$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

폴라니의 인격적 지식 관점에서 바라본 과학적 실행 기반의 과학 교육의 당위성
The Imperativeness of Scientific Practice-Based Science Education in Light of Michael Polanyi's Personal Knowledge 원문보기

한국과학교육학회지 = Journal of the Korean association for science education, v.43 no.5, 2023년, pp.459 - 467  

이경건 ,  오필석 (경인교육대학교)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

본 논문에서는 탐구 또는 실행 기반의 과학 교육에 철학적 정당화가 필요하다는 점을 지적하고, 인격적 지식을 중심으로 하는 폴라니의 과학철학적 인식론이 그러한 역할을 해줄 수 있다는 점을 제안하였다. 보다 구체적으로는 인격적 지식이 갖는 특징으로서 (1) 지식의 객관적 측면과 주관적 측면을 아우르는 상호주관성, (2) 명시적 지식의 기반이 되는 암묵성, (3) 외부 지식의 궁극적 도구로서의 몸을 중시하는 체화성을 집중적으로 살펴보았다. 그리고 이렇게 정리한 폴라니의 인식론은 인식자가 적극적으로 참여하는 행위로서의 실행 기반의 과학 교육을 정당화하는 것으로 볼 수 있으며, 여기서 특히 정보처리적 의미에서의 마음이 아닌 몸의 암묵적 인식 과정에 의존하는 체화된 마음에 기반한 과학 교수학습(예: 체험 활동, 실험 수업)이 갖는 중요성을 재발견하게 된다는 점을 논의하였다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

This study points out that inquiry- or practice-based science education needs a philosophical justification and suggests that Michael Polanyi's (1891-1976) philosophical epistemology of science, which centers on personal knowledge, can serve such a role. More specifically, we focused on (1) intersub...

주제어

#마이클 폴라니(1891-1976)   #인격적 지식   #암묵적 앎   #체화된 앎   #과학적 실행  

참고문헌 (62)

  1. Allen, R. T. (1978). The philosophy of Michael Polanyi and its significance？for education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 12, 167-177.？ 

    상세보기

  2. Biesta, G. (2009). Good education in an age of measurement: On the need？to reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Educational？Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 33-46.？ 

    상세보기

  3. Brock, R. (2015). Intuition and insight: Two concepts that illuminate the？tacit in science education. Studies in Science Education, 51(2),？127-167.？ 

    상세보기

  4. Brock, R. (2017). Tacit knowledge in science education. In K. S. Taber？& B Akpan (eds.), Science education (pp. 133-142). Sense Publishers. 

  5. Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving Scientific Literacy: From Purposes to？Practices. Heinemann.？ 

  6. Collins, H. M. (1985). Changing order: Replication and induction in scientific？practice. SAGE.？ 

  7. Crawford, B. A. (2014). From inquiry to scientific practices in the science？classroom. In Lederman, N. G., & Abell, S. K. (Eds.). Handbook of？Research on Science Education, Volume II (pp. 529-556). Routledge.？ 

  8. Flick, L. B. (1993). The meanings of hands-on science. Journal of Science？Teacher Education, 4(1), 1-8.？ 

    상세보기

  9. Forman, E. A. (2018). The practice turn in learning theory and science？education. in Kritt, D. W. (ed.). Constructivist Education in an Age？of Accountability (pp. 97-111). Palgrave Macmillan.？ 

  10. Garcia-Carmona, A. (2020). From inquiry-based science education to the？approach based on scientific practices: A critical analysis and？suggestions for science teaching. Science & Education, 29(2), 443-463.？ 

  11. Grene, M. (1977). Tacit knowing: Grounds for a revolution in philosophy.？Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 8(3), 164-171.？ 

    상세보기

  12. Hardahl, L. K., Wickman, P.-O., & Caiman, C. (2019). The body and the？production of phenomena in the science laboratory: Taking charge of？a tacit science content. Science & Education, 28(8), 865-895.？ 

  13. Hodgkin, R. A. (1992). Michael Polanyi on the activity of knowing: The？bearing of his ideas on the theory of multiple intelligence. Oxford？Review of Education, 18(3), 253-267.？ 

  14. Hodson, D. (2014). Learning science, learning about science, doing science:？Different goals demand different learning methods. International？Journal of Science Education, 36(15), 2534-2553.？ 

