[논문]치위생(학)과 학생이 지각한 비대면 시험의 공정성, 시험 불안 및 학교 신뢰 간의 구조적 관계

김형미; 김창희; 김정희

doi:10.22753/jkdhs/2023.6.1.37

치위생(학)과 학생이 지각한 비대면 시험의 공정성, 시험 불안 및 학교 신뢰 간의 구조적 관계
Structural relationship among justice of non-face-to-face exam, trust, and satisfaction with university 원문보기

대한치위생과학회지 = Journal of Korean dental hygiene science, v.6 no.1, 2023년, pp.37 - 50

김형미 (충청대학교 치위생과) , 김창희 (충청대학교 치위생과) , 김정희 (유원대학교 치위생학과)

초록
AI-Helper

연구배경: 본 연구는 치위생학과 학생들이 지각한 비대면 시험의 공정성과, 시험 불안 및 학교 신뢰간의 구조적 관계를 분석하고자 한다. 연구방법: 치위생학과 학생 267명을 대상으로 설문조사를 하였다. 조사항목은 일반적 특성과 평가에 대한 의견, 비대면시험의 공정성(분배 공정성, 절차 공정성, 상호작용 공정성), 학교 만족도, 학교 신뢰도 등으로 구성하였다. 통계분석은 독립표본 t검정과 일원배치분산분석, 구조모형분석을 하였다. 연구결과: 비대면 시험에서 학교만족도와 신뢰도에 직접적인 영향을 미치는 요인은 상호작용 공정성(β=.401, p<.001)과 분배공정성(β=.232, p=.002)이 높을수록 학교에 만족하였으며, 학교 만족도(β=.606, p<.001)와 절차공정성(β=.299, p<.001)이 높을수록 학교를 신뢰하였다. 학교신뢰도에 간접적인 영향을 미치는 요인은 상호작용공정성(β=.243, p=.010), 분배공정성(β=.141, p=.010)이었다. 학교만족에 영향을 미치는 요인은 상호작용 공정성(β=.592, p=.010), 분배 공정성(β=.208, p=.010)이며, 학교 신뢰도에 영향을 미치는 요인은 학교만족도(β=.56, p=.010), 상호작용 공정성(β=.332, p=.010), 절차 공정성(β=.229, p=.010), 분배 공정성(β=.116, p=.010)이었다. 결론: 비대면 시험에 대한 정보를 학교 또는 교수들이 충분히 제공하며, 시간을 들여 노력했을 때 정당한 성적을 받을 수 있도록 올바른 절차로 시행해야 학교를 신뢰하고 학교에 대해 만족할 수 있다. 학생들이 학교를 신뢰할 수 있는 공정한 비대면시험을 위한 다양한 콘텐츠 개발에 기초자료를 제공하고자 한다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

Background: This study investigated the structural relationships among justice, test anxiety, and school reliability s non-face-to-face tests of dental hygiene students. Methods: A survey was conducted with 267 dental hygiene students. The survey items included general characteristics, opinions on evaluation, the fairness of non-face-to-face tests (distributive, procedural, and interactional justice), school satisfaction, and school reliability. For statistical analysis, independent-sample t-tests, one-way ANOVA, and structural modeling analyses were performed. Results: Among factors that directly affected distributive justice and reliability towards non-face-to-face tests, the higher the interactional justice (β=0.401, p<0.001) and distributive justice (β=0.232, p=0.002) levels, the higher the school satisfaction. The higher the school satisfaction (β=0.606, p<0.001) and procedural justice (β=0.299, p<0.001) levels, the higher the perceived reliability of the school. Factors that indirectly affected school reliability included interactional justice (β=0.243, p=0.010) and distributive justice (β=0.141, p=0.010). Interactional justice (β=0.592, p=0.010) and distributive justice (β=0.208, p=0.010) were the factors affecting school satisfaction. Moreover, factors that influenced school reliability were distributive justice (β=0.56, p=0.010), interactional justice (β=0.332, p=0.010), procedural justice (β=0.229, p=0.010), and distributive justice (β=0.116, p=0.010). Conclusions: Students will trust and be satisfied with schools when schools and professors sufficiently provide information on face-to-face tests and ensure proper procedures to achieve reasonable grades as rewards for exerted time and effort. Furthermore, this study provides a reference base for developing a variety of content for fair, non-face-to-face tests, thereby allowing students to trust their schools.

