$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

19세기 학교 과학의 인식론으로서 실험실 방법의 한계와 희망
The Limitations and Hopes of the Laboratory Method as the Epistemology of School Science in the 19th Century 원문보기

한국과학교육학회지 = Journal of the Korean association for science education, v.43 no.5, 2023년, pp.415 - 423  

오필석 (경인교육대학교)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

본 연구에서는 과학교육사에 관한 문헌들을 고찰하여 19세기 학교 과학의 인식론으로서 실험실 방법이 지니는 한계와 희망에 대해 살펴보았다. 실험실 방법은 과학 혁명의 이상이었던 귀납적인 과학 방법론을 토대로 하여 학교 교육과정에 도입되었으며, 자연 현상에 대한 직접적인 접촉을 강조하고, 학교에서 과학의 공부하는 학생들의 정신 도야는 물론 도덕적 고양을 함께 도모하였다. 하지만 실험실 방법은 과학에 대한 전통적인 철학적 입장과 같은 인식론적인 한계를 지니고 있었으며, 학교 과학 교육의 맥락에서도 이와 관련된 제한점들이 문제로 지적되었다. 그럼에도 불구하고 실험실 방법은 과학적 탐구를 통한 이해의 가장 기본적인 방법으로서 자연 현상과의 직접적인 대면을 중요시하고, 현상을 이해하기 위한 과학적 실행을 통해 도덕적 고양에 이르는 것까지 추구하였다는 점에서 오늘날의 과학 교육에 유의미한 시사점을 제공하고 있다. 특히 새로운 과학 교육과정의 적용을 준비하고 있는 현 시기에 실험실 방법이 함의한 희망에 대해 다시금 궁구할 필요가 있다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Through a review of the literature relevant to the history of science education, this study explored the limitations and hopes of the laboratory method as the epistemology of school science in the 19th century. The laboratory method was introduced into the school curriculum based on the inductive me...

주제어

#과학교육사   #실험실 방법   #학교 과학 인식론   #과학 수업  

참고문헌 (63)

  1. Achieve (2016). Using phenomena in NGSS-designed lessons and units.？Washington, DC: Achieve. 

  2. American Association of the Advancement of Science (1881). Proceedings？of the American Association for the Advancement of Science,？Twenty-Ninth Meeting, held at Boston, Mass., August 1880. Salem,？MA: The Salem Press. 

  3. American Association of the Advancement of Science (1990). Science for？all americans. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 

  4. Barnes, C. R. (1898). Sciences in the high school. School Review, 6(9),？643-658. 

    상세보기

  5. Beavington, L. (2021). Hard-rooted to nature: Rediscovering the forgotten？forest in science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education,？16(3), 745-762. 

    상세보기

  6. Butler, L. P. (2020). The empirical child? A framework for investigating the？development of scientific habits of mind. Child Development？Perspectives, 14(1), 34-40. 

    상세보기

  7. Carhart, H. S., & Chute, H. N. (1892). The elements of physics. Boston,？MA: Allyn and Bacon. 

  8. Chalmers, A. (2013). What is this thing called science? Indianapolis, IN:？Hackett Publishing Company. 

  9. Clarke, F. W. (1881). A report on the teaching of chemistry and physics？in the united states. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. 

  10. Cho, Y., & Clary, R. M. (2019). Challenges and opportunities for virtual？learning in college geology. In Mintzes, J. & Walter, E. (Eds.), Active？learning in college science: The case for evidence based practice (pp.？713-728). Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature. 

  11. DeBoer, G. E. (1991). A history of ideas in science education: Implications for practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press. 

  12. DeBoer, G. E. (2004). Historical perspectives on inquiry teaching in schools.？In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature？of science (pp. 17-35). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic？Publishers. 

  13. Dewing, A. S. (1908). Science teaching in schools: III. Science teaching and？the laboratory method. School Science and Mathematics, 8(9), 740-744. 

  14. Entress, C. (in press). The disappearance of natural history, fieldwork, and？live organism study from american biology teacher education. Science？& Education. 

  15. Gooding, D. (1990). Experiment and the making of meaning. Dordrecht, The？Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 

  16. Gower, B. (1997). Scientific method: An historical and philosophical？introduction. London, UK: Routledge. 

  17. Griffin, L. F. (1892). The laboratory in the school. School and College, 1(8),？469-477. 

  18. Gunshenan, C., Inouye, M., Houseal, A., & Jacobs, T. (2021). Phenomenon-based professional development: Shifting perspectives between teacher？and learner to build understanding of complex science instruction.？Science & Children, 58(4), 74-80. 

  19. Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and intervening: Introductory topics in the？philosophy of natural science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University？Press. 

  20. Hall, E. H. (1892). Teaching elementary physics. Educational Review, 4,？157-163. 

  21. Hall, E. H. (1905). Experimental work in high-school physics. Educational？Review, 30, 94-96. 

  22. Harvard University (1889). Descriptive list of elementary physical？experiments: Intended for use in preparing students for Harvard College.？Cambridge, MA; Harvard University. 

  23. Hong, S. (2020). The evolution of laboratories. Paju: Gimm-Young？Publishers. 

  24. Howe, J. L. (1892). The teaching of science. Science, 19(481), 233-235. 

  25. Huxely, T. H. (1893). Science & Education. London, UK: Macmillan and？Co. 

  26. Inouye, M., Houseal, A., & Gunshenan, C. (2020). Beyond the hook: What？is a phenomenon and how is it used? The Science Teacher, 87(9), 59-63. 

