최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기한국과학교육학회지 = Journal of the Korean association for science education, v.43 no.2, 2023년, pp.167 - 180
한문현 (파주청암초등학교) , 오필석 (경인교육대학교)
과학 교실에서 교사의 개입은 학생의 실천에 주요한 영향을 끼칠 수 있다는 점에서 중요하다. 본 연구는 교사가 학생들의 과학적 설명구성 과정에서 어떤 종류의 발화를 하여 학생들의 실천에 개입하는지 질적으로 분석하였다. 두 명의 초등학교 교사인 L과 K가 본 연구에 참여하였으며, 그들의 6학년 과학 '식물의 구조와 기능' 단원이 과학적 설명 구성 수업으로 재구성되었다. 두 교사에게 매 수업에서 반응적 교수의 일환으로 학생의 과학적 실천을 도울 수 있도록 요청하였다. 연구 결과, 두 교사는 각각 주로 공감적 발화 또는 훈육적 발화를 사용하였으며, 이들은 학생들의 과학적 실천의 정서적, 과정적, 개념적 측면을 돕기 위해 사용된 것을 알 수 있었다. 이 중 공감적 발화는 알아채기, 적극적 수용, 대안 제시의 순서로 진행되어 학생들의 실천을 조력하였고, 이와는 대조적으로 훈육적 발화는 학생들의 실천을 개선하기 위한 목적에서 부족함 찾기, 평가하기, 촉구하기의 순서로 이루어졌다. 두 교사가 각각 공감적 발화와 훈육적 발화를 사용하는 까닭을 논의하였으며, 과학 교육에의 시사점을 제시하였다.
Teacher interventions in science classrooms are important because they can have a major impact on students' practices. This study qualitatively analyzed what kinds of utterances teachers used to intervene in students' practices of constructing scientific explanations. Two elementary school teachers,...
Arghode, V., Yalvac, B., Liew, J. (2013). Teacher empathy and science?education: A collective case study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics,?Science, & Technology Education, 9(2), 89-99.
Berland, L. K., & Reiser, B. J. (2009). Making sense of argumentation and?explanation. Science Education, 93(1), 26-55.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology.?Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Colley, C., & Windschitl, M. (2016). Rigor in elementary science students'?discourse: The role of responsiveness and supportive conditions for?talk. Science Education, 100(6), 1009-1038.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques?and procedures for developing grounded theory. CA, US: Sage?publications.
Davidson S. G., Jaber, L. Z., & Southerland, S. A. (2020). Emotions in?the doing of science: Exploring epistemic affect in elementary teachers'?science research experiences. Science Education, 104(6), 1008-1040.
Hammer, D., Goldberg, F., & Fargason, S. (2012). Responsive teaching and?the beginnings of energy in a third grade classroom. Review of Science,?Mathematics and ICT Education, 6(1), 51-72.
Han, M. H. (2020). Epistemic empathy of a teacher and emotional regulation?of elementary students during human respiratory system modeling.?Biology Education, 48(3), 368-380.
Han, M. H., & Oh, P. S. (2022). A case study of an elementary science?teacher's emotional responsive teaching. Journal of the Korean?Association for Science Education, 42(2), 227-238.
Jaber, L. Z. (2015). Attending to students' epistemic affect. In A. D.?Robertson, R. E. Scherr, & D. Hammer (Eds.), Responsive teaching?in science and mathematics (pp. 162-188). New York, NY: Routledge.
Jaber, L. Z. (2021). "He got a glimpse of the joys of understanding" -The?role of epistemic empathy in teacher learning. Journal of the Learning?Sciences, 30(3), 433-465.
Jaber, L. Z., Dini, V., & Hammer, D. (2022). "Well that's how the kids?feel!" -Epistemic empathy as a driver of responsive teaching. Journal?of Research in Science Teaching, 59(2), 223-251.
Jaber, L., Z., Dini, V., Hammer, D., & Danahy, E. (2018a). Targeting?disciplinary practices in an online learning environment. Science?Education, 102(4), 668-692.
Jaber, L. Z., Southerland, S., & Dake, F. (2018b). Cultivating epistemic?empathy in preservice teacher education. Teaching and Teacher?Education, 72, 13-23.
Kang, H. (2022). Teacher responsiveness that promotes equity in secondary?science classrooms. Cognition and Instruction, 40(2), 206-232.
Kang, H., & Anderson, C. W. (2015). Supporting preservice science teacher's?ability to attend and respond to student thinking by design. Science?Education, 99(5), 863-895.
Kang, E., & Kim, H. B. (2017). Elementary students' perceptions of role?and epistemic authority in the activity about 'Making a pet poster'.?Journal of Korean Association for Science Education, 37(4), 587-597.
Ke, L., & Schwarz, C. V. (2021). Supporting students' meaningful?engagement in scientific modeling through epistemological messages:?A case study of contrasting teaching approaches. Journal of Research?in Science Teaching, 58(3), 335-365.