주제어

표/그림 (7)

표 Table 1. Convergent validity of distributive justice, procedural justice, interactional justice, university trust, and university satisfaction
표 Table 2. Discriminant validity of distributive justice, procedural justice, interactional justice, university trust, and university satisfaction
표 Table 3. Respondents' opinions on exam methods
표 Table 4. Difference between justice of non-face-to-face exam, university trust and university satisfaction according to general characteristics and opinions on non-face-to-face exams
표 Table 5. Relationships among justice of non-face-to-face exam, university trust and university satisfaction
표 Table 6. Direct, indirect and total effect among justice of non-face-to-face exam, university trust and university satisfaction
그림 Figure 1. Path Diagram of the Study Final Model Path coefficient is indicated as a significant standardized coefficient

참고문헌 (24)

Shin YC. Toward one health & welfare: Health and welfare in the Covid-19 pandemic. Health and Social Welfare Review 2020;40(1):5-10. Ministry of education. [Inernet] Sejong: press release. Retrieved September 20, 2020 Fromhttps://bit.lv/3fADO3 (2022, Dec. 31)？
SBS news: The first day of college online classes...'Site paralyzed one after another'student confusion. Retrieved September 20, 2022, from https://news.sbs.co.kr/news/endPage.do?news_idN1005700722(2020, March 16)？
Jeong SM. Analysis of differences in satisfaction with remote learning between two-year college students and four-year university students after the outbreak of COVID-19. Jour. of KoCon. a 2021;21(5):276-284. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2021.21.05.276？

원문보기 상세보기
Hankook-Ilbo: University Online Lecture Satisfaction is only 7%. Give me back my Tuition. Retrieved May 9, 2022, from https://hankookilbo.com/News/Read/202004051554074446(2020, Apr. 6)？
Kim JY. A study on the changes in the satisfaction of distance learning learners. HSS21 2021;12(1):1647-59. https://doi.org/10.22143/HSS.21.12.1.116？
Jang JK, Kim HS. Prevention of cheating online test with random question. J of KIISE 2002;29(2):397-99.？
Ko JY, Shim JC, Kim HK. A system for improving fairness of online test using camera. J of KMMS 2009;12(10):1427-35.？
Kim MY. A research on the problems of the smart device-based distance instruction in college writing classes : using surveyed data from hongik university students & instructors. Journal of the Humanities 2020;120(0):5-49.？
Yoon MH. Perceived justice of college education services and its effect on relationship quality and customer voluntary behaviors. Korean Management Review 2003;32(1):315-40.？
Kim KS. Real-time online test experience and fairness at a university. JKAIS 2020;21(9):229-37. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2020.21.9.229？

원문보기 상세보기
Do JW. An investigation of design constraints in the process of converting face-to-face course into online course. JOEC 2020;26(2):153-73. https://doi.org/10.24159/joec.2020.26.2.153？
Park SJ, Chae SH. Study on teaching performance for satisfaction of online class learner of C university graduate school of education due to COVID-19. KALCI 2020;20(20):1319-44. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2020.20.20.1319？

상세보기
Kim TW. The effects of feedback patterns by instructor to the discussion participation levels and satisfaction levels in the online discussion environments. JEER 2020;13(6):24-32. https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2010.13.6.24？

원문보기 상세보기
Jang WY. Causal relationship between learning motivation and thinking in programming education using online evaluation tool. JKAIE 2020;24(4):379-90. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2020.24.4.379？

원문보기 상세보기
Mitchell RJ 2001 Mitchell RJ. Path Analysis. In: Scheiner S.M., Gurevitch J.. Design and analysis of ecological experiments. 2nd ed. New York:Oxford University Press;2001:217-234.？
Choi, SW, Choi, SU. A Study on Unproctored Exams in a Business School:Perspectives on Justice Perceptions, Trust, and Student Satisfaction. Korean Business Education Review 2015;30(6):377-401.？
Son JS. Structural Relations between Trust-Forming Factors in General Physical Education Class in College and Students' Trust in School, and between Relationship Quality and Maintenance of Relationship[Doctoral dissertation]. Seoul: Univ. of Hanyang, 2016.？
Jeong JE, Kwak EJ. A case study for deriving online exam conducting strategies. JLCCI 2021;21(19):469-488. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2021.21.19.469？

상세보기
Park KH, Jang HS. Research of the Fairness about On-line Testing. Journal of the Korea industrial information systems society 2011;16(4):67-73.？
Park CK. Design and Implementation of a System for Operating Online Examinations at Online Universities. Journal of Cyber Education 2013;7(2):119-136.？
Hwang HS. A Comparative Analysis of Text on the Face-to-face and Non-face Answer Sheet of University Liberal Arts. The Journal of Humanities and Social science 2021;12(2):2845-2856.？
Jung HK. College students' satisfaction with the overall implementation of online classes and testing during the Corona 19 pandemic. MALL 2020;23(3):392-412.？
Kim EH, Moon SJ. A Research Study on Professor Trust and Learning Satisfaction of College Students in Rural & Fishing Communities - For Students at Universities in Pohang, Gyeongsangbuk-do -. The Journal of Korean Island 2021;33(4):243-256. https://doi.org/10.26840/JKI.33.4.243？

상세보기
Yeo SH, Kim DJ. An Analysis on the Satisfaction of Real-time Online Tests from a Medical School By Gender, Age, and Test Area of Students During COVID-19. JLCCI 2021;21(23):805-818. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2021.21.23.805

상세보기

저자의 다른 논문 :

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증