  27. Mackenzie, A. H. (2021). Technology and scientific habits of mind. The？Science Teacher, 88(4), 6-7. 

  28. Maeng, S. (2018). Practical epistemology analysis on epistemic process in？science learning. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education,？37(2), 173-187. 

  29. Martin, M. (1986). Science education and moral education. Journal of Moral？Education, 15(2), 99-108. 

    상세보기

  30. McNeill, K. C., Affolter, R., & Clinchot, M. (2021). Shifting from learning？about to figuring out: PD resources to support classroom change.？Science Scope, 45(2), 12-19. 

  31. Moon, M.-J. (2018). Reexamination of the meaning of character education？based on Polanyi's theory of knowledge. The Journal of Education,？38(3), 289-306. 

  32. Myers, G. W. (1903). The laboratory method in the secondary school. The？School Review, 11(9), 727-741. 

  33. National Education Association (1893). Report of the committee on secondary？school studies. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. 

  34. National Research Council (1996). National Science Education Standards.？Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 

  35. Newell, L. C. (1902). Professor Remsen on the teaching of science. School？Science and Mathematics, 2(3), 129-132. 

  36. NGSS Lead States (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states,？by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 

  37. Norton, W. H. (1902). The teaching of science. School Science and？Mathematics, 2(4), 193-199. 

  38. Oh, P. S. (2020). A critical review of the skill-based approach to scientific？inquiry in science education. Journal of the Korean Association for？Science Education, 40(2), 141-150. 

  39. Oh, P. S. (2022). Possibility of science concept learning in scientific？practice-based science education: A review focused on situated learning？theories and conceptual agency. Journal of the Korean Association for？Science Education, 42(4), 477-486. 

  40. Oh, P. S., & Ahn, Y. (2013). An analysis of classroom discourse as an？epistemic practice: Based on elementary science classrooms. Journal？of Korean Elementary Science Education, 32(3), 269-284. 

  41. Oh, P. S., & Ahn, Y. (2015). Exploration of discursive-epistemic mechanisms？in high school earth science lessons. Journal of the Korean Earth？Science Society, 36(4). 390-403. 

  42. Ostman, L., & Wickman, P.-O. (2014). A pragmatic approach on epistemology,？teaching, and learning. Science Education, 98(3), 375-382. 

  43. Pruitt, S. L. (2015). The Next Generation Science Standards: Where are we？now and what have we learned? The Science Teacher, 82(5), 17-19. 

  44. Rice, W. N. (1888). Science-teaching in the schools. American Naturalist,？22(261), 765-774. 

    상세보기

  45. Rowland, H. A. (1886). The physical laboratory in modern education. Science,？7(177), 573-575. 

  46. Rudolph, J. L. (2003). Portraying epistemology: School science in historical？context. Science Education, 87(1), 64-79. 

  47. Rudolph, J. L. (2005). Epistemology for the masses: The origins of "the？scientific method" in american schools. History of Education Quarterly,？45(3), 341-376. 

    상세보기

  48. Rudolph, J. L. (2019). How we teach science: What's changed, and why？it matters. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 

  49. Rudolph, J. L. (2020). The lost moral purpose of science education. Science？Education, 104(5), 865-906. 

  50. Rudolph, J. L., & Meshoulam, D. (2014). Science education in american high？schools. In H. R. Slotten (Ed.), Oxford encyclopedia of the history of？american science, medicine, and technology (pp. 503-523). New York,？NY: Oxford University Press. 

  51. Russ, R. S. (2014). Epistemology of science vs. epistemology for science.？Science Education, 98(3), 388-396. 

  52. Schwarz, C. V., Passmore, C., & Reiser. B. J. (2017). Moving beyond？"knowing about" science to making sense of the world. In C. V.？Schwarz, C. Passmore & B. J. Reiser (Eds.), Helping students make？sense of the world using next generation science and engineering？practices (pp. 3-21). Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers？Association Press. 

  53. Sharon, A. J., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2018). Can science literacy help？individual identify misinformation in everyday life? Science Education,？104(5), 873-894. 

  54. Sharp, R. P. (1988). Earth science field work: Role and status. Annual Review？of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 16, 1-19. 

    상세보기

  55. Smith, A., & Hall, E. H. (1902). The teaching of chemistry and physics in？the secondary school. New York, NY: Longmans, Green, and Co. 

  56. Song, J. (2012). When science met people through education: The mechanics'？institute movement in the 19th century Britain. Journal of the Korean？Association for Science Education, 32(3), 541-554. 

    원문보기 상세보기

  57. Speidel, M. G. (2018). The emergence of the laboratory method and the？displacement of natural philosophy by physics in american high school？textbooks (1860-1900). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of？Hawai'i at Manoa. 

  58. Spencer, H. (1860). Education: Intellectual, moral, and physical. New York,？NY: D. Appleton and Company. 

  59. The Ministry of Education (2022). Science Curriculum. Sejong: The Ministry？of Education. 

  60. Thompson, D., Praia, J., & Marques, L. (2000). The importance of history？and epistemology in the designing of earth science curriculum materials？for general science education. Research in Science & Technological？Education, 18(1), 45-62. 

    상세보기

  61. Wead, C. K. (1884). Aims and methods of the teaching of physics.？Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. 

  62. Williams, R. P. (1901). Teaching of chemistry in schools: 1987, 1910.？Science, 14(342), 100-104. 

  63. Youmans, E. L. (1867). On mental discipline in education. In E. L. Youmans？(Ed.), The culture demanded by modern life (pp. 1-56). Arkon, OH:？The Werner Company. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

FREE

Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로