Kim, K. W., Yang, H. S., & Kang, S. J. (2019). The effect on manifesting?group creativity by empathy level of students in the elementary science?class. The Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 38(1),?1-15.
King, D., Ritchie, S., Sandhu, M., Henderson, S., & Borand, B. (2017).?Temporality of emotion: Antecedent and successive variants of?frustration when learning chemistry. Science Education, 101(4),?639-672.
Song, J., Kang, S.-J., Kwak, Y., Kim, D., Kim, S., Na, J., Do, J.-H., Min,?B., Park, S. C., Bae, S., Son, Y.-A, Son, J. W., Oh, P. S., Lee, J.-K.,?Ihm, H., Jeong, D. H., Joung, Y. J., Joung, J. (2018). A development?of Korean science education standards (KSES) for the next generation.?Seoul: KOFAC.
Kwon, J., & Kim, H.-B. (2016). Exploring small group argumentation shown?in designing an experiment: Focusing on students' epistemic goals and?epistemic considerations for activities. Journal of Korean Association?for Science Education, 36(1), 45-61.
Lee, D., Yoon, J., & Kang, S. (2015). The suggestion of design thinking?process and its feasibility study for fostering group creativity of?elementary-secondary school students in science education. Journal of?the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(3), 443-453.
Lee, E.-J., & Son, Y.-A. (2022). The effects of class applying the empathy?lens, and an suggestion of a science learning model using the empathy?lens. Biology Education, 50(4), 598-617.
Lee, S., Yoon, J., & Kang, S. (2018). Exploring the possibility of design?thinking program as a group creativity development strategy for?elementary school students. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum?and Instruction, 18(11), 525-544.
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values.?Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Levrini, O., Levin, M., Fantini, P., & Tasquier, G. (2019). Orchestration?of classroom discussions that foster appropriation. Science Education,?103(1), 206-235.
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA:?Sage.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in?education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Mikkonen, K., Kyngas, H., & Kaariainen, M. (2015). Nursing students'?experiences of the empathy of their teachers: A qualitative study.?Advances in Health Sciences Education, 20(3), 669-682.
Ministry of Education (2015). 2015 Science Curriculum (Notification?No.2015-74 of the Ministry of Education). Sejong: Ministry of?Education.
Ministry of Education (2019). 5th Grade Elementary Science Guidebook.?Seoul: Visang Press.
Muis, K. R., Chevrier, M., Singh, C. A. (2018). The role of epistemic?emotions in personal epistemology and self-regulated learning.?Educational Psychologist, 53(3), 165-184.
National Research Council (NRC). (2012). Next generation science?standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academic?Press.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states,?by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Oh, P. S. (2011). "Unfillable cups": Meaning of science classes to elementary?school teachers. Journal of Korean Association for Science Education,?31(2), 271-294.
Oh, P. S., & Han, M. (2021). A review of the history of and recent trends?on emotion research in science education. Journal of Korean?Association for Science Education, 41(2), 103-114.
Oxley, J. (2011). The moral dimensions of empathy: Limits and applications?in ethical theory and practice. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Park, C. (2015). Study of sympathy in education of literature. Doctoral?dissertation, Korea University, Seoul.
Park, J., Tang, K.-S., & Chang, J. (2021). Plan-Draw-Evaluate (PDE) pattern?in students' collaborative drawing: Interracial between visual and?verbal modes of representation. Science Education, 105(5), 1013-1045.
Park, J. Y., & Kim, H. B. (2018). Exploring teacher's responsive teaching?practice in argumentation-based science classroom: Focus on structural?and dialogical aspects of argument. Journal of the Korean Association?for Science Education, 38(1), 69-85.
Robertson, A. D., Scherr, R. E., & Hammer, D. (2015). Responsive teaching?in science and mathematics. New York, NY: Routledge.
Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., & Tucker-Raymond, E. (2016). Developing?interpretive power in science teaching. Journal of Research in Science?Teaching, 53(10), 1571-1600.
Stake, R. E. (2006).Multiple case study analysis. New York, NY: Guilford.
Tabak, I., & Baumgartner, E. (2004). The teacher as partner: Exploring?participant structures, symmetry, and identity work in scaffolding.?Cognition and Instruction, 22(4), 393-429.
utkur, N. (2019). Empathy in primary school life sciences course: The roles?assumed by pre-service teachers. Malaysian Online Journal of?Educational Sciences, 7(4), 43-54.
Yang, H., & Kang, S.-J. (2019). Scientific empathy discovered in scientists'?problem-solving process. Journal of the Korean Association for Science?Education, 39(2), 249-261.
Yang, H., Yoon, J., Park, J., & Kang S.-J. (2020). Analysis of empathy?factors in science class: Focusing on comparison with general empathy?factors. School Science Education, 14(2), 245-258.
Zeyer, A., & Dillon, J. (2019). The role of empathy for learning in complex?science, environment, health contexts. International Journal of Science?Education, 41(3), 297-315.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.