    상세보기

  15. Hurd, P. DeH. (1958). Scientific literacy: Its meaning for American schools.？Educational Leadership, 16, 13-16.？ 

  16. Ibrahim-Didi, K., Hackling, M. W., Ramseger, J., & Sherriff, B. (2017).？Embodied strategies in the teaching and learning science. In M. W.？Hackling, J. Ramseger & H.-L. S. Chen (eds.), Quality teaching in？primary science education (pp. 181-221). Springer.？ 

  17. Jacobs, S. (2000). Michael Polanyi on the education and knowledge of？scientists. Science & Education, 9(3), 309-320.？ 

  18. Jang, S. (1994). Extension of Personal Knowledge. Seoul: Kyoyookbook.？ 

  19. Jung, E.-M. (2011). Knowledge, practice, and the problem of relativism:？Reconsidering Michael Polanyi's 'personal knowledge'. In R. Schantz？& M. Seidel (Eds.), The problem of relativism in the sociology of？(scientific) knowledge (pp. 215-236). Ontos.？ 

  20. Kersting, M., Amin, T. G., Euler, E., Gregorcic, B., Haglund, J., Hardahl,？L. K., & Steier, R. (in press). What is the role of the body in science？education? A conversation between traditions. Science & Education.？ 

  21. Kersting, M., Haglund, J., & Steier, R. (2021). A growing body of？knowledge. Science & Education, 30, 1183-1210.？ 

  22. Kim, K., & Jeong, K. S. (2020). Discussion on the meaning of curriculum？reconstruction in the light of Polanyi's epistemology. The Journal of？Elementary Education Studies, 27(1), 53-80.？ 

  23. Kim, M., & Kim, B. (2003). A study on the objectivity of scientific？knowledge: Focused on Michael Polanyi's epistemology. Journal of？the Korean Association for Science Education, 23(1), 100-116.？ 

  24. Kim, J. -N. (2018). A discourse for educability of non-propositional？knowledge - Ryle's knowing-how and Polnayi's tacit knowing. The？Korean Journal of Philosophy of Education, 40(3), 1-20.？ 

  25. Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., & Antink, A. (2013). Nature of science？and scientific inquiry as contexts for the learning of science and？achievement of scientific literacy. International Journal of Education？in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1(3), 138-147.？ 

  26. Lee, G. -G., Han, S. -R., Bae, C. -H., & Hong, H. -G. (2019). Hilary Putnam's？internal realism and its implications for science curriculum. The？Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(1), 1-27.？ 

  27. Lee, G. -G., Park, J., Lee, S. -K., Hong, H. -G., Shim, H. S., & Shin, M.？K. (2019). Exploring multi-faceted understanding and issues regarding？science subject matter competency: Considering the relationship with？general core competency. Journal of Science Education, 43(1), 94-118.？ 

  28. Lee, G. -G., & Hong, H. -G. (2023). A comparative study of scientific literacy？and core competence discourses as rationals for the 21st century？science curriculum reform. Journal of the Korean Association for？Science Education, 42(1), 1-18.？ 

  29. Martin, B., & Brouwer, W. (1993). Exploring personal science. Science？Education, 77(4), 441-459.？ 

  30. Ministry of Education [MOE] (2015). Science Curriculum.？ 

  31. Ministry of Education [MOE] (2022). Science Curriculum.？ 

  32. Moon, M.-J. (2018). Reexamination of the meaning of character education？based on Polanyi's theory of knowledge. The Journal of Education,？38(3), 289-306.？ 

  33. Moon, M. (2021). Exploring th relationship knowledge and competency？based on Polanyi's epistemology. The Journal of Curriculum Studies,？39(3), 193-210.？ 

  34. Nam, J. Y. (2014). Teaching of the value of mathematics: In the perspective？of Michael Polanyi's philosophy. Journal of Elementary Mathematics？in Korea, 18(1), 63-81.？ 

  35. National Research Council [NRC] (1996). National Science Education？Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.？ 

  36. National Research Council [NRC] (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science？Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas.？Washington, DC: National Academies Press.？ 

  37. Next Generation Science Standards [NGSS] Lead States (2013). Next？Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington, DC:？National Academies Press.？ 

