농업환경보전프로그램 이행단계별 문제점 및 애로사항에 대한 이해당사자별 인식 비교 A Comparative Study of the Perceptions by Stakeholder on the Problems and Difficulties at Implementation Stages of the Agricultural Environment Conservation Program원문보기
The Agricultural Environmental Conservation Program is a useful system for creating sustainable agriculture and environmentally friendly and comfortable rural areas. However, there are still many problems and difficulties, such as the establishment of necessary activities and plans by the residents ...
The Agricultural Environmental Conservation Program is a useful system for creating sustainable agriculture and environmentally friendly and comfortable rural areas. However, there are still many problems and difficulties, such as the establishment of necessary activities and plans by the residents themselves, and improvements are required. The degree of importance and difficulties according to the implementation stage of each stakeholder was quantified and compared with each other, and the specific difficulties recognized by on-site support organizations were structurally analyzed. It was analyzed that the importance and difficulties of the project implementation stage for local government officials and the project implementation planning stage for on-site support organizations were very high, indicating that they perceived the most need for improvement. On the other hand, 21 specific problems and difficulties were derived based on the results of the literature survey and stakeholder interviews. As a result of the structural analysis using the DEMATEL method, the most influential factor was the low understanding of the project by residents, the most influential factor was the lack of collecting and reflecting residents' opinions, the most central factor was the lack of collecting and reflecting residents' opinions, and the most causal factor was the lack of education and promotion of the project. The results indicate that a more stable system can be established if continuous promotion and education, periodic meetings and discussions, active reflection of residents' opinions in project implementation plans, and simplification of implementation inspection and project cost execution through the implementation inspection platform are promoted. Despite the limitations, considering that no institutional analysis of agricultural environmental conservation programs has been conducted so far, the results of this study are expected to serve as a basis for the establishment of relevant policies in the future.
The Agricultural Environmental Conservation Program is a useful system for creating sustainable agriculture and environmentally friendly and comfortable rural areas. However, there are still many problems and difficulties, such as the establishment of necessary activities and plans by the residents themselves, and improvements are required. The degree of importance and difficulties according to the implementation stage of each stakeholder was quantified and compared with each other, and the specific difficulties recognized by on-site support organizations were structurally analyzed. It was analyzed that the importance and difficulties of the project implementation stage for local government officials and the project implementation planning stage for on-site support organizations were very high, indicating that they perceived the most need for improvement. On the other hand, 21 specific problems and difficulties were derived based on the results of the literature survey and stakeholder interviews. As a result of the structural analysis using the DEMATEL method, the most influential factor was the low understanding of the project by residents, the most influential factor was the lack of collecting and reflecting residents' opinions, the most central factor was the lack of collecting and reflecting residents' opinions, and the most causal factor was the lack of education and promotion of the project. The results indicate that a more stable system can be established if continuous promotion and education, periodic meetings and discussions, active reflection of residents' opinions in project implementation plans, and simplification of implementation inspection and project cost execution through the implementation inspection platform are promoted. Despite the limitations, considering that no institutional analysis of agricultural environmental conservation programs has been conducted so far, the results of this study are expected to serve as a basis for the establishment of relevant policies in the future.
Jung, N. S., 2021, Analysis of the Influence of？Community Consciousness on Participation in Agricultural？Environment Programs, Journal of Tourism and Leisure？Research, 33(1): 377-394, doi: 10.31336/JTLR.2021.1.33.1.377
Korea Rural Economic Institute(KREI), 2018, Finding？Ways to improve the Agricultural Environment through？the Agricultural Environmental Conservation Program.
Korea Rural Economic Institute(KREI), 2019, Challenges？and Ways to Improve the Agricultural Environmental？Conservation Program.
Hyun, J. G., Kim, S. J., Jung, W. S., Kim, J. O. and Yoo,？G. Y., 2021, Quantifying the Effects of Agricultural？Management Practices on Soil Carbon Storage in an？Agricultural Environment Conservation Program, Journal？of Climate Change Research, 12(6): 701-712, doi:？https://doi.org/10.15531/KSCCR.2021.12.6.701
Kim, H. W. and S ung, J. H., 2022, An Analysis of The？Relative Importance for Target Selecting Criteria in？Agricultural Environment Conservation Program, Korea？Journal of Organic Agriculture, 30(4): 485-497, doi:？http://dx.doi.org/10.11625/KJOA.2022.30.4.485
Kim, M. H., Kim, M. K., Choi, S. K., Eo, J. U., Yeob,？S. J. and Bang, J. H., 2021, Selection of Indicator Plants？to Evaluate the Effects of Agri-environmental？Conservation Program: On the Rice Paddy Fields in？South Korea, Korean Journal of Environmental？Agriculture, 40(3): 169-178, doi: https://doi.org/10.5338/KJEA. 2021.40.3.20
Lim, S. G., So, S. C. and Lee, C. S., 2017, An？empirical analysis of the performance of government？3.0 'service government' using IPA analysis, Korean？Journal of Public Administration, 55(2): 137-167.
Park, S. J. and Jeong, B. H., 2016, The evaluation of？cultural tourism festival service quality using IPA: a？study on the Chungjang memory festival, Journal of the？Korean Regional Development Association, 28(2):？131-152.
Kim, S. J., Bae, S. J. and Kim, D. S., 2022, Structural？analysis of Deactivation Factors behind Urban-Rural？Exchange using DEMATEL method, Journal of the？Korean Society of Rural Planning, 28(1): 89-98, doi:？https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2022.28.1.089
AI-Helper
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.