari ng types and creati vi ty level of？scientific humor made by general and scientifically-gifted elementary？students and their perceptions for educational benefits of making？scientific humor. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in？Science Education, 39(3), 415-426.
Lee, H., & Im, H. (2019). Instructional effect of infographics construction？in elementary science. Journal of the Korean Association for Research？in Science Education, 39(5), 625-635.
Lee, H., & Ryu, J. (2017). A study for developi ng vi sual li teracy wi th？emoticon: Focused on elementary art education. Art Education？Research Review, 31(4), 1-30.
Lee, S., Lee, J., & Park, C. (2019). Latest introduction to gifted education.？Seoul: Hakjisa.
Lim, C. (2014). Development of an assessment formula for scientific？creativity and its application. Journal of Korean Elementary Science？Education, 33(2), 242-257.
Lim, S. (2021). The effect of emoticon's cuteness type on empathy by？mediating attachment and fun. Doctor's thesis, Hong-ik National？University.
Ma, Y., Lee, H., & Lee, C, (2019). A study on emoticon expression types？and preference according to the emotional depth of sender and？relationship with receiver, Journal of Brand Design Association of？Korea, 17(1), 223-236.
Mayer, R. E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: Using the same？instructional design methods across different media. Learning and？Instruction, 13(2), 125-139.

상세보기
Ministry of Education (2022). Science curriculum. MOE Notification No.？2022-33 [supplement 9].
Mjdawi, A., & Jabi, S. (2020). A pragma-semiotic analysis of emoticons？in social media. Education and Linguistics Research, 6(2), 139-163.
Mongoo (2020). Witness and concept in one shot! scientific emoticon. Seoul:？Chungarammedia.
Mongoo (2021). Witness and concept in one shot! mathematical emoticon.？Seoul: Chungarammedia.
Provvidenza, C. F., Hartman, L. R., Carmichael, J., & Reed, N. (2019). Does？a picture speak louder than words? The role of infographics as a？concussion education strategy. Journal of Visual Communication in？Medicine, 42(3), 102-113.

상세보기
Smiciklas, M. (2012). The power of infographics: Using pictures to？communicate and connect with your audiences. Indianapolis: Que？Publishing.
Sompotan, A. (2019). A semiotics analysis on the use of emoticons in？inter-personal communication on facebook social media. Journal of？Educational Method And Technology, 2(1), 65-70.
Son, K., & Kim, H. (2020). Analysis of emotion types of animated emoticons.？Design Works, 3(2), 48-61.

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증