  38. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2005).？The Definition and Selection of Key Competencies: Executive？Summary. Paris: OECD.？ 

  39. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD] (2019).？OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030: OECD Learning Compass？2030 - A Series of Concept Notes. Paris: OECD.？ 

  40. Oh, P. S. (2008). Comparison of hypotheses-formation processes between？an earth scientist and undergraduate students: A case study about a？typhoon's anomalous path. Journal of the Korean Association for？Science Education, 28(6), 649-663.？ 

  41. Oh, P. S. (2022). Possibility of science concept learning in scientific？practice-based science education: A review focused on situated？learning theories and conceptual agency. Journal of the Korean？Association for Science Education, 42(4), 477-486.？ 

  42. Oh, P. S. (in press). How a student uses knowledge as a resource to solve？scientific problems: A case study on science learning as rediscovery.？Science & Education.？ 

  43. Osborne, J. (2023). Science, scientific literacy, and science education. In？Lederman, N, G., Zeidler, D. L., & Lederman, J. S. (Eds.). Handbook？of Research on Science Education, Volume III (pp. 785-816).？Routledge.？ 

  44. Palmer, P. J. (1983). To know as we are known: Education as a spiritual？journey. San Francisco: Harper & Row.？ 

  45. Paksi, D., & Heder, M. (2022). Guide to personal knowledge: The philosophy？of Michael Polanyi: Tacit knowledge, emergence and the fiduciary？program. Vernon Press.？ 

  46. Park, J. (2022). A Study on Intersubjectivity of Michael Polanyi's 'Personal？Knowledge'. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Dongguk University,？Seoul, Republic of Korea.？ 

  47. Park, J., Song, J., & Abrahams, I. (2016). Unintended learning in primary？school practical science lessons from Polanyi's perspective of？intellectual passion. Science & Education, 25(1-2), 3-20.？ 

  48. Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy.？Harper & Row.？ 

  49. Polanyi, M. (1962). The unaccountable element in science. Philosophy, 37,？1-14？ 

    상세보기

  50. Polanyi, M. (1966a). The tacit dimension. The University of Chicago Press.？ 

  51. Polanyi, M. (1966b). The logic of tacit inference. Philosophy, 41, 1-18.？ 

    상세보기

  52. Polanyi, M. (1969). Knowing and being. Essays by Michael Polanyi. The？University of Chicago Press.？ 

  53. Polanyi, M. (1997). Creative imagination. In R. T. Allen (ed.), Society,？economics, and philosophy: Selected papers Michael Polanyi (pp.？249-265). Routledge. (original work published 1966)？ 

  54. Polanyi, M., & Prosch, H. (1975). Meaning. The University of Chicago Press.？ 

  55. Polanyi, M., & Prosch, H. (1992). Meaning. (Kim, H., & Jeong, S. Trans.).？지적 자유와 의미. 서울: 범양사 출판부. (Original work published？1975).？ 

  56. Roberts, D. A., & Bybee, R. W. (2014). Scientific literacy, science literacy,？and science education. In Lederman, N. G., & Abell, S. K. (Eds.)？Handbook of Research on Science Education, Volume II (pp. 559-572).？Routledge.？ 

  57. Root-Bernstein, R., & Root-Bernstein, M. (1999). Sparks of genius: The？thirteen thinking tools of the world's most creative people. Mariner？Books.？ 

  58. Tang, X., Coffey, J. E., Elby, A., & Levin, D. M. (2010). The scientific？method and scientific inquiry: Tensions in teaching and learning.？Science Education, 94(1), 29-47.？ 

  59. Taber, K. S. (2011). Inquiry teaching, constructivist instruction and effective？pedagogy. Teacher Development, 15(2), 257-264.？ 

  60. Takaki, K. (2009). Embodied knowing: The tacit dimension in Johnson and？Lakoff, and Merleau-Ponty. Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi？Society Periodical, 36(2), 26-39.？ 

  61. Thomas Jha, R., & Price, S. (2022). Embodying science: The role of the？body in supporting young children's meaning making. International？Journal of Science Education, 44(10), 1659-1679.？ 

    상세보기

  62. Zhenhua, Y. (2008). Embodiment in Polanyi's theory of tacit knowing.？Philosophy Today, 52(2), 126-135.？ 

    상세보기

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

FREE

Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로